EPTNASL invites DRG, MMA, Violet and Taeja to S4 - Page 13
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Luepert
United States1934 Posts
| ||
|
Darth Caedus
United States326 Posts
Keep up the good work.  | ||
|
MrBitter
United States2940 Posts
On August 31 2012 09:40 Luepert wrote: Can someone explain the decay? Is it minus 1 point from EACH achievement or minus 1 point each day for everyone overall? -1 each day. So if you win a tournament, you get 365 points. 1 year later, it will have decayed down to 0. | ||
|
Luepert
United States1934 Posts
On August 31 2012 09:54 MrBitter wrote: -1 each day. So if you win a tournament, you get 365 points. 1 year later, it will have decayed down to 0. This is a little bit pointless isn't it? All it does is punish the first winner a little bit. You guys only pick the top 4, who will always have racked up some points early on because they are good and they would all be affected the same once they all have some points. Pretty sure if you did this without the decay all the top people would end up exactly the same. | ||
|
FrodaN
754 Posts
On August 31 2012 09:40 Luepert wrote: Can someone explain the decay? Is it minus 1 point from EACH achievement or minus 1 point each day for everyone overall? Per day. It's not per event otherwise there is literally no point in awarding top 32. | ||
|
Toganas
United States63 Posts
| ||
|
Ettick
United States2434 Posts
| ||
|
Luepert
United States1934 Posts
On August 31 2012 10:19 Toganas wrote: The decay makes sense as it will allow them to keep the system in the future without having results from the past influence it too heavily. At this point next year, Leenock's current MLG win will have no impact on his standings, but right now he has a lot of points from a recent tournament. People will always complain, but this seems like a good system. The top 4 people will always have at lest 1 point right? So if they each lose 1 a day, they will still be in the same order. | ||
|
Betelgeuse
Canada210 Posts
| ||
|
sam05396
United States783 Posts
On August 31 2012 10:22 Luepert wrote: The top 4 people will always have at lest 1 point right? So if they each lose 1 a day, they will still be in the same order. assuming no tournaments are played for the next year and that all these players will get eliminated from nasl ur point would matter | ||
Porcelina
United Kingdom3249 Posts
On August 31 2012 08:51 Dosey wrote: We all know half of those events never even occurred and Bitter is just fabricating this information to put another Korean in the NASL. I was listening to the Bitterdam cast yesterday and at some point they were talking about forming an NASL team. Now, after a thorough investigation literally littered with investigative journalism, I can uncover the truth to the world. Bitter came up with this system because he is about to land MMA for his team. And the whole of season four is but a smokescreen for getting as much hype for the new team captain and figurehead as possible. This is according to my sources yo. | ||
|
neoghaleon55
United States7435 Posts
On August 31 2012 09:39 FrodaN wrote: We agree and have been compiling them in the off-season for about a month now. Well I'm sold And I put my money where my post is. good job, guys. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/MzFOL.jpg) Those of you on the fence about this, please give NASL another chance. They seem more legit every season. And $15.99 is a very good deal for this amount of content. | ||
|
TommyP
United States6231 Posts
Also can we has rematch? + Show Spoiler + | ||
|
bourne117
United States837 Posts
On August 30 2012 11:59 digmouse wrote: Why are they still using invites? Whats wrong with invites. Invites can help ensure that the top level players who are competing for the GSL (actual contenders) will spend the time to go to foreign events. Making them go through a qualifier decreases the odds that they will take the time to go through the process. | ||
|
Luepert
United States1934 Posts
On August 31 2012 11:18 sam05396 wrote: assuming no tournaments are played for the next year and that all these players will get eliminated from nasl ur point would matter I'm talking from a pure ranking system. No top pro would ever get to 0 and since they all have the same decay it will be like there is no decay at all. So if they always take the top 4, it would never deviate from who the top 4 would be without decay. | ||
|
BathTubNZ
New Zealand2556 Posts
On August 31 2012 12:26 Luepert wrote: I'm talking from a pure ranking system. No top pro would ever get to 0 and since they all have the same decay it will be like there is no decay at all. So if they always take the top 4, it would never deviate from who the top 4 would be without decay. Except you don't earn points at the same rate. | ||
Waxangel
United States33700 Posts
On August 31 2012 11:30 neoghaleon55 wrote: Well I'm sold And I put my money where my post is. good job, guys. Those of you on the fence about this, please give NASL another chance. They seem more legit every season. And $15.99 is a very good deal for this amount of content. on the same note, are you going to ask ppl to ask for refunds if DRG is eliminated  ? | ||
|
HolyExlxF
United States256 Posts
| ||
|
Luepert
United States1934 Posts
On August 31 2012 12:33 BathTubNZ wrote: Except you don't earn points at the same rate. Exactly. The people who earn more points are still on top. Example: MMA has 1000 points. DRG has 1050 points. 300 days pass, MMA has 700, DRG has 750. Same difference. The only way they would switch places is if MMA were to win more than DRG. But if he did, he would pass DRG by the same amount in both systems. God this is hard to explain, people can still pass each other, but at any moment in the future when they take the top 4, it will be the same 4 people that would be on top in a no decay system because they would have the same amount of decay as each other. | ||
|
Proseat
Germany5113 Posts
Also, are the other participants of the next season already announced? | ||
| ||
