On April 24 2012 12:04 the`postman wrote:
Hate this change, tired of getting games worth +3/-20 points at low masters, much rather play an even match vs an opponent at my level than getting crushed by a much better player or getting cheesed by a worse one.

LOL i know that feeling

CakeSauc3

United States1437 Posts

April 24 2012 05:30 GMT

#48

I've been in diamond for the past year and a half, ever since season one, lol. And yet, for some reason, this is the only season when I haven't been able to get top 8 with ease. I'm having to play a lot more, and i'm still barely making top 25...

I think I have played an unusual amount of master's players, and a few platinums mixed in, so it feels like the whole ladder system is different than it used to be for me. Maybe I'm just in a tougher division this time? I'm really not sure, but something feels quite different.

Kruxxen

United States149 Posts

April 24 2012 05:33 GMT

#49

Why are people so worried about their opponent? If you're trying to improve your game then it doesn't matter if your opponent is right at your skill level, you still have holes to improve on.

mell0w

United States102 Posts

April 24 2012 05:37 GMT

#50

This would explain the 0-6 slide I've had today, and why the hell I was playing a GM in diamond.

..damn it, Blizzard

theBOOCH

United States832 Posts

April 24 2012 05:41 GMT

#51

Interesting. I'd rather play a bunch of masters players and lose all my games than play other diamonds all day, so I think this is a really good thing. I also dont mind playing a bunch of platinum players to rack up some wins. Either way, I'm happy.

Noxie

United States2227 Posts

April 24 2012 05:44 GMT

#52

Hopefully they get this whole system right. Honestly, the original system (which they seem to keep reverting too) was okay in my opinion. For top players I can imagine the que times to be long but, that comes with being at the top.

Deleted User 61629

1664 Posts

April 24 2012 05:50 GMT

#53

--- Nuked ---

Yoshi Kirishima

United States10345 Posts

April 24 2012 05:52 GMT

#54

Seems like the MMR range is still huge? Why is it so huge. If I am a 500 masters player, pairing me up with 200-800 masters players (assuming I'm winning 50% and not "improving" relatively) is fine, instead of just 400-600. Mid diamond can face high diamond or low diamond. But gold or masters? please no o.o

schmutttt

Australia3856 Posts

April 24 2012 06:00 GMT

#55

On April 24 2012 11:27 Kovaz wrote:
Sitting in diamond, everyone I've played today has been either Masters or Plat

This. I'm close to masters as well but hard to get promoted when I play the same plat Terran 3 games in a row for 15 points -_- .

ZeromuS

Canada13389 Posts

April 24 2012 06:01 GMT

#56

On April 24 2012 14:52 Yoshi Kirishima wrote:
Seems like the MMR range is still huge? Why is it so huge. If I am a 500 masters player, pairing me up with 200-800 masters players (assuming I'm winning 50% and not "improving" relatively) is fine, instead of just 400-600. Mid diamond can face high diamond or low diamond. But gold or masters? please no o.o

Im diamond and I've played a top master who had a 78% win rate the other day.

Matchmaking was fine before, theres a lot of other things they could be working on other than this -_-