• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:31
CEST 07:31
KST 14:31
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy0GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding0Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win0[BSL22] RO32 Group Stage3Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6
StarCraft 2
General
Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2)
Tourneys
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
Who is Ny[kS]? Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen ASL21 General Discussion [BSL22] RO32 Group Stage so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight.
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group F Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [ASL21] Ro24 Group E
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Chess Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Loot Boxes—Emotions, And Why…
TrAiDoS
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Electronics
mantequilla
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1880 users

[?] Spades hacking? - Page 157

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 155 156 157 158 159 298 Next
07:06 KST - method linked here has been disproved here

10:54 KST - Find a full timeline of pro comments (including Spades) in the topic here.

08:47 KST - Summary:
Accusations of maphacking have the potential to destroy a player's career if left unaddressed. Because of the potential consequences, we should be careful about accepting unproven accusations. The principle of 'innocent until proven guilty' should be applied here. That does not mean that there has been a conclusion about this case, however, which is why this thread remains tentatively open.

Please discuss with caution and use evidence to back up your claims.

(also a summary post by an unnamed pro on reddit here)
Holytornados
Profile Joined November 2011
United States1022 Posts
June 05 2012 15:11 GMT
#3121
On June 06 2012 00:06 Starshaped wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2012 00:00 the p00n wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:59 Starshaped wrote:
Nobody defending Spades seems to want to touch the Cloud Kingdom moment.


What moment in the replay exactly are you referring to and I shall address it.


09:50 on Cloud Kingdom.

Or ~35 minutes in here http://www.twitch.tv/rootcatz/b/320407912


I watched that part live, and in the replays, and cannot for the life of me think of a reason why he would move one inch before re-entering siege mode with his tanks except that he had vision of the army coming his way.
CLG/Liquid ~~ youtube.com/reddedgaming
ronpaul012
Profile Joined March 2011
United States769 Posts
June 05 2012 15:12 GMT
#3122
Well, the mob with pitchforks over at reddit appear to have spoken. Whether or not he's guilty appears to be irrelevant now that the mob will come after him.
I'm a gooner.
xNSwarm
Profile Joined December 2011
155 Posts
June 05 2012 15:12 GMT
#3123
On June 06 2012 00:03 TheLemontree wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 05 2012 23:56 benkei wrote:
If he can´t look into the fog of war how is this possible?

+ Show Spoiler +
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/703/screenshot2012060516443.jpg/


There are other examples too I saw during Catz's VODs. I'm surprised they didn't pick up and talk about them, but they seemed to have already made up their minds.

As Catz explained, if you command an action into the fog of war, such as right clicking or attack moving, the hack will allow your camera to be seeing an entire screen of fog of war. What Catz and co found suspicious was when he never viewed the fog of war through a left click. In one game even when he scouted he never viewed what his scv had seen. In his games where he isn't assumed to be hacking he regularly views the fog of war through a left click, as any normal player would.
OzVelas
Profile Joined September 2011
Bulgaria516 Posts
June 05 2012 15:13 GMT
#3124
On June 06 2012 00:00 ZenithM wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 05 2012 23:55 Tippecanoe wrote:
That scan on shakuras.

God damn. Just god damn.

Yeah, I think it's just one of the best arguments.
Nobody in their right mind (like above bronze), would waste a scan which has only 50% of landing on the opponent's fricking main at 5 minutes in the game, without waiting for the scouting SCV to at least confirm his spawning position. That's just retarded play.
If you're not maphacking, that is...


i just saw the scan, wtf 100% hacking
StreetWise
Profile Joined January 2010
United States594 Posts
June 05 2012 15:14 GMT
#3125
On June 05 2012 23:45 papaz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 05 2012 23:37 Mobsy wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:35 i)awn wrote:
I'm not an expert but the logical thing to do is to compare these replays to some other replays where you're certain he's not hacking. Also compare it to a pool of other players' replays and check if you see the same suspicious behavior else where. This has to be done by an unintersted team.


What CatZ and Co. Did was fine.. they compared his hacking games to a few of his non-hacking games and told us what made them think he hacks.. afterwards they all were in agreement that he was, in fact, hacking in the showmatch. Does that make it absolute? No. Does it mean he probably was yes? If you can't trust the pros opinions on a subject like this I don't know who we can trust.


I'm so glad the justice system doesn't rely on trust.

This thread has made me appreciate "innocent until proven guilty" even more.


The only problem is, how else do you prove someone is hacking besides analyzing their replays. Unless someone is blatantly streaming themselves with their hack on there is no other way of proving that someone hacks besides what Catz and other TL netizens have done.
I will not be poisoned by your bitterness
the p00n
Profile Joined September 2010
Netherlands615 Posts
June 05 2012 15:14 GMT
#3126
On June 06 2012 00:06 Starshaped wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2012 00:00 the p00n wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:59 Starshaped wrote:
Nobody defending Spades seems to want to touch the Cloud Kingdom moment.


What moment in the replay exactly are you referring to and I shall address it.


09:50 on Cloud Kingdom.

Or ~35 minutes in here http://www.twitch.tv/rootcatz/b/320407912


Where can I find this replay? This seems extremely suspicious to me as well from CatZ' point of view as well, but I need the replay to form my own opinion with all the available information.
TheLemontree
Profile Joined June 2012
United Kingdom2 Posts
June 05 2012 15:15 GMT
#3127
On June 06 2012 00:12 xNSwarm wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2012 00:03 TheLemontree wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:56 benkei wrote:
If he can´t look into the fog of war how is this possible?

+ Show Spoiler +
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/703/screenshot2012060516443.jpg/


There are other examples too I saw during Catz's VODs. I'm surprised they didn't pick up and talk about them, but they seemed to have already made up their minds.

As Catz explained, if you command an action into the fog of war, such as right clicking or attack moving, the hack will allow your camera to be seeing an entire screen of fog of war. What Catz and co found suspicious was when he never viewed the fog of war through a left click. In one game even when he scouted he never viewed what his scv had seen. In his games where he isn't assumed to be hacking he regularly views the fog of war through a left click, as any normal player would.


Ok that does make sense to me thanks
LorCHsc2
Profile Joined October 2011
Spain103 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-05 15:17:12
June 05 2012 15:16 GMT
#3128
Today I'm going to stream All the replays (Spanish) with a few partners.

We will talk about every one of the argument of this post. Time? 22:00 CET.

If some one speaks english you can alert us in the Justin chat and we can try some english to you ^^

I'm trying to take a few GM players to discuts those arguments, game by game.

Are you in?

Did he use hack? Doesn't he?

Sorry 'bout my english :D. I speak better than i write... i think...

www.lorchtv.es/tv/
Chargelot
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
2275 Posts
June 05 2012 15:16 GMT
#3129
On June 06 2012 00:14 StreetWise wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 05 2012 23:45 papaz wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:37 Mobsy wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:35 i)awn wrote:
I'm not an expert but the logical thing to do is to compare these replays to some other replays where you're certain he's not hacking. Also compare it to a pool of other players' replays and check if you see the same suspicious behavior else where. This has to be done by an unintersted team.


What CatZ and Co. Did was fine.. they compared his hacking games to a few of his non-hacking games and told us what made them think he hacks.. afterwards they all were in agreement that he was, in fact, hacking in the showmatch. Does that make it absolute? No. Does it mean he probably was yes? If you can't trust the pros opinions on a subject like this I don't know who we can trust.


I'm so glad the justice system doesn't rely on trust.

This thread has made me appreciate "innocent until proven guilty" even more.


The only problem is, how else do you prove someone is hacking besides analyzing their replays. Unless someone is blatantly streaming themselves with their hack on there is no other way of proving that someone hacks besides what Catz and other TL netizens have done.


There is this corporation known as Blizzard Entertainment. I hear they're the leading experts in StarCraft 2, and if they have not been actuated, it is likely that Spades isn't cheating.

Speculation based evidence + no reaction from the authority in the field = guilty? Give me a break.
if (post == "stupid") { document.getElementById('post').style.display = 'none'; }
toiletCAT
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
Qatar284 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-05 15:18:51
June 05 2012 15:16 GMT
#3130
I don't think that any of us are qualified to comment on this, and by the looks of it, it would seem that we're starting to hate each other because of our differences. Perhaps it's time for all of us to let go and enjoy the lovely weather outside.

+ Show Spoiler +
First post, btw.
cooked
Profile Joined December 2010
China1238 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-05 15:18:20
June 05 2012 15:18 GMT
#3131
At the moment I'm about 30 pages behind, and will be back in the afternoon to continue reading and updating.
slicknav
Profile Joined January 2011
1409 Posts
June 05 2012 15:18 GMT
#3132
On June 06 2012 00:12 ronpaul012 wrote:
Well, the mob with pitchforks over at reddit appear to have spoken. Whether or not he's guilty appears to be irrelevant now that the mob will come after him.


because there's no retarded mob here over at TL, right?
blah blah blah...
Xcobidoo
Profile Joined June 2011
Sweden1871 Posts
June 05 2012 15:18 GMT
#3133
Damn, Mirhi's comments makes me so happy I only watch offline events... Too much shit since 1.6 has made me wary of anything other than two players in separate booths, and even then you can't be sure (see IEM where Feast got whispered) (
Supreme Intergalactic Commander
sVnteen
Profile Joined January 2011
Germany2238 Posts
June 05 2012 15:18 GMT
#3134
On June 06 2012 00:16 Chargelot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2012 00:14 StreetWise wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:45 papaz wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:37 Mobsy wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:35 i)awn wrote:
I'm not an expert but the logical thing to do is to compare these replays to some other replays where you're certain he's not hacking. Also compare it to a pool of other players' replays and check if you see the same suspicious behavior else where. This has to be done by an unintersted team.


What CatZ and Co. Did was fine.. they compared his hacking games to a few of his non-hacking games and told us what made them think he hacks.. afterwards they all were in agreement that he was, in fact, hacking in the showmatch. Does that make it absolute? No. Does it mean he probably was yes? If you can't trust the pros opinions on a subject like this I don't know who we can trust.


I'm so glad the justice system doesn't rely on trust.

This thread has made me appreciate "innocent until proven guilty" even more.


The only problem is, how else do you prove someone is hacking besides analyzing their replays. Unless someone is blatantly streaming themselves with their hack on there is no other way of proving that someone hacks besides what Catz and other TL netizens have done.


There is this corporation known as Blizzard Entertainment. I hear they're the leading experts in StarCraft 2, and if they have not been actuated, it is likely that Spades isn't cheating.

Speculation based evidence + no reaction from the authority in the field = guilty? Give me a break.


yeah because blizzard bans all cheaters instantly there are no cheaters on their servers at any point in time...
i hope you don't really think that...
MY LIFE STARTS NOW ♥
Chargelot
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
2275 Posts
June 05 2012 15:21 GMT
#3135
On June 06 2012 00:18 sVnteen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2012 00:16 Chargelot wrote:
On June 06 2012 00:14 StreetWise wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:45 papaz wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:37 Mobsy wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:35 i)awn wrote:
I'm not an expert but the logical thing to do is to compare these replays to some other replays where you're certain he's not hacking. Also compare it to a pool of other players' replays and check if you see the same suspicious behavior else where. This has to be done by an unintersted team.


What CatZ and Co. Did was fine.. they compared his hacking games to a few of his non-hacking games and told us what made them think he hacks.. afterwards they all were in agreement that he was, in fact, hacking in the showmatch. Does that make it absolute? No. Does it mean he probably was yes? If you can't trust the pros opinions on a subject like this I don't know who we can trust.


I'm so glad the justice system doesn't rely on trust.

This thread has made me appreciate "innocent until proven guilty" even more.


The only problem is, how else do you prove someone is hacking besides analyzing their replays. Unless someone is blatantly streaming themselves with their hack on there is no other way of proving that someone hacks besides what Catz and other TL netizens have done.


There is this corporation known as Blizzard Entertainment. I hear they're the leading experts in StarCraft 2, and if they have not been actuated, it is likely that Spades isn't cheating.

Speculation based evidence + no reaction from the authority in the field = guilty? Give me a break.


yeah because blizzard bans all cheaters instantly there are no cheaters on their servers at any point in time...
i hope you don't really think that...

If your ONLY evidence is that CatZ told you so, that means you've no right to call him guilty.
If the ONLY people in the entire WORLD who can tell you if he was or was not hacking has not done so, you have no right to call him guilty.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Circumstantial Evidence
if (post == "stupid") { document.getElementById('post').style.display = 'none'; }
Xadar
Profile Joined October 2010
497 Posts
June 05 2012 15:22 GMT
#3136
Watch Catzs VOD at 59:30 or so. Try to explain how the heck that scan worked. He is hacking. Feel free to prove me wrong.
Starshaped
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Sweden575 Posts
June 05 2012 15:22 GMT
#3137
On June 06 2012 00:14 the p00n wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2012 00:06 Starshaped wrote:
On June 06 2012 00:00 the p00n wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:59 Starshaped wrote:
Nobody defending Spades seems to want to touch the Cloud Kingdom moment.


What moment in the replay exactly are you referring to and I shall address it.


09:50 on Cloud Kingdom.

Or ~35 minutes in here http://www.twitch.tv/rootcatz/b/320407912


Where can I find this replay? This seems extremely suspicious to me as well from CatZ' point of view as well, but I need the replay to form my own opinion with all the available information.


I wish I knew, I would love to see it for myself. But Catz shows it all anyway.
My Starcraft 2, gaming and e-sports-related blog: http://starshapedthoughts.blogspot.com/
hifriend
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
China7935 Posts
June 05 2012 15:22 GMT
#3138
On June 06 2012 00:21 Chargelot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2012 00:18 sVnteen wrote:
On June 06 2012 00:16 Chargelot wrote:
On June 06 2012 00:14 StreetWise wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:45 papaz wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:37 Mobsy wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:35 i)awn wrote:
I'm not an expert but the logical thing to do is to compare these replays to some other replays where you're certain he's not hacking. Also compare it to a pool of other players' replays and check if you see the same suspicious behavior else where. This has to be done by an unintersted team.


What CatZ and Co. Did was fine.. they compared his hacking games to a few of his non-hacking games and told us what made them think he hacks.. afterwards they all were in agreement that he was, in fact, hacking in the showmatch. Does that make it absolute? No. Does it mean he probably was yes? If you can't trust the pros opinions on a subject like this I don't know who we can trust.


I'm so glad the justice system doesn't rely on trust.

This thread has made me appreciate "innocent until proven guilty" even more.


The only problem is, how else do you prove someone is hacking besides analyzing their replays. Unless someone is blatantly streaming themselves with their hack on there is no other way of proving that someone hacks besides what Catz and other TL netizens have done.


There is this corporation known as Blizzard Entertainment. I hear they're the leading experts in StarCraft 2, and if they have not been actuated, it is likely that Spades isn't cheating.

Speculation based evidence + no reaction from the authority in the field = guilty? Give me a break.


yeah because blizzard bans all cheaters instantly there are no cheaters on their servers at any point in time...
i hope you don't really think that...

If your ONLY evidence is that CatZ told you so, that means you've no right to call him guilty.
If the ONLY people in the entire WORLD who can tell you if he was or was not hacking has not done so, you have no right to call him guilty.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Circumstantial Evidence

What makes you think blizzard is in a position to judge whether he hacks? There has been a plethora of different undetected hacks since before sc2 had even been released...
rei
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States3594 Posts
June 05 2012 15:23 GMT
#3139
On June 05 2012 23:59 Starshaped wrote:
Nobody defending Spades seems to want to touch the Cloud Kingdom moment.

lucifron wished spades good luck before the game, he got his wish, what's wrong with that? How do you explain the fact that spades got rip apart by drops? you can't just cherry pick a single instant and say that's your proof that spades hacks, you must look at all the games as a whole. you can't just ignore other facts that contradicts your argument. What you guys doing is scientifically and logically foul play. Team liquid is better than this cluster fuck of mass logical fallacy. When spades, testie and TT1 was hacking during the BW days, ppl call them out for hacking way before the technology was available to detect hacks via replay, yet we didn't made this kinds of stupid accusation without irrefutable proofs. We are better than this.
GET OUT OF MY BASE CHILL
Tippecanoe
Profile Joined May 2011
United States342 Posts
June 05 2012 15:24 GMT
#3140
On June 06 2012 00:22 hifriend wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2012 00:21 Chargelot wrote:
On June 06 2012 00:18 sVnteen wrote:
On June 06 2012 00:16 Chargelot wrote:
On June 06 2012 00:14 StreetWise wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:45 papaz wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:37 Mobsy wrote:
On June 05 2012 23:35 i)awn wrote:
I'm not an expert but the logical thing to do is to compare these replays to some other replays where you're certain he's not hacking. Also compare it to a pool of other players' replays and check if you see the same suspicious behavior else where. This has to be done by an unintersted team.


What CatZ and Co. Did was fine.. they compared his hacking games to a few of his non-hacking games and told us what made them think he hacks.. afterwards they all were in agreement that he was, in fact, hacking in the showmatch. Does that make it absolute? No. Does it mean he probably was yes? If you can't trust the pros opinions on a subject like this I don't know who we can trust.


I'm so glad the justice system doesn't rely on trust.

This thread has made me appreciate "innocent until proven guilty" even more.


The only problem is, how else do you prove someone is hacking besides analyzing their replays. Unless someone is blatantly streaming themselves with their hack on there is no other way of proving that someone hacks besides what Catz and other TL netizens have done.


There is this corporation known as Blizzard Entertainment. I hear they're the leading experts in StarCraft 2, and if they have not been actuated, it is likely that Spades isn't cheating.

Speculation based evidence + no reaction from the authority in the field = guilty? Give me a break.


yeah because blizzard bans all cheaters instantly there are no cheaters on their servers at any point in time...
i hope you don't really think that...

If your ONLY evidence is that CatZ told you so, that means you've no right to call him guilty.
If the ONLY people in the entire WORLD who can tell you if he was or was not hacking has not done so, you have no right to call him guilty.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Circumstantial Evidence

What makes you think blizzard is in a position to judge whether he hacks? There has been a plethora of different undetected hacks since before sc2 had even been released...


Even if they did find out that he hacked they wouldn't do shit. Impa the gm map hacker was streaming with his hacks on and blizzard still hasn't banned him.
Prev 1 155 156 157 158 159 298 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 29m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft454
PiGStarcraft378
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 4815
Shuttle 198
ggaemo 48
NaDa 30
soO 21
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Icarus 6
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K751
m0e_tv426
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox2438
C9.Mang0626
Mew2King17
Other Games
summit1g11330
Maynarde96
RuFF_SC282
Nina39
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick988
BasetradeTV152
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 55
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV852
League of Legends
• Lourlo1506
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
3h 29m
Kung Fu Cup
5h 29m
Replay Cast
18h 29m
The PondCast
1d 4h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 18h
WardiTV Team League
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
WardiTV Team League
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Team League
4 days
BSL
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
GSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Elite League 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W2
IPSL Spring 2026
Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.