|
On February 28 2012 12:26 Kharnage wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:44 ninjamyst wrote: IPL just announced its pricing plan for IPL4. FREEEE stream up to 480p. $5.00 for 720p and 1080p. That's the right way to do tournaments. Their production value is way way better than MLG. MLG is free. MLG Arena isn't. You are comparing apples to oranges.
why cant you compare one fruit with another? ipl and mlg are both "fruits" they both run sc2 tournaments. why cant you compare them?
|
On February 28 2012 12:26 Kharnage wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:44 ninjamyst wrote: IPL just announced its pricing plan for IPL4. FREEEE stream up to 480p. $5.00 for 720p and 1080p. That's the right way to do tournaments. Their production value is way way better than MLG. MLG is free. MLG Arena isn't. You are comparing apples to oranges.
Oh really? And how is MLG different than MLG Arena? Both are tournaments with some of the best players and casters. Only difference is that Sundance decided to foot the bill to fly everyone to the most expensive city in the country and then guilt the community to pay for it. What exactly did Arena add except taking away the live audience? You may argue that without paying for the player's flight and accomodation, they won't come and there will be no tournament. My counter argument is that those same players flew here on their own dime before for a measly $5k first prize for regular MLG. While the community complained about lag and other technical difficulties with streams with previous MLGs, they decided to blow all their money on invites and still managed to give us shitty streaming over the weekend.
|
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On February 28 2012 13:44 Longshank wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 13:30 lichter wrote:On February 28 2012 13:01 FlyingToilet wrote:On February 28 2012 11:46 FabledIntegral wrote:On February 28 2012 11:26 FlyingToilet wrote: damnit i came here to make a post about how watching mlg for free is hurting the sc2 community regardless and all i see is people talking about who has more morals and what not, don't watch it if you don' wanna pay, simple as that or else you are hurting someone somewhere regardless. And who cares if someone is posting about o00OO00oo look at me i have higher morals and paid, at least their setting the right example for the rest of the raging flamers in here... I know I probably shouldn't take this route, but how exactly are you hurting someone somewhere regardless? That doesn't make sense. If you weren't going to pay regardless, how does watching hurt anyone? MLG would have never gotten that income, they didn't lose anything by you (or me) watching. That said, even though I acquired a restream, I simply didn't watch... well I did, like half of 2 games total. its lost revenue, giving the opportunity to not pay for it in the first place is what i hurting the people, not just the ceo but everyone who works for that company is getting cuts. and the people who fund mlg is not like a big bank, gamble a way to plan out the event this year that doesn't pay off means they are fucked, they don't get buy outs and get saved. honestly voicing the wrong idea is not helping im not riding the high society yacht but at least not watching mlg at all instead of some stream leak is obviously showing some appreciation to the people putting out that content for you! The only lost revenue in this case are those that decided not to buy the ticket because they were counting on finding a restream. Those who just stumbled upon a restream (because of other posts in the LR thread or some other means) or got around the paywall somehow do not count as lost revenue because they had no intention of paying for the product regardless of the availability of a free method. If restreams and work-arounds were not possible, they still would not have paid for the Arena. I am not arguing that what they did is right, or that they don't indirectly harm the holy shrine that is esports. It is incorrect, however, to claim that MLG lost (much) revenue from restreams/crappy paywall. EDIT: It is possible though that MLG will lose future revenue in future Arenas because people now know that restreams/paywall work-arounds might be available. Former subscribers and potential subscribers that opt for restreams (since it has been proven to be possible, more people might take that chance) instead of purchasing a ticket will count as lost revenue. They didn't lose revenue for this event, true, but they might for the next one. Seeing how the workarounds and restreams came aplenty and with no effort, I bet there's quite a few people who will try to catch one of those for the next arena. Not that I feel bad about it, watched it for free, will do again.
Yeah, I edited that in when I realized it would affect future events. I wouldn't understand MLG if they don't rectify this issue though. Allowing people to get restreams or get an easy work-around is just a giant "fuck you" to their paying customers. They alienate not only those who don't want to pay, but those who pay as well. Not a good idea.
|
Based on the poll, the price wasn't right. Basic economics in a competitive market, is to lower the price until there is a optimal supply vs. demand. If only 5000 people out of 10000 paid 20 dollars this translates to $100,000, but if you lowered it to 5 dollars but got 8000 people to buy, this would be $16,000.
edit: lols bad math, either way bad example I'll leave it up I don't mind being wrong. Well more representative to the poll ~25% paid 20 dollars and ~20% were too cheap to pay at all and watched a restream. Normally you can find 10k viewers in a free tournament. So:
2,500 paying viewers * $20 vs 8,000 paying viewers * $10
|
On February 28 2012 12:14 gumshoe wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 12:05 Ice Climber wrote:On February 28 2012 12:00 gumshoe wrote:On February 28 2012 11:49 Alderan wrote:On February 28 2012 09:44 ninjamyst wrote: IPL just announced its pricing plan for IPL4. FREEEE stream up to 480p. $5.00 for 720p and 1080p. That's the right way to do tournaments. Their production value is way way better than MLG. They AREN'T MAKING MONEY. They are NOT PROFITABLE. Sure you like it, but it doesn't matter if it's just a huge unsustainable money pit. Alderaan funny running into you hear  I dont mind that they asked us to pay, I just didn't watch, my issue is that they've alienated a large portion of the audience of a very young sport, see I appreciate that gomtv lets us watch all the games live albeit in piss poor quality, I still get up every now and then in the morning to be reminded why this game is great. If mlg did a similar thing I would have no gripes, but they are literally just saying no to those who don't have access to credit . http://lmgtfy.com/?q=prepaid credit card canada I speak of children sir children, we mustn't alienate the toddlers 
If you can buy a gift card you can buy a prepaid visa card, unless there's an age restrication in Canada that I don't know about, but I doubt it.
|
On February 28 2012 13:59 lithium3n wrote: Based on the poll, the price wasn't right. Basic economics in a competitive market, is to lower the price until there is a optimal supply vs. demand. If only 5000 people out of 10000 paid 20 dollars this translates to $10,000, but if you lowered it to 5 dollars but got 8000 people to buy, this would be $16,000.
You are assuming that poll is representative of reality, that is a pretty big assumption.
|
On February 28 2012 14:14 Duravi wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 13:59 lithium3n wrote: Based on the poll, the price wasn't right. Basic economics in a competitive market, is to lower the price until there is a optimal supply vs. demand. If only 5000 people out of 10000 paid 20 dollars this translates to $10,000, but if you lowered it to 5 dollars but got 8000 people to buy, this would be $16,000. You are assuming that poll is representative of reality, that is a pretty big assumption.
people with minimal econ knowledge making big assumptions? inconceivable
|
On February 28 2012 13:59 lithium3n wrote: Based on the poll, the price wasn't right. Basic economics in a competitive market, is to lower the price until there is a optimal supply vs. demand. If only 5000 people out of 10000 paid 20 dollars this translates to $10,000, but if you lowered it to 5 dollars but got 8000 people to buy, this would be $16,000.
Wait, where did you get those numbers?
5,000x20 = 100,000 and 8,000x5 = 40,000
Something I'm missing? XD
|
Whether you watch MLG arena or not (paid or not), I think it's safe to say that MLG has somehow manage to screw their paying customers AGAIN, or at least make them feel cheated. I know I would feel that way if I paid the controversial 20 bucks and found out that there are ways to watch the streams for free.
MLG cannot afford to make mistakes like these if they were to be successful.
|
On February 28 2012 13:59 lithium3n wrote: Based on the poll, the price wasn't right. Basic economics in a competitive market, is to lower the price until there is a optimal supply vs. demand. If only 5000 people out of 10000 paid 20 dollars this translates to $10,000, but if you lowered it to 5 dollars but got 8000 people to buy, this would be $16,000.
Wow what is this maths?
|
On February 28 2012 14:29 ilikeredheads wrote: Whether you watch MLG arena or not (paid or not), I think it's safe to say that MLG has somehow manage to screw their paying customers AGAIN, or at least make them feel cheated. I know I would feel that way if I paid the controversial 20 bucks and found out that there are ways to watch the streams for free.
MLG cannot afford to make mistakes like these if they were to be successful.
Why would I, as someone who paid for the stream, feel cheated? I paid and got what I paid for. Just like when I go to a store I don't feel cheated because some kid shoplifted that candybar he wanted while I paid full price for it, or when I go to the movies and some people manage to sneak in.
I don't resent them for getting a better deal (even though I question their ethics, but hey), and in no way do I feel cheated, I paid for something and got it. There are always going to be restreams, or some circumvention of a paywall system, or some other way to sneak into the theater, not pay but enjoy the show, etc. MLG could have taken better steps to mitigate the amount of people watching for free, and I hope they do take a lesson from this, but at the end of the day it just strikes an odd chord with me to feel cheated when getting what you paid for. *shrug*
|
On February 28 2012 13:01 FlyingToilet wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 11:46 FabledIntegral wrote:On February 28 2012 11:26 FlyingToilet wrote: damnit i came here to make a post about how watching mlg for free is hurting the sc2 community regardless and all i see is people talking about who has more morals and what not, don't watch it if you don' wanna pay, simple as that or else you are hurting someone somewhere regardless. And who cares if someone is posting about o00OO00oo look at me i have higher morals and paid, at least their setting the right example for the rest of the raging flamers in here... I know I probably shouldn't take this route, but how exactly are you hurting someone somewhere regardless? That doesn't make sense. If you weren't going to pay regardless, how does watching hurt anyone? MLG would have never gotten that income, they didn't lose anything by you (or me) watching. That said, even though I acquired a restream, I simply didn't watch... well I did, like half of 2 games total. its lost revenue, giving the opportunity to not pay for it in the first place is what i hurting the people, not just the ceo but everyone who works for that company is getting cuts. and the people who fund mlg is not like a big bank, gamble a way to plan out the event this year that doesn't pay off means they are fucked, they don't get buy outs and get saved. honestly voicing the wrong idea is not helping im not riding the high society yacht but at least not watching mlg at all instead of some stream leak is obviously showing some appreciation to the people putting out that content for you!
Care to explain how it's lost revenue?
|
On February 28 2012 14:29 ilikeredheads wrote: Whether you watch MLG arena or not (paid or not), I think it's safe to say that MLG has somehow manage to screw their paying customers AGAIN, or at least make them feel cheated. I know I would feel that way if I paid the controversial 20 bucks and found out that there are ways to watch the streams for free.
MLG cannot afford to make mistakes like these if they were to be successful.
If a customer is mad at MLG because there was a work around, fuck them. This is a stupid statement to make. Was there a great stream all weekend long with the quality that MLG had promised (bar the twitchtv problem in the finals)? YES! They were not cheated out of anything. This is basically saying "God damnit apple! Why the fuck did I BUY your iPad when I could have STOLEN it?! You need to fix this!".
|
I think $20 is way too much for one weekend. Not sure I would even pay $5 especially when their competitors are either free or much cheaper.
|
On February 28 2012 14:11 Ice Climber wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 12:14 gumshoe wrote:On February 28 2012 12:05 Ice Climber wrote:On February 28 2012 12:00 gumshoe wrote:On February 28 2012 11:49 Alderan wrote:On February 28 2012 09:44 ninjamyst wrote: IPL just announced its pricing plan for IPL4. FREEEE stream up to 480p. $5.00 for 720p and 1080p. That's the right way to do tournaments. Their production value is way way better than MLG. They AREN'T MAKING MONEY. They are NOT PROFITABLE. Sure you like it, but it doesn't matter if it's just a huge unsustainable money pit. Alderaan funny running into you hear  I dont mind that they asked us to pay, I just didn't watch, my issue is that they've alienated a large portion of the audience of a very young sport, see I appreciate that gomtv lets us watch all the games live albeit in piss poor quality, I still get up every now and then in the morning to be reminded why this game is great. If mlg did a similar thing I would have no gripes, but they are literally just saying no to those who don't have access to credit . http://lmgtfy.com/?q=prepaid credit card canada I speak of children sir children, we mustn't alienate the toddlers  If you can buy a gift card you can buy a prepaid visa card, unless there's an age restrication in Canada that I don't know about, but I doubt it.
Theres a $3 activation fee on visa gift cards, same with AE and other gift cards like that
|
On February 28 2012 15:54 LanTAs wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 14:11 Ice Climber wrote:On February 28 2012 12:14 gumshoe wrote:On February 28 2012 12:05 Ice Climber wrote:On February 28 2012 12:00 gumshoe wrote:On February 28 2012 11:49 Alderan wrote:On February 28 2012 09:44 ninjamyst wrote: IPL just announced its pricing plan for IPL4. FREEEE stream up to 480p. $5.00 for 720p and 1080p. That's the right way to do tournaments. Their production value is way way better than MLG. They AREN'T MAKING MONEY. They are NOT PROFITABLE. Sure you like it, but it doesn't matter if it's just a huge unsustainable money pit. Alderaan funny running into you hear  I dont mind that they asked us to pay, I just didn't watch, my issue is that they've alienated a large portion of the audience of a very young sport, see I appreciate that gomtv lets us watch all the games live albeit in piss poor quality, I still get up every now and then in the morning to be reminded why this game is great. If mlg did a similar thing I would have no gripes, but they are literally just saying no to those who don't have access to credit . http://lmgtfy.com/?q=prepaid credit card canada I speak of children sir children, we mustn't alienate the toddlers  If you can buy a gift card you can buy a prepaid visa card, unless there's an age restrication in Canada that I don't know about, but I doubt it. Theres a $3 activation fee on visa gift cards, same with AE and other gift cards like that
Can't you reload them though? What's the big deal, one time $3 fee...?
|
Since I can't stay up all night, I couldn't watch the matches live, but I wanted to see the vods asap so I paid the $20. Except for a portion of the matches on Saturday, I've seen all matches from the vods.
There were a few things disappointing to me: -A few of the vods were incomplete at the time I watched. -The vods were cut from countdown to gg, content before and in between games was absent. -When loading up a vod, the total length in time of the games is already given away, though this isn't an indication for the outcome of the game, it is an indication of what kind of game you can expect and a spoiler to some degree because of it. -There had been several spoilers from casters during games, the lay-out of the vod section could contain spoilers as well if you didn't feel like digging through a whole round first before moving on to the next.
I really really missed the full re-stream like there has been on the previous MLG event, maybe I didn't look good enough and it has been there all along, I'm not sure. The interface looked really slick, I enjoyed watching it even though it was just for a few hours on the Saturday. The games I've seen were very entertaining and I enjoyed most of them a lot.
Down the line, I think $20 is a decent price, if you are capable of following the event live. If my time-zone would not be limiting for following the whole event live, I would most definitely pay $20 again. If there would be a lower subscription just for watching vods, I would take it in a heartbeat. A future MLG Arena event held in Europe would be absolutely awesome.
|
I didn't watch, had Asembly to watch ( and even from that i only watched like 5 games :p ) and MLG was at a kind shitty hour , would have just watched a free restream or worked around the paywall if i had really felt like watching tho.
|
I am the 1%...too many issues with getting bumped and having to log in again and again, I just ended up watching a restream.
|
SC2 is not my main hobby, I only occasionally drop by and watch large tournaments like MLG, Assembly etc. I don't occasionally drop by to pay 20$ to watch something. If they want a pretty hardcore audience then that's what they'll get with this, at the expense of a broader viewerbase.
|
|
|
|