EPTHad a TvT on slag pits earlier, where he tried a tank contain on the high ground but it was easily held with a couple tanks and mm and by me just taking more bases and the proxy pf at his gold.... Overall at first quick glance I think it's good that blizzard is making bigger maps, for more action, and more strategically military flanks and army positioning and macro games!
New Maps in 1v1 Pool - Page 22
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
-Jambi-
United States60 Posts
Had a TvT on slag pits earlier, where he tried a tank contain on the high ground but it was easily held with a couple tanks and mm and by me just taking more bases and the proxy pf at his gold.... Overall at first quick glance I think it's good that blizzard is making bigger maps, for more action, and more strategically military flanks and army positioning and macro games! | ||
|
shakenbake
United States207 Posts
 | ||
|
PiLoKo
Mexico144 Posts
| ||
|
Cha1R
United States221 Posts
| ||
|
blooblooblahblah
Australia4163 Posts
| ||
|
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
On February 26 2011 14:06 PiLoKo wrote: Shakuras gone but keep delta quadrant, way to go? Ya, no kidding. What is Blizzard thinking. I wish they would explain their decisions. It just makes no sense to me. Shakuras was a great map and a popular map. | ||
|
rebdomine
6040 Posts
It's actually the most decent map in the 1st map pool... | ||
|
JoLanTru
24 Posts
| ||
|
Coriolis
United States1152 Posts
| ||
|
Foreplay
United States1154 Posts
On February 26 2011 14:10 rebdomine wrote: Why, oh, why do they keep taking Shakuras away? It's actually the most decent map in the 1st map pool... Shakuras is 50/50 in zvt i'm stoked its gone. | ||
|
BamBam
745 Posts
 now im forced to play DQ and CS because all my votes went to all the new blizzard maps except for the new LT | ||
|
grevenchile
Chile118 Posts
| ||
|
Basileus
United States103 Posts
| ||
|
Honeybadger
United States821 Posts
Good god, there -has- to be a reason the gsl maps aren't in the game. | ||
|
drcatellino
Canada346 Posts
Whatever changes Blizzard do its seems inevitable to see non-stop bashing. People don't even try the maps and are already angry at the changes. I like blizzards maps. One of my favorite map was Desert Oasis. | ||
|
Honeybadger
United States821 Posts
On February 26 2011 14:32 drcatellino wrote: My god this forum is full of whiners. Whatever changes Blizzard do its seems inevitable to see non-stop bashing. People don't even try the maps and are already angry at the changes. I like blizzards maps. One of my favorite map was Desert Oasis. I liked oasis as well. It was brutal, but very, very interesting. You're right that most people are whining. The map design isn't likely to affect many of my games' outcomes (with the exception of close position backwater being hilariously bad) Gamers, unlike any other group, love to hate their hobby. But that's not to say these maps aren't very, very bad. the pro's on catz's stream all came to that conclusion. And I just played a long distance lost temple tvz. That map is basically impossible to push with mech on anymore. the middle is just a giant boxing ring for flanks. | ||
|
mastergriggy
United States1312 Posts
| ||
|
udgnim
United States8024 Posts
bring back Shakuras Blizzard | ||
|
BattRoll
100 Posts
So far I've played these new maps about a dozen times and I think that from a zerg perspective, they generally result in better games - less early all in stuff and the games are progressing into later stages. Vs Protoss, I feel like they're basically being forced into 4 gating - which coincidentally seems like it will be more effective since the average zerg is going to have a false sense of security from the distances. Vs Terran - I feel like there's going to be less give and take and every attack is going to be balls deep all in on their part - which I think is going to involve a lot of base trading. | ||
|
BattRoll
100 Posts
| ||
| ||
