http://imgur.com/XfUjbYg,TFe08k1
Snute's Click Game (SC2 Precision trainer) - Page 3
Forum Index > SC2 General |
etsharry
20 Posts
http://imgur.com/XfUjbYg,TFe08k1 | ||
exog
Norway279 Posts
Edit: Nevermind, i see there is a total timer. | ||
Ballesvette
Norway8 Posts
| ||
EGVicThoR
Romania2 Posts
Edit: got 52 out of 61 on best attempt | ||
sirdodgy
United Kingdom20 Posts
G400 at 400dpi no ingame% change. Use low sense because I heard marineking used really low sens and low sens is good in quake so it made sense. | ||
Eiki
Norway22 Posts
On December 19 2013 23:40 sirdodgy wrote: G400 at 400dpi no ingame% change. Use low sense because I heard marineking used really low sens and low sens is good in quake so it made sense. Ok, thanks =) | ||
Eiki
Norway22 Posts
| ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20263 Posts
On December 19 2013 21:09 Faust852 wrote: I wonder how Osu pro would explose this, even if it's not a determinate patern. It demands lower DPI i think than osu, 10x10 targets on 1920x1080 are pretty hard to hit | ||
Fenneth
Australia354 Posts
| ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20263 Posts
| ||
Valeranth
United States100 Posts
| ||
purakushi
United States3300 Posts
http://osu.ppy.sh/ Perhaps it is not the best SC2 click trainer, but it is fun :D | ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20263 Posts
On December 20 2013 00:49 Cyro wrote: I got 64/66 first try, any chance of ~25x25 or something bigger (whatever works) squares/circles version? Even with low DPI it's impossible to hit 10x10 on muscle memory (need to move, check position, move again, maybe check position and move again etc) which is what you try to avoid in the first place by having a good mouse sens and skill IMO Here is a picture of a marine with 26 pixel blue line through it* Here's a rolling baneling with a 33 pixel red line through it ^So i think 20x20 or 25x25 is a much more appropriate target size on 1920x1080, as even 25x25 is reasonably smaller than an individual marine facing the most awkward direction, i think a slight delay to recheck mouse position is ok when selecting something like an individual larvae, but not a baneling for example, if possible *actually, the main body of the marine, turned away from the camera, is something like ~25x40 - 1000 pixels in area - while a 10x10 target is 100 pixels (1/10'th of the size of a marine) | ||
Metafour
United States137 Posts
| ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20263 Posts
On December 20 2013 01:02 Metafour wrote: My god this is so hard for me. Gonna try to up my dpi from 800 :O Hint: DPI change helps, but it's in the other direction 800dpi is great for sc2, but 10x10 pixels is much smaller than other stuff like i explained. Also, shattering your muscle memory probably won't help too much :D | ||
sirdodgy
United Kingdom20 Posts
G400, 400DPI, no % change ingame. High Diamond Terran, too retarded to get masters :D I use low sens because in FPS games you improve at aiming much faster while using low sensitivity compared to with a high sensitivity. I think the same applies to RTS also. I have heard that MarineKing uses much lower sensitivity than virtually every other pro gamer and I like to think his micro is reflective of this. Edit: Lol double reply, need to get some sleep. | ||
Nimix
France1809 Posts
Like I think 400 would be good for the game, but wouldn't work in sc2 as edge scrolling and clicking minimap would get really hard; and as the game was made to help for sc2... :p I second the bigger squares suggestion! | ||
Cyro
United Kingdom20263 Posts
| ||
las91
United States5080 Posts
| ||
2vs2 FrozenImpact
Estonia25 Posts
Here is the reddit thread: Link Here is the TL thread: Link Thx! | ||
| ||