| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
zxcvalor
United Kingdom25 Posts
On June 23 2012 15:59 Doublemint wrote: Gah... I kinda appreciate the effort generally - but the carrier should be a whole lot better according to the stats provided as ppl already mentioned. And that really devalues the effort... Fixed carrier! Any more errors plz mention guys. | ||
|
MShaw006
United States74 Posts
| ||
|
zxcvalor
United Kingdom25 Posts
On June 23 2012 16:12 Mentor wrote: Did you factor in the glaive worm dmg, when calculating the Mutalisk dps? Nope, all the numbers ignore aoe. You can't read too much into these stats, mutas deal a lot of damage for sure xD | ||
|
Skamtet
Canada634 Posts
| ||
|
RenSC2
United States1098 Posts
| ||
|
BlondeOna
Australia89 Posts
| ||
|
Callynn
Netherlands917 Posts
| ||
|
Sapphire.lux
Romania2620 Posts
The Reaper is missleading. It has low hp so it dies fast without doing it's impresive dmg and builds slow so it's not massable. It's a bad combat unit regardless of dps  The sieged up tank also stands out as pretty bad untill you have full upgrades and a lot of them. No wander they are rarely used against protoss. | ||
|
sandman1454
United States96 Posts
| ||
|
Prillan
Sweden350 Posts
| ||
|
m!DniGhT
Germany34 Posts
Like Dmg per supply should be DMG/supply and not DMG*supply i.e. DT has 45dmg and costs 2 supply so it would be 22.5 dmg per supply. That way you can calculate the real dmg per supply and compare the units. If you multiplicate it like you did teh dmg per supply of units with higher supply costs are allways higher as them of the one with lower supply costs and that is somewhat wrong.. With the DPS im not sure. acutally the Attack speed means it (example Immo) 1.45 = everye 1.45 seconds one attack or 1.45 (nearly 1 1/2) attacks per second? | ||
|
aintthatfunny
193 Posts
Nice stats though thanks for posting. | ||
|
MrCash
United States1504 Posts
If you are looking to make your workf more popular, I would suggest making it more accessible. For example you could put it into a google doc file (if it wasn't how you made it to begin with), and make it public to view, but not edit. Hell you can recruit people to edit or contribute, so you don't have to do all the work. I'd bookmark something like that just to have it available, especially if you continued to add more content and information. Again, nice work. | ||
|
Masvidal
Korea (South)213 Posts
Silly things a Stalker does less damage than: A Zergling A Marine An Infested Terran A Roach And Stalkers do only .3 more dps than 2 probes attacking, and .9 more dps than a Sentry. I knew it wasn't just me thinking Stalkers just tickle stuff. Notice that all 4 things I listed cost far less than a Stalker. But even though they don't do a lot of damage, that still seems wrong that they do less damage than a marine or a roach. Is that number actually correct, or did you get something wrong? | ||
|
BraneSC2
United States123 Posts
| ||
|
iTzSnypah
United States1738 Posts
| ||
|
Krejven
Sweden105 Posts
On June 23 2012 18:38 Masvidal wrote: ROFL I just noticed how hilariously terrible stalkers are at doing damage. Silly things a Stalker does less damage than: A Zergling A Marine An Infested Terran A Roach And Stalkers do only .3 more dps than 2 probes attacking, and .9 more dps than a Sentry. I knew it wasn't just me thinking Stalkers just tickle stuff. Notice that all 4 things I listed cost far less than a Stalker. But even though they don't do a lot of damage, that still seems wrong that they do less damage than a marine or a roach. Is that number actually correct, or did you get something wrong? You clearly failed to see that you are looking at stalkers dps against everything but armored (which it has a dmg bonus against). Against armored targets it does infact quite alot more dmg than the units you listed. And it can shoot up compared to the roach. | ||
|
Reborn8u
United States1761 Posts
On June 23 2012 18:56 Krejven wrote: You clearly failed to see that you are looking at stalkers dps against everything but armored (which it has a dmg bonus against). Against armored targets it does infact quite alot more dmg than the units you listed. And it can shoot up compared to the roach. But a stalker vs armored is still worse than a single stimmed marine, and as he stated vs non armored it is worse than a single unstimmed marine. Now think about the supply and mineral/gas cost of these units. I'm beginning to think that avoiding making stalkers will actually make a toss army better in the early/mid game. Zealot, sentry, immortal is just so much more powerful for the cost. | ||
|
Dalavita
Sweden1113 Posts
| ||
|
iky43210
United States2099 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games summit1g10641 Liquid`RaSZi4421 JimRising  689shahzam596 C9.Mang0328 Day[9].tv310 Maynarde175 Livibee112 PiGStarcraft80 |
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Light vs EffOrt
OSC
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
GSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
