On July 08 2011 23:20 SafeAsCheese wrote:
Results are skewed by mass sometimes.
What imbalances a GSL player faces will not be the same as what a MLG pool player faces, for example.
If protoss found a build that was really hard to do, so that only 10 of the top protoss could pull it off but it had a 90% win rate, there would be problems, even though it could not effect the overall win rate.
Results are skewed by mass sometimes.
What imbalances a GSL player faces will not be the same as what a MLG pool player faces, for example.
If protoss found a build that was really hard to do, so that only 10 of the top protoss could pull it off but it had a 90% win rate, there would be problems, even though it could not effect the overall win rate.
God, people are so impossible.
*Shows Korean results*
"Nah sample size too low"
*Shows Korean + International results*
"Nah skewed by mass"
Not aiming solely at you but its so frustrating that whenever this kind of stuff gets posted people will try as hard as hell to discredit them(not that there is nothing wrong with checking sources and methodology) but I just feel that people just want to see someone that agrees with their perception >_>
But you are right, the balance at different skill levels should be accounted for, I am just frustrated because the OP had already separated the GSL and the int scene stats and people told him they were not valid because the sample size was too low >_>