EPTKorean teams withdraw from NASL - Page 25
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
hdan
27 Posts
| ||
|
Heraklitus
United States553 Posts
| ||
|
integrity
United States1014 Posts
On August 12 2011 08:58 Lokj wrote: Sue them for real? What good would that do for SC2 eSport or the NASL? still if nasl feel they have been wronged down the long run due to viewership. and they have legal grounds i say all the power to them | ||
|
snailz
Croatia900 Posts
in that regard i was really surprised that SO many koreans signed up for s2. even tho they won't come now, i dont think it has to be a bad thing. as long as top koreans still come, it's all good. 5-6 top dogs and it's all good  edit: nasl should perhaps use that 100,000$ in a way that less money goes to #1 and more money to everyone that gets to lan finals | ||
|
Pyo
United States738 Posts
| ||
|
Fubi
2228 Posts
On August 12 2011 08:17 storm44 wrote: How about you change your fuckin terrible format. One series and you get knocked out? Who gives a shit if you pay for all their expenses. They are not going to travel across the world only to play for 30 minutes. I think this was a huge factor in why they chose not to participate. This ^ For 2-3 months, the Koreans had to wake up at ungodly hours every week, play with lag disadvantage, then players like Boxer had to travel half way across the globe... all this to play two freakin games? And you're telling them that their full travel cost wont be covered? No wonder players like Boxer is withdrew... | ||
|
Pengu
England226 Posts
I mean its almost like they were using this as a threat... if you don't do X we will throw our toys out the pram. | ||
|
Deadbread
Germany143 Posts
will watch nervetheless | ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On August 12 2011 08:56 NASL.tv wrote: We have absolutely no problem if the Koreans think the NASL is not worth their time // investment. Our only issue is the fact that they all: a) knew the contents of the contract, b) deliberately signed up players to qualify for the league, c) made demands, and d) waited until we already started the season to tell us that our offers to them were not acceptable. I'm really beginning to question how these Korean teams are managed when it comes to money. It seems very amateurish. | ||
|
Rorschach
United States623 Posts
On August 12 2011 09:03 Fubi wrote: This ^ For 2-3 months, the Koreans had to wake up at ungodly hours every week, play with lag disadvantage, then players like Boxer had to travel half way across the globe... all this to play two freakin games? And you're telling them that their full travel cost wont be covered? No wonder players like Boxer is withdrew... I hate to say it but I have to agree with both these posters. Prob won't watch NASL unless a friend pays for it....... | ||
|
netsky4
Austria511 Posts
Tbh a fair and understanding move by the Koreans | ||
|
forgottendreams
United States1771 Posts
On August 12 2011 09:02 ravenKRaz wrote: Man this sucks.... really unfortunate for the NASL. The koreans were way too greedy. Don't say "The Koreans". This is probably due to bigwigs at SC2Con and the GSL-MLG partnership feeling threatened from the NASL and its deep pockets for prize money. Question for NASL, will ZeNeX or NShoseo be able to participate? I feel as if both of those teams have more talented players then any of the teams listed here anyway.... | ||
|
Soulish
Canada1403 Posts
On August 12 2011 09:03 hdan wrote: I think its kinda funny that the community is split on this but everyone thinks that MLGs prize money is fine, when some people are saying there should be a minimum $2-5k payout for NASL Top16. Ridiculous. MLG lasts for 3 days, nasl lasts for 2 months. And MLG is going to raise the prizepool soon anyways. | ||
|
Orracle
United States314 Posts
I'm happy to see the NASL actually offering to work with them to make it more affordable, but in all honesty, it really doesn't seem to be either sides fault. | ||
|
Legio
Sweden235 Posts
With the very late announcement, it does seem like they were looking to hurt NASL in this case.. or perhaps get a cash bonus to the SC2con officials, and not just the players. | ||
|
Dali.
New Zealand689 Posts
On August 12 2011 09:02 ShootingStars wrote: There does 90% of the NASL viewers... If 90% of viewers watch simply to spot a 'mythical' Korean then they're fools. The game > the player. | ||
|
Phaded
Australia579 Posts
This issue is much deeper than just money I think. | ||
|
snailz
Croatia900 Posts
On August 12 2011 09:03 Fubi wrote: This ^ For 2-3 months, the Koreans had to wake up at ungodly hours every week, play with lag disadvantage, then players like Boxer had to travel half way across the globe... all this to play two freakin games? And you're telling them that their full travel cost wont be covered? No wonder players like Boxer is withdrew... ^ i was just saying that... change the format, it's bad. | ||
|
Kraznaya
United States3711 Posts
On August 12 2011 09:00 NASL.tv wrote: We have already begun paying back all security deposits of players who are no longer in Season 2. Our contract states that all prizes will be paid within 60 days of the end of Season 1. We are still within that time frame, and will be paying all prizes within that period! Artosis, HuK (who paid Boxer's deposit for S1), WeMadeFox, etc could all attest to the fact that we have and will pay our deposits back. That's not what I'm asking. I'm asking: do Korean teams simply not have the cash to pay their new security deposits? Because considering the $2000 you're offering for travel costs, it seems like that is the true hang up to their participation. In that case I believe an exception should be made for the Koreans and their security deposits, since they had an exemplary record of playing all games on time in Season 1. | ||
|
EightyFive
58 Posts
| ||
| ||
