EPTCross Realm Conundrum - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
myopia
United States2928 Posts
| ||
dyodyo
Philippines578 Posts
Why would we pay for another copy just to play with our friends? Its like asking people to subscribe to another phone plan just to call people on another network. | ||
|
Jusciax
Lithuania588 Posts
And honestly, if you're a progamer dedicated to playing starcraft2 competitively for years to come, is 200$ be such a huge price to pay for free battle.net service? WOW is far more expensive luxury and it's not even rewarding. | ||
|
drp223
United States170 Posts
| ||
|
Koffiegast
Netherlands346 Posts
And lag issues? If anything that causes your game to lag, its the non P2P server of battle.net 2.0 that SC2 will be using, unlike SC1 which had this feature. Fancy graphics don't translate to more data to be transferred. | ||
|
lol.Froste
United States112 Posts
only recently has it been brought to my attention how scary the future looks. FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU | ||
Arrian
United States889 Posts
Not having chat channels kinda sucked. Not having LAN was a pretty serious offense (but I understand why they did it). No cross realm play is insane. Blizzard...wake up guys. You. are. better. than. this. | ||
|
Woyn
United Kingdom1628 Posts
| ||
|
LunarC
United States1186 Posts
Blizzard is trying too hard to "unify" players through the same interface, but how is that possible when that very interface is what is isolating pockets of competitive players? When designing such an interface, you have to provide as much transparency and open player communication and connectivity as possible. If they really wanted to promote community and Esports, they would have been a bit more careful in making such design decisions. If those are NOT Blizzard's actual intentions for Battle.net 2.0 and are simply their ADVERTISED intentions, we have a problem. And if this is a latency issue, it's unlikely that Blizzard will be unable to resolve it; Chaos Launcher makes that obvious. EDIT: /signed. apparently, Blizzard and Activision are both owned by Vivendi, and nothing's changed in practice. Let's hope this is true. EDIT: It's not true. | ||
|
Salv
Canada3083 Posts
| ||
|
floor exercise
Canada5847 Posts
| ||
|
Kiante
Australia7069 Posts
Blizzard please stop being silly  | ||
|
DragoonPK
3259 Posts
| ||
|
Spidinko
Slovakia1174 Posts
And shit storm we shall cause. | ||
|
tyCe
Australia2542 Posts
| ||
|
Reaper9
United States1724 Posts
With all the technical problems the internet can bring, and the fact that Facebook is repulsive (Facebook?! OH why oh why, how much did they pay you Blizzard?!), they also deny us the opportunity to play other players globally, and to even have rudimentary communication! | ||
|
Kerl
Germany74 Posts
| ||
|
Puosu
6985 Posts
On May 29 2010 05:47 Sniggle wrote: They are owned by activision, hard to see any other reason for it than it being about money. They are _not_ owned by Activision. Both companies are owned by Vivendi. Blizzard has been owned by Vivendi since the fucking dawn of time. In practice nothing changed when they "merged". | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
| ||
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
On May 29 2010 05:54 Salv wrote: Let us think of a collective way to effectively cause a shit storm. A thread in TL probably isn't going to do any thing unfortunately. All the clowns on forums.battle.net are already saying, "TL guys are so biased, they have no idea what they are saying!" and other ignorant comments like that. Yeah we are planning a multi site article on it. | ||
| ||
