• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:47
CEST 07:47
KST 14:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou1Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four0BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET6Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)80
StarCraft 2
General
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou The New Patch Killed Mech! Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy herO joins T1 Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
Is there anyway to get a private coach? BW caster Sayle BSL Season 21 BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament [ASL20] Semifinal B
Strategy
[I] TvP Strategies and Build [I] TvZ Strategies and Builds Roaring Currents ASL final Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Chess Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Men's Fashion Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Series you have seen recently... Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Heroism of Pepe the Fro…
Peanutsc
Rocket League: Traits, Abili…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1166 users

Patch 1.4.3.2 - Page 21

Forum Index > SC2 General
2059 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 19 20 21 22 23 103 Next
boppel
Profile Joined March 2012
140 Posts
May 10 2012 04:58 GMT
#401
u forget thats not just terrans who will struggle with queens

s3rp
Profile Joined May 2011
Germany3192 Posts
May 10 2012 04:58 GMT
#402
On May 10 2012 13:44 sc14s wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2012 13:43 s3rp wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:40 emjaytron wrote:
^^ yeah I can still see 35 siege tank damage being handy even at 0-0, if you can set them up and kite back, the protoss army does tend to clump up narrowly when chasing bio. And -4 damage from zealot armor at 3-3 isn't going to be nearly as big a deal due to the high burst damage of tanks compared to 6+3 attack marines


Chargelots close the distance too fast to tanks / the terran army while also beeing able to significantly withstand siege tank fire.

thats the thing though.. good T will target fire with their siege tanks. Have you ever watched 3-4 tanks target fire collosi?


Its basically impossible to kite well enough , dodge storm and also focus fire your tanks on all their shots. Siege Tanks will allways hit some part of your army which is not a good idea .
m!st
Profile Joined January 2009
Australia95 Posts
May 10 2012 05:00 GMT
#403
On May 10 2012 13:55 s3rp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2012 13:48 m!st wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:43 Inty wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:35 sc14s wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:32 doffe wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:23 m!st wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:19 s3rp wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:12 m!st wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:10 s3rp wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:05 m!st wrote:
[quote]
you didnt answer most of my question. Yes they are more expensive, but they are the similar to a colossi (cost wise) and I was discussing a way for terrans to spend all their gas late game. I'm sure a large seeker missile hit on my army would be as damaging as a storm on yours.....and the argument that I would just feedback the ravens is just like saying "why get HTs, you will just snipe them". if your floating 2K gas, why not add some high tech units, Zerg and Protoss do :D


Its not . Siege Tanks deal have bigger Splash than Seeker Missiles . At best the first target gets hit for 100 , 1-2 targets get hit for 50 and 2-3 get hit for 25. Seeker Missile is good against Air Units since they stack up easily but against ground its just bad.

Why not add tanks then, Its very hard to engage a terran force backed up by seige tanks.


Because Sieged tanks don't move .... . The late Terran army need to avoid the masses of AOE Protoss has with kiting. Sieged tanks kind of not move .... . I mean they barely have more HP then Marauders and can't be healed as easily.



They dont need to move if you engage properly, you can put them behind your army and kite back to the safety of seige tanks. There has to be units other than MMMVG to use against protoss late game. Instead of rejecting every unit except those, try to work out a way to use units with insane splash damage late game.


the problem is that chargelots make siegetanks costinefficient due to splash on own units. You can try to use them all you want but as long as chargelots autoconnect and siegetanks splash friendlies I doubt they will be implented other then in a few timing attacks or maybe to defend locations where your army is not.

And the second issue is upgrades. While the toss army share upgrades across the board a few 0-0 siegetanks wont do much against 3-3 armies. And upgrading both mech and bio is not realistic when the mechuse is so limited.

so so wrong <.< i've seen plenty of games from MKP and MVP in particular where they work wonders.. so i have to completely disagree with you considering those two are certainly some of the top Ts in the world.


Seige tanks are good against protoss in the early to mid game before charge and templar colossi, and archons are present. It is also before protoss begins to get a lot of ground upgrades and everyone is at 0-0 maybe 1-1. After this it becomes unfeasible to upgrade air attack, bio, and mech upgrades while getting vikings and medivacs meaning your tanks will be severely out upgraded. Add to that the fact that chargelots auto hit your army causing your tanks to do more aoe to your army(dying easier to storm/colossi) you end up doing more harm than good with tanks. The supply/cost is better used on vikings and ghosts. These are the reasons why pro players( including mvp and mkp) only get tanks for certain 1-1-1 builds (including expo into 1-1-1) and then stop producing as they transition into 3 base economy.


They have the same range as colossi yeah? if so couldn't your bio deal with zeals while tanks and vikings deal with colossi? seems like they both fit a similar role but siege tanks are more fragile if you loose the battle, cant run away very easily. there has to be a way use your gas, whether it be more upgrades for your existing units, or upgrades and higher tech units. I guess Terran will keep complaining until a Pro figures out a way to use units out of the standard composition(which is fair enough :D)


There was a time just about everything was used not just MMMGV. It just complely died out because outside of timing pushes MMMVG is by far stronger then anything you can build. Everybody plays it in later stages . I would like to do anything then MMMVG but after losing countless games with non-MMMVG i just resigned .

I know its the standard for a reason, if we didnt go colossi/storm/chargelot we wouldnt win either. But there has to be a way to supplement your composition with something else. Im talking about your buildup of gas when your bio is easily replenishable, there has to be something to put in.
surgical tossssss!
ZenithM
Profile Joined February 2011
France15952 Posts
May 10 2012 05:02 GMT
#404
Queen range is way over the top :'(
bokchoi
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Korea (South)9498 Posts
May 10 2012 05:03 GMT
#405
So soonish as in in the next few days? xDD. I wonder when this will take place for Korea. Before or after GSL finals?
s3rp
Profile Joined May 2011
Germany3192 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-10 05:07:47
May 10 2012 05:03 GMT
#406
On May 10 2012 14:00 m!st wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2012 13:55 s3rp wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:48 m!st wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:43 Inty wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:35 sc14s wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:32 doffe wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:23 m!st wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:19 s3rp wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:12 m!st wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:10 s3rp wrote:
[quote]

Its not . Siege Tanks deal have bigger Splash than Seeker Missiles . At best the first target gets hit for 100 , 1-2 targets get hit for 50 and 2-3 get hit for 25. Seeker Missile is good against Air Units since they stack up easily but against ground its just bad.

Why not add tanks then, Its very hard to engage a terran force backed up by seige tanks.


Because Sieged tanks don't move .... . The late Terran army need to avoid the masses of AOE Protoss has with kiting. Sieged tanks kind of not move .... . I mean they barely have more HP then Marauders and can't be healed as easily.



They dont need to move if you engage properly, you can put them behind your army and kite back to the safety of seige tanks. There has to be units other than MMMVG to use against protoss late game. Instead of rejecting every unit except those, try to work out a way to use units with insane splash damage late game.


the problem is that chargelots make siegetanks costinefficient due to splash on own units. You can try to use them all you want but as long as chargelots autoconnect and siegetanks splash friendlies I doubt they will be implented other then in a few timing attacks or maybe to defend locations where your army is not.

And the second issue is upgrades. While the toss army share upgrades across the board a few 0-0 siegetanks wont do much against 3-3 armies. And upgrading both mech and bio is not realistic when the mechuse is so limited.

so so wrong <.< i've seen plenty of games from MKP and MVP in particular where they work wonders.. so i have to completely disagree with you considering those two are certainly some of the top Ts in the world.


Seige tanks are good against protoss in the early to mid game before charge and templar colossi, and archons are present. It is also before protoss begins to get a lot of ground upgrades and everyone is at 0-0 maybe 1-1. After this it becomes unfeasible to upgrade air attack, bio, and mech upgrades while getting vikings and medivacs meaning your tanks will be severely out upgraded. Add to that the fact that chargelots auto hit your army causing your tanks to do more aoe to your army(dying easier to storm/colossi) you end up doing more harm than good with tanks. The supply/cost is better used on vikings and ghosts. These are the reasons why pro players( including mvp and mkp) only get tanks for certain 1-1-1 builds (including expo into 1-1-1) and then stop producing as they transition into 3 base economy.


They have the same range as colossi yeah? if so couldn't your bio deal with zeals while tanks and vikings deal with colossi? seems like they both fit a similar role but siege tanks are more fragile if you loose the battle, cant run away very easily. there has to be a way use your gas, whether it be more upgrades for your existing units, or upgrades and higher tech units. I guess Terran will keep complaining until a Pro figures out a way to use units out of the standard composition(which is fair enough :D)


There was a time just about everything was used not just MMMGV. It just complely died out because outside of timing pushes MMMVG is by far stronger then anything you can build. Everybody plays it in later stages . I would like to do anything then MMMVG but after losing countless games with non-MMMVG i just resigned .

I know its the standard for a reason, if we didnt go colossi/storm/chargelot we wouldnt win either. But there has to be a way to supplement your composition with something else. Im talking about your buildup of gas when your bio is easily replenishable, there has to be something to put in.


Anything but Bio is not cost effecient enough against Warpgate units considering how slow it rebuilds. Warpgate units trade well with high tech Terran units but rebuild so much faster. I mean most of those units do ok in fights ( but not any better than Bio ) while also not rebuilding as fast. You can add in stuff but it just doesn't make your army any stronger. In fact you if add in bad upgraded stuff it weakens your army considerably.
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44919 Posts
May 10 2012 05:04 GMT
#407
On May 10 2012 13:55 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2012 13:54 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:52 VPFaith wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:48 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:41 sc14s wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:38 VPFaith wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:35 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:23 VPFaith wrote:
Again I am really disappointed in Blizzard's decision of not nerfing Terran...
1. Increase bunker build time to 60-70 seconds.
2. Increase Ghost Build cost to 300 min - 150 gas
3. Increase Queen starting energy to 50 - 75
4. Increase Raven build cost to 300 min - 300 gas
5. Increase Tech lab build time to 50 seconds
6. Decrease Collosus build time to 50 seconds
7. Decrease Protoss shield upgrade to 100- 100
8. Decrease Sentry cost to 50 minerals 50 gas
9. Decrease High Templar cost to 50 min 100 gas
10. Observer should not cost any supply


I don't understand why people will continue to whine about Terran repeatedly getting nerfed throughout the early months of SC2 when they were winning everything and statistically much stronger than Zerg and Protoss.

Guess what? If your race is overpowered, you get nerfed. Sometimes it takes more than one nerf to balance your race. That's why the earlier months were so ridiculously in your favor, and now the winrates are more balanced. The nerfs did their fucking job. Stop crying.



Lol, I want Terran to have less ability and ways to win the game. I specifically said I am disappointed at Blizzard's failed effort to nerf the already OP Terran.... Are you okay? Understand English or no?

fairly certain he detected the sarcasm in the post? Since you are a T player as well as the changes you stated are ridiculous?


Indeed, especially since this thread has already seen a dozen other people whine about Terrans being royally screwed by non-stop nerfs as proof that Blizzard hates them.


Nope, Blizzard doesn't hate Terran. Blizzard just hates MVP for being in GSL round of 4. Haha =)


Only if he makes cloaked units I suppose Otherwise, this patch will have no effect on him.

Naturally, he should be making a truckload of ghosts >.> Parting's pretty good at making extra observers anyway, so I don't think the buff would change his playstyle much.


Well, the observers are also useful for scouting and such-- and the reduced build time also helps get out immortals more quickly to defend all-ins and stuff right? Not saying that there's a problem with the unnecessary observer buff, just that observers serve multiple purposes, and so do robos.


Sure, if you're constantly queueing robo units (as you should), the unit after your observer will start 10 seconds earlier The whole line will have moved 10 seconds faster than before.
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
OGzan
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States289 Posts
May 10 2012 05:04 GMT
#408
Remove energy on thor/ battle cruise plz
(Zan) :: http://www.twitch.tv/byzantiumsc :: Terran Player currently teamless ::
Dosey
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4505 Posts
May 10 2012 05:06 GMT
#409
On May 10 2012 13:48 m!st wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2012 13:43 Inty wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:35 sc14s wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:32 doffe wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:23 m!st wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:19 s3rp wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:12 m!st wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:10 s3rp wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:05 m!st wrote:
On May 10 2012 12:59 ig0tfish wrote:
[quote]

Ravens are more expensive than HTs, and building a raven requires a starport with tech lab.

you didnt answer most of my question. Yes they are more expensive, but they are the similar to a colossi (cost wise) and I was discussing a way for terrans to spend all their gas late game. I'm sure a large seeker missile hit on my army would be as damaging as a storm on yours.....and the argument that I would just feedback the ravens is just like saying "why get HTs, you will just snipe them". if your floating 2K gas, why not add some high tech units, Zerg and Protoss do :D


Its not . Siege Tanks deal have bigger Splash than Seeker Missiles . At best the first target gets hit for 100 , 1-2 targets get hit for 50 and 2-3 get hit for 25. Seeker Missile is good against Air Units since they stack up easily but against ground its just bad.

Why not add tanks then, Its very hard to engage a terran force backed up by seige tanks.


Because Sieged tanks don't move .... . The late Terran army need to avoid the masses of AOE Protoss has with kiting. Sieged tanks kind of not move .... . I mean they barely have more HP then Marauders and can't be healed as easily.



They dont need to move if you engage properly, you can put them behind your army and kite back to the safety of seige tanks. There has to be units other than MMMVG to use against protoss late game. Instead of rejecting every unit except those, try to work out a way to use units with insane splash damage late game.


the problem is that chargelots make siegetanks costinefficient due to splash on own units. You can try to use them all you want but as long as chargelots autoconnect and siegetanks splash friendlies I doubt they will be implented other then in a few timing attacks or maybe to defend locations where your army is not.

And the second issue is upgrades. While the toss army share upgrades across the board a few 0-0 siegetanks wont do much against 3-3 armies. And upgrading both mech and bio is not realistic when the mechuse is so limited.

so so wrong <.< i've seen plenty of games from MKP and MVP in particular where they work wonders.. so i have to completely disagree with you considering those two are certainly some of the top Ts in the world.


Seige tanks are good against protoss in the early to mid game before charge and templar colossi, and archons are present. It is also before protoss begins to get a lot of ground upgrades and everyone is at 0-0 maybe 1-1. After this it becomes unfeasible to upgrade air attack, bio, and mech upgrades while getting vikings and medivacs meaning your tanks will be severely out upgraded. Add to that the fact that chargelots auto hit your army causing your tanks to do more aoe to your army(dying easier to storm/colossi) you end up doing more harm than good with tanks. The supply/cost is better used on vikings and ghosts. These are the reasons why pro players( including mvp and mkp) only get tanks for certain 1-1-1 builds (including expo into 1-1-1) and then stop producing as they transition into 3 base economy.


They have the same range as colossi yeah? if so couldn't your bio deal with zeals while tanks and vikings deal with colossi? seems like they both fit a similar role but siege tanks are more fragile if you loose the battle, cant run away very easily. there has to be a way use your gas, whether it be more upgrades for your existing units, or upgrades and higher tech units. I guess Terran will keep complaining until a Pro figures out a way to use units out of the standard composition(which is fair enough :D)


That would require micro! How dare you suggest that a Terran should do anything but press "1" "T" "A"
The NERVE!
m!st
Profile Joined January 2009
Australia95 Posts
May 10 2012 05:07 GMT
#410
On May 10 2012 14:04 Rygasm wrote:
Remove energy on thor/ battle cruise plz

If you do that, Strike cannon and Yamato on cooldowns? that would be a bit borked. unless the cooldown was quite large.
surgical tossssss!
Ricoic
Profile Joined May 2012
39 Posts
May 10 2012 05:07 GMT
#411
Thank you blizzard for finally giving us a little bit faster overlords. Not sure about queen range but ill take it.
"Take what you can, Give nothing back!"
ZenithM
Profile Joined February 2011
France15952 Posts
May 10 2012 05:09 GMT
#412
Even animation-wise it doesn't make any sense. It's obvious the Queen attack is more of a melee type rather than range projectiles or something. That's like raising Ultralisk range from 1 to 3.

+ Show Spoiler +
Now THAT would be scary right? xD
GloryOfAiur
Profile Joined October 2011
United States127 Posts
May 10 2012 05:09 GMT
#413
Queen range is... I have no idea how to put it. My hellions will probably lose 1 more HP than they usually would after harassment now. Maybe I don't play Zerg enough, but it seems so redundant. Oh well, guess it is better than nothing. Love the Observer and Overlord buffs!
s3rp
Profile Joined May 2011
Germany3192 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-10 05:14:50
May 10 2012 05:09 GMT
#414
On May 10 2012 14:06 Dosey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2012 13:48 m!st wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:43 Inty wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:35 sc14s wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:32 doffe wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:23 m!st wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:19 s3rp wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:12 m!st wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:10 s3rp wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:05 m!st wrote:
[quote]
you didnt answer most of my question. Yes they are more expensive, but they are the similar to a colossi (cost wise) and I was discussing a way for terrans to spend all their gas late game. I'm sure a large seeker missile hit on my army would be as damaging as a storm on yours.....and the argument that I would just feedback the ravens is just like saying "why get HTs, you will just snipe them". if your floating 2K gas, why not add some high tech units, Zerg and Protoss do :D


Its not . Siege Tanks deal have bigger Splash than Seeker Missiles . At best the first target gets hit for 100 , 1-2 targets get hit for 50 and 2-3 get hit for 25. Seeker Missile is good against Air Units since they stack up easily but against ground its just bad.

Why not add tanks then, Its very hard to engage a terran force backed up by seige tanks.


Because Sieged tanks don't move .... . The late Terran army need to avoid the masses of AOE Protoss has with kiting. Sieged tanks kind of not move .... . I mean they barely have more HP then Marauders and can't be healed as easily.



They dont need to move if you engage properly, you can put them behind your army and kite back to the safety of seige tanks. There has to be units other than MMMVG to use against protoss late game. Instead of rejecting every unit except those, try to work out a way to use units with insane splash damage late game.


the problem is that chargelots make siegetanks costinefficient due to splash on own units. You can try to use them all you want but as long as chargelots autoconnect and siegetanks splash friendlies I doubt they will be implented other then in a few timing attacks or maybe to defend locations where your army is not.

And the second issue is upgrades. While the toss army share upgrades across the board a few 0-0 siegetanks wont do much against 3-3 armies. And upgrading both mech and bio is not realistic when the mechuse is so limited.

so so wrong <.< i've seen plenty of games from MKP and MVP in particular where they work wonders.. so i have to completely disagree with you considering those two are certainly some of the top Ts in the world.


Seige tanks are good against protoss in the early to mid game before charge and templar colossi, and archons are present. It is also before protoss begins to get a lot of ground upgrades and everyone is at 0-0 maybe 1-1. After this it becomes unfeasible to upgrade air attack, bio, and mech upgrades while getting vikings and medivacs meaning your tanks will be severely out upgraded. Add to that the fact that chargelots auto hit your army causing your tanks to do more aoe to your army(dying easier to storm/colossi) you end up doing more harm than good with tanks. The supply/cost is better used on vikings and ghosts. These are the reasons why pro players( including mvp and mkp) only get tanks for certain 1-1-1 builds (including expo into 1-1-1) and then stop producing as they transition into 3 base economy.


They have the same range as colossi yeah? if so couldn't your bio deal with zeals while tanks and vikings deal with colossi? seems like they both fit a similar role but siege tanks are more fragile if you loose the battle, cant run away very easily. there has to be a way use your gas, whether it be more upgrades for your existing units, or upgrades and higher tech units. I guess Terran will keep complaining until a Pro figures out a way to use units out of the standard composition(which is fair enough :D)


That would require micro! How dare you suggest that a Terran should do anything but press "1" "T" "A"
The NERVE!


I want to see you dodge storms and kite while making sure tanks don't friendly fire. Its impossible to tell tanks to not fire they will allways shoot at something . Even 1-2 shots of FF against a Bioball can be devastating ( Marines have only 55 HP and Marauders get bonus damage ) .

If tanks had a hold fire button ( like Ghosts have ) adding tanks in TvP actually could work. But they don't have that.
boppel
Profile Joined March 2012
140 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-10 05:10:37
May 10 2012 05:10 GMT
#415
On May 10 2012 14:09 ZenithM wrote:
Even animation-wise it doesn't make any sense. It's obvious the Queen attack is more of a melee type rather than range projectiles or something. That's like raising Ultralisk range from 1 to 3.

+ Show Spoiler +
Now THAT would be scary right? xD


u remember the spine crawler "root" change ?
he breakdanced for whatever seconds without a real ending animation.. :D
ill expect the queen to hit with her claws?! or wtf like a spine crawler now
Dosey
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4505 Posts
May 10 2012 05:10 GMT
#416
On May 10 2012 14:09 ZenithM wrote:
Even animation-wise it doesn't make any sense. It's obvious the Queen attack is more of a melee type rather than range projectiles or something. That's like raising Ultralisk range from 1 to 3.

+ Show Spoiler +
Now THAT would be scary right? xD

iirc They already said they were changing the animation. Incontrol brought up this issue in an episode of SotG
Random_Guy09
Profile Joined April 2012
Canada1010 Posts
May 10 2012 05:12 GMT
#417
On May 10 2012 13:55 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2012 13:54 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:52 VPFaith wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:48 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:41 sc14s wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:38 VPFaith wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:35 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On May 10 2012 13:23 VPFaith wrote:
Again I am really disappointed in Blizzard's decision of not nerfing Terran...
1. Increase bunker build time to 60-70 seconds.
2. Increase Ghost Build cost to 300 min - 150 gas
3. Increase Queen starting energy to 50 - 75
4. Increase Raven build cost to 300 min - 300 gas
5. Increase Tech lab build time to 50 seconds
6. Decrease Collosus build time to 50 seconds
7. Decrease Protoss shield upgrade to 100- 100
8. Decrease Sentry cost to 50 minerals 50 gas
9. Decrease High Templar cost to 50 min 100 gas
10. Observer should not cost any supply


I don't understand why people will continue to whine about Terran repeatedly getting nerfed throughout the early months of SC2 when they were winning everything and statistically much stronger than Zerg and Protoss.

Guess what? If your race is overpowered, you get nerfed. Sometimes it takes more than one nerf to balance your race. That's why the earlier months were so ridiculously in your favor, and now the winrates are more balanced. The nerfs did their fucking job. Stop crying.



Lol, I want Terran to have less ability and ways to win the game. I specifically said I am disappointed at Blizzard's failed effort to nerf the already OP Terran.... Are you okay? Understand English or no?

fairly certain he detected the sarcasm in the post? Since you are a T player as well as the changes you stated are ridiculous?


Indeed, especially since this thread has already seen a dozen other people whine about Terrans being royally screwed by non-stop nerfs as proof that Blizzard hates them.


Nope, Blizzard doesn't hate Terran. Blizzard just hates MVP for being in GSL round of 4. Haha =)


Only if he makes cloaked units I suppose Otherwise, this patch will have no effect on him.

Naturally, he should be making a truckload of ghosts >.> Parting's pretty good at making extra observers anyway, so I don't think the buff would change his playstyle much.


Well, the observers are also useful for scouting and such-- and the reduced build time also helps get out immortals more quickly to defend all-ins and stuff right? Not saying that there's a problem with the unnecessary observer buff, just that observers serve multiple purposes, and so do robos.


Exactly. Observers help with the banshee harass as they get out right as the banshee gets to the main of the toss player. And it helps with scouting zerg alot faster (because we're obviously not HerO who can hide probes around the map to scout later) and being able to then prepare for the most likely roach push or muta/ling or w/e else people run into. Really will help with getting scouting out and then being able to pump out immortals for the roach push that is likely to happen as it seems to be a hot strat to use now against toss. Instead of relying on the perfect FF's to defend (which we've seen only pro's can do 95% of the time. (pro's make mistakes too)).

Faster scouting the push more time to prepare and not have to depend on 1 ability and be stuck gg'ing if we screw up those crucial FF's.

So just because you terran players cant use banshee's to harass for an extra 5-10 seconds doesnt give you the right to QQ as you all end up getting a nice stack of units to put pressure on and toss is forced to read it right or have the wrong early game comp to defend.

Less QQ and more practice >_>
KiNGxXx
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
7928 Posts
May 10 2012 05:14 GMT
#418
On May 10 2012 14:07 m!st wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2012 14:04 Rygasm wrote:
Remove energy on thor/ battle cruise plz

If you do that, Strike cannon and Yamato on cooldowns? that would be a bit borked. unless the cooldown was quite large.

Remove strike cannon and yamato, too. I think all terrans would be fine with it.
MKP|Maru|TaeJa|Mvp|Polt|INnoVation|GuMiho|Bomber|GoOdy|TeamTerran
bokchoi
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Korea (South)9498 Posts
May 10 2012 05:15 GMT
#419
On May 10 2012 14:14 KiNGxXx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2012 14:07 m!st wrote:
On May 10 2012 14:04 Rygasm wrote:
Remove energy on thor/ battle cruise plz

If you do that, Strike cannon and Yamato on cooldowns? that would be a bit borked. unless the cooldown was quite large.

Remove strike cannon and yamato, too. I think all terrans would be fine with it.


Yamato has its uses and serves its purpose. Strike Cannon on the otherhand takes way too long and Thors are so clunky and clumsy you never see it used.
GloryOfAiur
Profile Joined October 2011
United States127 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-10 05:16:11
May 10 2012 05:16 GMT
#420
On May 10 2012 14:14 KiNGxXx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2012 14:07 m!st wrote:
On May 10 2012 14:04 Rygasm wrote:
Remove energy on thor/ battle cruise plz

If you do that, Strike cannon and Yamato on cooldowns? that would be a bit borked. unless the cooldown was quite large.

Remove strike cannon and yamato, too. I think all terrans would be fine with it.

Blind strike cannon decimated my one-base Colossi push once, and is somewhat good against Immortals. Yamato is a battle-changing spell when massing Battlecruisers; however, if you are implying that Battlecruisers are useless, then that is somewhat true. Other than that, Yamato is always crucial when having BCs.

EDIT: yay 100th post
Prev 1 19 20 21 22 23 103 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 14m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft696
StarCraft: Brood War
sorry 140
PianO 74
HiyA 2
Dota 2
XaKoH 159
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K659
Coldzera 289
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King130
Other Games
summit1g9633
C9.Mang0309
hungrybox179
Tasteless123
Trikslyr28
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick875
Counter-Strike
PGL437
Other Games
BasetradeTV190
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH118
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV681
League of Legends
• Rush1388
• Lourlo1221
• HappyZerGling128
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
5h 14m
Wardi Open
8h 44m
PiGosaur Monday
18h 14m
Replay Cast
1d 4h
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
1d 17h
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Online Event
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.