|
07:06 KST - method linked here has been disproved here10:54 KST - Find a full timeline of pro comments (including Spades) in the topic here.08:47 KST - Summary:Accusations of maphacking have the potential to destroy a player's career if left unaddressed. Because of the potential consequences, we should be careful about accepting unproven accusations. The principle of 'innocent until proven guilty' should be applied here. That does not mean that there has been a conclusion about this case, however, which is why this thread remains tentatively open. Please discuss with caution and use evidence to back up your claims. (also a summary post by an unnamed pro on reddit here) |
On June 06 2012 00:06 Starshaped wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 00:00 the p00n wrote:On June 05 2012 23:59 Starshaped wrote: Nobody defending Spades seems to want to touch the Cloud Kingdom moment. What moment in the replay exactly are you referring to and I shall address it. 09:50 on Cloud Kingdom. Or ~35 minutes in here http://www.twitch.tv/rootcatz/b/320407912
I watched that part live, and in the replays, and cannot for the life of me think of a reason why he would move one inch before re-entering siege mode with his tanks except that he had vision of the army coming his way.
|
Well, the mob with pitchforks over at reddit appear to have spoken. Whether or not he's guilty appears to be irrelevant now that the mob will come after him.
|
On June 06 2012 00:03 TheLemontree wrote:Show nested quote +On June 05 2012 23:56 benkei wrote:If he can´t look into the fog of war how is this possible? + Show Spoiler +http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/703/screenshot2012060516443.jpg/ There are other examples too I saw during Catz's VODs. I'm surprised they didn't pick up and talk about them, but they seemed to have already made up their minds. As Catz explained, if you command an action into the fog of war, such as right clicking or attack moving, the hack will allow your camera to be seeing an entire screen of fog of war. What Catz and co found suspicious was when he never viewed the fog of war through a left click. In one game even when he scouted he never viewed what his scv had seen. In his games where he isn't assumed to be hacking he regularly views the fog of war through a left click, as any normal player would.
|
On June 06 2012 00:00 ZenithM wrote:Show nested quote +On June 05 2012 23:55 Tippecanoe wrote: That scan on shakuras.
God damn. Just god damn. Yeah, I think it's just one of the best arguments. Nobody in their right mind (like above bronze), would waste a scan which has only 50% of landing on the opponent's fricking main at 5 minutes in the game, without waiting for the scouting SCV to at least confirm his spawning position. That's just retarded play. If you're not maphacking, that is...
i just saw the scan, wtf 100% hacking
|
On June 05 2012 23:45 papaz wrote:Show nested quote +On June 05 2012 23:37 Mobsy wrote:On June 05 2012 23:35 i)awn wrote: I'm not an expert but the logical thing to do is to compare these replays to some other replays where you're certain he's not hacking. Also compare it to a pool of other players' replays and check if you see the same suspicious behavior else where. This has to be done by an unintersted team. What CatZ and Co. Did was fine.. they compared his hacking games to a few of his non-hacking games and told us what made them think he hacks.. afterwards they all were in agreement that he was, in fact, hacking in the showmatch. Does that make it absolute? No. Does it mean he probably was yes? If you can't trust the pros opinions on a subject like this I don't know who we can trust. I'm so glad the justice system doesn't rely on trust. This thread has made me appreciate "innocent until proven guilty" even more.
The only problem is, how else do you prove someone is hacking besides analyzing their replays. Unless someone is blatantly streaming themselves with their hack on there is no other way of proving that someone hacks besides what Catz and other TL netizens have done.
|
On June 06 2012 00:06 Starshaped wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 00:00 the p00n wrote:On June 05 2012 23:59 Starshaped wrote: Nobody defending Spades seems to want to touch the Cloud Kingdom moment. What moment in the replay exactly are you referring to and I shall address it. 09:50 on Cloud Kingdom. Or ~35 minutes in here http://www.twitch.tv/rootcatz/b/320407912
Where can I find this replay? This seems extremely suspicious to me as well from CatZ' point of view as well, but I need the replay to form my own opinion with all the available information.
|
On June 06 2012 00:12 xNSwarm wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 00:03 TheLemontree wrote:On June 05 2012 23:56 benkei wrote:If he can´t look into the fog of war how is this possible? + Show Spoiler +http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/703/screenshot2012060516443.jpg/ There are other examples too I saw during Catz's VODs. I'm surprised they didn't pick up and talk about them, but they seemed to have already made up their minds. As Catz explained, if you command an action into the fog of war, such as right clicking or attack moving, the hack will allow your camera to be seeing an entire screen of fog of war. What Catz and co found suspicious was when he never viewed the fog of war through a left click. In one game even when he scouted he never viewed what his scv had seen. In his games where he isn't assumed to be hacking he regularly views the fog of war through a left click, as any normal player would.
Ok that does make sense to me thanks
|
Today I'm going to stream All the replays (Spanish) with a few partners.
We will talk about every one of the argument of this post. Time? 22:00 CET.
If some one speaks english you can alert us in the Justin chat and we can try some english to you ^^
I'm trying to take a few GM players to discuts those arguments, game by game.
Are you in?
Did he use hack? Doesn't he?
Sorry 'bout my english :D. I speak better than i write... i think...
www.lorchtv.es/tv/
|
On June 06 2012 00:14 StreetWise wrote:Show nested quote +On June 05 2012 23:45 papaz wrote:On June 05 2012 23:37 Mobsy wrote:On June 05 2012 23:35 i)awn wrote: I'm not an expert but the logical thing to do is to compare these replays to some other replays where you're certain he's not hacking. Also compare it to a pool of other players' replays and check if you see the same suspicious behavior else where. This has to be done by an unintersted team. What CatZ and Co. Did was fine.. they compared his hacking games to a few of his non-hacking games and told us what made them think he hacks.. afterwards they all were in agreement that he was, in fact, hacking in the showmatch. Does that make it absolute? No. Does it mean he probably was yes? If you can't trust the pros opinions on a subject like this I don't know who we can trust. I'm so glad the justice system doesn't rely on trust. This thread has made me appreciate "innocent until proven guilty" even more. The only problem is, how else do you prove someone is hacking besides analyzing their replays. Unless someone is blatantly streaming themselves with their hack on there is no other way of proving that someone hacks besides what Catz and other TL netizens have done.
There is this corporation known as Blizzard Entertainment. I hear they're the leading experts in StarCraft 2, and if they have not been actuated, it is likely that Spades isn't cheating.
Speculation based evidence + no reaction from the authority in the field = guilty? Give me a break.
|
I don't think that any of us are qualified to comment on this, and by the looks of it, it would seem that we're starting to hate each other because of our differences. Perhaps it's time for all of us to let go and enjoy the lovely weather outside.
+ Show Spoiler +
|
At the moment I'm about 30 pages behind, and will be back in the afternoon to continue reading and updating.
|
On June 06 2012 00:12 ronpaul012 wrote: Well, the mob with pitchforks over at reddit appear to have spoken. Whether or not he's guilty appears to be irrelevant now that the mob will come after him.
because there's no retarded mob here over at TL, right?
|
Damn, Mirhi's comments makes me so happy I only watch offline events... Too much shit since 1.6 has made me wary of anything other than two players in separate booths, and even then you can't be sure (see IEM where Feast got whispered) (
|
On June 06 2012 00:16 Chargelot wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 00:14 StreetWise wrote:On June 05 2012 23:45 papaz wrote:On June 05 2012 23:37 Mobsy wrote:On June 05 2012 23:35 i)awn wrote: I'm not an expert but the logical thing to do is to compare these replays to some other replays where you're certain he's not hacking. Also compare it to a pool of other players' replays and check if you see the same suspicious behavior else where. This has to be done by an unintersted team. What CatZ and Co. Did was fine.. they compared his hacking games to a few of his non-hacking games and told us what made them think he hacks.. afterwards they all were in agreement that he was, in fact, hacking in the showmatch. Does that make it absolute? No. Does it mean he probably was yes? If you can't trust the pros opinions on a subject like this I don't know who we can trust. I'm so glad the justice system doesn't rely on trust. This thread has made me appreciate "innocent until proven guilty" even more. The only problem is, how else do you prove someone is hacking besides analyzing their replays. Unless someone is blatantly streaming themselves with their hack on there is no other way of proving that someone hacks besides what Catz and other TL netizens have done. There is this corporation known as Blizzard Entertainment. I hear they're the leading experts in StarCraft 2, and if they have not been actuated, it is likely that Spades isn't cheating. Speculation based evidence + no reaction from the authority in the field = guilty? Give me a break.
yeah because blizzard bans all cheaters instantly there are no cheaters on their servers at any point in time... i hope you don't really think that...
|
On June 06 2012 00:18 sVnteen wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 00:16 Chargelot wrote:On June 06 2012 00:14 StreetWise wrote:On June 05 2012 23:45 papaz wrote:On June 05 2012 23:37 Mobsy wrote:On June 05 2012 23:35 i)awn wrote: I'm not an expert but the logical thing to do is to compare these replays to some other replays where you're certain he's not hacking. Also compare it to a pool of other players' replays and check if you see the same suspicious behavior else where. This has to be done by an unintersted team. What CatZ and Co. Did was fine.. they compared his hacking games to a few of his non-hacking games and told us what made them think he hacks.. afterwards they all were in agreement that he was, in fact, hacking in the showmatch. Does that make it absolute? No. Does it mean he probably was yes? If you can't trust the pros opinions on a subject like this I don't know who we can trust. I'm so glad the justice system doesn't rely on trust. This thread has made me appreciate "innocent until proven guilty" even more. The only problem is, how else do you prove someone is hacking besides analyzing their replays. Unless someone is blatantly streaming themselves with their hack on there is no other way of proving that someone hacks besides what Catz and other TL netizens have done. There is this corporation known as Blizzard Entertainment. I hear they're the leading experts in StarCraft 2, and if they have not been actuated, it is likely that Spades isn't cheating. Speculation based evidence + no reaction from the authority in the field = guilty? Give me a break. yeah because blizzard bans all cheaters instantly there are no cheaters on their servers at any point in time... i hope you don't really think that... If your ONLY evidence is that CatZ told you so, that means you've no right to call him guilty. If the ONLY people in the entire WORLD who can tell you if he was or was not hacking has not done so, you have no right to call him guilty.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Circumstantial Evidence
|
Watch Catzs VOD at 59:30 or so. Try to explain how the heck that scan worked. He is hacking. Feel free to prove me wrong.
|
On June 06 2012 00:14 the p00n wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 00:06 Starshaped wrote:On June 06 2012 00:00 the p00n wrote:On June 05 2012 23:59 Starshaped wrote: Nobody defending Spades seems to want to touch the Cloud Kingdom moment. What moment in the replay exactly are you referring to and I shall address it. 09:50 on Cloud Kingdom. Or ~35 minutes in here http://www.twitch.tv/rootcatz/b/320407912 Where can I find this replay? This seems extremely suspicious to me as well from CatZ' point of view as well, but I need the replay to form my own opinion with all the available information.
I wish I knew, I would love to see it for myself. But Catz shows it all anyway.
|
On June 06 2012 00:21 Chargelot wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 00:18 sVnteen wrote:On June 06 2012 00:16 Chargelot wrote:On June 06 2012 00:14 StreetWise wrote:On June 05 2012 23:45 papaz wrote:On June 05 2012 23:37 Mobsy wrote:On June 05 2012 23:35 i)awn wrote: I'm not an expert but the logical thing to do is to compare these replays to some other replays where you're certain he's not hacking. Also compare it to a pool of other players' replays and check if you see the same suspicious behavior else where. This has to be done by an unintersted team. What CatZ and Co. Did was fine.. they compared his hacking games to a few of his non-hacking games and told us what made them think he hacks.. afterwards they all were in agreement that he was, in fact, hacking in the showmatch. Does that make it absolute? No. Does it mean he probably was yes? If you can't trust the pros opinions on a subject like this I don't know who we can trust. I'm so glad the justice system doesn't rely on trust. This thread has made me appreciate "innocent until proven guilty" even more. The only problem is, how else do you prove someone is hacking besides analyzing their replays. Unless someone is blatantly streaming themselves with their hack on there is no other way of proving that someone hacks besides what Catz and other TL netizens have done. There is this corporation known as Blizzard Entertainment. I hear they're the leading experts in StarCraft 2, and if they have not been actuated, it is likely that Spades isn't cheating. Speculation based evidence + no reaction from the authority in the field = guilty? Give me a break. yeah because blizzard bans all cheaters instantly there are no cheaters on their servers at any point in time... i hope you don't really think that... If your ONLY evidence is that CatZ told you so, that means you've no right to call him guilty. If the ONLY people in the entire WORLD who can tell you if he was or was not hacking has not done so, you have no right to call him guilty. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Circumstantial Evidence What makes you think blizzard is in a position to judge whether he hacks? There has been a plethora of different undetected hacks since before sc2 had even been released...
|
On June 05 2012 23:59 Starshaped wrote: Nobody defending Spades seems to want to touch the Cloud Kingdom moment. lucifron wished spades good luck before the game, he got his wish, what's wrong with that? How do you explain the fact that spades got rip apart by drops? you can't just cherry pick a single instant and say that's your proof that spades hacks, you must look at all the games as a whole. you can't just ignore other facts that contradicts your argument. What you guys doing is scientifically and logically foul play. Team liquid is better than this cluster fuck of mass logical fallacy. When spades, testie and TT1 was hacking during the BW days, ppl call them out for hacking way before the technology was available to detect hacks via replay, yet we didn't made this kinds of stupid accusation without irrefutable proofs. We are better than this.
|
On June 06 2012 00:22 hifriend wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 00:21 Chargelot wrote:On June 06 2012 00:18 sVnteen wrote:On June 06 2012 00:16 Chargelot wrote:On June 06 2012 00:14 StreetWise wrote:On June 05 2012 23:45 papaz wrote:On June 05 2012 23:37 Mobsy wrote:On June 05 2012 23:35 i)awn wrote: I'm not an expert but the logical thing to do is to compare these replays to some other replays where you're certain he's not hacking. Also compare it to a pool of other players' replays and check if you see the same suspicious behavior else where. This has to be done by an unintersted team. What CatZ and Co. Did was fine.. they compared his hacking games to a few of his non-hacking games and told us what made them think he hacks.. afterwards they all were in agreement that he was, in fact, hacking in the showmatch. Does that make it absolute? No. Does it mean he probably was yes? If you can't trust the pros opinions on a subject like this I don't know who we can trust. I'm so glad the justice system doesn't rely on trust. This thread has made me appreciate "innocent until proven guilty" even more. The only problem is, how else do you prove someone is hacking besides analyzing their replays. Unless someone is blatantly streaming themselves with their hack on there is no other way of proving that someone hacks besides what Catz and other TL netizens have done. There is this corporation known as Blizzard Entertainment. I hear they're the leading experts in StarCraft 2, and if they have not been actuated, it is likely that Spades isn't cheating. Speculation based evidence + no reaction from the authority in the field = guilty? Give me a break. yeah because blizzard bans all cheaters instantly there are no cheaters on their servers at any point in time... i hope you don't really think that... If your ONLY evidence is that CatZ told you so, that means you've no right to call him guilty. If the ONLY people in the entire WORLD who can tell you if he was or was not hacking has not done so, you have no right to call him guilty. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Circumstantial Evidence What makes you think blizzard is in a position to judge whether he hacks? There has been a plethora of different undetected hacks since before sc2 had even been released...
Even if they did find out that he hacked they wouldn't do shit. Impa the gm map hacker was streaming with his hacks on and blizzard still hasn't banned him.
|
|
|
|