| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Poo
Canada536 Posts
On April 26 2013 10:32 Alryk wrote: Blizzard wasn't the only one making the maps, tournament makers had a say too  Yeah, that's true. At least Blizzard is moving in the right direction by seeking some community guidance. But there's still room for improvement. Blizzard really needs a group of both pro-gamers and tournament makers who could evaluate maps in their potential for entertaining games & relative balance. | ||
|
Shodaa
Canada404 Posts
Not sure about Zerus, I guess Swarm Host could be good on that map if you take control of the center. | ||
|
BiG
Germany153 Posts
On April 26 2013 11:28 Qwyn wrote: Well, these maps are all easily downvotes for me (except for the space platform one, maybe - I'd prefer that over Shit Station). What the fuck has gotten into their heads that they make 3 bases (and even 4 on that Zerus map) so fucking easy to take. Really Blizzard? When are you going to let the community make all the ladder maps? This is just another disappointment. because its incredibly bad for toss to have 3rds which are not defendable? 2-base all ins are quite forseeable and can be hold when scouted quite easily + having to all in every game on maps like neo planet s is really great..... wtf | ||
|
KrazyTrumpet
United States2520 Posts
On April 26 2013 11:26 BiG wrote: i dont get why people want balanced or near-balanced maps removed... daybreak was a perfectly fine map, now we get klontas for it? yeah great. seriously how is there supposed to be any map-balance, when ppl always cry about wanting to have "innovative" maps, which just favor some race in some matchups quite heavily. Because having the same map in the pool for 19482934829345 months gets reaaaaaaaaally boring. | ||
|
BiG
Germany153 Posts
On April 26 2013 11:33 KrazyTrumpet wrote: Because having the same map in the pool for 19482934829345 months gets reaaaaaaaaally boring. not for me + having bad maps is really great for esports, right? | ||
|
KrazyTrumpet
United States2520 Posts
On April 26 2013 11:34 BiG wrote: not for me + having bad maps is really great for esports, right? Most people like variety. Doing the same thing gets really old after a while. Also, I love people calling a map bad without having even had any games played on it yet...lol. Armchair mapmakers here in this thread | ||
|
EatThePath
United States3943 Posts
On April 26 2013 11:31 BiG wrote: because its incredibly bad for toss to have 3rds which are not defendable? 2-base all ins are quite forseeable and can be hold when scouted quite easily + having to all in every game on maps like neo planet s is really great..... wtf There's a difference between a map with balanced 3rd base and derp automatic 3rd bases. | ||
|
Netsky
Australia1155 Posts
It's so goddamn frustrating and such an easy, simple fix. | ||
|
BaaL`
297 Posts
| ||
|
Hamzerglar
United States19 Posts
| ||
|
TT1
Canada10045 Posts
edit: and planet s | ||
|
oGsTrueSmug
England141 Posts
And why remove Daybreak, it was a great map at pretty much all stages of the game. Sad that we still don't really have any long-term balanced maps that can stay on the ladder for more than a few seasons, but then we don't even have a properly balanced game yet (and won't until Legacy of the Void meta stabilises) so I guess we're at the whim of Blizzard on this. | ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16123 Posts
On April 26 2013 11:34 BiG wrote: not for me + having bad maps is really great for esports, right? You don't know the map is bad yet, you arent an expert. The variety is good for the ladder and good for the esports scene in general because it provides variety for the viewer. | ||
|
LeeDawg
United States1306 Posts
On April 26 2013 11:40 ROOTT1 wrote: they also need to remove star station and whirlwild edit: and planet s i agree except for whirlwind. map's fine imo | ||
|
Mackus
England1681 Posts
On April 26 2013 11:40 ROOTT1 wrote: they also need to remove star station and whirlwild edit: and planet s StarStation can favour Terran cos the forward positioning on the 3rd but there's no reason at all the other 2 maps should be removed. - Alot of downvotes on Klontas, I dont mind it but that huge chasm with the bridge to the north totally ruins it. | ||
NonY
8751 Posts
These map changes look nice. Klontas Mire instantly looks like the weird one but I'm actually excited to immediately try some builds that ought to work better on it than on a typical map. | ||
|
PardonYou
United States1360 Posts
| ||
|
mrRoflpwn
United States2618 Posts
| ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16123 Posts
On April 26 2013 11:57 NonY wrote: You can always tell the WC3 players by their desire to play the same map for a decade. These map changes look nice. Klontas Mire instantly looks like the weird one but I'm actually excited to immediately try some builds that ought to work better on it than on a typical map. Ah yes, I hadn't considered the Warcraft 3 variable. Such a shame that map pool has literally NEVER changed since the game's launch. | ||
|
Bulkers
Poland509 Posts
 instant thumbs down. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War League of Legends Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
Mihu vs TBD
Online Event
RSL Revival
WardiTV Weekly
RSL Revival
RSL Revival
Bombastic Starleague
Kung Fu Cup
OSC
CrankTV Team League
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ahdPU3X.jpg)
