EPTOn October 18 2011 06:37 ckw wrote:
HOLY SHI**! There is a Reaver in that video towards the end!!!
HOLY SHI**! There is a Reaver in that video towards the end!!!
lol. nice find :D
New Zerg Unit in Heart of The Swarm - Page 111
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Mereel
Germany895 Posts
lol. nice find :D | ||
|
Zorgaz
Sweden2951 Posts
On October 18 2011 06:37 ckw wrote: HOLY SHI**! There is a Reaver in that video towards the end!!! Yeah, they reworked alot since then.... Man Blizzard, typical of them. Seems i won't get it until ''Tuesday'' -.-' | ||
|
synapse
China13814 Posts
On October 18 2011 06:34 chuscorral wrote: Why broo? I never used so don´t know how it works. I played late beta and wasn´t available. It was scrapped in alpha, never made it to beta. | ||
|
Thrasymachus725
Canada527 Posts
On October 18 2011 06:15 ckw wrote: How would it be a bad unit, do you realize the main use of Arbiters in BW was for cloak and recall? The only difference in having Arbiter instead of mothership would be the fact that you can make more than one. Right now all those things you mentioned against it cause the same issues for the mothership and any other spell caster. The mothership has ways of couteracting all those units, and being kept safe. Motherships cloaking field is longer range than arbiter, allowing it to stay further back than arbiters need to. It also has a significant amount of HP, which makes it EXCELLENT for tanking hits. You WANT Vikings and Mutalisks to waste time attacking the mothership. Arbiters you want to keep safe from any damage at all times, because they are fragile, and your army is significantly weaker by losing them. Mutalisks cannot fly in and pick off a mothership unless you have seriously fucked up... Vikings need to take time and effort to take down a mothership, which keeps them off your other air and colossi. EMP doesn't affect mothership that seriously, because its strength isn't its spells, it is it's massive health and shields and long range cloak. Arbs with no shields and no energy are fragile and for the most part a liability. Arbs rely on a good amount of micro and mobility to be effective, making fungal powerful on them. This is not the case with motherships. You don't want to replace the mothership with the arbiter, trust me. Or just think that cuz you liked it in SC1 it must be awesome in SC2... I mean the carrier is in sc2 and it is just as awesome as it was in BW right!!!!!!!!!!111? | ||
|
Bayyne
United States1967 Posts
| ||
|
Mr.Pyro
Denmark959 Posts
On October 18 2011 06:45 Bayyne wrote: I can't believe they were thinking of calling the Carrier a "Tempest"....>.> It wasn't the same as a carrier though  | ||
|
InFi.asc
Germany518 Posts
On October 18 2011 06:45 Bayyne wrote: I can't believe they were thinking of calling the Carrier a "Tempest"....>.> I would love to see that anti ground shield, though. | ||
|
Nachtwind
Germany1130 Posts
the fighter drones called here shurrikans did make melee dmg also the shield was like immortal but only to ground weapons while it was weak and normal to aTa attacks | ||
|
Appendix
Sweden979 Posts
If the arbiter were to be introduced in SC2, I´d guess its strongest spell would be stasis, if it has enough range, especially with the tighter clumping. Then protoss could stasis->move army in to position-> force field -> let zealots whack away at them. | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
Unless Blizzard forgot about it entirely, which would be a shame. | ||
|
Roxy
Canada753 Posts
On October 18 2011 06:56 eviltomahawk wrote: Seeing how the Terran unit's silhouette was posted at exactly 8 pm, I wouldn't be surprised if the Protoss unit was released at a similar time. I'm pretty much checking TL and FB every few minutes right now to catch a glimpse of it. Unless Blizzard forgot about it entirely, which would be a shame. its just protoss who gives a crap? | ||
|
bovineblitz
United States314 Posts
| ||
|
pycho
Paraguay372 Posts
On October 18 2011 06:59 bovineblitz wrote: How about something with a PDD that stops EMPs? like a vortex THAT SUCKS ENERGY AND EVERYTHING IN ITS PATH?! ye id like that, but where is the silhuhuhuetetete? blizzard doesnt love protoss | ||
|
Brotocol
243 Posts
On October 18 2011 07:01 pycho wrote: like a vortex THAT SUCKS ENERGY AND EVERYTHING IN ITS PATH?! ye id like that, but where is the silhuhuhuetetete? blizzard doesnt love protoss Even the Xel'naga stopped loving Protoss. emozealot.gif ;( | ||
|
0neder
United States3733 Posts
On October 18 2011 06:59 bovineblitz wrote: How about something with a PDD that stops EMPs? How about giving EMP an animation and raising cost a bit so it's not ridiculously easy to use? | ||
|
0neder
United States3733 Posts
| ||
|
Leviance
Germany4079 Posts
| ||
|
Brotocol
243 Posts
On October 18 2011 07:05 Leviance wrote: Well I have to go to bed now, and I'm sort of pissed that I didn'T GET TO SEE THE NEW TOSS UNIT TODAY .( They already showed it, but it got EMP'd and vaporized. + Show Spoiler + Just a joke. Don't hate. edit: First concept art! ![[image loading]](http://i1.squidoocdn.com/resize/squidoo_images/250/draft_lens17905439module150007526photo_1304739988Terran_explosion.jpg) There it is in the background, on the right! | ||
|
Salteador Neo
Andorra5591 Posts
| ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
Observe that it hasn't been "released" yet. However, perhaps it actually is already released, but we just can't see it on the page. Perhaps it is cloaked, which is the reason why we don't see it on the Facebook page. Browder said in a recent interview that he wants a new Protoss raider. Cloaking would be a logical ability for a raider, especially considering that a perma-cloaked, high-DPS, low-durability raider would be perfect for Protoss. Therefore, I think the new unit will be the Dark Templar. | ||
| ||
