[Poll]Design model for Warhound - Page 6
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Panzerfaust7
United States38 Posts
| ||
DusTerr
2520 Posts
| ||
brichals
Germany50 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On October 25 2011 23:40 Bobster wrote: On October 25 2011 22:06 Soma.bokforlag wrote: sounds objective. your poll has a nice set of options too. im sure blizzard will listen hahaha same reaction here. Came in here to vote in earnest, then didn't and laughed on my way out after seeing the options and the OP's text. :p On October 25 2011 23:37 wollhandkrabbe wrote: I don't really like how the model is quite a shameless ![]() The sooner you accept and embrace the obvious Warhammer influences in Starcraft, the better off you are. :D Space Marines, Tyranids and Eldar, oh my. The Battletech Warhammer is not related to the 40K universe but is from a different franchise that eveolved about the same time. However there is a bipedal warmachine in the 40K universe that looks a bit similar, oh, and its called a Warhound. I don't think Blizz should keep this name to be honest. http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Warhound_Scout_Titan | ||
ToastieNL
Netherlands845 Posts
| ||
Daralii
United States16991 Posts
| ||
TenTigers
32 Posts
On October 26 2011 00:24 brichals wrote: The Battletech Warhammer is not related to the 40K universe but is from a different franchise that eveolved about the same time. However there is a bipedal warmachine in the 40K universe that looks a bit similar, oh, and its called a Warhound. I don't think Blizz should keep this name to be honest. http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Warhound_Scout_Titan Wow at this point everything i see looks better than the sc2 warhound model ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | ||
GinDo
3327 Posts
| ||
BronzeKnee
United States5212 Posts
| ||
FeyFey
Germany10114 Posts
Poor collecters edition people though their collectors edition unit got removed from the multiplayer and is just a super unit now (yet to be removed in the next expansion lol) PS: remember there is single player as well and i guess there will be more then just the multiplayer units on the enemies side ![]() | ||
Fus
Sweden1112 Posts
| ||
Honeybadger
United States821 Posts
Thor and goliath (sc2 version) were spot-on perfect models. In a rare (for me) criticism, I have to agree that I hate the model. It just looks flimsy, for some reason. | ||
MShaw006
United States74 Posts
| ||
Snuggles
United States1865 Posts
| ||
-Archangel-
Croatia7457 Posts
| ||
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
| ||
brichals
Germany50 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On October 26 2011 00:38 TenTigers wrote: On October 26 2011 00:24 brichals wrote: The Battletech Warhammer is not related to the 40K universe but is from a different franchise that eveolved about the same time. However there is a bipedal warmachine in the 40K universe that looks a bit similar, oh, and its called a Warhound. I don't think Blizz should keep this name to be honest. http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Warhound_Scout_Titan Wow at this point everything i see looks better than the sc2 warhound model ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Well they did say it's a work in progress. The 40K warhound does look like a hound though, I've no idea why Blizzard need to use that name other than it sounds cool and goes a bit with the War Pigs name from Terran campaign. However that goliath model ^^ looks great. Why fix what ain't broke. | ||
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
p1cKLes
United States342 Posts
| ||
Everlong
Czech Republic1973 Posts
On October 26 2011 00:54 Geo.Rion wrote: 0 chance Blizzard would take into consideration an awfully biased poll like that How on earth you can talk about bias here? You don't need formal, serious poll with answer's range 1-5 like back in primary school (some guys prolly still attending..) to see what is going on. It's not like they see stupid Star Wars refference that someone don't get and say, hey - this is stupid and biased, let's better not take those 500 votes into consideration.. | ||
MikeG
Canada128 Posts
Doesn't "flow" well with the other units, its just so goofy looking. | ||
| ||