| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
MaxField
United States2386 Posts
On June 22 2011 10:56 pzea469 wrote: Yeah thats one of the reasons im updating the baneling. Look at the pics in the last page. Ya that looks a lot better than before. I do think it looks pretty and cool, but i dont know if i will ever end up doing it to my account. | ||
|
IIIOmegaIII
Sweden319 Posts
| ||
|
Tsuycc
Canada269 Posts
| ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland24946 Posts
| ||
|
pzea469
United States1520 Posts
On June 22 2011 20:44 Ubertron wrote: Strange how this works but editing the sounds apparently not longer does? People were experiencing problems with sound when they dragged the download into the liberty folder instead of in the liberty MULTI like is stated in the instructions. check to see if this maybe happened. | ||
|
.Mthex-
United States168 Posts
| ||
|
Keldrath
United States449 Posts
| ||
|
ectonym
United States147 Posts
On June 15 2011 20:02 pzea469 wrote: Ohh sorry about this. Yeah sure ill make it version 1.0 I guess. I havent uploaded any changes since release because I dont want to make people download too often. But once I make a few more ill update. No teamcolor on collossi legs and less teamcolor on zerg buildings while they are being morphed are some things im changing. And hopefully also a fix for fungal. Also I made creep have more detail. I didnt mean to include this in the mpq but I think I did. If anyone is unpleased with the creep then remove the files that start with creep in the mpq. I will probably remove this from future releases since it is unrelated. Loving this change except for the Fungal Growth. As soon as it is changed please let us all know -- it is VERY difficult to tell what has been Fungal Growth-d Thanks for this | ||
|
pzea469
United States1520 Posts
On June 23 2011 17:04 ectonym wrote: Loving this change except for the Fungal Growth. As soon as it is changed please let us all know -- it is VERY difficult to tell what has been Fungal Growth-d Thanks for this ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/pHfXL.jpg) I seem to have finally fixed it. Im not sure what regular fungal looked like anymore but I think this is shinier, more easy to see? Or maybe its actually the same idk, I'm tired lol. Click to zoom in. EDIT: Just looked up a pic of regular fungal. My version is definitely easier to spot I think. Its definitely brighter. Zoom in on both images and compare. ![[image loading]](http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/images2/5/53/Fungal_Growth_and_Bane_vs_Bio.jpg) | ||
|
alokin
Canada269 Posts
| ||
|
Expurgate
United States208 Posts
| ||
|
Moochlol
United States456 Posts
| ||
|
Xanbatou
United States805 Posts
| ||
|
noregretz
Ireland1 Post
| ||
|
thnikkaman
19 Posts
I would just hope that teamliquid doesn't endorse something that can be used to cheat the game | ||
|
Blisse
Canada3710 Posts
If this is too dangerous for you, then don't download it. The author is presenting an argument, and a solution, which does not modify any of Blizzard's files, if you've read it over. And so far, no one has been banned or warned for using the textures. The textures also don't give any game changing advantage to the player, and no one competitive is using it, so it shouldn't matter in that regard either. Also, TeamLiquid is not endorsing the post or its contents. If you realize, there's a disclaimer at the bottom which says, The opinions expressed by our users do not reflect the official position of TeamLiquid.net or its staff. so chill out. If you don't want to use it, don't. He even has a disclaimer which says use at your risk. I use it because I don't have the best eyesight, and this clears up the game quite a bit, but there are some bugs to work out. | ||
|
Xanbatou
United States805 Posts
On June 24 2011 10:03 Blisse wrote: @Xanbatou, how is this relevant at all. If this is too dangerous for you, then don't download it. The author is presenting an argument, and a solution, which does not modify any of Blizzard's files, if you've read it over. And so far, no one has been banned or warned for using the textures. The textures also don't give any game changing advantage to the player, and no one competitive is using it, so it shouldn't matter in that regard either. Also, TeamLiquid is not endorsing the post or its contents. If you realize, there's a disclaimer at the bottom which says, so chill out. If you don't want to use it, don't. He even has a disclaimer which says use at your risk. I use it because I don't have the best eyesight, and this clears up the game quite a bit, but there are some bugs to work out. Uhh, no need to take that attitude. I was asking a legitimate question. As far how it's relevant, I'm asking a question about changing the texture of an observer? I'm not saying this is dangerous for me bro, calm down. I'm just curious if what I asked is possible. | ||
|
pzea469
United States1520 Posts
| ||
|
pzea469
United States1520 Posts
Alright let me know if something is off for me to fix, thanks! | ||
|
alokin
Canada269 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Road to EWC
Lemon vs HeRoMaRinE
Astrea vs GuMiho
goblin vs TBD
Ryung vs TBD
BSL: ProLeague
UltrA vs Sziky
Dewalt vs MadiNho
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
The PondCast
Replay Cast
BSL: ProLeague
SOOP
|
|
|
EPT
