• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:22
CEST 00:22
KST 07:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation11$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps [G] Progamer Settings [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 618 users

Breadth of Gameplay in SC2 - Page 93

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 91 92 93 94 95 113 Next
NEW IN-GAME CHANNEL: FRB
Space Invader
Profile Joined September 2010
Australia291 Posts
April 02 2012 08:19 GMT
#1841
Seems like this entire post is based on one unfortunate misconception: that 3 bases is all you need for a fully-functional economy. That simply isn't true... Look for example at someone like Stephano, who is a dominating Sauron zerg, and who also frequently plays off a fast 4 or 5 bases and uses every bit of them.

The problem isn't the game mechanics, it's the players, and when people start getting 4 bases instead of 3, it's the players with 4 bases that are going to start crushing the players with 3 bases. People just don't know how to turtle and expand properly yet.
I may be of thome athithtanthe if there ith a thudden crithith!
TyrantPotato
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Australia1541 Posts
April 02 2012 08:31 GMT
#1842
On April 02 2012 17:19 Space Invader wrote:
Seems like this entire post is based on one unfortunate misconception: that 3 bases is all you need for a fully-functional economy. That simply isn't true... Look for example at someone like Stephano, who is a dominating Sauron zerg, and who also frequently plays off a fast 4 or 5 bases and uses every bit of them.

The problem isn't the game mechanics, it's the players, and when people start getting 4 bases instead of 3, it's the players with 4 bases that are going to start crushing the players with 3 bases. People just don't know how to turtle and expand properly yet.


first, where are you getting this so called misconception that 3 bases is needed for a fully functional economy? i cant see it in the post so please quote the parts that reference this.

second, your counter argument is that players need to turtle and expand more?

i think the entire concept of this thread has gone over your head. i vigorously recommend you re-read the entire post again carefully.
Forever ZeNEX.
IronManSC
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States2119 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-02 08:37:29
April 02 2012 08:34 GMT
#1843
On April 02 2012 17:19 Space Invader wrote:
Seems like this entire post is based on one unfortunate misconception: that 3 bases is all you need for a fully-functional economy. That simply isn't true... Look for example at someone like Stephano, who is a dominating Sauron zerg, and who also frequently plays off a fast 4 or 5 bases and uses every bit of them.

The problem isn't the game mechanics, it's the players, and when people start getting 4 bases instead of 3, it's the players with 4 bases that are going to start crushing the players with 3 bases. People just don't know how to turtle and expand properly yet.



Everything that stephano does could be done off three bases, mabye even two if given the time. He takes more bases (as any zerg player should actually) to not only stay ahead of their opponent but to keep a steady or high income. In the late game, a zerg who forgets to expand constantly is going to run very low on larva and resources which is the death sentence. It's very easy for zerg to lose a base due to a drop or initial ground push, so having extra bases is another reason for that. Zerg is also known to re-max very quickly, so having more bases is known for that as well. It's not that him, or zerg players in general, expand because they want to... they HAVE to. The higher league you go, the better players you will face who will pull off multi-prong attacks against a zerg player, so having a bunch of bases is almost necessary in that regards.

A protoss player can create a maxed out deathball on 2-3 bases because he knows that's all he'll need, so why should he expand? In FRB you need at least 1-3 MORE bases to create a maxed out deathball. The protoss player has to work up to it, and this applies to terran and zerg as well.

Yes, it depends on the player of course. There are very aggressive players (whether attacking or expanding) as well as passive players. The idea behind barrin's theory is to not necessarily force players to expand, but alert them that they simply need an additional 1-3 bases to reach critical mass, which means games will last longer and there is more build up in between. The average game in SC2 is around 12-15 minutes. So far in FRB, the average game is 23ish minutes.

And I won't lie, it's quite nice seeing protoss players grab 4-6 bases in FRB instead of 2 or 3 in the current SC2.

watch this video as mappers and barrin himself talk about FRB:

SC2 Mapmaker || twitter: @ironmansc || Ohana & Mech Depot || 3x TLMC finalist || www.twitch.tv/sc2mapstream
VictorJones
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States235 Posts
April 03 2012 00:15 GMT
#1844
I got to do storm drops in PvZ and it felt gooood. Boy oh boy do I hope less income per base becomes standard
Sketchius
Profile Joined March 2012
United States8 Posts
April 03 2012 01:58 GMT
#1845
I put together a custom map in order to test how changes to worker mining stats affects income.+ Show Spoiler +
I'll try to post more about this later.
I've heard some people talking about 6m vs 4 minerals per trip (with 8m), so I went ahead and tested this too. Here's how it looks according to my tests:

[image loading]

I think the curve for 4mpt looks better than the curve for 6m, where it takes more workers to saturate and seems to have a softer cap. However, 4mpt also provides much less mineral income early game, and creates more problems with the mineral:gas ratio.+ Show Spoiler +
8m 5mpt -> 8m 4mpt is more or less a 20% reduction in mineral income. The two gas geysers that come with the normal 8m 5mpt setup provides 6 workers each getting 4 gas per trip, or 24 gas per "round" when saturated. If we reduce the gas per trip to 3, we would end up with 18 gas per round, which is a 25% reduction in gas income. But maybe that missing 5% wouldn't be too big of a deal.
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
April 03 2012 02:10 GMT
#1846
Well, I think increasing the time it takes to mine a load from a mineral patch is a better option than decreasing the amount per trip. For one, it allows you to have more control over the min/gas ratio (and increasing gas harvest time %15 does a great job at allowing 3 workers to saturate far away geysers while close ones are still fine.) In addition, it allows 2 workers to fully saturate a close patch, like in BW, meaning the worker curve will begin much earlier, in the 8-16 range instead of the 16-24. This is the biggest difference between BW and SC2 mining (not the maximum income per base actually, since they are actually close to the same.)

However, due to the extra gas geyser per base, I feel that 8m2g requires too many workers per base in total. 6m2g with mining time/amount adjusted for scale, or maybe 7m2g, would be better, imo.
all's fair in love and melodies
Polygamy
Profile Joined January 2010
Austria1114 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-03 02:47:34
April 03 2012 02:44 GMT
#1847
I really like the mappers show, I think its great they are discussing FRB.
I think people are focusing on small details a little to much right now though, in my opinion it would be better to get the concept widely approved then work on the smaller details like number of leftover zerg larva.
Sketchius
Profile Joined March 2012
United States8 Posts
April 03 2012 04:01 GMT
#1848
On April 03 2012 11:10 Gfire wrote:
Well, I think increasing the time it takes to mine a load from a mineral patch is a better option than decreasing the amount per trip. For one, it allows you to have more control over the min/gas ratio (and increasing gas harvest time %15 does a great job at allowing 3 workers to saturate far away geysers while close ones are still fine.) In addition, it allows 2 workers to fully saturate a close patch, like in BW, meaning the worker curve will begin much earlier, in the 8-16 range instead of the 16-24. This is the biggest difference between BW and SC2 mining (not the maximum income per base actually, since they are actually close to the same.)

However, due to the extra gas geyser per base, I feel that 8m2g requires too many workers per base in total. 6m2g with mining time/amount adjusted for scale, or maybe 7m2g, would be better, imo.


I have been messing around with time spent mining. It seems like it can cause some weird effects. For instance, when I added +15% to the mining time, the income pretty much matched my control group from 1-16, and then CLUNK, it plateaued sharply. When I doubled the mining time, I got the effect you were talking about, where you could see a curve starting at 8 workers. However, full saturation occurred at about 18 workers (about the same as with 6m).

This brings up an issue I've been worrying about. Looking at the brood war graphs, it seems that the income never really plateaus. You can always gain a little more from adding another worker. The minerals / worker / mineral graphs for brood war show that each added worker decreases the efficiency of each worker slightly. I think the problem with 6m and increasing mining time is that you reach the point of diminishing returns very quickly.

Instead of encouraging the player to think, "I can keep pumping my economy into this base if I want, but expanding will put my workers to more efficient use.", it makes him think, "More workers will add nothing. I should expand."

So far I haven't been able to find any changes to worker stats that create an income curve like in brood war. Details:+ Show Spoiler +
Increasing mining time had some decent results, as I talked about above.

Decreasing mining time just made the income curve go straight up, meaning it would take a ton of workers to saturate.

Taking away the delay after mining seemed to screw up the AI: after 16 workers efficiency took a big hit. I think it's because the mining AI uses after mining delay workers as a priority flag for mining, like "hey this patch just got free!"

Decreasing worker was impractical, it made a slighty unique curve, but I had to cut worker speed in half to get this.

I tried decreasing the range at which workers find a new patch if the current one is already in use, but this had no effect.

I tried pushing a few mineral patches further away, but this had very little effect at all.

I tried 10m with lower minerals per trip. The curve went off my chart, which only goes up to 28 workers. I'm assuming it's just a more drawn out version of 8m.
It's seeming like the only way to do it would be to mess with the worker AI. As far as I can tell, this isn't possible anywhere in the editor. It seems to be hard-coded in. A simple change that might work, without "dumbing down" the AI too much could be this: When a worker comes to a patch that is occupied, he redirects to a different patch at random, whether or not that patch is occupied. Currently when a worker redirects, it will scan for patches that are not occupied as targets. I think that this change could create the kind of curve we're looking for, by adding a random element that can be overcome by adding more and more workers. But again, this seems to be something that only blizzard could change.
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
April 03 2012 04:08 GMT
#1849
You have to remove the 0.5 second return delay to allow more growth in the 16-24 range. Set it to 0, add 0.5 to the harvest time and then adjust it by some amount.

You're random idea, though, is completely "dumbing down" the AI, and I don't like it.
all's fair in love and melodies
WniO
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2706 Posts
April 03 2012 04:22 GMT
#1850
ok this shit seriously better stop soon... mappers should stop wasting time making these types of maps.
why dont you just go full out and have 3 m 1 g per base with like 6 X the number of bases if you want people to "really show their skill!" this doesnt make sc2 better in any sense. just makes the games start slow as hell.
Sketchius
Profile Joined March 2012
United States8 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-03 04:24:49
April 03 2012 04:23 GMT
#1851
On April 03 2012 13:08 Gfire wrote:
You have to remove the 0.5 second return delay to allow more growth in the 16-24 range. Set it to 0, add 0.5 to the harvest time and then adjust it by some amount.


Ahh, nice. I'll give that a shot.

On April 03 2012 13:08 Gfire wrote:You're random idea, though, is completely "dumbing down" the AI, and I don't like it.


Fair enough, a matter of opinion, I suppose! I feel like the biggest difference between SC1 and SC2 worker AI from the average gamer's standpoint is that you don't have to split your workers at the very beginning of the game. I see the "random idea" as a small change that would have a big impact on what the income curve looks like, while at the same time being hardly noticeable to the average gamer.

Btw, I've enjoyed reading what you've posted so far on these topics. I don't mean to butt in or anything. I've just been excited with making test maps and spreadsheets and graphs!
dUTtrOACh
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada2339 Posts
April 03 2012 04:56 GMT
#1852
This thread's OP is awesome. Such a good read, and spot on descriptions of the types of scenarios that could arise from such changes. I like the look of the 6m+1hyg income charts. Seems perfect. This change would revolutionize PvP.
twitch.tv/duttroach
TheFish7
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States2824 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-03 05:19:34
April 03 2012 05:15 GMT
#1853
On April 02 2012 17:34 IronManSC wrote:

A protoss player can create a maxed out deathball on 2-3 bases because he knows that's all he'll need, so why should he expand? In FRB you need at least 1-3 MORE bases to create a maxed out deathball. The protoss player has to work up to it, and this applies to terran and zerg as well.

Yes, it depends on the player of course. There are very aggressive players (whether attacking or expanding) as well as passive players. The idea behind barrin's theory is to not necessarily force players to expand, but alert them that they simply need an additional 1-3 bases to reach critical mass, which means games will last longer and there is more build up in between. The average game in SC2 is around 12-15 minutes. So far in FRB, the average game is 23ish minutes.

And I won't lie, it's quite nice seeing protoss players grab 4-6 bases in FRB instead of 2 or 3 in the current SC2.


Totally agree, IronManSC. This reminds me of the time I tried to explain SC2 to a friend of mine who quit RTS gaming when warcraft 3 came out. (We had played Warcraft 2 together on 56k modems for a long time, and later starcraft 1)

He asked about SC2, and having not played any RTS games since brood war, the way I described the games confused him.
He said stuff like

"So the games only usually last like 15 minutes? that is so short."
"What do you mean by "all-in"?"
"You can win using one base? so its like every map is BGH?"

He then decided that blizzard had "sold out" to sell more copies, and his RTS days were over, since it seemed to him that no gave would ever be as good as the original considering the trend.

He saw in less detail what Barrin is able to quantify.

Also the unrelated but still funny-
"Overlords aren't detectors? creep colonies don't create creep? No lurkers? How the heck does zerg defend?"
"there aren't any hero units in multiplayer, are there? that **** was stupid."
~ ~ <°)))><~ ~ ~
HypertonicHydroponic
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
437 Posts
April 03 2012 06:19 GMT
#1854
On April 03 2012 13:22 WniO wrote:
ok this shit seriously better stop soon... mappers should stop wasting time making these types of maps.
why dont you just go full out and have 3 m 1 g per base with like 6 X the number of bases if you want people to "really show their skill!" this doesnt make sc2 better in any sense. just makes the games start slow as hell.

Agria Sky -- 'nuff said?
[P] The Watery Archives -- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=279070
DoDonPachi
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada69 Posts
April 03 2012 12:53 GMT
#1855
On April 03 2012 15:19 HypertonicHydroponic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 03 2012 13:22 WniO wrote:
ok this shit seriously better stop soon... mappers should stop wasting time making these types of maps.
why dont you just go full out and have 3 m 1 g per base with like 6 X the number of bases if you want people to "really show their skill!" this doesnt make sc2 better in any sense. just makes the games start slow as hell.

Agria Sky -- 'nuff said?


I was about to write that what Wnio has said is just unnecessary, that if he think it's a waste of time (which he has the right to think so), then he should just ignore this thread, instead of calling this a "shit". For Hypertonic, searching in his history to find a counter-argument is certainly the best way to provoke him.

But i don't want this thread to become a fight between people. This idea is extremely difficult to make it standart, and we, as people who care about making SC2 better by encouraging expanding with FRB, should just ignore when someone post this kind of publication. I want to this thread to promote FRB, not go into a fight like all opinion based thread have just fall because people have finish to insult each other.

So i'll just said what i love about FRB:
OMG it's entertaining, i have seen better game on FRB map then what Pro have done in the last year.
i haven't play in the ladder for a week, no joke. Not only can i play better game, but also i can finally interract with people in the 7m channel ( soon to be FRB channel) instead of just saying glhf and gg to someone i play randomly, i actually feel encourage to play, to find a mysterious build that will be the next standart build in FRB map.
Also, i now care about the map. it's not like in ladder where i veto a map because the gimmicky thing on it is annoying. I look at expansion layout, angle from which to attack, etc, etc.

Barrin, Bravo again, i strongly support this idea. I want more map !
i'll schroumpfs you until you GG
ntssauce
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany750 Posts
April 03 2012 13:04 GMT
#1856
i have a bad feeling about 1hyg on these maps.. did anyone consider gas stealing? you would denie almost all tech and it would be very hard to keep up with tech. the onli option would be some cheese or some fast expand build. i guess we need 2 gas O.o!
MMA and Alive you are the best! | Goodbye ST_Sound ~
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
April 03 2012 13:30 GMT
#1857
On April 03 2012 22:04 ntssauce wrote:
i have a bad feeling about 1hyg on these maps.. did anyone consider gas stealing? you would denie almost all tech and it would be very hard to keep up with tech. the onli option would be some cheese or some fast expand build. i guess we need 2 gas O.o!

1 gas existed in brood war too, it worked out fine - this question has been brought up 10 times before, you could also just read the thread instead of repeating silly arguments.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
ntssauce
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany750 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-03 13:36:50
April 03 2012 13:35 GMT
#1858
On April 03 2012 22:30 Grumbels wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 03 2012 22:04 ntssauce wrote:
i have a bad feeling about 1hyg on these maps.. did anyone consider gas stealing? you would denie almost all tech and it would be very hard to keep up with tech. the onli option would be some cheese or some fast expand build. i guess we need 2 gas O.o!

1 gas existed in brood war too, it worked out fine - this question has been brought up 10 times before, you could also just read the thread instead of repeating silly arguments.


excuse me for not readin 93 pages.did it cost you that much to answear?

/e btw. just so you don't think i didn't read any of the 93 pages.. i did, just never saw this question/ forgott it
MMA and Alive you are the best! | Goodbye ST_Sound ~
TheFish7
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States2824 Posts
April 03 2012 15:16 GMT
#1859
I just casted a few 6m games on my youtube channel.

Here is one with a GM and Masters player


And there are a few others on my channel of myself and some diamond players.
~ ~ <°)))><~ ~ ~
Sketchius
Profile Joined March 2012
United States8 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-03 15:58:39
April 03 2012 15:57 GMT
#1860
On April 03 2012 13:08 Gfire wrote:
You have to remove the 0.5 second return delay to allow more growth in the 16-24 range. Set it to 0, add 0.5 to the harvest time and then adjust it by some amount.


Alright, I tried your idea. I keep getting the same problem when I take away the delay after mining--it creates a sharp dropoff in efficiency right at the 16 worker mark, which creates a horrible curve. I also tried the same thing with +1.0 harvest time and got the same curve, shifted down a little. Maybe there is a magic number to the mining time, but so far it doesn't look very promising.

Graph: + Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
Prev 1 91 92 93 94 95 113 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 38m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ZombieGrub175
JuggernautJason114
ProTech79
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 432
NaDa 48
LuMiX 1
League of Legends
Grubby4145
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1501
fl0m1284
Stewie2K748
sgares105
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken35
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor145
Other Games
summit1g9230
C9.Mang0275
Maynarde71
Sick61
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick48983
BasetradeTV90
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 38
• davetesta30
• RyuSc2 18
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Eskiya23 24
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22409
League of Legends
• Jankos2248
• TFBlade949
Other Games
• imaqtpie1726
• Shiphtur494
• Scarra82
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
1h 38m
RSL Revival
11h 38m
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
14h 38m
Replay Cast
1d 1h
RSL Revival
1d 11h
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 17h
OSC
1d 21h
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
2 days
FEL
2 days
[ Show More ]
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.