EPTPatch 1.5 thoughts? - Page 40
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
chris5180
198 Posts
| ||
|
Conti
Germany2516 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/6JpIQ.jpg) | ||
|
Glenn313
United States475 Posts
| ||
|
Frex
Finland888 Posts
On August 01 2012 23:19 wajd wrote: I am seriously jealous of these problems you are all having. I would much rather have to deal with all this, than be forced to buy a new computer thanks to a PATCH. This. Basically ladder feels unplayable to me after I tried. First of all I've always played on low graphics, however, now after patch low graphics feels like Ultra, they seem just so good and too bad my computer can't handle that. | ||
|
Dox
Australia1199 Posts
Installed without a hitch in 20 minutes. | ||
|
sc2pal
Poland624 Posts
also my windowed mode fucked up and it looks super bad | ||
|
Imzoo
132 Posts
i don't like this new fog of war i don't like the creep colour... Xel'naga towers are way smaller on the minimap | ||
|
phoenixfeather95
665 Posts
On August 01 2012 23:29 Rokoz wrote: This. Basically ladder feels unplayable to me after I tried. First of all I've always played on low graphics, however, now after patch low graphics feels like Ultra, they seem just so good and too bad my computer can't handle that. Hmm, I felt the same way too just after the patch. Tried playing a custom or two and it lagged like hell. But after I changed the all the settings to low and set refresh rate to 60Hz I seem to get the same performance as before patch ^^. A good indicator may be the Ctrl+Alt+F thing, to see if your FPS dips below 20. For the record I play on a crappy laptop (Vaio CS Series, Core 2 Duo 2.54 Ghz, 4GB Memory). | ||
|
Knutzi
Norway664 Posts
| ||
|
Existor
Russian Federation4295 Posts
On August 01 2012 23:43 Knutzi wrote: i dont get why they feel the need to force us to play with better graphics, atleast just keep the old one and rename it lower and have this new shit be low Because new low settings are part of new engine, that holds special textures for low settings, that loads very fast and they are sharper, than smooth textures on lows. | ||
|
ThirdDegree
United States329 Posts
On August 01 2012 22:34 .syd. wrote: It's not a good sign when you must use hotkeys to browse a GUI conviently... It's a bad thing to you? Do you normally use the edit menu, and then select copy while in Word rather than ctrl-c? Shortcuts are always a good thing | ||
|
niekoz
Netherlands350 Posts
Edit: I guess my resolution settings are changed or something like that.. (?) | ||
|
BronzeKnee
United States5217 Posts
On August 01 2012 18:16 RaiZ wrote: My eyes ! >_< Ohana's ramp with alternatelowtexture to 1 with medium settings. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/6BPTC.jpg) That isn't a bug. In addition to Terran and Protoss players being able to block the ramp, we can now "blind" the ramp, its an ability on the CC and Nexus. Makes ramp blocking easier vs Zerg players. | ||
|
cpu
102 Posts
WTF BLIZZARD SERIOUSLY WHAT ARE YOU DOING ???????????????????? | ||
|
covetousrat
2109 Posts
On August 01 2012 23:43 Knutzi wrote: i dont get why they feel the need to force us to play with better graphics, atleast just keep the old one and rename it lower and have this new shit be low Totally agree. Bring back the Low setting from before. The new 1.5 low is pure trash!! | ||
|
LaborDay
Sweden1 Post
| ||
|
Jono7272
United Kingdom6330 Posts
| ||
|
BronzeKnee
United States5217 Posts
| ||
|
DreamChaser
1649 Posts
| ||
|
Imzoo
132 Posts
| ||
| ||
