EPTSo your terrible ladder system renders it impossible for him to queue up for any games, yet using another account is forbidden?
Fuck you activision
Blizzard warns HuK/TLO for account sharing - Page 34
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
So your terrible ladder system renders it impossible for him to queue up for any games, yet using another account is forbidden? Fuck you activision | ||
|
chickenhawk
Portugal339 Posts
Why is everyone making such a big deal about this? Oh, Blizzard enforcing the rules they set for their game? HOW DARE THEY!? Wrong, its our game. A game without players is incomplete. | ||
|
goiflin
Canada1218 Posts
On June 25 2011 07:52 TheDougler wrote: Why is everyone making such a big deal about this? Oh, Blizzard enforcing the rules they set for their game? HOW DARE THEY!? It's really not a big deal and threads like this do nothing but hurt e-sports. Frankly I think we're being the immature ones, if we want people to take e-sports seriously then the very VERY few times that Blizzard wants to say something we should listen to them IMO. How about no? How's that sound? They basically want HuK to buy a new account and grind it up to masters if he wants to find games quickly. It's silly, and this type of behavior shouldn't be supported. Honestly, it's the same thing as lending a game to your friend. Companies don't like that; they'd rather have your friend buy the game himself to play it. But, just because the company says that it's wrong, doesn't make the action wrong. There's nothing wrong with sharing an account for something like this. Perhaps if HuK was playing on TLO's account forever, and never actually had his own account, ever. Maybe then, it would warrant a warning. But this is just silly. We shouldn't just sit down and listen to them. And honestly, people aren't going to take esports seriously if we listen to blizzard. If we listened to blizzard, and never complained, we wouldn't have had GSL maps in the ladder pool; we'd still have steppes of war in there, since blizzard said they wanted rush maps in the ladder pool, like steppes of war. | ||
|
eloist
United States1017 Posts
If you want to get all 'FU' with Blizzard, do it about them putting this into the license to begin with. | ||
|
Turbo.Tactics
Germany675 Posts
In addition, Huks MMA problem is pretty unique or to phrase it differently the normal customer will never have this problem. I don't know what i would do in his situation but breaking the user agreement is not the way to go... and Blizzard is sending exactly this message by threatening bans on those who do. | ||
|
bubblegumbo
Taiwan1296 Posts
| ||
|
Mailing
United States3087 Posts
On June 25 2011 08:01 Turbo.Tactics wrote: This is basically Blizzard saying: "don't share accounts". Stop reading so much into it. In addition, Huks MMA problem is pretty unique or to phrase it differently the normal customer will never have this problem. I don't know what i would do in his situation but breaking the user agreement is not the way to go... and Blizzard is sending exactly this message by threatening bans on those who do. So basically Huk has to lose on purpose 10 games in a row just so he can play the game? Makes sense. | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
On June 25 2011 06:57 kevinmon wrote: Who gives a shit! Blizzard is retarded! Yet you continue to buy their products just like the rest of us. Let's face it. Nothing is going to happen until you don't buy into their crap anymore. Gamers are the biggest pawns when it comes to consumerism. Considering Blizzard has such a loyal fan base the likelihood of them treating their customers better is extremely far fetched. Nothing is going to change. In fact, Blizzard will only tighten the noose to protect their property. | ||
|
oBlade
United States5898 Posts
On June 25 2011 08:03 Mailing wrote: So basically Huk has to lose on purpose 10 games in a row just so he can play the game? Makes sense. Then he'd be warned for throwing games. | ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
On June 25 2011 07:55 chickenhawk wrote: Wrong, its our game. A game without players is incomplete. Lol no, its actually Blizzard's game. We all agree to the ToS when we bought the game. What's the problem? | ||
|
Phaded
Australia579 Posts
| ||
|
arb
Noobville17921 Posts
On June 25 2011 00:48 VicTimEyes wrote: Classic Blizzard to enforce the Terms of Use the players agreed on when installing the game. Yep, 100% support Blizzards decision. | ||
|
guitarizt
United States1492 Posts
What if a family member wants to play sc2 on your account? Is that sharing? What about a co-worker? What if you need to play games on an alias so people are checking up on you or you just want to be left alone? | ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
| ||
|
Heavenly
2172 Posts
On June 25 2011 08:03 Medrea wrote: Lol no, its actually Blizzard's game. We all agree to the ToS when we bought the game. What's the problem? The problem is that it's an idiotic thing to enforce in this situation? Just because it's in the ToS doesn't mean it's not stupid. No one is arguing that Blizzard isn't allowed to do this. | ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
On June 25 2011 08:07 Heavenly wrote: The problem is that it's an idiotic thing to enforce? How is this difficult to understand? Just because it's in the ToS doesn't mean it's stupid. No one is arguing that Blizzard isn't allowed to do this. They wouldn't put anything in the ToS they didn't mean to enforce. English is a very very precise language and fat is not allowed in the legal sense. | ||
|
Jim7
United States154 Posts
| ||
|
AxelTVx
Canada916 Posts
| ||
|
Soleron
United Kingdom1324 Posts
The problem is that it's an idiotic thing to enforce? How is this difficult to understand? Just because it's in the ToS doesn't mean it's stupid. No one is arguing that Blizzard isn't allowed to do this. It's an illegal contract and unenforceable. ToS and EULAs would not hold up if in court as binding contracts. | ||
|
jinorazi
Korea (South)4948 Posts
On June 25 2011 08:08 Medrea wrote: They wouldn't put anything in the ToS they didn't mean to enforce. English is a very very precise language and fat is not allowed in the legal sense. i think the point is, the people aren't happy with whats in the tos, however we dont have a choice but to "follow" it to play the game. | ||
| ||
