EPTi mean, i see where it says it is, but how do i get there
me=incompetent
nvm i got it
Patch 1.2.0 on PTR - Page 31
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
i mean, i see where it says it is, but how do i get there me=incompetent nvm i got it | ||
|
Dauntless
Norway548 Posts
On December 04 2010 12:25 Wahoa wrote: Upon running the PTR executable, I instantly get this message: The message comes up instantly, as if it's not even checking if the server is up. It's only for NA. People should really start reading FAQs | ||
|
jmillz
73 Posts
On December 04 2010 12:26 vyyye wrote: Can't have the cake and eat it too. Seriously, it has all the basic functionality of chat channels. That's all I ever wanted at least, when we finally get it.. do you really have to complain? its no different then what we already have, i doubt a channel that small can support more then 10 people in it talking... | ||
|
IdrA
United States11541 Posts
On December 04 2010 12:25 DoubleLariat wrote: He speaks! I'm confused though. There weren't that many changes other than the FG and bunker build time to the TvZ matchup. Fungal growth busted turtle terrans? broods were the way to bust turtle terran, vikings > corruptor/brood without fungal | ||
|
cannavaro
Italy86 Posts
| ||
|
Darpa
Canada4413 Posts
That said, keep in mind that PTR notes are often changed fairly significantly throughout the testing process. At least that has been the case with many other blizzard games. | ||
|
SayTT
Sweden2158 Posts
| ||
|
Silidons
United States2813 Posts
Yes it is. Zergs complaining that in ZvZ you can't FG mutas to stop them. Well now they have to deal with Muta harass the same way us Toss and Terran do. Running frantically from base to base cursing at them. | ||
|
k20
United States342 Posts
On December 04 2010 12:24 jmillz wrote: is it just me or do these chat channels suck???? not impressed at all.. Yeah it is probably just you. What exactly were you expecting it to be? It does what a chat channel is supposed to do, is nice to look at, and you can participate in chat even when you're going through achievements or profiles etc. Can you use chat channels in-game too? | ||
|
vyyye
Sweden3917 Posts
On December 04 2010 12:27 jmillz wrote: its no different then what we already have, i doubt a channel that small can support more then 10 people in it talking... It's extremely different from what we already have, there hasn't been any public channels in SC2 until now. There are already screenshots proving it fits more than 10 people, look back in the thread. You're making silly assumptions, I can't see why. We finally have chat channels, that's a good thing. | ||
|
willeesmalls
United States477 Posts
| ||
|
wooozy
3813 Posts
| ||
|
Josealtron
United States219 Posts
Stimmed marines and phoenix shred mutas much better than any zerg unit -_- Hydras are too damn slow, even on creep, to kill mutas, This is why FG was necessary-without it, ZvZ is going to turn into a mutafest. Same thing with phoenixes. And the change to stop holding hotkey to make units with larvae: WTF? How the hell is Z supposed to macro in the late game? Press Z 50 times for 50 zergling eggs? T and P can both hold down hotkeys to macro, why the hell can't Z, the race that needs it more? I don't think T and P players realize how much this destroys late game Z macro, to the point where that it's extremely difficult to produce units and fight battles at the same time(something that is not very hard for T or P in comparison) Seriously. SCV change was good though. | ||
|
DoubleLariat
Canada190 Posts
On December 04 2010 12:27 IdrA wrote: broods were the way to bust turtle terran, vikings > corruptor/brood without fungal Ah! This is why you are the pro and I'm the lowly TL lurker. this is indeed serious. Submit the replays from the PTR idra! Tell them why this is bad. | ||
|
aNooburak
Australia190 Posts
Although I do like that the scv move pattern while building is much stable than before. | ||
|
Wahoa
Australia9 Posts
PTR is only on North American servers. Ah, I was assuming my SEA account, with NA access, would be able to access it. Looks like that may be the case, too; after starting the original executable, logging into the NA region, then closing the game, the PTR executable now works as expected. People should really start reading FAQs * The player has had an active StarCraft II North America game account before 11/11/10. Despite having a SEA copy of the game, I still fit this criteria due to the NA access in September giving me an active NA game account long before 11/11. | ||
|
Serpico
4285 Posts
On December 04 2010 12:26 vyyye wrote: Can't have the cake and eat it too. Seriously, it has all the basic functionality of chat channels. That's all I ever wanted at least, when we finally get it.. do you really have to complain? Yes....because blizzard has a nice little "when it's done" policy they always parade around. They're supposed to be devs that like everything to be polished. | ||
|
Gryffes
United Kingdom763 Posts
That is a really good suggestion. 20 phoenix shouldn't die because of one fungal, nor should they be invincible. Nice compromise. How about not one control group syndroming your entire air army when you know Z has infestors out? Too much to ask for? | ||
|
dtz
5834 Posts
i wonder how long do i have to play to get into masters league in the PTR. is the ladders working proper? do i start with my MMR in the NA ladder or everyone starts from scratch? | ||
|
Bijan
United States286 Posts
I can't wait to have fun with toss again. I used to play them in SC1 but couldn't quite get the hang of sc2 toss. Maybe this will change things. | ||
| ||
