• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 18:23
CET 00:23
KST 08:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns5[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 103SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-1822Weekly Cups (Dec 22-28): Classic & MaxPax win, Percival surprises3Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Weekly Cups (Dec 22-28): Classic & MaxPax win, Percival surprises Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Starcraft 2 Zerg Coach
Tourneys
SC2 AI Tournament 2026 WardiTV Winter Cup OSC Season 13 World Championship uThermal 2v2 Circuit WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ I would like to say something about StarCraft Data analysis on 70 million replays Empty tournaments section on Liquipedia A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 SLON Grand Finals – Season 2
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread The Big Programming Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced
Blogs
How do archons sleep?
8882
Psychological Factors That D…
TrAiDoS
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
StarCraft improvement
iopq
GOAT of Goats list
BisuDagger
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 840 users

Is the Blizzard Ladder Hurting SC2? - Page 11

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 15 Next All
DyEnasTy
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States3714 Posts
February 13 2011 19:58 GMT
#201
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.



The game has been around for 7 or so months, but Blizzard has been around for 20 years.
Much better to die an awesome Terran than to live as a magic wielding fairy or a mindless sac of biological goop. -Manifesto7
101toss
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
3232 Posts
February 13 2011 20:02 GMT
#202
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.
Math doesn't kill champions and neither do wards
Enzyme
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Australia183 Posts
February 13 2011 20:12 GMT
#203
While the first iPhone wasn't very polished as a phone, it was still ok compared to other phones at the time. If it has come out the size of a room with 64k of memory, then people wouldn't have said "You can't compare the iPhone to phone X, the iPhone has only been out 7 months". Technology as a whole has advanced from then, the ideas already exist, you can't just take steps into the stone age and claim that something is new hence it doesn't need to be very good.

While I agree with the sentiment that Blizzard has taken a step back from ICCup, we have to remember ICCup was never made by Blizzard in the first place. Bnet 2.0 IS a step forward to them, because the old Bnet was useless, hence ICCup. It's just a shame they couldn't rip more features, hopefully they will come with time. The longevity of SC2 would seem to hang on it.
FrostOtter
Profile Joined September 2010
United States537 Posts
February 13 2011 20:12 GMT
#204
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.
2v2SNAX
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada97 Posts
February 13 2011 20:15 GMT
#205
I think the lack of them changing maps has been to better help them balance the game. If they're changing the maps a lot then the data they generate may not be due to imbalances in races but maybe map reasons....


I would love a new map pool, the maps are boring, but the game is not balanced yet so this is simply the process.

In regards to everything else, they've sure dropped the ball. Imagine tournament features... Would actually be cool.,
101toss
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
3232 Posts
February 13 2011 20:43 GMT
#206
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.

It's proof of how DRM kills the game (remember spore and how cracked copies were better than real copies?)

Also, if there's going to be no LAN, at least have servers that don't randomly drop people
Math doesn't kill champions and neither do wards
Bartimaeus
Profile Joined January 2011
United States67 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-13 21:09:39
February 13 2011 21:07 GMT
#207
I completely agree with the main post, but I haven't read through all eleven pages so forgive me if this has been mentioned before.

The reason I bought a smurf account to play terran on was mainly because of PvP. It's just such a stagnant matchup and it revolves purely around who can A) Who defends/pushes the 4gate better and B) who can get more colossi faster and much less depends on factors such as positioning, unit composition (as both compositions are the same - stalkers, maybe 1 immortal, and as many colossi as possible) and macro as whoever expands first is viable to get crushed by a 2-colossi push.

The maps are horrendous: Blizzard's refusal to accept GSL maps which are clearly better than their current (and projected) map pools puzzles and annoys me, although I'm sure they wouldn't attempt to make starcraft 2 a cash-shop game with map-packs.

I think the matchup of PvP and the current map-pool will be the deciding factor of many to either leave the game (blizzard loses no profit from this as it is not a pay-per-month game) or to buy a smurf account (which blizzard profits hugely from). I believe this is why blizzard invests so little into the features i mentioned in this post.


edit: I would encourage someone with authority to re-post this onto the Battlenet forums so it is viewed by more people
FrostOtter
Profile Joined September 2010
United States537 Posts
February 13 2011 21:21 GMT
#208
On February 14 2011 05:43 101toss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.

It's proof of how DRM kills the game (remember spore and how cracked copies were better than real copies?)

Also, if there's going to be no LAN, at least have servers that don't randomly drop people

I never really have a problem.
Arisen
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States2382 Posts
February 13 2011 21:42 GMT
#209
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.


Yeah, well should they start releasing computers without the ability to access the internet? Because, you know, some people used the internet to look up child porn and steal movies/music.

No. That's stupid.Control the abuse, not the service that's being abused.
"If you're not angry, you're not paying attention"
SpoR
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1542 Posts
February 13 2011 21:44 GMT
#210
On February 13 2011 22:52 FrostOtter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 13 2011 16:49 SpoR wrote:
your friend is correct in everything. Part of the reason I quit playing sc2 was because all that crap. Maybe once they fix all or most of that I may come back.

When I quit something I don't generally put time into talking about it on the internet, so you'll forgive me if I don't quite believe you.

I don't play for a number of reasons. I still like to follow things and see what's new. I've been coming to TL a long time.
A man is what he thinks about all day long.
Klive5ive
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United Kingdom6056 Posts
February 13 2011 21:48 GMT
#211
I agree with your friends points and preferred the ICCUP system where you could choose your matchup, map and your opponent also.

But I'm pretty sure we had a poll and most of TL prefered the new system. So maybe it's a toss-up but overall I'd say that probably the new system is better overall (even though I prefer the old).

Now the lack of decent maps and decent balance... we'll that's completely unexcusable in my eyes.
At least now we have chat channels we can sort out our own games, that's a blessing at least.
Don't hate the player - Hate the game
red_hq
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada450 Posts
February 13 2011 21:57 GMT
#212
I think a way blizzard could implement these sort of things would be the option before hitting find match, to select oppenents race (T,P,Z,random, and any) and map(s). So you could zone in one match up.

Yes blizzard NEEDS to update maps they have been decent at it so far, but I would like to see it better.
Get some 'good' Dota 2: twitch.tv/redhq
Schnullerbacke13
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany1199 Posts
February 13 2011 22:02 GMT
#213
i miss LAN and the poosibility to choose opponents race at custom games the most.
21 is half the truth
loft
Profile Joined July 2009
United States344 Posts
February 13 2011 22:05 GMT
#214
Both sides are right "ladder gets boring" and "these things take time"

The game is still new, 2 expansions are coming. not 1, but 2!

Yes it's a money game... and yes it will improve.
Voice your concern and be patient.
Drake
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany6146 Posts
February 13 2011 22:08 GMT
#215
some of the problems are right, some ideas not

as example yes it would be cool i think to have 3 ranks on one account for every race but i dislike to have many accounts. i like how they did it to prevent everyone from smurfing so much like in bw where everyone had 200 accounts and the levels from D to C+ was sometimes so many B players smurfing that it was no fun anymore.

the problem with the maps is a real issue but to train some matchups and some specific maps the custom games is all to do

i would not like if you can pick matchup and map because then some maps/matchups would nearly have no gamers anymore

all in all i think sc2 is on a good way but it needs some progress and ...

when does blizzard allow us to watch reps together its so hard to train without that feature
Nb.Drake / CoL_Drake / Original Joined TL.net Tuesday, 15th of March 2005
FrostOtter
Profile Joined September 2010
United States537 Posts
February 13 2011 22:21 GMT
#216
On February 14 2011 06:42 Arisen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.


Yeah, well should they start releasing computers without the ability to access the internet? Because, you know, some people used the internet to look up child porn and steal movies/music.

No. That's stupid.Control the abuse, not the service that's being abused.

That is how they control the abuse, smart guy. Blizzard owns SC2. They find that with LAN, people tend to use their games illegally/make their own ladders/use their own maps-- then, when Blizzard challenges the illegal game use, said abusers then claim that their contribution makes the game not fully Blizzard's property.

Why do you think that Blizzard isn't letting SC2 operate like BW? Because of the community, not in spite of the community. Private ladders and KeSPA did this to themselves. Ever wonder why all the iCCup pleas fall on deaf ears? Because Blizzard doesn't want iCCup, or anyone else, to undermine their authority this time. It doesn't matter whether iCCup or anyone else has the intention of undermining Blizzard's IP rights, the fact remains that BW was abused so much that Blizzard isn't going to put itself in that position again.

You can only cut out the middle-man so much before he either goes away or cuts you out-- and guess what happened.
101toss
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
3232 Posts
February 13 2011 22:26 GMT
#217
On February 14 2011 07:21 FrostOtter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 06:42 Arisen wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.


Yeah, well should they start releasing computers without the ability to access the internet? Because, you know, some people used the internet to look up child porn and steal movies/music.

No. That's stupid.Control the abuse, not the service that's being abused.

That is how they control the abuse, smart guy. Blizzard owns SC2. They find that with LAN, people tend to use their games illegally/make their own ladders/use their own maps-- then, when Blizzard challenges the illegal game use, said abusers then claim that their contribution makes the game not fully Blizzard's property.

Why do you think that Blizzard isn't letting SC2 operate like BW? Because of the community, not in spite of the community. Private ladders and KeSPA did this to themselves. Ever wonder why all the iCCup pleas fall on deaf ears? Because Blizzard doesn't want iCCup, or anyone else, to undermine their authority this time. It doesn't matter whether iCCup or anyone else has the intention of undermining Blizzard's IP rights, the fact remains that BW was abused so much that Blizzard isn't going to put itself in that position again.

You can only cut out the middle-man so much before he either goes away or cuts you out-- and guess what happened.

Which is why we're forced to use the shitty interface that is Bnet 0.2
Math doesn't kill champions and neither do wards
FrostOtter
Profile Joined September 2010
United States537 Posts
February 13 2011 22:28 GMT
#218
On February 14 2011 07:26 101toss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 07:21 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 06:42 Arisen wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.


Yeah, well should they start releasing computers without the ability to access the internet? Because, you know, some people used the internet to look up child porn and steal movies/music.

No. That's stupid.Control the abuse, not the service that's being abused.

That is how they control the abuse, smart guy. Blizzard owns SC2. They find that with LAN, people tend to use their games illegally/make their own ladders/use their own maps-- then, when Blizzard challenges the illegal game use, said abusers then claim that their contribution makes the game not fully Blizzard's property.

Why do you think that Blizzard isn't letting SC2 operate like BW? Because of the community, not in spite of the community. Private ladders and KeSPA did this to themselves. Ever wonder why all the iCCup pleas fall on deaf ears? Because Blizzard doesn't want iCCup, or anyone else, to undermine their authority this time. It doesn't matter whether iCCup or anyone else has the intention of undermining Blizzard's IP rights, the fact remains that BW was abused so much that Blizzard isn't going to put itself in that position again.

You can only cut out the middle-man so much before he either goes away or cuts you out-- and guess what happened.

Which is why we're forced to use the shitty interface that is Bnet 0.2

I don't think it is that shitty, since I mainly just ladder unless I'm playing with friends, but yes. That's why.
Arisen
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States2382 Posts
February 13 2011 22:44 GMT
#219
On February 14 2011 07:21 FrostOtter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 06:42 Arisen wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.


Yeah, well should they start releasing computers without the ability to access the internet? Because, you know, some people used the internet to look up child porn and steal movies/music.

No. That's stupid.Control the abuse, not the service that's being abused.

That is how they control the abuse, smart guy.


Obviously, and I'm saying its a shitty solution that reflects that they care less about the game and more about profit margins. They COULD have LAN and stop the abuse, but they don't want to put that effort in, and I as well as anyone else who thinks that this is stupid should speak up about it, or it will never get implimented. If you think the game is perfect how it is, that's fine, however there are a LOT of people (including a large number of professional players) who want things like LAN, better custom game support, custom ladders, etc. who can, will, and should keep pressure on Blizzard to change the game.
"If you're not angry, you're not paying attention"
floor exercise
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Canada5847 Posts
February 13 2011 22:46 GMT
#220
On February 14 2011 07:28 FrostOtter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 07:26 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 07:21 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 06:42 Arisen wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.


Yeah, well should they start releasing computers without the ability to access the internet? Because, you know, some people used the internet to look up child porn and steal movies/music.

No. That's stupid.Control the abuse, not the service that's being abused.

That is how they control the abuse, smart guy. Blizzard owns SC2. They find that with LAN, people tend to use their games illegally/make their own ladders/use their own maps-- then, when Blizzard challenges the illegal game use, said abusers then claim that their contribution makes the game not fully Blizzard's property.

Why do you think that Blizzard isn't letting SC2 operate like BW? Because of the community, not in spite of the community. Private ladders and KeSPA did this to themselves. Ever wonder why all the iCCup pleas fall on deaf ears? Because Blizzard doesn't want iCCup, or anyone else, to undermine their authority this time. It doesn't matter whether iCCup or anyone else has the intention of undermining Blizzard's IP rights, the fact remains that BW was abused so much that Blizzard isn't going to put itself in that position again.

You can only cut out the middle-man so much before he either goes away or cuts you out-- and guess what happened.

Which is why we're forced to use the shitty interface that is Bnet 0.2

I don't think it is that shitty, since I mainly just ladder unless I'm playing with friends, but yes. That's why.


It's really bad, take it from me! I wouldn't lie
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 15 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 37m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft215
elazer 211
JuggernautJason124
UpATreeSC 120
Nathanias 101
CosmosSc2 29
White-Ra 29
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 499
Shuttle 185
910 43
Dota 2
syndereN485
monkeys_forever309
League of Legends
JimRising 709
C9.Mang0216
Counter-Strike
fl0m1489
Foxcn154
Super Smash Bros
PPMD23
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu501
Other Games
tarik_tv6659
Grubby3520
Liquid`RaSZi2502
shahzam521
Pyrionflax342
B2W.Neo170
QueenE78
Livibee66
ViBE48
minikerr32
Chillindude7
Ketroc2
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick40280
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 39
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV383
• Noizen27
Other Games
• imaqtpie2572
• Shiphtur794
• Scarra1
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
1h 37m
davetesta20
SOOP
4h 37m
OSC
12h 37m
OSC
1d 14h
SOOP
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
IPSL
4 days
DragOn vs Sziky
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
[ Show More ]
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-05
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
OSC Championship Season 13
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W3
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Thunderfire SC2 All-star 2025
Big Gabe Cup #3
Nations Cup 2026
Underdog Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.