| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
ACrow
Germany6583 Posts
We know how much the carrier means to everyone and think that this is a great opportunity to give the carrier another chance before making a final decision on the unit’s future. it might not be a final decision, so we need to use it in HotS beta and give them reason to keep it! Source: http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/6571627434 | ||
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
| ||
|
vicml21
Canada165 Posts
| ||
|
Orzabal
France287 Posts
| ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
| ||
|
Erik.TheRed
United States1655 Posts
Hopefully the new oracle ability will prevent interceptors from getting fungaled. I'm afraid about mass corruptors still being cost effective vs skytoss though-- with both carriers and tempests being massive they will take bonus dmg (& corruption bonus) but maybe tempests can snipe them down or something. | ||
|
Sandermatt
Switzerland1365 Posts
On September 15 2012 03:53 Erik.TheRed wrote: I think that the carrier will be more viable when mixed with the new HOTS units, even if it does still need some tweaking in regards to build time/cost/micro-ability. Hopefully the new oracle ability will prevent interceptors from getting fungaled. I'm afraid about mass corruptors still being cost effective vs skytoss though-- with both carriers and tempests being massive they will take bonus dmg (& corruption bonus) but maybe tempests can snipe them down or something. Mass corruptors should always be effective against skytoss. Corupptors are a sole air to air unit, while skytoss has units that shoot air and ground. The sole purpose air superiority unit has to be better than the catch all unit like the carrier in the head up engagement. | ||
|
felisconcolori
United States6168 Posts
But it's back. Woot! | ||
|
SilSol
Sweden2744 Posts
| ||
|
Erik.TheRed
United States1655 Posts
On September 15 2012 03:58 Sandermatt wrote: Mass corruptors should always be effective against skytoss. Corupptors are a sole air to air unit, while skytoss has units that shoot air and ground. The sole purpose air superiority unit has to be better than the catch all unit like the carrier in the head up engagement. I'm not even taking about balance though, just that it's boring as both a player and spectator to see any 1 unit that can be massed reactively that easily takes out a composition that the other player has slowly but steadily accumulated. I don't think I'm alone in thinking that the corruptor is a fairly boring unit either. | ||
|
Hetairoi
Sweden508 Posts
On September 15 2012 04:05 SilSol wrote: is this thread still alive? I think MoW's reputation is pretty much tarnished after this. Huh? | ||
|
Gentso
United States2218 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
| ||
|
xHQx
Russian Federation601 Posts
oh guys i'm not playing protoss anymore, but i'm happy icon unit in both games now just downgrade damage and up movement speed ^^ | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On September 15 2012 04:29 xHQx wrote: CARRIER IS ALIVE! oh guys i'm not playing protoss anymore, but i'm happy icon unit in both games now just downgrade damage and up movement speed ^^ Remove its current upgrade imo. Carrier needs to work like the carrier in Bw imo | ||
|
Doubting
Canada981 Posts
| ||
|
NOOBALOPSE
Canada802 Posts
| ||
|
flyingnimbus
Canada16 Posts
| ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
Add Carrier Blizz just restored my faith in esports | ||
|
Moonsalt
267 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Map Test Tournament
Zoun vs Spirit
Reynor vs herO
Clem vs MaxPax
OSC
IPSL
Bonyth vs Art_Of_Turtle
Razz vs rasowy
Afreeca Starleague
Barracks vs Snow
Afreeca Starleague
Soma vs Bisu
OSC
OSC
The PondCast
OSC
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
