EPTAlso, rain is in Code A. I love it, death to 1 base allins.
March Code S player list - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Boundless
Canada588 Posts
Also, rain is in Code A. I love it, death to 1 base allins. | ||
|
happyness
United States2400 Posts
| ||
|
happyness
United States2400 Posts
On January 30 2011 09:28 Boundless wrote: This could easily be a repeat of the last Code S tournament if they don't change up the damned maps. No good protosses except MC+NsPGeniuS. I could see MVP going deep again, maybe even repeating (although that would be a stretch). I play Terran and we need some diversity here. Maybe I'll cheer for Cool this season, but I doubt he'll bring his game like in S1, his winners cheque has allowed him to drink too much. Also, rain is in Code A. I love it, death to 1 base allins. I would put Tester on the same level as Genius. Both really good protosses who usually lose because of greedy play. | ||
|
redeux
United States148 Posts
On January 30 2011 07:55 Zephirdd wrote: My hopes is that, with the map pool change incoming, if becomes close to the 1/3 next time. the map change still hasn't been officially announced though. I hope they take effect for GSL 5. As of now though, only the GSTL map pool changes have been officially announced. | ||
|
Akuemon
Canada151 Posts
4 prime 3 fou 2 IM 8 OG's 1 liquid 1 EG 6 ZeNex 3 TSL 2 ST 1 SlayerS 1 Fox | ||
|
Boundless
Canada588 Posts
On January 30 2011 09:34 happyness wrote: I would put Tester on the same level as Genius. Both really good protosses who usually lose because of greedy play. Oh yeah, thats' true. I didn't even notice him in there because I was looking for the name TSL.Trickster. | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
On January 30 2011 09:35 GetGood wrote: the map change still hasn't been officially announced though. I hope they take effect for GSL 5. As of now though, only the GSTL map pool changes have been officially announced. Hopefully, the GSTL map pool change will be the final test of their new maps before implementing them for the next GSL. It would be a shame if after all this testing on GSTL and the Gisado stream, the maps don't end up making the cut. However, I think GOM has too much to lose from not changing up their map pool. | ||
|
Dezire
Netherlands640 Posts
| ||
|
Ribbon
United States5278 Posts
On January 30 2011 09:54 Dezire wrote: Rain in code a, deserved, who didnt was leenock tho. that kid is good! Leenock totally deserved his losses, though. He played ludicrously greedy, and lost to a-moved marines due to forgetting to make any units at all. | ||
ZeromuS
Canada13389 Posts
| ||
|
revoN
Japan804 Posts
On January 30 2011 05:28 Zephirdd wrote: What. Rain. what. wait. second. WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT. FruitDealer is still in but Rain dropped? mind=blown IdrA had forseen this. (in the most recent interview with Artosis b4 GSL4 started iirc) | ||
|
doffe
Sweden636 Posts
On January 30 2011 07:27 jalstar wrote: + Show Spoiler + the point is that MVP copied MKP's style of play, implying MKP's style is solid and not a gimmick that can be countered + Show Spoiler + SPOILERTAGS! How did he copy MKPs style? Sure I dont remember exactly how the games went and I missed most of the game on scrap in wich I understand he sort of copied it but the rest? He incorporated tanks pretty early on in all 3 games wich is in my opinion not copying MKPs style. It is pretty late in the game before you see MKP getting tanks and I have seldom or rather never seen him use them in a timing push. | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
On January 30 2011 10:42 doffe wrote: + Show Spoiler + SPOILERTAGS! How did he copy MKPs style? Sure I dont remember exactly how the games went and I missed most of the game on scrap in wich I understand he sort of copied it but the rest? He incorporated tanks pretty early on in all 3 games wich is in my opinion not copying MKPs style. It is pretty late in the game before you see MKP getting tanks and I have seldom or rather never seen him use them in a timing push. + Show Spoiler + Well, MVP went for an aggressive one-base, multiple barracks, pure marine aggressive push against MKP during many of the games, which is something many people thought would come out of MKP instead. People equate MKP with an aggressive, marine-heavy style, yet in the Code S finals MVP outproduced marines and was more aggressive than MKP, which was ironic considering MarineKing was dethroned as the king of aggressive marine play. | ||
|
Reptilia
Chile913 Posts
Also, you are arguing the march season will be the same as January because there are no other players at + Show Spoiler [GSL4 Finals] + IMMvp's level He is an extremely good player and he didn't win because he is Terran. | ||
|
Moragon
United States355 Posts
On January 30 2011 05:39 Geo.Rion wrote: it's so strange there are as many Zergs as Protosses Strange in what way? Zerg has won more finals and made if farther in 3 out of 4 GSL's than Protoss. What's strange is that there arent as many Zergs as Protoss. | ||
|
Black Gun
Germany4482 Posts
| ||
|
trikshun
United States437 Posts
Nestea and Makaprime. then loosing to FD. | ||
|
ZerGuy
Poland204 Posts
On January 30 2011 06:13 doffe wrote: it is entirly possibe however unlikely that we have 0 TvTs with 2 terrans in each group with them resulting in one going 1-1 and one 0-2 and not have to face eachother. From there it is once again possible for the same to occur in RO16 and no terrans being matched in RO8. Just saying, you are not correct in saying 45% WILL be TvTs unless you already know the layout of the groups. Most likely lots will be but your statement is misleading. I'm kinda interested in hearing how he counted it to be 45%... | ||
|
beat farm
United States478 Posts
On January 30 2011 11:18 ZerGuy wrote: I'm kinda interested in hearing how he counted it to be 45%... assuming 45% of the players being terran results in 45% of the matches being tvt which they clearly wont be. | ||
|
beat farm
United States478 Posts
| ||
| ||
