| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
TrickyGilligan
United States641 Posts
-Assuming that this interview takes place after the new units have been revealed, what gaps in a race's overall abilities do you see these new units filling? -From a design perspective, what do you see the "theme" of each race as being? What units fit with this overall theme? What units don't? | ||
|
Flossy
United States870 Posts
Where are ma lurkers? And reavers? | ||
|
XRaDiiX
Canada1730 Posts
Why are Hydra's the Most Awful Unit in the Game except for ZvZ in some situations( Whenever Zerg is forced to make them against Air Toss-- They Tech into Robo(Colossus) And they become Useless.) Also When you Commit with an attack with Hydralisk in 90% of Situations its an All-In Attack because your creep spread in Real situations is not all the way to the enemy base; so by the time you attack with them a retreat with Hydralisks is unrealistic. They will get left behind when an Army Retreats. (Fix the Hydralisk Its Awful) P.S( Buff Ultra (So it gets more use) , Nerf Ghosts. EMP (It seems OP vs Toss) ) | ||
|
Ksyper
Bulgaria665 Posts
Also will we get the hydra speed upgrade for hots? Are they planning on a new way for spearing creep? Seriously JP you have to ask about the hydras, so many people care. It's the most iconic zerg unit and has been turned one of the least used units. Can't we go back to the old hydra :D? | ||
|
Brotocol
243 Posts
On October 21 2011 05:57 Ksyper wrote: As a zerg player I want to ask how would DB view the idea of nerfing the roach or the hydra, but also making them cheaper and cost 1 food, that way zerg can go back to the swarm feel it used to have, because right now lategame the zerg army is the same size as the toss and terran ones. I like this idea. Maybe if it's too specific, it can be reworded into a "preserving racial identity" question. Hope this question gets selected! | ||
|
tsuxiit
1305 Posts
| ||
|
psteeleneg
48 Posts
| ||
|
0neder
United States3733 Posts
| ||
|
TheGlassface
United States612 Posts
On October 21 2011 05:42 Nazza wrote: What is your stance on the time it takes for battles to occur? It seems that a lot of units do alot of damage with little or no micro and/or people are willing just to their units die in exchange for the amount of damage they do. Any plans for changing this? I really like the fact that you have tried to put in/tried to make viable drop play for all three races. However, is it possible to make all three races viable "macro races"? Although playing a macro game is a solid strategy for all three races, their seems to be some races that focus more on harassment than others. In a previous interview, you said that you didn't play much Brood War and don't understand it. I understand that SC2 is a different game, but would you be willing to try out BW to get a better perspective? What about just reading battle reports? Lmao..? Seriously? Man, that suddenly explains so much to me... | ||
|
Roxy
Canada753 Posts
On October 21 2011 05:38 PraetorialGamer wrote: Uuum...that was a joke about how Activision Blizzard also happens to own the Call of Duty franchise, which has made the media's perception of gaming what it is today, for good or for ill. My bad, i just read the first couple words thought "NO" and responded sorry | ||
|
0neder
United States3733 Posts
On October 21 2011 05:58 psteeleneg wrote: Ask him Why they can't just change the ladder maps to NOT HAVE CLOSE POSITIONS allowed? It wouldn't be hard to do, and they could make their own blizzard official ladder maps like that...they wouldn't need to like take MLG maps or anything. Because the problem is small and bad maps, not close positions. Having close positions possible is a good thing, but only if the map is big enough. | ||
|
rockerman101
United States85 Posts
| ||
|
Timerly
Germany511 Posts
Did you create a unit with a certain role that has now changed significantly? What was the most surprising usage you have seen so far? | ||
|
gurrpp
United States437 Posts
| ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
| ||
|
Datum
United States371 Posts
| ||
|
amazingxkcd
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
On October 21 2011 06:00 TheGlassface wrote: Lmao..? Seriously? Man, that suddenly explains so much to me... This has to be the NUMBER ONE QUESTION ASKED: HAVE YOU PLAYED BW!? | ||
|
Roxy
Canada753 Posts
Did you create a unit with a certain role that has now changed significantly? What was the most surprising usage you have seen so far? Id be very interested to know this I doubt they knew about the magic boxing on thors Honestly, to me, it seems like they designed this game not knowing units could kite | ||
|
kuroshiro
United Kingdom378 Posts
| ||
|
Swwww
Switzerland812 Posts
How do you feel that the statement that "the biggest problem with sc2 and game balance is due to the game engine being too good." Do you have any plans to change unit pathing and especially clumping in the future to fix this issue? | ||
| ||
|
|
CranKy Ducklings
RSL Revival
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
Cure vs Reynor
Classic vs herO
IPSL
ZZZero vs rasowy
Napoleon vs KameZerg
OSC
BSL 21
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
Sparkling Tuna Cup
RSL Revival
Reynor vs sOs
Maru vs Ryung
Kung Fu Cup
WardiTV Korean Royale
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
