• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:11
CEST 09:11
KST 16:11
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments1[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes139BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch2Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues
Tourneys
Stellar Fest KSL Week 80 StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
ASL20 General Discussion BW General Discussion Diplomacy, Cosmonarchy Edition Soulkey on ASL S20 ASL TICKET LIVE help! :D
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch [ASL20] Ro16 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Borderlands 3 Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Big Programming Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Too Many LANs? Tournament Ov…
TrAiDoS
i'm really bored guys
Peanutsc
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1676 users

[D] KA in PvT then and now- NSHoSeo_san vs MVP_sC - Page 22

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 20 21 22 All
IVN
Profile Joined October 2010
534 Posts
November 06 2011 19:32 GMT
#421
On November 07 2011 04:01 CellTech wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 07 2011 03:02 IVN wrote:
On November 07 2011 03:00 CellTech wrote:
On November 07 2011 02:54 IVN wrote:
On November 07 2011 02:43 CellTech wrote:
Please learn to read, did I say PvT or PvZ. Archons were worse in PvT because they effectively had 10 hp because the EMP was complete shield depletion. Never did I mention PvZ or PvP.

Not to mention they'd have to travel through a minefield/mass siege tank line. Clearly you nubs above have never even seen a single Broodwar game / are probably 12 years old.

Archons werent used in PvT, because there were better tanking and anti mine units (zealots), and because of the size of mech units, splash wasnt too helpful. Besides, having HTs for storm (which had insane radius compared to SC2) was more important, than having them for archons. Archons werent bad, there were just better options.


In HotS, if mech becomes popular (thx to warhounds and new hellions), you wont be seeing archons either.


That's fine i'll just transition into carriers. Wait no I won't.

You'll prob make a lot of chargelots, replicants, immortals and phoenixes.


Chargelots will melt like kit kat bars being thrown into the sun.
Immortals are meh..
Phoenix's will get wrecked by warhounds, and replicants arent really good for anything because theyll be outnumbered.

Simple theorycrafting tells you, you need to switch to air vs a highly immobile mech army.


Chargelots will only be there for absorbing tank shots, and for harrasing. Immortals are awesome vs full mech. Its the bio mech (marines), that fuck immortals up. Repicants will be good for copying tanks, and for controlling space, so that terran cant just move to your front door and siege. And phoenix will be good for busting siegelines. You basically send them in simultaneously with the chargelots, lift the tanks, siege your replicants in range and send immortals in. Your replicants target hellions, your immortals own warhounds while waiting for the phoenix to get wiped out/for tanks to come down.
The KY
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United Kingdom6252 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-06 19:42:52
November 06 2011 19:42 GMT
#422
On November 07 2011 04:01 CellTech wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 07 2011 03:02 IVN wrote:
On November 07 2011 03:00 CellTech wrote:
On November 07 2011 02:54 IVN wrote:
On November 07 2011 02:43 CellTech wrote:
Please learn to read, did I say PvT or PvZ. Archons were worse in PvT because they effectively had 10 hp because the EMP was complete shield depletion. Never did I mention PvZ or PvP.

Not to mention they'd have to travel through a minefield/mass siege tank line. Clearly you nubs above have never even seen a single Broodwar game / are probably 12 years old.

Archons werent used in PvT, because there were better tanking and anti mine units (zealots), and because of the size of mech units, splash wasnt too helpful. Besides, having HTs for storm (which had insane radius compared to SC2) was more important, than having them for archons. Archons werent bad, there were just better options.


In HotS, if mech becomes popular (thx to warhounds and new hellions), you wont be seeing archons either.


That's fine i'll just transition into carriers. Wait no I won't.

You'll prob make a lot of chargelots, replicants, immortals and phoenixes.


Chargelots will melt like kit kat bars being thrown into the sun.
Immortals are meh..
Phoenix's will get wrecked by warhounds, and replicants arent really good for anything because theyll be outnumbered.

Simple theorycrafting tells you, you need to switch to air vs a highly immobile mech army.



I can do some simpler theorycrafting -robo tech will still be in the game and it does just fine against mech given that colossus never have to siege giving you a huge advantage from the get go, not to mention the now 6 range immortals being so fucking sick against tanks. And chargelots make pretty good meat shields tbh.

Also that's not simple theorycrafting you're doing, it's copy pasting what you have seen in BW and assuming it will work the same way in SC2.

And this
Clearly you nubs above have never even seen a single Broodwar game / are probably 12 years old.


displays much more immaturity than the people you were insulting did...
_Search_
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada180 Posts
November 06 2011 20:15 GMT
#423
On November 07 2011 02:54 IVN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 07 2011 02:43 CellTech wrote:
Please learn to read, did I say PvT or PvZ. Archons were worse in PvT because they effectively had 10 hp because the EMP was complete shield depletion. Never did I mention PvZ or PvP.

Not to mention they'd have to travel through a minefield/mass siege tank line. Clearly you nubs above have never even seen a single Broodwar game / are probably 12 years old.

Archons werent used in PvT, because there were better tanking and anti mine units (zealots), and because of the size of mech units, splash wasnt too helpful. Besides, having HTs for storm (which had insane radius compared to SC2) was more important, than having them for archons. Archons werent bad, there were just better options.


In HotS, if mech becomes popular (thx to warhounds and new hellions), you wont be seeing archons either.


Sure you will. They're one of the only non-mech toss units, so they'll rape warhounds. Tanks and hellions are crap against them too.
IVN
Profile Joined October 2010
534 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-06 20:26:37
November 06 2011 20:23 GMT
#424
On November 07 2011 05:15 _Search_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 07 2011 02:54 IVN wrote:
On November 07 2011 02:43 CellTech wrote:
Please learn to read, did I say PvT or PvZ. Archons were worse in PvT because they effectively had 10 hp because the EMP was complete shield depletion. Never did I mention PvZ or PvP.

Not to mention they'd have to travel through a minefield/mass siege tank line. Clearly you nubs above have never even seen a single Broodwar game / are probably 12 years old.

Archons werent used in PvT, because there were better tanking and anti mine units (zealots), and because of the size of mech units, splash wasnt too helpful. Besides, having HTs for storm (which had insane radius compared to SC2) was more important, than having them for archons. Archons werent bad, there were just better options.


In HotS, if mech becomes popular (thx to warhounds and new hellions), you wont be seeing archons either.


Sure you will. They're one of the only non-mech toss units, so they'll rape warhounds. Tanks and hellions are crap against them too.

And archons are crap against all those units, thanks to low DPS against non organic units. Why would any protoss throw away precious gas on archons, when he can make immortals against mech?

And no, warhound wont do squat against immortals.
xlava
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States676 Posts
November 06 2011 21:45 GMT
#425
I think bringing KA back will actually balance the matchup from where it is now. Its kinda ironic how its nerf led to a few other nerfs and Terran buffs that eventually put Protoss in a hole. Now we're slowly heading in the other direction :s
RemrafGrez
Profile Joined November 2010
United States180 Posts
November 07 2011 02:18 GMT
#426
On November 06 2011 06:24 IVN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 06 2011 06:18 aksfjh wrote:
On November 06 2011 06:13 IVN wrote:
On November 06 2011 05:56 aksfjh wrote:
On November 06 2011 05:04 IVN wrote:
On November 06 2011 04:55 aksfjh wrote:
On November 06 2011 04:28 Eternalmisfit wrote:
On November 06 2011 03:34 iamke55 wrote:
Excellent post. It boggles my mind that there are people who consider it imbalanced for PvT to have a ~50% winrate with KA, but balanced when PvT has a ~40% winrate without KA.


Depending on what you exactly meant in your post, my post below may agree/disagree with that.

I believe the balance of an individual unit does not necessarily correlate with the win-rate percent of a match. The W-L % of the match at any given point in time depends on the map pool, evolution of strategies and counter strategies combined with maturation of the potential of a unit. Until the game is mature enough and devoid of balance changes for a while, it is hard to make an argument whether a unit/ability in balanced or not.

The best example of this, in context of SC2, being the hellion. BFH have been pretty much untouched in the game since its inception. However, during the entirety of the 1st year of the game, the blue flame upgrade was rarely used and BFH strategies were non-existent. It was only in mid-2011 when Slayers hellion strategies were developed when we came to know how strong that ability was.

If you go back to late 2010 or early 2011, I do not think you would find anyone arguing the BFH were imbalanced. However, in view of current information, it can argued that BFH strategies were equally or even more 'imba' due to the fact that medivcas moved faster, Terran timings could come earlier due no bunker before rax requirements and so on.

The key point I am trying to make that even though there might have been a time period when ZvT was 50-50 split pre-BFH era, BFH were still 'imbalanced' (in quotes as imo we still just don't have enough knowledge to claim confidently) independent of the win-rate. Extending this logic to KA, it is not possible to prove that KA is imbalanced at PvT 50% or even at 40%. Until the game becomes mature enough that a lot of the unit potentials/strategies are realized, determining the balance of an individual unit/ability in terms of a matchup win-loss % is not possible as there are too many variables that come into play.

Note that by similar logic, removing KA was an equally bad idea since a local event of PvT matchup increase did not necessarily mean that KA was imbalanced at that point of time. Though I applaud Blizzard for being active with the amount of balance changes going on, I do think that they are making too many drastic changes too quick and not letting strategies evolve sufficiently. If Blizzard had strong reason/evidence to believe that KA was imba, it should have been nerfed to a point where you needed 4-5 sec after warp-in to storm and then studied how much of a difference this made instead of outright removing it.

The idea of KA was flawed in actual practice though. For both Terran and Zerg, starting the production of the iconic caster is an investment and risk, basically predicting you aren't going to be attacked in the next ~45s. At the very least, you won't need the abilities of the caster for the next ~45s. For Protoss, this removed all forward thinking of the HT out of the equation. If you needed storms, you just warped them in ~5s. There is no significant waiting period or forward thinking, just reaction. Especially with the archon buff, this would become an incredibly hard scenario to deal with for both Terran and Zerg.

To address other arguments about gateways being on cooldown, we're beginning to see a metagame shift where gateways are being massed beyond the income potential of Protoss. This allows them to warp in units on demand when having to address harassment forces away from their main force. Thus, the cooldown for HTs becomes moot and the only barrier is gas income. On 2-3 bases, that gives harassment opportunity for 18s at most (only 7-11s for a medivac drop) if you're relying ONLY on HTs. With zealots as a buffer, it's very easy to warp in a HT in time.

Races are different.

Terran has the best defense in the game, zerg has the best production (remax in under a minute), so why is it wrong for protoss to have something equally potent?

And no, warpgates are not, since they give you no defenders advantage, since they are balanced around timing attacks.

Protoss can warp in small defense forces ANYWHERE they have pylon power and the can remax in less than 5s. FFs and high AoE make attacking head on suicidal after a certain point in the game. But if you want to live in a world where the only advantage to gateway tech is 4 and 6 gate timing attacks, be my guest. It at least wouldn't be a surprise why you would want a massive buff to Protoss.

It was already established, that warpgates must be balanced around attacking, therefore, they give yo no defender advantage. And you also cant remax in 5 sec, thats BS. FFs and AoE are not a plus, they are a necessity to survive.

Warpgates on cooldown -> attack at 200/200 -> lose gateway units in attack -> warp in fresh set of wargate units in 5s

When was it "established" that warpgates must be balanced around timing attacks? And since when do balances around timing attacks give you no defenders advantage? Defenders advantage takes into account positioning, reinforcement, and static defense. How warp gates would ignore even one of those aspects makes no sense.

1) That wont let you remax in 5 sec.

2) It was discussed to death in many threads, and even terran and zerg players agreed that due to being balanced around attacking, warpgates dont give porotoss any defenders advantage. Its quite simple, if WGs warp to any location with equal speed/efficiency, and that speed/cooldown is balanced so that protoss dont have an advantage over Z or T while attacking (means toss production has to be somewhat slower), then wehn your defending as a protoss, you have no defenders advantage. Whether you are fighting and warping in the middle of the map, or at your natural, its the same. And protoss also dont have bunkers or creep, therefore no "home-field advantage".


About #2, the no homefield advantage for Protoss seems real to me. Warp in late game obviously is good for getting around, but for a major assault you really have to have colossus and not allow the enemy to retain their corruptor/viking count or your colossi count will not matter.
Prev 1 20 21 22 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Korean StarCraft League
03:00
Week 80
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft684
Nina 192
StarCraft: Brood War
hero 728
PianO 288
Nal_rA 131
Noble 43
Free 35
Dewaltoss 34
Aegong 33
JulyZerg 28
Bale 8
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm130
League of Legends
JimRising 565
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K852
semphis_36
Super Smash Bros
Westballz22
Other Games
summit1g3920
C9.Mang0353
Maynarde195
Trikslyr40
ViBE40
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick756
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH388
• LUISG 12
• Adnapsc2 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos736
• Stunt516
Upcoming Events
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
50m
RSL Revival
2h 50m
Reynor vs Cure
TBD vs Zoun
OSC
13h 50m
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
1d
RSL Revival
1d 2h
Classic vs TBD
WardiTV Invitational
1d 3h
Online Event
1d 8h
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
LiuLi Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.