|
On March 31 2012 14:30 Tevinhead wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:28 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:27 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:23 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:22 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:20 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:17 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:16 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:11 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:07 Treemonkeys wrote:
[quote]
It is too much to lock them up or take a bunch of money over words on a screen.
Stop acting like anyone thinks it was good behavior, no one is saying that. Should one go to jail for stealing a candy bar from a store? That is extreme!!! OMG /sarcasm ^ this is what you are saying. You think the punishment is too severe when it simply isn't. I don't think I should have to go to court and pay a fine for speeding... So what I'm saying is, what legal background do you have to say the punishment doesn't fit the crime? Don't say that is what I'm saying right after bringing up candy theft which I haven't talked about at all. Fair punishment for stealing is a fine because you took some of value so you pay that value back. Yes locking someone up over a candy bar is disgusting, it's a fucking candy bar. You don't need a legal backround for morals, silly. More often than not legal systems are enforcing immoral laws and people are going through law school for $$$ not to make the world a better place. Society form rules so it can sustain itself. Morals fail, that's why there are rules. And at the end of rules there are punishment, it's the fear of punishment that guides the people on to the right paths. Getting insulted online (or anywhere) is completely irrelevant towards wether or not society will be able to sustain itself. Maybe fear guides you lol, I mostly just know nice people. Oh but god, they have slung some insults from time to time! Who the fuck hasn't. Please tell me how a society composed of complete douchebags and classless people with a complete lack of human decency and any kind of trust will sustain itself. hey both lack human decency in this case, Jessica more so for the escalation of words to force. LOL, that is hilarious, I meant to act with class but you have got me there. What did Jessica do? all she did was take it to the police as she was privileged to do. because of her position as the victim. Calling the police over an insult is pathetic. No it's smart. Hopefully people will start to actually take responsibility for their actions online.
It's a waste of time nothing more.
|
Vatican City State582 Posts
I support her, the troll has obviously been banned repeatedly, and each time, he would just come back. and it pissed me off too. i was there the whole time, and i was sick of that kid too.
people think harassing or w/e bs is okay; whereas, taking the appropriate measures to stop this bs is not?
what's up with people these days?
these kids need to learn their lesson the hard way, and grow up.
and I am sure the prison sentence will teach them how to be a normal human being.
|
On March 31 2012 14:33 Zerothegreat wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:26 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:24 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:20 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:18 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:15 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:13 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:10 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:09 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:07 Treemonkeys wrote:
[quote]
It is too much to lock them up or take a bunch of money over words on a screen.
Stop acting like anyone thinks it was good behavior, no one is saying that. what he did was completely classless and unacceptable and need to be made an example of. Making an example of people is a stupid redneck view of things. It explicitly implies the punishment is unfair with the goal of scaring the shit out of everyone else. Ruling by fear is barbaric and not needed for human beings. Any form of punishment or upheld law is barbaric? Hmm explain that one to me! thats nto what he said, making an example of someone is pretty barbaric, basically what making an example of someone is is purposely giving them an extra large sentannce then normal (like lets say speeding normall is a 100$ fine and instead fining 1000$) in order to show everyone else how serious you are Once again, he is being made an example of by being punished by what the law clearly states is wrong. The court will decide the severity of it based on the case not by some vendetta like objective to scare off all trolls. The real "example" of him being made is by making this case public. When the ruling comes then you can scream, "OMG THAT IS TOO EXTREME!?!" But until then, reserve judgement and just be happy that this moron is being punished for committing a crime. human decency = being happy at the suffering of others? No human decency = pursuing justice for crimes commited. The same way your parents should ground you or spank you for doing something bad. I wouldn't see that as "suffering." bad example since spanking im pretty sure if a parent is evert found to have spanked there kid they could have the kid taken away also, grounding someone and fining them 40 thousand dollars, not the same thing I'm sure his punishment won't be that severe... But spanking shouldn't justify taking a kid away either lol.
if the parent is consistantly spanking the kid theyll be seen as an unfit parent and the kid get sent to a home
itd be extremely rare for it to happen cause of jsut spanking though generally the parent would be lacking in other areas but im pretty sure spanking is filed under child abuse now
|
Free speech does have some caveats. In the United States it is illegal to threaten violence or rape against another person. Is there really a difference whether it's on the internet or not?
The thing that gets me is that the sentence for conviction would be seven years in jail. This type of crime seems like it should penalize a person's wallet, not their time. Maybe 6 months would be appropriate? I don't know.
Since the comments are blurred we don't know what was exactly said, but I think if it was simple defamation or insults it really shouldn't be a criminal offence. To the people saying "good, it will teach these trolls a lesson", I think it goes against basic civil rights to put someone in jail because of mere insults, even if it was repetitive over a long period of time.
Harassment is not equivalent to cyber-harassment, but a threat is a threat no matter what. If there was even a hint of a threat of rape or violence then there is a big problem, regardless of medium.
|
On March 31 2012 14:34 nOminal wrote:
I honestly don't see why everyone is going absolutely crazy her actions. She has the legal option to sue, so why not? If it's illegal over there in SK then he knew what he was getting himself into and he's fair game.
In some countries you can legally kill gay people, so why not? You fuck another dude, you know what you're getting into, so it's fair game.
|
Vatican City State582 Posts
On March 31 2012 14:34 Lysanias wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:30 Tevinhead wrote:On March 31 2012 14:28 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:27 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:23 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:22 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:20 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:17 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:16 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:11 Zerothegreat wrote:
[quote]
Should one go to jail for stealing a candy bar from a store? That is extreme!!! OMG /sarcasm
^ this is what you are saying. You think the punishment is too severe when it simply isn't. I don't think I should have to go to court and pay a fine for speeding...
So what I'm saying is, what legal background do you have to say the punishment doesn't fit the crime?
Don't say that is what I'm saying right after bringing up candy theft which I haven't talked about at all. Fair punishment for stealing is a fine because you took some of value so you pay that value back. Yes locking someone up over a candy bar is disgusting, it's a fucking candy bar. You don't need a legal backround for morals, silly. More often than not legal systems are enforcing immoral laws and people are going through law school for $$$ not to make the world a better place. Society form rules so it can sustain itself. Morals fail, that's why there are rules. And at the end of rules there are punishment, it's the fear of punishment that guides the people on to the right paths. Getting insulted online (or anywhere) is completely irrelevant towards wether or not society will be able to sustain itself. Maybe fear guides you lol, I mostly just know nice people. Oh but god, they have slung some insults from time to time! Who the fuck hasn't. Please tell me how a society composed of complete douchebags and classless people with a complete lack of human decency and any kind of trust will sustain itself. hey both lack human decency in this case, Jessica more so for the escalation of words to force. LOL, that is hilarious, I meant to act with class but you have got me there. What did Jessica do? all she did was take it to the police as she was privileged to do. because of her position as the victim. Calling the police over an insult is pathetic. No it's smart. Hopefully people will start to actually take responsibility for their actions online. It's a waste of time nothing more.
Believe it or not, it's actually not a waste of time in asia.
There have already been cases where cyber harassment..etc. are actually taken to court and people getting punished in Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore...etc.
|
On March 31 2012 14:34 Lysanias wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:30 Tevinhead wrote:On March 31 2012 14:28 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:27 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:23 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:22 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:20 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:17 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:16 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:11 Zerothegreat wrote:
[quote]
Should one go to jail for stealing a candy bar from a store? That is extreme!!! OMG /sarcasm
^ this is what you are saying. You think the punishment is too severe when it simply isn't. I don't think I should have to go to court and pay a fine for speeding...
So what I'm saying is, what legal background do you have to say the punishment doesn't fit the crime?
Don't say that is what I'm saying right after bringing up candy theft which I haven't talked about at all. Fair punishment for stealing is a fine because you took some of value so you pay that value back. Yes locking someone up over a candy bar is disgusting, it's a fucking candy bar. You don't need a legal backround for morals, silly. More often than not legal systems are enforcing immoral laws and people are going through law school for $$$ not to make the world a better place. Society form rules so it can sustain itself. Morals fail, that's why there are rules. And at the end of rules there are punishment, it's the fear of punishment that guides the people on to the right paths. Getting insulted online (or anywhere) is completely irrelevant towards wether or not society will be able to sustain itself. Maybe fear guides you lol, I mostly just know nice people. Oh but god, they have slung some insults from time to time! Who the fuck hasn't. Please tell me how a society composed of complete douchebags and classless people with a complete lack of human decency and any kind of trust will sustain itself. hey both lack human decency in this case, Jessica more so for the escalation of words to force. LOL, that is hilarious, I meant to act with class but you have got me there. What did Jessica do? all she did was take it to the police as she was privileged to do. because of her position as the victim. Calling the police over an insult is pathetic. No it's smart. Hopefully people will start to actually take responsibility for their actions online. It's a waste of time nothing more.
Its not your time, why do you care? If the Korean government deems it worth(which they obviously did since... you know they made a law against it) their time then its their problem.
|
On March 31 2012 14:28 FairForever wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:27 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:22 FairForever wrote:On March 31 2012 14:18 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:15 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:13 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:10 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:09 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:07 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:06 Blasterion wrote:
[quote]
human decency = the ability to interact with other humans with cohesion and with manner and respect.
Punishable if otherwise sure?
It's not too much to ask for someone to act with some human decency it really isn't. It is too much to lock them up or take a bunch of money over words on a screen. Stop acting like anyone thinks it was good behavior, no one is saying that. what he did was completely classless and unacceptable and need to be made an example of. Making an example of people is a stupid redneck view of things. It explicitly implies the punishment is unfair with the goal of scaring the shit out of everyone else. Ruling by fear is barbaric and not needed for human beings. Any form of punishment or upheld law is barbaric? Hmm explain that one to me! thats nto what he said, making an example of someone is pretty barbaric, basically what making an example of someone is is purposely giving them an extra large sentannce then normal (like lets say speeding normall is a 100$ fine and instead fining 1000$) in order to show everyone else how serious you are Once again, he is being made an example of by being punished by what the law clearly states is wrong. The court will decide the severity of it based on the case not by some vendetta like objective to scare off all trolls. The real "example" of him being made is by making this case public. When the ruling comes then you can scream, "OMG THAT IS TOO EXTREME!?!" But until then, reserve judgement and just be happy that this moron is being punished for committing a crime. Have you ever sped on the road? I guess you've committed a crime too. I'm not sure how laws in SK work (probably more strict than in USA) but I can't imagine such a case being upheld in USA. Irregardless of the guy's act, Jessica needs to grow up. She can't expect everyone to always agree with her and for things to alays go her way - she needs to be able to take some criticism. I don't think you know what all she puts up with. As a female in a gaming community, I don't think any of us could ever understand what all she probably goes through. Every female can share this sentiment from what I see though. It may be a challenge, but her ridiculously poor attitude complicates matters. Others have dealt with such challenges in a much more professional manner.
Examples? How would you professionally handle it? Females don't think like males do. They run higher on emotion and are more easily hurt. You need to keep that in mind as well. But maybe me being married for so many years, I tend to understand how females think now.
|
On March 31 2012 14:35 dacimvrl wrote:
I support her, the troll has obviously been banned repeatedly, and each time, he would just come back. and it pissed me off too. i was there the whole time, and i was sick of that kid too.
people think harassing or w/e bs is okay; whereas, taking the appropriate measures to stop this bs is not?
what's up with people these days?
these kids need to learn their lesson the hard way, and grow up.
and I am sure the prison sentence will teach them how to be a normal human being.
First off, would someone mind pointing out to me where he has been banned repeatedly? I've had multiple people tell me that, but yet provided no source and refused to. All I see is he has been constantly doing it, but heard the moderators couldn't figure out how to ban him.
Secondly, if you think throwing some one in prison will domesticate a person, you're blatantly wrong. Prison is designed to keep criminals out of the city, not to domesticate them.
|
On March 31 2012 14:34 Treemonkeys wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:31 hypercube wrote:On March 31 2012 14:27 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:26 hypercube wrote:On March 31 2012 14:18 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:16 Haustka wrote:
Jessica is not handling this well imo, why she has to make this public? this is gonna make Slayers image bad... i agree if this is an every day sorta occurence in korea (well not everyday but you get what i mean) then theres no reason for her to make such a huge fuss over this, she should know that news would spread outside SK and obviously people outside SK would see this as a bid deal Except most people see her action as justified, even outside of Korea. Did you poll everyone already? I don't need to. There was one earlier in the thread and the results were something like 2:1. The results on a starcraft website voting on the wife of starcraft legend couldn't possibly be bias lol.
Guess what, no one outside the Starcraft community cares. Anyway, my point is that it's not just some kind of Korea vs the rest of the World cultural debate. Many Starcraft fans outside of Korea are fine with dealing with trolling this way.
|
On March 31 2012 14:35 dacimvrl wrote:
I support her, the troll has obviously been banned repeatedly, and each time, he would just come back. and it pissed me off too. i was there the whole time, and i was sick of that kid too.
people think harassing or w/e bs is okay; whereas, taking the appropriate measures to stop this bs is not?
what's up with people these days?
these kids need to learn their lesson the hard way, and grow up.
and I am sure the prison sentence will teach them how to be a normal human being.
You think so ? Him going to jail having a harder time to ever get a normal job again, meeting great people in jail hang out with the right crowd ye that's going to teach him a lesson. One's you go to jail you will be back.
A fine would be more then just, let him pay some of his cash. More then a good lesson. Instead of ruining his entire life over a small matter.
|
On March 31 2012 14:36 Treemonkeys wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:34 nOminal wrote:
I honestly don't see why everyone is going absolutely crazy her actions. She has the legal option to sue, so why not? If it's illegal over there in SK then he knew what he was getting himself into and he's fair game. In some countries you can legally kill gay people, so why not? You fuck another dude, you know what you're getting into, so it's fair game.
Are you seriously comparing persecuting a minority based on their sexual orientation to prosecuting a troll?
Being Gay= not a choice
Being a Troll= a choice
|
On March 31 2012 14:37 Zerothegreat wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:28 FairForever wrote:On March 31 2012 14:27 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:22 FairForever wrote:On March 31 2012 14:18 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:15 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:13 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:10 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:09 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:07 Treemonkeys wrote:
[quote]
It is too much to lock them up or take a bunch of money over words on a screen.
Stop acting like anyone thinks it was good behavior, no one is saying that. what he did was completely classless and unacceptable and need to be made an example of. Making an example of people is a stupid redneck view of things. It explicitly implies the punishment is unfair with the goal of scaring the shit out of everyone else. Ruling by fear is barbaric and not needed for human beings. Any form of punishment or upheld law is barbaric? Hmm explain that one to me! thats nto what he said, making an example of someone is pretty barbaric, basically what making an example of someone is is purposely giving them an extra large sentannce then normal (like lets say speeding normall is a 100$ fine and instead fining 1000$) in order to show everyone else how serious you are Once again, he is being made an example of by being punished by what the law clearly states is wrong. The court will decide the severity of it based on the case not by some vendetta like objective to scare off all trolls. The real "example" of him being made is by making this case public. When the ruling comes then you can scream, "OMG THAT IS TOO EXTREME!?!" But until then, reserve judgement and just be happy that this moron is being punished for committing a crime. Have you ever sped on the road? I guess you've committed a crime too. I'm not sure how laws in SK work (probably more strict than in USA) but I can't imagine such a case being upheld in USA. Irregardless of the guy's act, Jessica needs to grow up. She can't expect everyone to always agree with her and for things to alays go her way - she needs to be able to take some criticism. I don't think you know what all she puts up with. As a female in a gaming community, I don't think any of us could ever understand what all she probably goes through. Every female can share this sentiment from what I see though. It may be a challenge, but her ridiculously poor attitude complicates matters. Others have dealt with such challenges in a much more professional manner. Examples? How would you professionally handle it? Females don't think like males do. They run higher on emotion and are more easily hurt. You need to keep that in mind as well. But maybe me being married for so many years, I tend to understand how females think now.
Dude get off your chauvnistic high horse and grow up. Females use emotion and act hurt because it gets them what they want. They aren't destined to be more weak and emotional, it just works for them so they go with it. Because guys like to beat their chest, save them, and can't stand to see him cry. A dude crys he just gets laughed at, so he learns not to cry. It's all just evolutionary adaptation.
|
It's funny. Some people think it's wrong that Orb got fired for saying the N-word on his stream infront of sub 1k viewers.
Then when Jessica is attempting to put somebody in jail for 7years for being rude on a fucking chat-channel, people agrere with her?
On March 31 2012 14:34 Treemonkeys wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:31 hypercube wrote:On March 31 2012 14:27 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:26 hypercube wrote:On March 31 2012 14:18 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:16 Haustka wrote:
Jessica is not handling this well imo, why she has to make this public? this is gonna make Slayers image bad... i agree if this is an every day sorta occurence in korea (well not everyday but you get what i mean) then theres no reason for her to make such a huge fuss over this, she should know that news would spread outside SK and obviously people outside SK would see this as a bid deal Except most people see her action as justified, even outside of Korea. Did you poll everyone already? I don't need to. There was one earlier in the thread and the results were something like 2:1. The results on a starcraft website voting on the wife of starcraft legend couldn't possibly be bias lol.
Truer words has never been spoken.
|
On March 31 2012 14:38 Lysanias wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:35 dacimvrl wrote:
I support her, the troll has obviously been banned repeatedly, and each time, he would just come back. and it pissed me off too. i was there the whole time, and i was sick of that kid too.
people think harassing or w/e bs is okay; whereas, taking the appropriate measures to stop this bs is not?
what's up with people these days?
these kids need to learn their lesson the hard way, and grow up.
and I am sure the prison sentence will teach them how to be a normal human being. You think so ? Him going to jail having a harder time to ever get a normal job again, meeting great people in jail hang out with the right crowd ye that's going to teach him a lesson. One's you go to jail you will be back. A fine would be more then just, let him pay some of his cash. More then a good lesson. Instead of ruining his entire life over a small matter.
Well, he should have thought about that before harassing her.
And jail time ruining your life is a complete different issue.
|
On March 31 2012 14:37 Zerothegreat wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:28 FairForever wrote:On March 31 2012 14:27 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:22 FairForever wrote:On March 31 2012 14:18 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:15 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 14:13 Zerothegreat wrote:On March 31 2012 14:10 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:09 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 14:07 Treemonkeys wrote:
[quote]
It is too much to lock them up or take a bunch of money over words on a screen.
Stop acting like anyone thinks it was good behavior, no one is saying that. what he did was completely classless and unacceptable and need to be made an example of. Making an example of people is a stupid redneck view of things. It explicitly implies the punishment is unfair with the goal of scaring the shit out of everyone else. Ruling by fear is barbaric and not needed for human beings. Any form of punishment or upheld law is barbaric? Hmm explain that one to me! thats nto what he said, making an example of someone is pretty barbaric, basically what making an example of someone is is purposely giving them an extra large sentannce then normal (like lets say speeding normall is a 100$ fine and instead fining 1000$) in order to show everyone else how serious you are Once again, he is being made an example of by being punished by what the law clearly states is wrong. The court will decide the severity of it based on the case not by some vendetta like objective to scare off all trolls. The real "example" of him being made is by making this case public. When the ruling comes then you can scream, "OMG THAT IS TOO EXTREME!?!" But until then, reserve judgement and just be happy that this moron is being punished for committing a crime. Have you ever sped on the road? I guess you've committed a crime too. I'm not sure how laws in SK work (probably more strict than in USA) but I can't imagine such a case being upheld in USA. Irregardless of the guy's act, Jessica needs to grow up. She can't expect everyone to always agree with her and for things to alays go her way - she needs to be able to take some criticism. I don't think you know what all she puts up with. As a female in a gaming community, I don't think any of us could ever understand what all she probably goes through. Every female can share this sentiment from what I see though. It may be a challenge, but her ridiculously poor attitude complicates matters. Others have dealt with such challenges in a much more professional manner. Examples? How would you professionally handle it? Females don't think like males do. They run higher on emotion and are more easily hurt. You need to keep that in mind as well. But maybe me being married for so many years, I tend to understand how females think now.
oh yes everyone msut protect the dainty little females -.-
|
Seriously, does anyone have any facts about this yet? 54 pages in (<3 to tl, fwiw), and this thread could either be 100% unnecessary off-base bullshit, or a totally salient discussion depending on what specific facts/allegations/damages are (not to mention huge jurisdictional questions). W/O any more info, this tread is kind of like saying "Boxer played Nada today: Discuss!!" The discussion is kind of meaningless until some actual facts come to light.
Also, arguing about a lawsuit without considering the legal issues is like arguing 2 + 2 = 4 without considering the mathematical issues.
|
On March 31 2012 14:37 Orracle wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:35 dacimvrl wrote:
I support her, the troll has obviously been banned repeatedly, and each time, he would just come back. and it pissed me off too. i was there the whole time, and i was sick of that kid too.
people think harassing or w/e bs is okay; whereas, taking the appropriate measures to stop this bs is not?
what's up with people these days?
these kids need to learn their lesson the hard way, and grow up.
and I am sure the prison sentence will teach them how to be a normal human being. First off, would someone mind pointing out to me where he has been banned repeatedly? I've had multiple people tell me that, but yet provided no source and refused to. All I see is he has been constantly doing it, but heard the moderators couldn't figure out how to ban him. Secondly, if you think throwing some one in prison will domesticate a person, you're blatantly wrong. Prison is designed to keep criminals out of the city, not to domesticate them.
for the last time he's not going to jail, that's max sentence.He's going to be let off with a severe warning and maybe a fine. Relax.
|
On March 31 2012 14:39 windsupernova wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:36 Treemonkeys wrote:On March 31 2012 14:34 nOminal wrote:
I honestly don't see why everyone is going absolutely crazy her actions. She has the legal option to sue, so why not? If it's illegal over there in SK then he knew what he was getting himself into and he's fair game. In some countries you can legally kill gay people, so why not? You fuck another dude, you know what you're getting into, so it's fair game. Are you seriously comparing persecuting a minority based on their sexual orientation to prosecuting a troll? Being Gay= not a choice Being a Troll= a choice
No, you are lacking understanding.
I'm showing the absurdity of using a legal argument against a moral one.
|
Vatican City State582 Posts
On March 31 2012 14:37 Orracle wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 14:35 dacimvrl wrote:
I support her, the troll has obviously been banned repeatedly, and each time, he would just come back. and it pissed me off too. i was there the whole time, and i was sick of that kid too.
people think harassing or w/e bs is okay; whereas, taking the appropriate measures to stop this bs is not?
what's up with people these days?
these kids need to learn their lesson the hard way, and grow up.
and I am sure the prison sentence will teach them how to be a normal human being. First off, would someone mind pointing out to me where he has been banned repeatedly? I've had multiple people tell me that, but yet provided no source and refused to. All I see is he has been constantly doing it, but heard the moderators couldn't figure out how to ban him. Secondly, if you think throwing some one in prison will domesticate a person, you're blatantly wrong. Prison is designed to keep criminals out of the city, not to domesticate them.
err, I was there?
i really don't care if prisons domesticate people or not, these kids won't be harassing other people for a few years, that's good enough for humanity
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
