EPTWTF?!
How the Rank 200 GM gamed the MMR system - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
PureRnd
Austria2 Posts
WTF?! | ||
|
Paperplane
Netherlands1823 Posts
| ||
|
amazingxkcd
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
| ||
|
teide
Spain178 Posts
| ||
|
mBnBuki
7 Posts
| ||
|
iloveav
Poland1482 Posts
On December 11 2011 23:57 teide wrote: Grandmaster league should be the best 200 people all the time until league block not the 200 best mmr the day it start the league. Yeah, and politicians should be good, guys not pigs and girls not whores... so what else is new :D. | ||
|
voy
Poland348 Posts
| ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
On December 11 2011 23:57 mBnBuki wrote: What if he was actually a victim to a mad brother or girlfriend? or maybe he just likes trolling? Lol, nice. | ||
|
ch33psh33p
7650 Posts
| ||
|
JDub
United States976 Posts
I'm mid/high masters, for reference, so probably early on in his tanking. | ||
|
ohokurwrong
Brazil283 Posts
| ||
|
Crovea
Denmark100 Posts
On December 11 2011 21:40 CanucksJC wrote: You can't ban him for throwing 130 games lol Also I have no idea how he did this, it doesnt make sense that other farmers didn't get GM this way... :S Blizzard made you sign an EULA that states that they can ban you whenever they want without any reason, so they can ban him ofc. They also stated that intentionally losing is an offence they will punish, so i have to disagree. | ||
|
BronzeKnee
United States5224 Posts
On December 11 2011 21:38 Unfortunate wrote: The problem with GM is that it's not actually invite only. There's a system, and when there's a system, it's going to be beaten by some derp. Way to avoid this? Make GM actually an "invite only" league. Why not? Get the top pros, with some room to cycle new up and comers into it, and let em duke it out. But atm ladder has no worth so who cares :D This is a horrible idea. A big problem with the community is that the "invite only" system recycles the same players over and over, while new skilled players who are better than the "invites" have difficulty breaking in. It is like the system MLG used over this last year, where someone can do well at the start of the season, and get invited back again and again. Only this is worse because it is more invisible. In fact, I think the Blizzcon Invitationals were a complete sham. Instead of inviting the Top 8 ladder players from NA/EU ect, they cherry picked who they thought were the best. When we judge who we think is the best subjectively, instead of letting the results speaks for themselves objectively, E-Sports becomes a sham like professional boxing. | ||
|
sereniity
Sweden1159 Posts
The ToS states that they own your account and that they can ban your account for any given reason, I don't know how this holds up in court tho cuz I'm not a lawyer. Then again I doubt anyone would win a case vs Blizzard in a court rofl... | ||
|
HardMacro
Canada361 Posts
This isn't going to work just for any account, where is the "gaming" of the system in which you talk about? Please elaborate, on the steps that a silver player need take to get into GM? | ||
|
WightyCity
Canada887 Posts
| ||
|
Sadist
United States7328 Posts
On December 11 2011 23:38 Keyboard Warrior wrote: GM system in NA is not reliable. Blizzard needs to do something about it. Maybe invites? Remove the lock (give an icon). Make it top 200 based on points similar to the weekly top 200's blizzard posted before GM was open. You can even decide to lock GM Weekly and then re-org at a specifed time when they update the top 200. The system is stupid. A locked league is stupid, its not as if they only play each other. It makes absolutely no sense that they have done this and it is really frustrating that it is based on MMR which you cannot see so you have no idea if you are progressing or where you stand. | ||
|
Oxb
199 Posts
| ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
| ||
|
nkulu
United States242 Posts
| ||
| ||
