I remember there was a guide that Sheth posted during beta that a LOT of guys bashed on. It was an unbelievably fantastic guide, but some platinum players that thought they were better than everyone polluted the thread for people who were genuinely trying to learn.
[VOTE] SC2 Player quality limits in order to post - Page 29
Forum Index > SC2 General |
FaZe
Canada472 Posts
I remember there was a guide that Sheth posted during beta that a LOT of guys bashed on. It was an unbelievably fantastic guide, but some platinum players that thought they were better than everyone polluted the thread for people who were genuinely trying to learn. | ||
contrast
Australia21 Posts
Anyway, I think the sub forum should be on an invite basis, with those invited being able to invite others they deem 1337 enough. | ||
amatoer
Germany212 Posts
i thought of 1.2k posts here on tl.net. even though it wouldnt be perfect because noobish spammer are favored by this system whereas lurker who have quite some skill and knowledge, are disadvantaged. another good thing about 1.2k (or maybe some other number) posts is, that its perhaps easier to add to the (sub)forum. | ||
251
United States1401 Posts
| ||
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
| ||
Hizzo
United States193 Posts
:D | ||
Sirot
48 Posts
Though, I would like a way to have more intelligent discussions in the forums, this is not the way to do it. Hell, I wouldn't trust the community even to properly consider the ramifications that something this will do. At best, I would like "high level" players or responsible members of the community given some kind of icon beside their name to indicate that they know what the hell they are talking about. | ||
Slix36
United Kingdom145 Posts
| ||
QuanticHawk
United States32027 Posts
On September 22 2010 23:15 me_viet wrote: I actually remember a Poll somewhere that finished with something like half of TL being in diamond.. can't remember, but someone can always hold a Poll again. I'm for this idea. Would reduce the time it takes me to wade through all the bronzies posts etc to get to the 'good stuff'. Honestly the cut-off should be even higher.. I remember seeing 2 posts on b.net forums one posting that Thors should have an aoe slow ability to catch muta...and another one posting that banelings should be nerfed because "Zerg just a-moves them thus requiring no micro". I was like "lol haha bronze leaguer" - went and looked it up on sc2ranks. They were both ~800 diamond players -_____-" | ||
Rakanishu2
United States475 Posts
Please indulge me | ||
Triscuit
United States722 Posts
Top 100 in your region maybe? 200? Maybe just those in TLPD that are considered to be progamers? I know Day9 and the rest joke about how easy it is to get to 1200 with 4 warp gate rushes. | ||
CagedMind
United States506 Posts
There's 75% of people who want a subforum although idea of not being able to read it is ridiculous idea. Best way to do is having a skill lvl of "good" players. Even people hundreds of points under can take games off the top. They still have knowledge and are more able converse about the game. You open up talk a lot by having a depth of people who can play well. Maybe something like top 2k global? I don't think only pros is a good idea cause how many are we talking about that would post? They will post even less cause there's no threads. Best way to do is have it being good players. Interesting option is to allow all people to post in subforum still but you have to expand a window to read them. It makes it more cut and dry where your getting your info from and your not bogged down by bad posts. Good players can go on talking without seeing those posts if they want and not disturb discussion. | ||
DeCoup
Australia1933 Posts
It's too easy to get a high rating on strategies such as 4 gate with little knowledge or understanding of 70% of the game. I would not mind a forum with read for all and wright limited to 'invite only', but rating based is just not the right way to go about it. Start with a hand picked group of high end players and allow them to give other players writing rights. Mods could revoke those rights if they feel someone without sufficient understanding of the game gets invited. | ||
Orion_2kTC
United States80 Posts
More people need to just shut up and watch/read and they'll be surprised with how much better they'll become. | ||
Krohm
Canada1857 Posts
| ||
Purpose2
England187 Posts
If such a forum does get created, I would prefer that it is possible that us midlevel players (such as myself) are still able to view, and potentially have the chance to learn from the discussion at hand. | ||
Zeroes
United States1102 Posts
| ||
wollhandkrabbe
Germany97 Posts
Wannabe-progamers 2010: Man SC is way too popular! I think this idea is ridiculous and completely defies what a web community is about. If you read stuff you think is worthless and get worked up about it the problem is etirely yours IMO. | ||
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
KillerPlague
United States1386 Posts
| ||
| ||