|
Northern Ireland27471 Posts
On March 31 2012 12:59 Forikorder wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 12:56 mrtomjones wrote:On March 31 2012 12:54 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:52 mrtomjones wrote:On March 31 2012 12:51 Forikorder wrote:Jessica but we should make a stand that sexually harassing a woman is wrong. It seems like a no-brainer for me. we shouldnt say sexual harassing a women is wrong, we should say harassing anyone is wrong nonono... you already said people bothered by it shouldnt be online. Just kick those who get sexually harassed off and your world is perfect. The world isn't as biased as you seem to think. this and that are two completely different things yes, everyone who is so sensitice shouldnt be in a position where they can easily be harassed thats one argument going on women and men shouldnt be considered as seperate is a completely different argument happening You are arguing 10 different things about women and ignoring all the relevant arguments and continuing on. Should I forget that you think sensitive people shouldn't be allowed online? Here's an idea, lets put them all in one country or one walled in area so bad people can't get them. Much easier than simply getting people to act mature. there are at least 2 arguments going on the thread, keep them seperate or dont participate in both i dont think sensitive people shouldnt be allowed online, i do think they need to use there brain and understand the internet isnt made of lollipops and rainbows
You are creating a false dichotomy in options here: between using the internet and being insulted, or staying off it entirely. Alternatively you can have option three which is stop talking puerile spam lying down and do something about it, either individually or as a collective. You can therefore making the internet a BETTER environment to fulfil its initial purpose - the spreading of ideas.
|
It's a case of both cyber bullying and sexual harrassment. I hope the guy does go to prison.
|
On March 31 2012 13:02 Blasterion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 13:00 SnipedSoul wrote:On March 31 2012 12:59 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 12:57 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:55 jinorazi wrote:On March 31 2012 12:52 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:51 jinorazi wrote:On March 31 2012 12:50 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:48 Blasterion wrote:Poll: Let's just get this out of the wayAgree with Jessica (39) 59% Disagree with Jessica but against Cyber Defamation (21) 32% Cyber Defamation is ok, (Disclaim: these voter's views do not reflect the community) (6) 9% 66 total votes Your vote: Let's just get this out of the way (Vote): Agree with Jessica
(Vote): Disagree with Jessica but against Cyber Defamation
(Vote): Cyber Defamation is ok, (Disclaim: these voter's views do not reflect the community)
biased poll much? how about a "this sint a big deal and Jessica is overeacting" option? that would be the 3rd option. no the third option is saying taht it is completely okay what is written, noone in there right mind would click that, that doesnt mean that Jessica isnt completely overeacting and this whole thing was blown out of porportion so you think jessica was wrong but cyberbully is wrong, that would be number 2. no i dont think cyberbullying when done to adults is wrong, adults should be able to either witshstand or ignore it on there own So it's ok to Cyber Bully adults is what you are saying. So cyber bullying anyone over the age of 18 is the right thing to do is what you are saying? It's neither right nor wrong. It just is...the internet. but it is incorrect for us as community to support it right? It's a part of the internet, doesn't mean we should agree with it. We should strive for better class no regress into worse class.
Yeah, that's right. I was just making a joke.
|
On March 31 2012 12:59 Forikorder wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 12:56 mrtomjones wrote:On March 31 2012 12:54 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:52 mrtomjones wrote:On March 31 2012 12:51 Forikorder wrote:Jessica but we should make a stand that sexually harassing a woman is wrong. It seems like a no-brainer for me. we shouldnt say sexual harassing a women is wrong, we should say harassing anyone is wrong nonono... you already said people bothered by it shouldnt be online. Just kick those who get sexually harassed off and your world is perfect. The world isn't as biased as you seem to think. this and that are two completely different things yes, everyone who is so sensitice shouldnt be in a position where they can easily be harassed thats one argument going on women and men shouldnt be considered as seperate is a completely different argument happening You are arguing 10 different things about women and ignoring all the relevant arguments and continuing on. Should I forget that you think sensitive people shouldn't be allowed online? Here's an idea, lets put them all in one country or one walled in area so bad people can't get them. Much easier than simply getting people to act mature. there are at least 2 arguments going on the thread, keep them seperate or dont participate in both i dont think sensitive people shouldnt be allowed online, i do think they need to use there brain and understand the internet isnt made of lollipops and rainbows
why not try to make internet a better environment? instead you're saying it is the way it is and we should leave it at that.
that is what these laws are for, to make the internet a better environment. do you really want to see tl.net turn into b.net like forum? seriously?
|
On March 31 2012 13:01 Forikorder wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 12:59 mrtomjones wrote:On March 31 2012 12:57 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:55 jinorazi wrote:On March 31 2012 12:52 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:51 jinorazi wrote:On March 31 2012 12:50 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:48 Blasterion wrote:Poll: Let's just get this out of the wayAgree with Jessica (39) 59% Disagree with Jessica but against Cyber Defamation (21) 32% Cyber Defamation is ok, (Disclaim: these voter's views do not reflect the community) (6) 9% 66 total votes Your vote: Let's just get this out of the way (Vote): Agree with Jessica
(Vote): Disagree with Jessica but against Cyber Defamation
(Vote): Cyber Defamation is ok, (Disclaim: these voter's views do not reflect the community)
biased poll much? how about a "this sint a big deal and Jessica is overeacting" option? that would be the 3rd option. no the third option is saying taht it is completely okay what is written, noone in there right mind would click that, that doesnt mean that Jessica isnt completely overeacting and this whole thing was blown out of porportion so you think jessica was wrong but cyberbully is wrong, that would be number 2. no i dont think cyberbullying when done to adults is wrong, adults should be able to either witshstand or ignore it on there own lolllllll. Ok so you are prejudiced against people over the age of 18. You realize that makes you no different than a sexist? man you aren't coherent or educated enough to continue this conversation with. GL HF who said anything about 18? unless you go into like a grade 4 class and start spouting obsenities go right ahead id say the cut off point is about 13 before that and its up to the parent what there child should or should not be exposed to
look, it's black or white, right or wrong. How the victim receives it or responds is not of discussion right now. We are questioning you whether you think Cyber Bullying is morally correct and acceptable.
|
On March 31 2012 12:13 Spieltor wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 12:10 mrtomjones wrote:On March 31 2012 12:09 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:07 Wombat_NI wrote:On March 31 2012 11:55 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 11:51 Wombat_NI wrote:
The reason people are invoking the sexism angle is because it's probably a motivating factor in the initial chat. I grow more and more uneasy with the increase in outright, horrendous misogyny. Hey I'm all for a risque sexist joke, if there's some wit involved, but the spewing of such bile makes me worry that societal attitudes towards women will change for the worse. Bear in mind this from personal recollection rather than anything backed empirically
Of course I'm a 'white knight' for believing that somebody having different reproductive organs to me doesn't give me carte blanche to abuse them. the dude who was trolling probably doesnt give 2 cents what gender she is and was just having fun trolling if a male was doing Jessicas job and acted jsut like jessica has the dude would still have been on that chout shouting obsenities, possibly even the same ones insults are pretty universal now the real problem with the world is people like YOU not him, he doesnt care about the gender, you do becuase Jessica is a women you consider it our job to protect her, if it was a dude you probably wouldnt care at all and jsut say he needed thicker skin, but becuase its a women allofasudden this is a big huge deal that everyone should stop and halp console Jessica after her terrible ordeal sexism is pretty much dead, the only people keeping it alive is people who make such a huge deal over stuff like this and keep it at the top of peoples minds Sexism is alive and well and you're deluded if you think otherwise. Legalistic equality has not seen a cultural shift to true gender equality, but it's a complex issue overall. I don't think it's fair to be characterised as some overprotective man defined by some pseudo-scientific idea of man as naturally protective. I tend to stand up against ridiculous behaviour on this forum if I'm in a particularly angry mood. Most of this relates to player/caster bashing and giving the low proportion of woman players I hardly think I'm some white-knight. I criticised the opportunities given to players like QuanticFlo because they are so blatantly non-meritocratic. Anyhow, if people don't call out atrocious behaviour for what it actually is, then attitudes don't change. For a good example of cultural conditioning, look at the societal attitudes towards drink driving and how they have changed. At least in Ireland it used to be de rigieur to drive home while drunk as a skunk. It was 'the done thing' and nobody saw a problem with it, it took real effort for the practice to be as socially frowned upon as it now is, over years and years of government funded campaigns and grass-roots privately-supported initiatives. Granted there is a case to be made about crying wolf racism/sexism or what have you. in this specific instance I was under the impression he was using Korean equivalents of cunt and other such pejoratives which are often applied in a misogynist manner. If wrong I stand corrected sexism is alive becuase people want it to be the white knights want sexism to be alive so they can pretend to defend the dainty females females want it to be alive so they can scream it and get people in trouble if everyone jsut forgot that women and men are different, and i mean everyone not just the people throwing insults, then sexism will disapear Ummm what? How old are you dude? lol... You have to be trolling. No way you believe this crap. People WANT it to exist? The only people who do are those who are sexist... man... you are crazy. he isnt wrong. Holding doors for women, paying for dinner for women, thats sexism because you're treating them differently due to their sex bits. Prove this isnt so.
Dude, that's not sexism, that's you willing to degrade yourself doing shit you don't want to do because you hope you get rewarded with sex/affection. Or do women force you gun-point to hold the door for them and buy them dinner? Call the cops or start seeing other women, the ones you are spending time with right now seem to be of the ... dubious kind ...
|
I've heard that this kind of thing isn't that strange in Korea. I'm not sure. This might be getting a little out of hand, though.
|
There are many many suicides due to cyberbullying and cyber defamation and most of them are adults. So no. Cyberbullying is wrong on every person.
if you cant handle the heat get out of the kitchen, i think adults are long past the stage where everything should be bubble wrapped for them
but it is incorrect for us as community to support it right? It's a part of the internet, doesn't mean we should agree with it. We should strive for better class no regress into worse class.
it is incorrect for us as a community to both support and work against it
what is right is all about the individual, what is better class and what is worse class is all about the individual, is it better for everything someone saids to be censored so noone ever gets offended or is it better for people to be able to way what they will and be who they want to be?
thats up for the indivicual
|
On March 31 2012 13:02 Wombat_NI wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 12:59 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:56 mrtomjones wrote:On March 31 2012 12:54 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:52 mrtomjones wrote:On March 31 2012 12:51 Forikorder wrote:Jessica but we should make a stand that sexually harassing a woman is wrong. It seems like a no-brainer for me. we shouldnt say sexual harassing a women is wrong, we should say harassing anyone is wrong nonono... you already said people bothered by it shouldnt be online. Just kick those who get sexually harassed off and your world is perfect. The world isn't as biased as you seem to think. this and that are two completely different things yes, everyone who is so sensitice shouldnt be in a position where they can easily be harassed thats one argument going on women and men shouldnt be considered as seperate is a completely different argument happening You are arguing 10 different things about women and ignoring all the relevant arguments and continuing on. Should I forget that you think sensitive people shouldn't be allowed online? Here's an idea, lets put them all in one country or one walled in area so bad people can't get them. Much easier than simply getting people to act mature. there are at least 2 arguments going on the thread, keep them seperate or dont participate in both i dont think sensitive people shouldnt be allowed online, i do think they need to use there brain and understand the internet isnt made of lollipops and rainbows You are creating a false dichotomy in options here: between using the internet and being insulted, or staying off it entirely. Alternatively you can have option three which is stop talking puerile spam lying down and do something about it, either individually or as a collective. You can therefore making the internet a BETTER environment to fulfil its initial purpose - the spreading of ideas.
no dude, what do you mean original purpose of internet is spread of ideas? guy just said 3 minutes ago, it's the internet, its for lulz and kicks, herpderp's and bullying people for no apparent reason. i mean, they're adults, they can deal with it, amirite or amirite? besides, its not you when you log on to internet. anonimty and freedom of speech, fuck yeah!
|
On March 31 2012 13:04 Forikorder wrote:Show nested quote +There are many many suicides due to cyberbullying and cyber defamation and most of them are adults. So no. Cyberbullying is wrong on every person. if you cant handle the heat get out of the kitchen, i think adults are long past the stage where everything should be bubble wrapped for them Show nested quote +but it is incorrect for us as community to support it right? It's a part of the internet, doesn't mean we should agree with it. We should strive for better class no regress into worse class. it is incorrect for us as a community to both support and work against it what is right is all about the individual, what is better class and what is worse class is all about the individual, is it better for everything someone saids to be censored so noone ever gets offended or is it better for people to be able to way what they will and be who they want to be? thats up for the indivicual
A lot of people disagree with you. The internet is no longer a playground for nerds to live out their fantasies. It's become an important part of peoples' lives. No one should have to put up with harrassment under any circumstances.
|
On March 31 2012 13:04 Forikorder wrote:Show nested quote +There are many many suicides due to cyberbullying and cyber defamation and most of them are adults. So no. Cyberbullying is wrong on every person. if you cant handle the heat get out of the kitchen, i think adults are long past the stage where everything should be bubble wrapped for them Show nested quote +but it is incorrect for us as community to support it right? It's a part of the internet, doesn't mean we should agree with it. We should strive for better class no regress into worse class. it is incorrect for us as a community to both support and work against it what is right is all about the individual, what is better class and what is worse class is all about the individual, is it better for everything someone saids to be censored so noone ever gets offended or is it better for people to be able to way what they will and be who they want to be? thats up for the indivicual
Everyone has their own moral standards but must live up to the moral standard set and demanded by the society they live in.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37121 Posts
Full ThisisGame article translation:
http://www.thisisgame.com/board/view.php?id=1139599&board=0&category=13438&subcategory=&page=1&best=&searchmode=&search=&orderby=&token=
슬레이어스 김가연 게임단주가 인터넷 게임 중계 도중 채팅으로 욕설을 퍼붓고 희롱한 네티즌을 ‘사이버 명예훼손’ 혐의로 고소했다.
Manager of Team SlayerS, SlayerS_Jessica is suing a netizen for saying vile comments on the SlayerS stream chat.
사건은 지난 28일, 슬레이어스 게임단의 스타2 경기 실황 창에서 발생했다. 슬레이어스는 인터넷 방송을 활용해 스타2 경기를 진행하고 있었고, nolgoituh라는 아이디를 사용하는 네티즌이 입장하면서 시작됐다.
The case happened on the 28th during a live segment on the SlayerS stream. During this live broadcast, a netizen by the name of nolgoituh appeared.
이 네티즌은 채팅 창에서 김가연 게임단주를 상대로 ‘여성 성기’를 직접 언급하며 희롱했고, 수 차례 성행위를 빙자한 폭언과 욕설을 퍼부었다.
This netizen personally attacked SlayerS_Jessica, and made all sorts of sexual harassment comments involving words like "cunt," and comments about having sex with her.
슬레이어스 관계자에 따르면 “인터넷에서 게임 중계를 하면 팬들이 참여할 수 있는 채팅창을 이용할 수 있다. 이날도 한창 경기가 진행중인 도중에 특정 네티즌이 들어와 김가연 게임단주에게 막말을 퍼부었다”고 말한 뒤 “남자인 내가 봐도 수위가 높았고, 심한 표현들이 가득했다”고 전했다.
According to a witness on the SlayerS stream, there was a special SlayerS segment going on that day so a lot of viewers were there. During this segment, nolgoituh appeared and made many inappropriate sexual comments at Jessica. The witness was quoted saying "Even for a man such as myself, I found this to be absolutely revolting."
이에 김가연 게임단주는 한국은 물론 외국의 많은 팬들도 지켜보는 상황에서 상식 밖의 행동으로 물의를 일으켰다고 판단, 해당 화면을 캡처해 사이버수사대에 수사 의뢰를 했다고 밝혔다.
During this segment, SlayerS_Jessica decided that because they had a lot of Korean and international viewers, this kind of behavior was unacceptable, captured a screenshot of the conversation, sent it to the authorities and filed a complaint.
김가연 게임단주는 “인적 상황이나 얼굴을 알 수 없는 인터넷 공간이라고 함부로 욕설을 퍼붓거나 예의에 어긋나는 행동을 하는 일부 네티즌을 볼 때마다 안타깝다”며 “같은 일이 반복돼서는 안되겠다는 생각에 일부 몰지각한 네티즌들에게 경종을 울리는 의미로 형사고소라는 극약 처방을 내리게 됐다”고 말했다.
SlayerS_Jessica was quoted saying "people cannot just say or do whatever they want just because they're on the internet and no one can see their faces. I find this kind of behavior to be absolutely unacceptable and filed this case in hopes that other people will see it and realize they cannot act this way."
슬레이어스는 30일 오전 김포 경찰서에 해당 네티즌을 ‘사이버 명예훼손’ 혐의로 형사고소했고, 혐의가 인정될 경우 피의자는 정보통신망 이용촉진 및 정보보호 등에 관한 법률에 의거해 7년 이하의 징역이나 10년 이하의 자격정지 또는 5,000만 원 이하의 벌금형을 받을 수 있다
The SlayerS team filed this case on the 30th at the police station in Kimpo. If the suspect is found to be guilty of all charges, he can face up to either 7 years in prison, or 10 years on probation with a 50,000won ($5,00) fine. (According to the article, Korea has some sort of law that protects ppl against cyber harassment, and this netizen violated said law/laws)
|
On March 31 2012 13:03 Blasterion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 13:01 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:59 mrtomjones wrote:On March 31 2012 12:57 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:55 jinorazi wrote:On March 31 2012 12:52 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:51 jinorazi wrote:On March 31 2012 12:50 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:48 Blasterion wrote:Poll: Let's just get this out of the wayAgree with Jessica (39) 59% Disagree with Jessica but against Cyber Defamation (21) 32% Cyber Defamation is ok, (Disclaim: these voter's views do not reflect the community) (6) 9% 66 total votes Your vote: Let's just get this out of the way (Vote): Agree with Jessica
(Vote): Disagree with Jessica but against Cyber Defamation
(Vote): Cyber Defamation is ok, (Disclaim: these voter's views do not reflect the community)
biased poll much? how about a "this sint a big deal and Jessica is overeacting" option? that would be the 3rd option. no the third option is saying taht it is completely okay what is written, noone in there right mind would click that, that doesnt mean that Jessica isnt completely overeacting and this whole thing was blown out of porportion so you think jessica was wrong but cyberbully is wrong, that would be number 2. no i dont think cyberbullying when done to adults is wrong, adults should be able to either witshstand or ignore it on there own lolllllll. Ok so you are prejudiced against people over the age of 18. You realize that makes you no different than a sexist? man you aren't coherent or educated enough to continue this conversation with. GL HF who said anything about 18? unless you go into like a grade 4 class and start spouting obsenities go right ahead id say the cut off point is about 13 before that and its up to the parent what there child should or should not be exposed to look, it's black or white, right or wrong. How the victim receives it or responds is not of discussion right now. We are questioning you whether you think Cyber Bullying is morally correct and acceptable.
it is not black or white, nothing is black and white nothing is either okay or not okay for kids they dont know enough to decide on there own opinion so they rely on the opinion of there parent to decide whats right for them and whats wrong for them, if the parent decides its okay then its okay if they decide its not then its not you cant jsut throw a blanket statement over it and go to bed
|
Northern Ireland27471 Posts
On March 31 2012 13:04 snailz wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 13:02 Wombat_NI wrote:On March 31 2012 12:59 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:56 mrtomjones wrote:On March 31 2012 12:54 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:52 mrtomjones wrote:On March 31 2012 12:51 Forikorder wrote:Jessica but we should make a stand that sexually harassing a woman is wrong. It seems like a no-brainer for me. we shouldnt say sexual harassing a women is wrong, we should say harassing anyone is wrong nonono... you already said people bothered by it shouldnt be online. Just kick those who get sexually harassed off and your world is perfect. The world isn't as biased as you seem to think. this and that are two completely different things yes, everyone who is so sensitice shouldnt be in a position where they can easily be harassed thats one argument going on women and men shouldnt be considered as seperate is a completely different argument happening You are arguing 10 different things about women and ignoring all the relevant arguments and continuing on. Should I forget that you think sensitive people shouldn't be allowed online? Here's an idea, lets put them all in one country or one walled in area so bad people can't get them. Much easier than simply getting people to act mature. there are at least 2 arguments going on the thread, keep them seperate or dont participate in both i dont think sensitive people shouldnt be allowed online, i do think they need to use there brain and understand the internet isnt made of lollipops and rainbows You are creating a false dichotomy in options here: between using the internet and being insulted, or staying off it entirely. Alternatively you can have option three which is stop talking puerile spam lying down and do something about it, either individually or as a collective. You can therefore making the internet a BETTER environment to fulfil its initial purpose - the spreading of ideas. no dude, what do you mean original purpose of internet is spread of ideas? guy just said 3 minutes ago, it's the internet, its for lulz and kicks, herpderp's and bullying people for no apparent reason. i mean, they're adults, they can deal with it, amirite or amirite?
I've been banned too many times for posting image macros, but as for my appraisal of your impersonation of the modern troll, I'd say 'Not bad.'
|
Well that explains why Cella and Ryung we frantically trying to figure out how to ban him that night. Kind of interesting to see a law suit come out of this though. I'm curious to see where this goes.
|
A lot of people disagree with you. The internet is no longer a playground for nerds to live out their fantasies. It's become an important part of peoples' lives. No one should have to put up with harrassment under any circumstances.
noone HAS to though, she could have ignored it so easily but she chose not to
|
On March 31 2012 13:07 Forikorder wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2012 13:03 Blasterion wrote:On March 31 2012 13:01 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:59 mrtomjones wrote:On March 31 2012 12:57 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:55 jinorazi wrote:On March 31 2012 12:52 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:51 jinorazi wrote:On March 31 2012 12:50 Forikorder wrote:On March 31 2012 12:48 Blasterion wrote:Poll: Let's just get this out of the wayAgree with Jessica (39) 59% Disagree with Jessica but against Cyber Defamation (21) 32% Cyber Defamation is ok, (Disclaim: these voter's views do not reflect the community) (6) 9% 66 total votes Your vote: Let's just get this out of the way (Vote): Agree with Jessica
(Vote): Disagree with Jessica but against Cyber Defamation
(Vote): Cyber Defamation is ok, (Disclaim: these voter's views do not reflect the community)
biased poll much? how about a "this sint a big deal and Jessica is overeacting" option? that would be the 3rd option. no the third option is saying taht it is completely okay what is written, noone in there right mind would click that, that doesnt mean that Jessica isnt completely overeacting and this whole thing was blown out of porportion so you think jessica was wrong but cyberbully is wrong, that would be number 2. no i dont think cyberbullying when done to adults is wrong, adults should be able to either witshstand or ignore it on there own lolllllll. Ok so you are prejudiced against people over the age of 18. You realize that makes you no different than a sexist? man you aren't coherent or educated enough to continue this conversation with. GL HF who said anything about 18? unless you go into like a grade 4 class and start spouting obsenities go right ahead id say the cut off point is about 13 before that and its up to the parent what there child should or should not be exposed to look, it's black or white, right or wrong. How the victim receives it or responds is not of discussion right now. We are questioning you whether you think Cyber Bullying is morally correct and acceptable. it is not black or white, nothing is black and white nothing is either okay or not okay for kids they dont know enough to decide on there own opinion so they rely on the opinion of there parent to decide whats right for them and whats wrong for them, if the parent decides its okay then its okay if they decide its not then its not you cant jsut throw a blanket statement over it and go to bed
It's either right to do it or it's wrong to do it. Make up your mind. Ignorance doesn't excuse doing wrong.
|
On March 31 2012 13:09 Forikorder wrote:Show nested quote +A lot of people disagree with you. The internet is no longer a playground for nerds to live out their fantasies. It's become an important part of peoples' lives. No one should have to put up with harrassment under any circumstances. noone HAS to though, she could have ignored it so easily but she chose not to
Poor wording on my part.
No one should be expected to put up with harrassment under any circumstances.
|
The SlayerS team filed this case on the 30th at the police station in Kimpo. If the suspect is found to be guilty of all charges, he can face up to either 7 years in prison, or 10 years on probation with a 50,000won ($5,00) fine.
Can you get prison if you call someone the c word in real life? This is ridicilous 
|
If that's the law, don't effing do it...
If the law says Jessica can get some A-hole off her stream why shouldn't she?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
