EPT1. fire esports team
2. quadruple their budget
3. hire teamliquid people as new team
Destiny on where he thinks SC2 is heading. - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
1. fire esports team 2. quadruple their budget 3. hire teamliquid people as new team | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
Some games will be bigger than others, drastically bigger. But that doesn't mean other games won't exist. Look at pro sports. NFL dwarfs anything else in the United states. Yet there are still other sports doing well. And right now, these sales companies are coming in and spending on sc2, while Riot is the one completely funding LoL and Valve is pushing Dota 2. SC2 has more independent sponsors than both. To suggest that its dying is ridiculous. SC2 is standing on its own a hell of a lot more than LoL and Dota 2. Was it not just a month ago when the WCS EU had 100k concurrent viewers? | ||
|
Camlito
Australia4040 Posts
On October 17 2012 14:32 lorestarcraft wrote: SC2 is a batter game than BW, which was no fun at all, imo. I like being able to actually see what I'm clicking and have stuff respond and path well. This is just more BW elitism. Although BW's issues (well obviously, made in 1998) are quite apparent to people who didn't play it in it's prime, you can't simply call a game better because it handles well. Indeed SC2 handles tremendously well, but it's too bad for most of the games existence that there has been bitching about everything from no LAN to Balance. To this day I feel i'm getting no reward out of playing because I play Zerg concurrently, and a game where I beat a better player and it means nothing, or lose to a worse player and get discouraged is not good. I'd rather have a competitive, balanced game that is fun too than an easy to use average game any day. Although going back to playing Brood War it does hurt my hands just to play and most current gamers wouldn't appreciate that and that's understandable haha. It's too bad the majority doesn't feel the same way considering the success of League of Legends (although I haven't actually PLAYED it before, all I know is i'm told it's easy to use control-wise and the 'easiest' Moba). + Show Spoiler + Also can't help but feel you are just flame baiting, especially since you said 'batter' | ||
|
Dephy
Lithuania163 Posts
| ||
|
Traceback
United States469 Posts
They just feel so distant right now, like they are separate from everything that's going on. | ||
|
AssyrianKing
Australia2116 Posts
| ||
|
Animzor
Sweden2154 Posts
On October 17 2012 13:53 ROOTT1 wrote: The fact that we had a game launch without chat channels...I don't...what...how...my God.... This, coupled with the fact that Blizzard had made it basically impossible to play custom games with their retarded popularity system, is the reason that all the 15 friends that I encouraged to buy SC2 at launch quit playing the game almost instantly. I told them it would be so fucking awesome to play custom games just like we did in BW, but NO, WE CANNOT HAVE FUN BECAUSE BLIZZARD WANTS TO IMPLEMENT A SYSTEM SO THEY CAN MAKE MONEY OFF OF MAPS. And according to Blizzard, this is "what the map makers want" | ||
|
kasumimi
Greece460 Posts
| ||
|
TheWorldToCome
United States452 Posts
On October 17 2012 14:37 Xxio wrote: Blizzard should have given Brood War a facelift instead of making StarCraft 2. At the very least given bnet 1.0 a facelift rather than create bnet 2.0 that pales in comparison to its predecessor. | ||
|
Orracle
United States314 Posts
| ||
|
IMHope
Korea (South)1241 Posts
| ||
|
ketomai
United States2789 Posts
On October 17 2012 14:21 kellymilkies wrote: it's quite obvious how much certain companies care about the game. valve has a dev forum for dota2 and they do read the social sites and stuff and updates their games and functions according to what the community is asking for... and this game is just a beta atm. Yea, for sure. In interviews, I've seen Puppey and many other players continuously praise valve for listening to player input as well as being fans of the game. On the other hand, I've never seen players give anything but complaints when talking about David Kim/Browder. To be honest, I've had this in my head for awhile as the new, real elephant in the room. Glad a post like this was made, and hope it doesn't disappear uneventfully. | ||
|
LlamaNamedOsama
United States1900 Posts
| ||
|
Qwyn
United States2779 Posts
I, along with around 22 of my friends in highschool purchased SC2 two years ago at release. However, over the course of 4 months 19 of those friends LEFT for League of Legends. Now they play League and DOTA2. It has been very disappointing to me to see all my friends leave, and never give the game a second chance. However, after asking many of them why they left, the answer is always the same. At first, they scoot around it, but as I press them they end up confessing that the game just was NOT interesting. That StarCraft 2 is not accessible. We have, (many of us) held this opinion since the game came out. It has been restated again and again. As much as I prefer to avoid it, (I think we all do, not b/c we do not care, but because we have given up) it needs to be addressed. Here's an idea that I had. TO CATZ: I have heard rumours that there is a secret pro-only forum for SC2. Would you not consider getting as many of your buddies as you can to write letters of complaints similiar to Destiny's and posting them there? Just mass posting them? If this is not true then whatever. Your twitter idea is good too... To any major tournaments....would you not consider getting viewers to trend tweets calling for improving the game? This is a big issue. | ||
|
TheWorldToCome
United States452 Posts
| ||
|
Kambing
United States1176 Posts
On October 17 2012 14:43 Animzor wrote: This, coupled with the fact that Blizzard had made it basically impossible to play custom games with their retarded popularity system, is the reason that all the 15 friends that I encouraged to buy SC2 at launch quit playing the game almost instantly. I told them it would be so fucking awesome to play custom games just like we did in BW, but NO, WE CANNOT HAVE FUN BECAUSE BLIZZARD WANTS TO IMPLEMENT A SYSTEM SO THEY CAN MAKE MONEY OFF OF MAPS. And according to Blizzard, this is "what the map makers want" Well, someone has to make the maps. And unlike 5-10 years ago, SC2 needs to compete with the multitudes of other game development platforms out there for the developer's interests. Custom maps are a relic of the brood war era that you can't recreate in this day and age as is. Relatively easy monetary incentive the only big win that Blizzard can make for their system versus the others. | ||
|
AndAgain
United States2621 Posts
It's like how fast food joints are way more popular than steakhouses. That doesn't mean steakhouses should be more like fast food joints. | ||
|
Bashae
Netherlands13 Posts
| ||
|
lodeet
United States147 Posts
Most people played BW for UMS. That was it's success for casual gamers. SC2 has nothing for casual gamers. The arcade system is complete garbage. Never once since sc2 was released have custom games made any impact. The game is solely about 1v1 and ladder, which doesn't appeal to casual gamers. | ||
|
MateShade
Australia736 Posts
| ||
| ||
