• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:09
CEST 01:09
KST 08:09
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies18Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview2herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2026)5Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO4 & Finals Preview5[ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course12
Community News
Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League2Weekly Cups (May 11-17): Classic wins double0Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO8 Results2Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win1Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !18
StarCraft 2
General
herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview Weekly Cups (May 11-17): Classic wins double Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO4 & Finals Preview Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists
Tourneys
Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League GSL Code S Season 2 (2026) GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 527 Hell Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 526 Rubber and Glue Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ VPN experiences 25 Years Since Brood War Patch 1.08 vespene.gg — BW replays in browser (Spoiler) ASL21 Winner's Interview
Tourneys
[ASL21] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Muta micro map competition [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Dating: How's your luck? European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software)
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Esports Organizations: Raisi…
TrAiDoS
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1438 users

Is the Blizzard Ladder Hurting SC2? - Page 11

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 15 Next All
DyEnasTy
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States3714 Posts
February 13 2011 19:58 GMT
#201
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.



The game has been around for 7 or so months, but Blizzard has been around for 20 years.
Much better to die an awesome Terran than to live as a magic wielding fairy or a mindless sac of biological goop. -Manifesto7
101toss
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
3232 Posts
February 13 2011 20:02 GMT
#202
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.
Math doesn't kill champions and neither do wards
Enzyme
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Australia183 Posts
February 13 2011 20:12 GMT
#203
While the first iPhone wasn't very polished as a phone, it was still ok compared to other phones at the time. If it has come out the size of a room with 64k of memory, then people wouldn't have said "You can't compare the iPhone to phone X, the iPhone has only been out 7 months". Technology as a whole has advanced from then, the ideas already exist, you can't just take steps into the stone age and claim that something is new hence it doesn't need to be very good.

While I agree with the sentiment that Blizzard has taken a step back from ICCup, we have to remember ICCup was never made by Blizzard in the first place. Bnet 2.0 IS a step forward to them, because the old Bnet was useless, hence ICCup. It's just a shame they couldn't rip more features, hopefully they will come with time. The longevity of SC2 would seem to hang on it.
FrostOtter
Profile Joined September 2010
United States537 Posts
February 13 2011 20:12 GMT
#204
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.
2v2SNAX
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada97 Posts
February 13 2011 20:15 GMT
#205
I think the lack of them changing maps has been to better help them balance the game. If they're changing the maps a lot then the data they generate may not be due to imbalances in races but maybe map reasons....


I would love a new map pool, the maps are boring, but the game is not balanced yet so this is simply the process.

In regards to everything else, they've sure dropped the ball. Imagine tournament features... Would actually be cool.,
101toss
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
3232 Posts
February 13 2011 20:43 GMT
#206
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.

It's proof of how DRM kills the game (remember spore and how cracked copies were better than real copies?)

Also, if there's going to be no LAN, at least have servers that don't randomly drop people
Math doesn't kill champions and neither do wards
Bartimaeus
Profile Joined January 2011
United States67 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-13 21:09:39
February 13 2011 21:07 GMT
#207
I completely agree with the main post, but I haven't read through all eleven pages so forgive me if this has been mentioned before.

The reason I bought a smurf account to play terran on was mainly because of PvP. It's just such a stagnant matchup and it revolves purely around who can A) Who defends/pushes the 4gate better and B) who can get more colossi faster and much less depends on factors such as positioning, unit composition (as both compositions are the same - stalkers, maybe 1 immortal, and as many colossi as possible) and macro as whoever expands first is viable to get crushed by a 2-colossi push.

The maps are horrendous: Blizzard's refusal to accept GSL maps which are clearly better than their current (and projected) map pools puzzles and annoys me, although I'm sure they wouldn't attempt to make starcraft 2 a cash-shop game with map-packs.

I think the matchup of PvP and the current map-pool will be the deciding factor of many to either leave the game (blizzard loses no profit from this as it is not a pay-per-month game) or to buy a smurf account (which blizzard profits hugely from). I believe this is why blizzard invests so little into the features i mentioned in this post.


edit: I would encourage someone with authority to re-post this onto the Battlenet forums so it is viewed by more people
FrostOtter
Profile Joined September 2010
United States537 Posts
February 13 2011 21:21 GMT
#208
On February 14 2011 05:43 101toss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.

It's proof of how DRM kills the game (remember spore and how cracked copies were better than real copies?)

Also, if there's going to be no LAN, at least have servers that don't randomly drop people

I never really have a problem.
Arisen
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States2382 Posts
February 13 2011 21:42 GMT
#209
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.


Yeah, well should they start releasing computers without the ability to access the internet? Because, you know, some people used the internet to look up child porn and steal movies/music.

No. That's stupid.Control the abuse, not the service that's being abused.
"If you're not angry, you're not paying attention"
SpoR
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1542 Posts
February 13 2011 21:44 GMT
#210
On February 13 2011 22:52 FrostOtter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 13 2011 16:49 SpoR wrote:
your friend is correct in everything. Part of the reason I quit playing sc2 was because all that crap. Maybe once they fix all or most of that I may come back.

When I quit something I don't generally put time into talking about it on the internet, so you'll forgive me if I don't quite believe you.

I don't play for a number of reasons. I still like to follow things and see what's new. I've been coming to TL a long time.
A man is what he thinks about all day long.
Klive5ive
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United Kingdom6056 Posts
February 13 2011 21:48 GMT
#211
I agree with your friends points and preferred the ICCUP system where you could choose your matchup, map and your opponent also.

But I'm pretty sure we had a poll and most of TL prefered the new system. So maybe it's a toss-up but overall I'd say that probably the new system is better overall (even though I prefer the old).

Now the lack of decent maps and decent balance... we'll that's completely unexcusable in my eyes.
At least now we have chat channels we can sort out our own games, that's a blessing at least.
Don't hate the player - Hate the game
red_hq
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada450 Posts
February 13 2011 21:57 GMT
#212
I think a way blizzard could implement these sort of things would be the option before hitting find match, to select oppenents race (T,P,Z,random, and any) and map(s). So you could zone in one match up.

Yes blizzard NEEDS to update maps they have been decent at it so far, but I would like to see it better.
Get some 'good' Dota 2: twitch.tv/redhq
Schnullerbacke13
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany1199 Posts
February 13 2011 22:02 GMT
#213
i miss LAN and the poosibility to choose opponents race at custom games the most.
21 is half the truth
loft
Profile Joined July 2009
United States344 Posts
February 13 2011 22:05 GMT
#214
Both sides are right "ladder gets boring" and "these things take time"

The game is still new, 2 expansions are coming. not 1, but 2!

Yes it's a money game... and yes it will improve.
Voice your concern and be patient.
Drake
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany6146 Posts
February 13 2011 22:08 GMT
#215
some of the problems are right, some ideas not

as example yes it would be cool i think to have 3 ranks on one account for every race but i dislike to have many accounts. i like how they did it to prevent everyone from smurfing so much like in bw where everyone had 200 accounts and the levels from D to C+ was sometimes so many B players smurfing that it was no fun anymore.

the problem with the maps is a real issue but to train some matchups and some specific maps the custom games is all to do

i would not like if you can pick matchup and map because then some maps/matchups would nearly have no gamers anymore

all in all i think sc2 is on a good way but it needs some progress and ...

when does blizzard allow us to watch reps together its so hard to train without that feature
Nb.Drake / CoL_Drake / Original Joined TL.net Tuesday, 15th of March 2005
FrostOtter
Profile Joined September 2010
United States537 Posts
February 13 2011 22:21 GMT
#216
On February 14 2011 06:42 Arisen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.


Yeah, well should they start releasing computers without the ability to access the internet? Because, you know, some people used the internet to look up child porn and steal movies/music.

No. That's stupid.Control the abuse, not the service that's being abused.

That is how they control the abuse, smart guy. Blizzard owns SC2. They find that with LAN, people tend to use their games illegally/make their own ladders/use their own maps-- then, when Blizzard challenges the illegal game use, said abusers then claim that their contribution makes the game not fully Blizzard's property.

Why do you think that Blizzard isn't letting SC2 operate like BW? Because of the community, not in spite of the community. Private ladders and KeSPA did this to themselves. Ever wonder why all the iCCup pleas fall on deaf ears? Because Blizzard doesn't want iCCup, or anyone else, to undermine their authority this time. It doesn't matter whether iCCup or anyone else has the intention of undermining Blizzard's IP rights, the fact remains that BW was abused so much that Blizzard isn't going to put itself in that position again.

You can only cut out the middle-man so much before he either goes away or cuts you out-- and guess what happened.
101toss
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
3232 Posts
February 13 2011 22:26 GMT
#217
On February 14 2011 07:21 FrostOtter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 06:42 Arisen wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.


Yeah, well should they start releasing computers without the ability to access the internet? Because, you know, some people used the internet to look up child porn and steal movies/music.

No. That's stupid.Control the abuse, not the service that's being abused.

That is how they control the abuse, smart guy. Blizzard owns SC2. They find that with LAN, people tend to use their games illegally/make their own ladders/use their own maps-- then, when Blizzard challenges the illegal game use, said abusers then claim that their contribution makes the game not fully Blizzard's property.

Why do you think that Blizzard isn't letting SC2 operate like BW? Because of the community, not in spite of the community. Private ladders and KeSPA did this to themselves. Ever wonder why all the iCCup pleas fall on deaf ears? Because Blizzard doesn't want iCCup, or anyone else, to undermine their authority this time. It doesn't matter whether iCCup or anyone else has the intention of undermining Blizzard's IP rights, the fact remains that BW was abused so much that Blizzard isn't going to put itself in that position again.

You can only cut out the middle-man so much before he either goes away or cuts you out-- and guess what happened.

Which is why we're forced to use the shitty interface that is Bnet 0.2
Math doesn't kill champions and neither do wards
FrostOtter
Profile Joined September 2010
United States537 Posts
February 13 2011 22:28 GMT
#218
On February 14 2011 07:26 101toss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 07:21 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 06:42 Arisen wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.


Yeah, well should they start releasing computers without the ability to access the internet? Because, you know, some people used the internet to look up child porn and steal movies/music.

No. That's stupid.Control the abuse, not the service that's being abused.

That is how they control the abuse, smart guy. Blizzard owns SC2. They find that with LAN, people tend to use their games illegally/make their own ladders/use their own maps-- then, when Blizzard challenges the illegal game use, said abusers then claim that their contribution makes the game not fully Blizzard's property.

Why do you think that Blizzard isn't letting SC2 operate like BW? Because of the community, not in spite of the community. Private ladders and KeSPA did this to themselves. Ever wonder why all the iCCup pleas fall on deaf ears? Because Blizzard doesn't want iCCup, or anyone else, to undermine their authority this time. It doesn't matter whether iCCup or anyone else has the intention of undermining Blizzard's IP rights, the fact remains that BW was abused so much that Blizzard isn't going to put itself in that position again.

You can only cut out the middle-man so much before he either goes away or cuts you out-- and guess what happened.

Which is why we're forced to use the shitty interface that is Bnet 0.2

I don't think it is that shitty, since I mainly just ladder unless I'm playing with friends, but yes. That's why.
Arisen
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States2382 Posts
February 13 2011 22:44 GMT
#219
On February 14 2011 07:21 FrostOtter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 06:42 Arisen wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.


Yeah, well should they start releasing computers without the ability to access the internet? Because, you know, some people used the internet to look up child porn and steal movies/music.

No. That's stupid.Control the abuse, not the service that's being abused.

That is how they control the abuse, smart guy.


Obviously, and I'm saying its a shitty solution that reflects that they care less about the game and more about profit margins. They COULD have LAN and stop the abuse, but they don't want to put that effort in, and I as well as anyone else who thinks that this is stupid should speak up about it, or it will never get implimented. If you think the game is perfect how it is, that's fine, however there are a LOT of people (including a large number of professional players) who want things like LAN, better custom game support, custom ladders, etc. who can, will, and should keep pressure on Blizzard to change the game.
"If you're not angry, you're not paying attention"
floor exercise
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Canada5847 Posts
February 13 2011 22:46 GMT
#220
On February 14 2011 07:28 FrostOtter wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 14 2011 07:26 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 07:21 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 06:42 Arisen wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:12 FrostOtter wrote:
On February 14 2011 05:02 101toss wrote:
On February 14 2011 04:54 stormchaser wrote:
Starcraft 2 is fine when it comes to the ladder. The real problem is that the community continually compares a 7 month (?) old game to a game thats been around for YEARS.

What you fail to see is the framework has already been there. BW was in the dark ages of gaming. SC2 is in the year 2010, with plenty of resources and feedback available.

A 7 month old game released with no LAN? No search function for games? Region locked? Damn, even consoles have more flexibility than SC2.

Once again, and I'm not sure why this has to be constantly pointed out, SC2 lacks some of those features, specifically the LAN, because those features were abused in the original.


Yeah, well should they start releasing computers without the ability to access the internet? Because, you know, some people used the internet to look up child porn and steal movies/music.

No. That's stupid.Control the abuse, not the service that's being abused.

That is how they control the abuse, smart guy. Blizzard owns SC2. They find that with LAN, people tend to use their games illegally/make their own ladders/use their own maps-- then, when Blizzard challenges the illegal game use, said abusers then claim that their contribution makes the game not fully Blizzard's property.

Why do you think that Blizzard isn't letting SC2 operate like BW? Because of the community, not in spite of the community. Private ladders and KeSPA did this to themselves. Ever wonder why all the iCCup pleas fall on deaf ears? Because Blizzard doesn't want iCCup, or anyone else, to undermine their authority this time. It doesn't matter whether iCCup or anyone else has the intention of undermining Blizzard's IP rights, the fact remains that BW was abused so much that Blizzard isn't going to put itself in that position again.

You can only cut out the middle-man so much before he either goes away or cuts you out-- and guess what happened.

Which is why we're forced to use the shitty interface that is Bnet 0.2

I don't think it is that shitty, since I mainly just ladder unless I'm playing with friends, but yes. That's why.


It's really bad, take it from me! I wouldn't lie
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 15 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 51m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft325
SpeCial 119
SteadfastSC 48
ProTech37
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 402
Movie 85
NaDa 12
Dota 2
monkeys_forever495
NeuroSwarm96
League of Legends
Doublelift5242
Counter-Strike
kRYSTAL_59
Other Games
shahzam810
uThermal246
C9.Mang0195
Trikslyr40
JuggernautJason25
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL378
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta117
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21525
Other Games
• imaqtpie1833
• Shiphtur380
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
51m
Kung Fu Cup
11h 51m
GSL
1d 10h
herO vs Classic
Cure vs Clem
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 15h
Replay Cast
2 days
GSL
2 days
Maru vs SHIN
Zoun vs Rogue
WardiTV Spring Champion…
2 days
SKillous vs Strange
Lambo vs Strange
Ryung vs Strange
Lambo vs Ryung
Ryung vs SKillous
Lambo vs SKillous
OSC
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Maestros of the Game
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Lambo vs SHIN
Solar vs Rogue
herO vs Clem
Maestros of the Game
4 days
IPSL
4 days
ZZZero vs WorsT
Julia vs eOnzErG
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Maestros of the Game
5 days
IPSL
5 days
Dragon vs Artosis
dxtr13 vs Hawk
BSL
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Monday Night Weeklies
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 21
2026 GSL S1
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

2026 KK StarCraft Pro League
BSL Season 22
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
KK 2v2 League Season 1
YSL S3
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
SCTL 2026 Spring
WardiTV Spring 2026
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: King of Kings
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
Bounty Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.