• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:20
CET 16:20
KST 00:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
2026 KongFu Cup Announcement3BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled12Blizzard Classic Cup - Tastosis announced as captains15Weekly Cups (March 2-8): ByuN overcomes PvT block4GSL CK - New online series19
StarCraft 2
General
GSL CK - New online series BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled Blizzard Classic Cup - Tastosis announced as captains BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 KongFu Cup Announcement [GSL CK] Team Maru vs. Team herO
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026] Map Editor closed ?
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 516 Specter of Death Mutation # 515 Together Forever Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BSL 22 Map Contest — Submissions OPEN to March 10 ASL21 General Discussion Are you ready for ASL 21? Hype VIDEO Gypsy to Korea
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL22] Open Qualifiers & Ladder Tours IPSL Spring 2026 is here! ASL Season 21 Qualifiers March 7-8
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Fighting Spirit mining rates Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread PC Games Sales Thread No Man's Sky (PS4 and PC)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Five o'clock TL Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Mexico's Drug War Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine NASA and the Private Sector
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread General nutrition recommendations Cricket [SPORT] TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3251 users

[D] KA in PvT then and now- NSHoSeo_san vs MVP_sC - Page 22

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 20 21 22 All
IVN
Profile Joined October 2010
534 Posts
November 06 2011 19:32 GMT
#421
On November 07 2011 04:01 CellTech wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 07 2011 03:02 IVN wrote:
On November 07 2011 03:00 CellTech wrote:
On November 07 2011 02:54 IVN wrote:
On November 07 2011 02:43 CellTech wrote:
Please learn to read, did I say PvT or PvZ. Archons were worse in PvT because they effectively had 10 hp because the EMP was complete shield depletion. Never did I mention PvZ or PvP.

Not to mention they'd have to travel through a minefield/mass siege tank line. Clearly you nubs above have never even seen a single Broodwar game / are probably 12 years old.

Archons werent used in PvT, because there were better tanking and anti mine units (zealots), and because of the size of mech units, splash wasnt too helpful. Besides, having HTs for storm (which had insane radius compared to SC2) was more important, than having them for archons. Archons werent bad, there were just better options.


In HotS, if mech becomes popular (thx to warhounds and new hellions), you wont be seeing archons either.


That's fine i'll just transition into carriers. Wait no I won't.

You'll prob make a lot of chargelots, replicants, immortals and phoenixes.


Chargelots will melt like kit kat bars being thrown into the sun.
Immortals are meh..
Phoenix's will get wrecked by warhounds, and replicants arent really good for anything because theyll be outnumbered.

Simple theorycrafting tells you, you need to switch to air vs a highly immobile mech army.


Chargelots will only be there for absorbing tank shots, and for harrasing. Immortals are awesome vs full mech. Its the bio mech (marines), that fuck immortals up. Repicants will be good for copying tanks, and for controlling space, so that terran cant just move to your front door and siege. And phoenix will be good for busting siegelines. You basically send them in simultaneously with the chargelots, lift the tanks, siege your replicants in range and send immortals in. Your replicants target hellions, your immortals own warhounds while waiting for the phoenix to get wiped out/for tanks to come down.
The KY
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United Kingdom6252 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-06 19:42:52
November 06 2011 19:42 GMT
#422
On November 07 2011 04:01 CellTech wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 07 2011 03:02 IVN wrote:
On November 07 2011 03:00 CellTech wrote:
On November 07 2011 02:54 IVN wrote:
On November 07 2011 02:43 CellTech wrote:
Please learn to read, did I say PvT or PvZ. Archons were worse in PvT because they effectively had 10 hp because the EMP was complete shield depletion. Never did I mention PvZ or PvP.

Not to mention they'd have to travel through a minefield/mass siege tank line. Clearly you nubs above have never even seen a single Broodwar game / are probably 12 years old.

Archons werent used in PvT, because there were better tanking and anti mine units (zealots), and because of the size of mech units, splash wasnt too helpful. Besides, having HTs for storm (which had insane radius compared to SC2) was more important, than having them for archons. Archons werent bad, there were just better options.


In HotS, if mech becomes popular (thx to warhounds and new hellions), you wont be seeing archons either.


That's fine i'll just transition into carriers. Wait no I won't.

You'll prob make a lot of chargelots, replicants, immortals and phoenixes.


Chargelots will melt like kit kat bars being thrown into the sun.
Immortals are meh..
Phoenix's will get wrecked by warhounds, and replicants arent really good for anything because theyll be outnumbered.

Simple theorycrafting tells you, you need to switch to air vs a highly immobile mech army.



I can do some simpler theorycrafting -robo tech will still be in the game and it does just fine against mech given that colossus never have to siege giving you a huge advantage from the get go, not to mention the now 6 range immortals being so fucking sick against tanks. And chargelots make pretty good meat shields tbh.

Also that's not simple theorycrafting you're doing, it's copy pasting what you have seen in BW and assuming it will work the same way in SC2.

And this
Clearly you nubs above have never even seen a single Broodwar game / are probably 12 years old.


displays much more immaturity than the people you were insulting did...
_Search_
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada180 Posts
November 06 2011 20:15 GMT
#423
On November 07 2011 02:54 IVN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 07 2011 02:43 CellTech wrote:
Please learn to read, did I say PvT or PvZ. Archons were worse in PvT because they effectively had 10 hp because the EMP was complete shield depletion. Never did I mention PvZ or PvP.

Not to mention they'd have to travel through a minefield/mass siege tank line. Clearly you nubs above have never even seen a single Broodwar game / are probably 12 years old.

Archons werent used in PvT, because there were better tanking and anti mine units (zealots), and because of the size of mech units, splash wasnt too helpful. Besides, having HTs for storm (which had insane radius compared to SC2) was more important, than having them for archons. Archons werent bad, there were just better options.


In HotS, if mech becomes popular (thx to warhounds and new hellions), you wont be seeing archons either.


Sure you will. They're one of the only non-mech toss units, so they'll rape warhounds. Tanks and hellions are crap against them too.
IVN
Profile Joined October 2010
534 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-11-06 20:26:37
November 06 2011 20:23 GMT
#424
On November 07 2011 05:15 _Search_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 07 2011 02:54 IVN wrote:
On November 07 2011 02:43 CellTech wrote:
Please learn to read, did I say PvT or PvZ. Archons were worse in PvT because they effectively had 10 hp because the EMP was complete shield depletion. Never did I mention PvZ or PvP.

Not to mention they'd have to travel through a minefield/mass siege tank line. Clearly you nubs above have never even seen a single Broodwar game / are probably 12 years old.

Archons werent used in PvT, because there were better tanking and anti mine units (zealots), and because of the size of mech units, splash wasnt too helpful. Besides, having HTs for storm (which had insane radius compared to SC2) was more important, than having them for archons. Archons werent bad, there were just better options.


In HotS, if mech becomes popular (thx to warhounds and new hellions), you wont be seeing archons either.


Sure you will. They're one of the only non-mech toss units, so they'll rape warhounds. Tanks and hellions are crap against them too.

And archons are crap against all those units, thanks to low DPS against non organic units. Why would any protoss throw away precious gas on archons, when he can make immortals against mech?

And no, warhound wont do squat against immortals.
xlava
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States676 Posts
November 06 2011 21:45 GMT
#425
I think bringing KA back will actually balance the matchup from where it is now. Its kinda ironic how its nerf led to a few other nerfs and Terran buffs that eventually put Protoss in a hole. Now we're slowly heading in the other direction :s
RemrafGrez
Profile Joined November 2010
United States180 Posts
November 07 2011 02:18 GMT
#426
On November 06 2011 06:24 IVN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 06 2011 06:18 aksfjh wrote:
On November 06 2011 06:13 IVN wrote:
On November 06 2011 05:56 aksfjh wrote:
On November 06 2011 05:04 IVN wrote:
On November 06 2011 04:55 aksfjh wrote:
On November 06 2011 04:28 Eternalmisfit wrote:
On November 06 2011 03:34 iamke55 wrote:
Excellent post. It boggles my mind that there are people who consider it imbalanced for PvT to have a ~50% winrate with KA, but balanced when PvT has a ~40% winrate without KA.


Depending on what you exactly meant in your post, my post below may agree/disagree with that.

I believe the balance of an individual unit does not necessarily correlate with the win-rate percent of a match. The W-L % of the match at any given point in time depends on the map pool, evolution of strategies and counter strategies combined with maturation of the potential of a unit. Until the game is mature enough and devoid of balance changes for a while, it is hard to make an argument whether a unit/ability in balanced or not.

The best example of this, in context of SC2, being the hellion. BFH have been pretty much untouched in the game since its inception. However, during the entirety of the 1st year of the game, the blue flame upgrade was rarely used and BFH strategies were non-existent. It was only in mid-2011 when Slayers hellion strategies were developed when we came to know how strong that ability was.

If you go back to late 2010 or early 2011, I do not think you would find anyone arguing the BFH were imbalanced. However, in view of current information, it can argued that BFH strategies were equally or even more 'imba' due to the fact that medivcas moved faster, Terran timings could come earlier due no bunker before rax requirements and so on.

The key point I am trying to make that even though there might have been a time period when ZvT was 50-50 split pre-BFH era, BFH were still 'imbalanced' (in quotes as imo we still just don't have enough knowledge to claim confidently) independent of the win-rate. Extending this logic to KA, it is not possible to prove that KA is imbalanced at PvT 50% or even at 40%. Until the game becomes mature enough that a lot of the unit potentials/strategies are realized, determining the balance of an individual unit/ability in terms of a matchup win-loss % is not possible as there are too many variables that come into play.

Note that by similar logic, removing KA was an equally bad idea since a local event of PvT matchup increase did not necessarily mean that KA was imbalanced at that point of time. Though I applaud Blizzard for being active with the amount of balance changes going on, I do think that they are making too many drastic changes too quick and not letting strategies evolve sufficiently. If Blizzard had strong reason/evidence to believe that KA was imba, it should have been nerfed to a point where you needed 4-5 sec after warp-in to storm and then studied how much of a difference this made instead of outright removing it.

The idea of KA was flawed in actual practice though. For both Terran and Zerg, starting the production of the iconic caster is an investment and risk, basically predicting you aren't going to be attacked in the next ~45s. At the very least, you won't need the abilities of the caster for the next ~45s. For Protoss, this removed all forward thinking of the HT out of the equation. If you needed storms, you just warped them in ~5s. There is no significant waiting period or forward thinking, just reaction. Especially with the archon buff, this would become an incredibly hard scenario to deal with for both Terran and Zerg.

To address other arguments about gateways being on cooldown, we're beginning to see a metagame shift where gateways are being massed beyond the income potential of Protoss. This allows them to warp in units on demand when having to address harassment forces away from their main force. Thus, the cooldown for HTs becomes moot and the only barrier is gas income. On 2-3 bases, that gives harassment opportunity for 18s at most (only 7-11s for a medivac drop) if you're relying ONLY on HTs. With zealots as a buffer, it's very easy to warp in a HT in time.

Races are different.

Terran has the best defense in the game, zerg has the best production (remax in under a minute), so why is it wrong for protoss to have something equally potent?

And no, warpgates are not, since they give you no defenders advantage, since they are balanced around timing attacks.

Protoss can warp in small defense forces ANYWHERE they have pylon power and the can remax in less than 5s. FFs and high AoE make attacking head on suicidal after a certain point in the game. But if you want to live in a world where the only advantage to gateway tech is 4 and 6 gate timing attacks, be my guest. It at least wouldn't be a surprise why you would want a massive buff to Protoss.

It was already established, that warpgates must be balanced around attacking, therefore, they give yo no defender advantage. And you also cant remax in 5 sec, thats BS. FFs and AoE are not a plus, they are a necessity to survive.

Warpgates on cooldown -> attack at 200/200 -> lose gateway units in attack -> warp in fresh set of wargate units in 5s

When was it "established" that warpgates must be balanced around timing attacks? And since when do balances around timing attacks give you no defenders advantage? Defenders advantage takes into account positioning, reinforcement, and static defense. How warp gates would ignore even one of those aspects makes no sense.

1) That wont let you remax in 5 sec.

2) It was discussed to death in many threads, and even terran and zerg players agreed that due to being balanced around attacking, warpgates dont give porotoss any defenders advantage. Its quite simple, if WGs warp to any location with equal speed/efficiency, and that speed/cooldown is balanced so that protoss dont have an advantage over Z or T while attacking (means toss production has to be somewhat slower), then wehn your defending as a protoss, you have no defenders advantage. Whether you are fighting and warping in the middle of the map, or at your natural, its the same. And protoss also dont have bunkers or creep, therefore no "home-field advantage".


About #2, the no homefield advantage for Protoss seems real to me. Warp in late game obviously is good for getting around, but for a major assault you really have to have colossus and not allow the enemy to retain their corruptor/viking count or your colossi count will not matter.
Prev 1 20 21 22 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Team League
12:00
Group B
WardiTV845
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
MindelVK 51
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 15934
firebathero 6651
Horang2 2188
Jaedong 2120
Mini 471
BeSt 463
EffOrt 427
Stork 327
Rush 270
Soma 257
[ Show more ]
Dewaltoss 134
actioN 123
Last 95
ToSsGirL 72
Mind 71
sorry 57
Sea.KH 52
Backho 47
Barracks 40
IntoTheRainbow 33
Hm[arnc] 32
JulyZerg 30
Aegong 23
GoRush 21
Nal_rA 21
Terrorterran 18
NaDa 13
ivOry 11
SilentControl 10
Dota 2
Gorgc6113
BananaSlamJamma143
Counter-Strike
fl0m2758
byalli944
kRYSTAL_39
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor473
Liquid`Hasu296
Other Games
B2W.Neo1807
Liquid`RaSZi1126
DeMusliM266
KnowMe215
Fuzer 181
Hui .165
crisheroes115
Mew2King65
Mlord3
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream19027
Other Games
gamesdonequick905
ComeBackTV 267
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 19
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 9
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 75
• musti20045 43
• poizon28 26
• iHatsuTV 13
• Adnapsc2 10
• Response 2
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 39
• iopq 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1248
Upcoming Events
Patches Events
1h 40m
BSL
4h 40m
GSL
16h 40m
Wardi Open
20h 40m
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 1h
WardiTV Team League
1d 20h
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
OSC
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
[ Show More ]
KCM Race Survival
3 days
WardiTV Team League
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
KCM Race Survival
4 days
WardiTV Team League
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
BSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-03-13
WardiTV Winter 2026
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
BSL Season 22
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
2026 Changsha Offline CUP
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
NationLESS Cup
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.