|
If this is even true then i'd agree on the fact that she is a drama queen and this will not help her PR.
I can understand that some one calling you names in chat is a annoying thing to read, but ones you start doing this it is not going to have an end. Either keep banning his IP/name or ignore him and at some point the fun is over and he/she will be gone.
There are many many people in chats acting like 8 year olds will you procecute them all Jessica ?
And the confiction 7 years in prison ? Really ? Would you let some one go to jail for such a small thing and suffer for it for 7 years ?
If you do procecute him, can you not just give a ticket and let him pay a 100 euro or something in that order, i don't see why a person in it's most severe case would get 7 years of jail for calling some one a cunt in a chat ...
|
On March 31 2012 14:23 Treemonkeys wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:22 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:20 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:17 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:16 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:11 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:07 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:06 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:02 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:00 Wombat_NI wrote:
[quote]
Human decency = being a coward and abusing people via the guise of anonymity the internet gives you. In a country where there is legislation in place that can be used against you in this regard. human decency = destorying anyone who doesnt agree with you? human decency = the ability to interact with other humans with cohesion and with manner and respect. Punishable if otherwise sure? It's not too much to ask for someone to act with some human decency it really isn't. It is too much to lock them up or take a bunch of money over words on a screen. Stop acting like anyone thinks it was good behavior, no one is saying that. Should one go to jail for stealing a candy bar from a store? That is extreme!!! OMG /sarcasm ^ this is what you are saying. You think the punishment is too severe when it simply isn't. I don't think I should have to go to court and pay a fine for speeding... So what I'm saying is, what legal background do you have to say the punishment doesn't fit the crime? Don't say that is what I'm saying right after bringing up candy theft which I haven't talked about at all. Fair punishment for stealing is a fine because you took some of value so you pay that value back. Yes locking someone up over a candy bar is disgusting, it's a fucking candy bar. You don't need a legal backround for morals, silly. More often than not legal systems are enforcing immoral laws and people are going through law school for $$$ not to make the world a better place. Society form rules so it can sustain itself. Morals fail, that's why there are rules. And at the end of rules there are punishment, it's the fear of punishment that guides the people on to the right paths. Getting insulted online (or anywhere) is completely irrelevant towards wether or not society will be able to sustain itself. Maybe fear guides you lol, I mostly just know nice people. Oh but god, they have slung some insults from time to time! Who the fuck hasn't. Please tell me how a society composed of complete douchebags and classless people with a complete lack of human decency and any kind of trust will sustain itself. hey both lack human decency in this case, Jessica more so for the escalation of words to force.
LOL, that is hilarious, I meant to act with class but you have got me there. What did Jessica do? all she did was take it to the police as she was privileged to do. because of her position as the victim.
|
I hope the guy lives out the rest of his life in jail. Internet trolls are not funny, cool or tough.
|
On March 31 2012 14:26 hypercube wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:18 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:16 Haustka wrote:
Jessica is not handling this well imo, why she has to make this public? this is gonna make Slayers image bad... i agree if this is an every day sorta occurence in korea (well not everyday but you get what i mean) then theres no reason for her to make such a huge fuss over this, she should know that news would spread outside SK and obviously people outside SK would see this as a bid deal Except most people see her action as justified, even outside of Korea.
Did you poll everyone already?
|
On March 31 2012 14:22 FairForever wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:18 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:15 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:13 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:10 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:09 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:07 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:06 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:02 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:00 Wombat_NI wrote:
[quote]
Human decency = being a coward and abusing people via the guise of anonymity the internet gives you. In a country where there is legislation in place that can be used against you in this regard. human decency = destorying anyone who doesnt agree with you? human decency = the ability to interact with other humans with cohesion and with manner and respect. Punishable if otherwise sure? It's not too much to ask for someone to act with some human decency it really isn't. It is too much to lock them up or take a bunch of money over words on a screen. Stop acting like anyone thinks it was good behavior, no one is saying that. what he did was completely classless and unacceptable and need to be made an example of. Making an example of people is a stupid redneck view of things. It explicitly implies the punishment is unfair with the goal of scaring the shit out of everyone else. Ruling by fear is barbaric and not needed for human beings. Any form of punishment or upheld law is barbaric? Hmm explain that one to me! thats nto what he said, making an example of someone is pretty barbaric, basically what making an example of someone is is purposely giving them an extra large sentannce then normal (like lets say speeding normall is a 100$ fine and instead fining 1000$) in order to show everyone else how serious you are Once again, he is being made an example of by being punished by what the law clearly states is wrong. The court will decide the severity of it based on the case not by some vendetta like objective to scare off all trolls. The real "example" of him being made is by making this case public. When the ruling comes then you can scream, "OMG THAT IS TOO EXTREME!?!" But until then, reserve judgement and just be happy that this moron is being punished for committing a crime. Have you ever sped on the road? I guess you've committed a crime too. I'm not sure how laws in SK work (probably more strict than in USA) but I can't imagine such a case being upheld in USA. Irregardless of the guy's act, Jessica needs to grow up. She can't expect everyone to always agree with her and for things to alays go her way - she needs to be able to take some criticism.
I don't think you know what all she puts up with. As a female in a gaming community, I don't think any of us could ever understand what all she probably goes through. Every female can share this sentiment from what I see though.
|
On March 31 2012 14:27 Blasterion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:23 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:22 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:20 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:17 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:16 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:11 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:07 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:06 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:02 Forikorder wrote:
[quote]
human decency = destorying anyone who doesnt agree with you? human decency = the ability to interact with other humans with cohesion and with manner and respect. Punishable if otherwise sure? It's not too much to ask for someone to act with some human decency it really isn't. It is too much to lock them up or take a bunch of money over words on a screen. Stop acting like anyone thinks it was good behavior, no one is saying that. Should one go to jail for stealing a candy bar from a store? That is extreme!!! OMG /sarcasm ^ this is what you are saying. You think the punishment is too severe when it simply isn't. I don't think I should have to go to court and pay a fine for speeding... So what I'm saying is, what legal background do you have to say the punishment doesn't fit the crime? Don't say that is what I'm saying right after bringing up candy theft which I haven't talked about at all. Fair punishment for stealing is a fine because you took some of value so you pay that value back. Yes locking someone up over a candy bar is disgusting, it's a fucking candy bar. You don't need a legal backround for morals, silly. More often than not legal systems are enforcing immoral laws and people are going through law school for $$$ not to make the world a better place. Society form rules so it can sustain itself. Morals fail, that's why there are rules. And at the end of rules there are punishment, it's the fear of punishment that guides the people on to the right paths. Getting insulted online (or anywhere) is completely irrelevant towards wether or not society will be able to sustain itself. Maybe fear guides you lol, I mostly just know nice people. Oh but god, they have slung some insults from time to time! Who the fuck hasn't. Please tell me how a society composed of complete douchebags and classless people with a complete lack of human decency and any kind of trust will sustain itself. hey both lack human decency in this case, Jessica more so for the escalation of words to force. LOL, that is hilarious, I meant to act with class but you have got me there. What did Jessica do? all she did was take it to the police as she was privileged to do. because of her position as the victim.
Calling the police over an insult is pathetic.
|
On March 31 2012 14:27 Zerothegreat wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:22 FairForever wrote:On March 31 2012 14:18 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:15 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:13 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:10 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:09 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:07 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:06 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:02 Forikorder wrote:
[quote]
human decency = destorying anyone who doesnt agree with you? human decency = the ability to interact with other humans with cohesion and with manner and respect. Punishable if otherwise sure? It's not too much to ask for someone to act with some human decency it really isn't. It is too much to lock them up or take a bunch of money over words on a screen. Stop acting like anyone thinks it was good behavior, no one is saying that. what he did was completely classless and unacceptable and need to be made an example of. Making an example of people is a stupid redneck view of things. It explicitly implies the punishment is unfair with the goal of scaring the shit out of everyone else. Ruling by fear is barbaric and not needed for human beings. Any form of punishment or upheld law is barbaric? Hmm explain that one to me! thats nto what he said, making an example of someone is pretty barbaric, basically what making an example of someone is is purposely giving them an extra large sentannce then normal (like lets say speeding normall is a 100$ fine and instead fining 1000$) in order to show everyone else how serious you are Once again, he is being made an example of by being punished by what the law clearly states is wrong. The court will decide the severity of it based on the case not by some vendetta like objective to scare off all trolls. The real "example" of him being made is by making this case public. When the ruling comes then you can scream, "OMG THAT IS TOO EXTREME!?!" But until then, reserve judgement and just be happy that this moron is being punished for committing a crime. Have you ever sped on the road? I guess you've committed a crime too. I'm not sure how laws in SK work (probably more strict than in USA) but I can't imagine such a case being upheld in USA. Irregardless of the guy's act, Jessica needs to grow up. She can't expect everyone to always agree with her and for things to alays go her way - she needs to be able to take some criticism. I don't think you know what all she puts up with. As a female in a gaming community, I don't think any of us could ever understand what all she probably goes through. Every female can share this sentiment from what I see though.
It may be a challenge, but her ridiculously poor attitude complicates matters. Others have dealt with such challenges in a much more professional manner.
|
This is ridiculous, no way this guy is gonna get 7 years of prison for that. The government has others things to handle
|
On March 31 2012 14:27 Zerothegreat wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:22 FairForever wrote:On March 31 2012 14:18 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:15 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:13 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:10 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:09 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:07 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:06 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:02 Forikorder wrote:
[quote]
human decency = destorying anyone who doesnt agree with you? human decency = the ability to interact with other humans with cohesion and with manner and respect. Punishable if otherwise sure? It's not too much to ask for someone to act with some human decency it really isn't. It is too much to lock them up or take a bunch of money over words on a screen. Stop acting like anyone thinks it was good behavior, no one is saying that. what he did was completely classless and unacceptable and need to be made an example of. Making an example of people is a stupid redneck view of things. It explicitly implies the punishment is unfair with the goal of scaring the shit out of everyone else. Ruling by fear is barbaric and not needed for human beings. Any form of punishment or upheld law is barbaric? Hmm explain that one to me! thats nto what he said, making an example of someone is pretty barbaric, basically what making an example of someone is is purposely giving them an extra large sentannce then normal (like lets say speeding normall is a 100$ fine and instead fining 1000$) in order to show everyone else how serious you are Once again, he is being made an example of by being punished by what the law clearly states is wrong. The court will decide the severity of it based on the case not by some vendetta like objective to scare off all trolls. The real "example" of him being made is by making this case public. When the ruling comes then you can scream, "OMG THAT IS TOO EXTREME!?!" But until then, reserve judgement and just be happy that this moron is being punished for committing a crime. Have you ever sped on the road? I guess you've committed a crime too. I'm not sure how laws in SK work (probably more strict than in USA) but I can't imagine such a case being upheld in USA. Irregardless of the guy's act, Jessica needs to grow up. She can't expect everyone to always agree with her and for things to alays go her way - she needs to be able to take some criticism. I don't think you know what all she puts up with. As a female in a gaming community, I don't think any of us could ever understand what all she probably goes through. Every female can share this sentiment from what I see though.
Those poor females need to be saved from those terrible words I guess.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
On March 31 2012 14:18 Forikorder wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:16 Haustka wrote:
Jessica is not handling this well imo, why she has to make this public? this is gonna make Slayers image bad... i agree if this is an every day sorta occurence in korea (well not everyday but you get what i mean) then theres no reason for her to make such a huge fuss over this, she should know that news would spread outside SK and obviously people outside SK would see this as a bid deal
This may seem like a "big deal" to some of the people from nations that favor a more radical freedom from legal restrictions on the internet, but for South Korea and for Jessica this seems FAR from a big deal. She is well within her legal boundaries to sue someone under South Korean law. It is well known that excessive flaming and defamation of character on the internet or any form of media in South Korea is a legally punishable offense. Whether you think the laws of South Korea are moral or not is an irrelevant issue in the matter, she is simply exercising a legal right open to her after someone has quite obviously broken a law on multiple occaisions.
As for what it will do to the image of SlayerS, it may detract from their foreign fan base who tend to favor an internet where people are not held accountable for sexual harassment, racism, and the like; but I highly doubt that it will have any impact on their Korean perception as they have legal precedent for accountability on the internet. This will probably be quite an easy case as there seems to be an abundance of evidence in favor of Jessica.
|
On March 31 2012 14:27 Clefairy wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:23 FairForever wrote:On March 31 2012 14:22 bokchoi wrote:
People don't seem to understand. In Korea this is totally reasonable and happens. Great. We're based in NA/Europe. From our perspectives a lawsuit is frivolous and ridiculous. She doesn't live in NA/Europe so their perspectives probably don't matter when dealing with stuff in Korea.
Uhh yeah they do. Because if Slayers' popularity suffers internationally as a result of her actions it could have a detrimental effect on her team getting invitations to foreign tournaments.
Legally it has little to no relevance, but as a celebrity known across the world it has quite a bit of significance.
|
On March 31 2012 14:28 Treemonkeys wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:27 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:23 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:22 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:20 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:17 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:16 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:11 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:07 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:06 Blasterion wrote:
[quote]
human decency = the ability to interact with other humans with cohesion and with manner and respect.
Punishable if otherwise sure?
It's not too much to ask for someone to act with some human decency it really isn't. It is too much to lock them up or take a bunch of money over words on a screen. Stop acting like anyone thinks it was good behavior, no one is saying that. Should one go to jail for stealing a candy bar from a store? That is extreme!!! OMG /sarcasm ^ this is what you are saying. You think the punishment is too severe when it simply isn't. I don't think I should have to go to court and pay a fine for speeding... So what I'm saying is, what legal background do you have to say the punishment doesn't fit the crime? Don't say that is what I'm saying right after bringing up candy theft which I haven't talked about at all. Fair punishment for stealing is a fine because you took some of value so you pay that value back. Yes locking someone up over a candy bar is disgusting, it's a fucking candy bar. You don't need a legal backround for morals, silly. More often than not legal systems are enforcing immoral laws and people are going through law school for $$$ not to make the world a better place. Society form rules so it can sustain itself. Morals fail, that's why there are rules. And at the end of rules there are punishment, it's the fear of punishment that guides the people on to the right paths. Getting insulted online (or anywhere) is completely irrelevant towards wether or not society will be able to sustain itself. Maybe fear guides you lol, I mostly just know nice people. Oh but god, they have slung some insults from time to time! Who the fuck hasn't. Please tell me how a society composed of complete douchebags and classless people with a complete lack of human decency and any kind of trust will sustain itself. hey both lack human decency in this case, Jessica more so for the escalation of words to force. LOL, that is hilarious, I meant to act with class but you have got me there. What did Jessica do? all she did was take it to the police as she was privileged to do. because of her position as the victim. Calling the police over an insult is pathetic.
No it's smart. Hopefully people will start to actually take responsibility for their actions online.
|
On March 31 2012 14:27 Lysanias wrote:
If this is even true then i'd agree on the fact that she is a drama queen and this will not help her PR.
I can understand that some one calling you names in chat is a annoying thing to read, but ones you start doing this it is not going to have an end. Either keep banning his IP/name or ignore him and at some point the fun is over and he/she will be gone.
There are many many people in chats acting like 8 year olds will you procecute them all Jessica ?
And the confiction 7 years in prison ? Really ? Would you let some one go to jail for such a small thing and suffer for it for 7 years ?
If you do procecute him, can you not just give a ticket and let him pay a 100 euro or something in that order, i don't see why a person in it's most severe case would get 7 years of jail for calling some one a cunt in a chat ...
Keep prosecuting until people start to act like they have class. Because, we should be trying to weed out Cyber Defamation while all of you are not only tolerating it but supporting it. A real good image it give the gaming community keep it up.
Looks like you are not so different from the fighting game community after all. How disappointing, I expected SC2 community to have more class.
|
On March 31 2012 14:27 Treemonkeys wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:26 hypercube wrote:On March 31 2012 14:18 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:16 Haustka wrote:
Jessica is not handling this well imo, why she has to make this public? this is gonna make Slayers image bad... i agree if this is an every day sorta occurence in korea (well not everyday but you get what i mean) then theres no reason for her to make such a huge fuss over this, she should know that news would spread outside SK and obviously people outside SK would see this as a bid deal Except most people see her action as justified, even outside of Korea. Did you poll everyone already?
I don't need to. There was one earlier in the thread and the results were something like 2:1.
|
This is not the first time someone is sued for spewing obscenities over the internet. However, I find it ludicrous the offender could face jail time over stuff like this.
We've had a similar case here in Finland and the offenders didn't even appear in court. They received few dozen / hundred euro fine.
|
On March 31 2012 14:30 Tevinhead wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:28 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:27 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:23 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:22 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:20 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:17 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:16 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:11 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:07 Treemonkeys wrote:
[quote]
It is too much to lock them up or take a bunch of money over words on a screen.
Stop acting like anyone thinks it was good behavior, no one is saying that. Should one go to jail for stealing a candy bar from a store? That is extreme!!! OMG /sarcasm ^ this is what you are saying. You think the punishment is too severe when it simply isn't. I don't think I should have to go to court and pay a fine for speeding... So what I'm saying is, what legal background do you have to say the punishment doesn't fit the crime? Don't say that is what I'm saying right after bringing up candy theft which I haven't talked about at all. Fair punishment for stealing is a fine because you took some of value so you pay that value back. Yes locking someone up over a candy bar is disgusting, it's a fucking candy bar. You don't need a legal backround for morals, silly. More often than not legal systems are enforcing immoral laws and people are going through law school for $$$ not to make the world a better place. Society form rules so it can sustain itself. Morals fail, that's why there are rules. And at the end of rules there are punishment, it's the fear of punishment that guides the people on to the right paths. Getting insulted online (or anywhere) is completely irrelevant towards wether or not society will be able to sustain itself. Maybe fear guides you lol, I mostly just know nice people. Oh but god, they have slung some insults from time to time! Who the fuck hasn't. Please tell me how a society composed of complete douchebags and classless people with a complete lack of human decency and any kind of trust will sustain itself. hey both lack human decency in this case, Jessica more so for the escalation of words to force. LOL, that is hilarious, I meant to act with class but you have got me there. What did Jessica do? all she did was take it to the police as she was privileged to do. because of her position as the victim. Calling the police over an insult is pathetic. No it's smart. Hopefully people will start to actually take responsibility for their actions online.
It's vindictive and a complete waste of time, money, and energy, not smart. Smart would be getting a chat room and moderators that can effectively ban the jackasses.
|
On March 31 2012 14:31 hypercube wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:27 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:26 hypercube wrote:On March 31 2012 14:18 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:16 Haustka wrote:
Jessica is not handling this well imo, why she has to make this public? this is gonna make Slayers image bad... i agree if this is an every day sorta occurence in korea (well not everyday but you get what i mean) then theres no reason for her to make such a huge fuss over this, she should know that news would spread outside SK and obviously people outside SK would see this as a bid deal Except most people see her action as justified, even outside of Korea. Did you poll everyone already? I don't need to. There was one earlier in the thread and the results were something like 2:1.
Poll: Let's just get this out of the wayAgree with Jessica (39) 59% Disagree with Jessica but against Cyber Defamation (21) 32% Cyber Defamation is ok, (Disclaim: these voter's views do not reflect the community) (6) 9% 66 total votes Your vote: Let's just get this out of the way (Vote): Agree with Jessica
(Vote): Disagree with Jessica but against Cyber Defamation
(Vote): Cyber Defamation is ok, (Disclaim: these voter's views do not reflect the community)
|
On March 31 2012 14:26 Forikorder wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:24 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:20 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:18 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:15 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:13 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:10 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:09 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:07 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:06 Blasterion wrote:
[quote]
human decency = the ability to interact with other humans with cohesion and with manner and respect.
Punishable if otherwise sure?
It's not too much to ask for someone to act with some human decency it really isn't. It is too much to lock them up or take a bunch of money over words on a screen. Stop acting like anyone thinks it was good behavior, no one is saying that. what he did was completely classless and unacceptable and need to be made an example of. Making an example of people is a stupid redneck view of things. It explicitly implies the punishment is unfair with the goal of scaring the shit out of everyone else. Ruling by fear is barbaric and not needed for human beings. Any form of punishment or upheld law is barbaric? Hmm explain that one to me! thats nto what he said, making an example of someone is pretty barbaric, basically what making an example of someone is is purposely giving them an extra large sentannce then normal (like lets say speeding normall is a 100$ fine and instead fining 1000$) in order to show everyone else how serious you are Once again, he is being made an example of by being punished by what the law clearly states is wrong. The court will decide the severity of it based on the case not by some vendetta like objective to scare off all trolls. The real "example" of him being made is by making this case public. When the ruling comes then you can scream, "OMG THAT IS TOO EXTREME!?!" But until then, reserve judgement and just be happy that this moron is being punished for committing a crime. human decency = being happy at the suffering of others? No human decency = pursuing justice for crimes commited. The same way your parents should ground you or spank you for doing something bad. I wouldn't see that as "suffering." bad example since spanking im pretty sure if a parent is evert found to have spanked there kid they could have the kid taken away also, grounding someone and fining them 40 thousand dollars, not the same thing
I'm sure his punishment won't be that severe... But spanking shouldn't justify taking a kid away either lol.
|
I honestly don't see why everyone is going absolutely crazy her actions. She has the legal option to sue, so why not? If it's illegal over there in SK then he knew what he was getting himself into and he's fair game.
|
On March 31 2012 14:31 hypercube wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:27 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:26 hypercube wrote:On March 31 2012 14:18 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:16 Haustka wrote:
Jessica is not handling this well imo, why she has to make this public? this is gonna make Slayers image bad... i agree if this is an every day sorta occurence in korea (well not everyday but you get what i mean) then theres no reason for her to make such a huge fuss over this, she should know that news would spread outside SK and obviously people outside SK would see this as a bid deal Except most people see her action as justified, even outside of Korea. Did you poll everyone already? I don't need to. There was one earlier in the thread and the results were something like 2:1.
The results on a starcraft website voting on the wife of starcraft legend couldn't possibly be bias lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
