• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:10
CEST 10:10
KST 17:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch0Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
Soulkey on ASL S20 NaDa's Body BW General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D [ASL20] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Borderlands 3 General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1936 users

Project Micro - Page 11

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 20 Next All
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
May 13 2010 22:01 GMT
#201
On May 14 2010 06:59 Spawkuring wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
Can you show me a true copper level who has mastered phoenix micro perfectly?


You misunderstand my point.

Like I said earlier, there will always be a gap between newb and pro. In fact, this applies to every single game ever made. Hardcores will always be better than casual players no matter what. The thing that separates a good competitive game from a bad competitive game is that the good game has a very large skill gap between the newbie and the pro. A pro should handle a game so much better that it makes anybody in the audience go "WOW!"

The question isn't "Can a copper player micro Phoenixes perfectly?" but rather it's "Can a person who has mastered Phoenix micro perform it to such an advanced degree that it can cause an audience to go 'WOW' rather than 'Meh I can do that'."


You said phoenix micro was easy to master. Im asking you to back that point up
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Two_DoWn
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States13684 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-13 22:03:32
May 13 2010 22:02 GMT
#202
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:46 Spawkuring wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:40 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:38 Spawkuring wrote:
There's no real reason why some units have to be super easy and others don't.

Yes there is! "Easy to learn, hard to master" Its their fricking motto


And before you say every noob can micro phoenix's perfectly, no they cannot.


The idea behind "easy to learn, hard to master" is that it's easy for a newbie to use, but there's an extreme amount of depth for a person willing to dig deeply into it.


Making phoenix attack on movement contradicts this because it's "Easy to learn, easy to master". Yes, there will always be a gap between noob and pro, but even you can't deny that the gap is much smaller than if Blizzard had implemented the BW moving shot.



Can you show me a true copper level who has mastered phoenix micro perfectly?

umm, you click move and the phoenix does everything for you? How is that even possible not to master. The only thing that changes as players get better is the number of move commands, not damage or anything else.

I'm sorry, but your noob friendly idea is complete shit. The units should be useful and good without micro, but situationally better with micro that is engaging, takes practice, and requires multi tasking. SC2 doesnt need training wheel micro to make new players feel better about themselves. It needs units that work so that a low level player can succeed without micro, then begin to add more and more micro in as they improve. No way in hell blizz should deliberately make some units easier to micro just because they can. It isnt micro if it doesnt call your attention away from something else. What you want is automation, and automation is not good for a game meant to be played at a high level.

If you really want noob starcraft 2 so much, why not just make it so that the novice maps all have automated moving shots to make new players feel all warm and fuzzy inside as they play. Worrying about noobs has no place in making decisions that effect competitive and serious gamers. Its like making a shooting game that aims and shoots for you, all you have to do is move and select guns.
"What is the air speed velocity of an unladen courier?" "Dire or Radiant?"
BeMannerDuPenner
Profile Blog Joined April 2004
Germany5638 Posts
May 13 2010 22:03 GMT
#203
On May 14 2010 06:59 Spawkuring wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
Can you show me a true copper level who has mastered phoenix micro perfectly?


You misunderstand my point.

Like I said earlier, there will always be a gap between newb and pro. In fact, this applies to every single game ever made. Hardcores will always be better than casual players no matter what. The thing that separates a good competitive game from a bad competitive game is that the good game has a very large skill gap between the newbie and the pro. A pro should handle a game so much better that it makes anybody in the audience go "WOW!"

The question isn't "Can a copper player micro Phoenixes perfectly?" but rather it's "Can a person who has mastered Phoenix micro perform it to such an advanced degree that it can cause an audience to go 'WOW' rather than 'Meh I can do that'."


this.

look at super smash bros. the game would never gotten played in any competive match ever if it wasnt for the super hard to do,effective and cool lookin glitches evrywhere.

a high skill cap lets people go "omgawd did you see that?".
life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery
kickinhead
Profile Joined December 2008
Switzerland2069 Posts
May 13 2010 22:04 GMT
#204
On May 14 2010 06:37 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 06:33 kickinhead wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:31 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:05 Spawkuring wrote:
I'm not sure if Phoenix-micro is really the best solution though. Even simple kiting is more complicated than that, and anything that's simpler than kiting micro is going a bit too far on the easy side to me. A player should be pressing at least two buttons to micro a unit, and not just spamming right-click.



Believe it or not its imporant to have easy tasks the new players can learn how to do and have fun with. Phoenix micro is perfect for that. Statements like "A player should be pressing at least two buttons to micro a unit," are baseless. A player should be pressing at least two buttons to micro a unit that has difficult high end micro mechanics.


Whats missing in this whole debate is the same thing that was missing in the macro debate. Its the realization that you can have a two tiered system

low level mechanics AND high level mechanics.
Easy to learn AND hard to master.


but how you balance that when you distrubute different hard to control Units between the races?


Same way you did in SC1. Tell me which was easier? Microing your marines around a lurkers attack or sitting back and watching your lurker attack automatically?


Remember balanced does not mean equal. The final races need to be balanced not the individual mechanics. Blizzard has specifically said they like things like "X beats Y unless Y micros better".

So in this example, Mutas beat phoenix unless phoenix does attack move micro unless mutas do SC1 micro better...


Ah, now I finally get what you mean! ^^'

But I think the Air-Units all need the attack-move-micro, there will still be lots of ground-units that have different skill-level-demands I guess.... It's just that I'd be dissappointed as a Protoss-player If the Phoenix wouldn't be such an awesome to control unit!
https://soundcloud.com/thesamplethief
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-13 22:09:10
May 13 2010 22:07 GMT
#205
On May 14 2010 07:02 Two_DoWn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:46 Spawkuring wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:40 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:38 Spawkuring wrote:
There's no real reason why some units have to be super easy and others don't.

Yes there is! "Easy to learn, hard to master" Its their fricking motto


And before you say every noob can micro phoenix's perfectly, no they cannot.


The idea behind "easy to learn, hard to master" is that it's easy for a newbie to use, but there's an extreme amount of depth for a person willing to dig deeply into it.


Making phoenix attack on movement contradicts this because it's "Easy to learn, easy to master". Yes, there will always be a gap between noob and pro, but even you can't deny that the gap is much smaller than if Blizzard had implemented the BW moving shot.



Can you show me a true copper level who has mastered phoenix micro perfectly?

umm, you click move and the phoenix does everything for you? How is that even possible not to master. The only thing that changes as players get better is the number of move commands, not damage or anything else.

I'm sorry, but your noob friendly idea is complete shit. The units should be useful and good without micro, but situationally better with micro that is engaging, takes practice, and requires multi tasking. SC2 doesnt need training wheel micro to make new players feel better about themselves. It needs units that work so that a low level player can succeed without micro, then begin to add more and more micro in as they improve. No way in hell blizz should deliberately make some units easier to micro just because they can. It isnt micro if it doesnt call your attention away from something else. What you want is automation, and automation is not good for a game meant to be played at a high level.

If you really want noob starcraft 2 so much, why not just make it so that the novice maps all have automated moving shots to make new players feel all warm and fuzzy inside as they play. Worrying about noobs has no place in making decisions that effect competitive and serious gamers. Its like making a shooting game that aims and shoots for you, all you have to do is move and select guns.



Wow your like saying the exact same things that we heard at the begining of the MBS wars. But thats fine stick to your guns. lol weve seen your kind before :p



Anyway since none of you want to post any evidence how about i post some for you. Look at this example of phoenix micro which is obviously "easy to master"

http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Spawkuring
Profile Joined July 2008
United States755 Posts
May 13 2010 22:08 GMT
#206
On May 14 2010 07:01 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 06:59 Spawkuring wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
Can you show me a true copper level who has mastered phoenix micro perfectly?


You misunderstand my point.

Like I said earlier, there will always be a gap between newb and pro. In fact, this applies to every single game ever made. Hardcores will always be better than casual players no matter what. The thing that separates a good competitive game from a bad competitive game is that the good game has a very large skill gap between the newbie and the pro. A pro should handle a game so much better that it makes anybody in the audience go "WOW!"

The question isn't "Can a copper player micro Phoenixes perfectly?" but rather it's "Can a person who has mastered Phoenix micro perform it to such an advanced degree that it can cause an audience to go 'WOW' rather than 'Meh I can do that'."


You said phoenix micro was easy to master. Im asking you to back that point up


Kinda hard to do that considering that most newbs haven't gotten their hands on the game yet and are too busy massing Void Rays

Even so, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that there isn't much depth to a unit that is played on maximum efficiency by spamming right-click. Pros will do it better of course, but the question is "how much better", and I'm skeptical that the answer to that question is "very much".
kickinhead
Profile Joined December 2008
Switzerland2069 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-13 22:14:42
May 13 2010 22:14 GMT
#207
On May 14 2010 07:07 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 07:02 Two_DoWn wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:46 Spawkuring wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:40 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:38 Spawkuring wrote:
There's no real reason why some units have to be super easy and others don't.

Yes there is! "Easy to learn, hard to master" Its their fricking motto


And before you say every noob can micro phoenix's perfectly, no they cannot.


The idea behind "easy to learn, hard to master" is that it's easy for a newbie to use, but there's an extreme amount of depth for a person willing to dig deeply into it.


Making phoenix attack on movement contradicts this because it's "Easy to learn, easy to master". Yes, there will always be a gap between noob and pro, but even you can't deny that the gap is much smaller than if Blizzard had implemented the BW moving shot.



Can you show me a true copper level who has mastered phoenix micro perfectly?

umm, you click move and the phoenix does everything for you? How is that even possible not to master. The only thing that changes as players get better is the number of move commands, not damage or anything else.

I'm sorry, but your noob friendly idea is complete shit. The units should be useful and good without micro, but situationally better with micro that is engaging, takes practice, and requires multi tasking. SC2 doesnt need training wheel micro to make new players feel better about themselves. It needs units that work so that a low level player can succeed without micro, then begin to add more and more micro in as they improve. No way in hell blizz should deliberately make some units easier to micro just because they can. It isnt micro if it doesnt call your attention away from something else. What you want is automation, and automation is not good for a game meant to be played at a high level.

If you really want noob starcraft 2 so much, why not just make it so that the novice maps all have automated moving shots to make new players feel all warm and fuzzy inside as they play. Worrying about noobs has no place in making decisions that effect competitive and serious gamers. Its like making a shooting game that aims and shoots for you, all you have to do is move and select guns.



Wow your like saying the exact same things that we heard at the begining of the MBS wars. But thats fine stick to your guns. lol weve seen your kind before :p



Anyway since none of you want to post any evidence how about i post some for you. Look at this example of phoenix micro which is obviously "easy to master"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00nA_BRln38&feature=related


This Vid is a bad example, cuz all Toss had to do is to fly away from the Mutas - there is no need to fly around them n' stuff, because mutas are the Units that will engage you, not the other way round. You can just sit there and w8 in the middle of the Map and if the Mutas try to attack anything from you, catch them on the way over and just fly away from them and kill them in the process.

It's like saying: look how good zergling-micro is by wildly clicking and running in circles around another Unit - it's just silly. ^^'
https://soundcloud.com/thesamplethief
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
May 13 2010 22:15 GMT
#208
On May 14 2010 07:14 kickinhead wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 07:07 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 07:02 Two_DoWn wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:46 Spawkuring wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:40 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:38 Spawkuring wrote:
There's no real reason why some units have to be super easy and others don't.

Yes there is! "Easy to learn, hard to master" Its their fricking motto


And before you say every noob can micro phoenix's perfectly, no they cannot.


The idea behind "easy to learn, hard to master" is that it's easy for a newbie to use, but there's an extreme amount of depth for a person willing to dig deeply into it.


Making phoenix attack on movement contradicts this because it's "Easy to learn, easy to master". Yes, there will always be a gap between noob and pro, but even you can't deny that the gap is much smaller than if Blizzard had implemented the BW moving shot.



Can you show me a true copper level who has mastered phoenix micro perfectly?

umm, you click move and the phoenix does everything for you? How is that even possible not to master. The only thing that changes as players get better is the number of move commands, not damage or anything else.

I'm sorry, but your noob friendly idea is complete shit. The units should be useful and good without micro, but situationally better with micro that is engaging, takes practice, and requires multi tasking. SC2 doesnt need training wheel micro to make new players feel better about themselves. It needs units that work so that a low level player can succeed without micro, then begin to add more and more micro in as they improve. No way in hell blizz should deliberately make some units easier to micro just because they can. It isnt micro if it doesnt call your attention away from something else. What you want is automation, and automation is not good for a game meant to be played at a high level.

If you really want noob starcraft 2 so much, why not just make it so that the novice maps all have automated moving shots to make new players feel all warm and fuzzy inside as they play. Worrying about noobs has no place in making decisions that effect competitive and serious gamers. Its like making a shooting game that aims and shoots for you, all you have to do is move and select guns.



Wow your like saying the exact same things that we heard at the begining of the MBS wars. But thats fine stick to your guns. lol weve seen your kind before :p



Anyway since none of you want to post any evidence how about i post some for you. Look at this example of phoenix micro which is obviously "easy to master"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00nA_BRln38&feature=related


This Vid is a bad example, cuz all Toss had to do is to fly away from the Mutas - there is no need to fly around them n' stuff, because mutas are the Units that will engage you, not the other way round. You can just sit there and w8 in the middle of the Map and if the Mutas try to attack anything from you, catch them on the way over and just fly away from them and kill them in the process.

It's like saying: look how good zergling-micro is by wildly clicking and running in circles around another Unit - it's just silly. ^^'


Im waiting for your counter evidence showing a low level player who has mastered this.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
Rokk
Profile Joined March 2010
United States425 Posts
May 13 2010 22:21 GMT
#209
People keep misunderstanding the point of micro, especially making it relative apm-intensive. Yes, tank micro is pretty easy to do. When you're just controlling a tank, move-hold-move-hold-move is very simple and won't take long to master. However, how long can you keep microing your tank against zealots/immortals while keeping up with everything else going on? Are you still spending money? Are you calling down mules? Are you moving the rest of your army into position? Now, I suck with Terran, but whenever I try to reaper harass against a competent player, I can do it effectively because it's not very hard. But soon my minerals are passing a thousand and I've done more damage to myself than I have to my opponent.

The skill that is so vital in RTSs is multitasking. The ability to keep multiple strategies in their head at the same time while microing their units, producing more units, keeping an eye on the minimap, using macro mechanics efficiently, etc are what separates the good people from the great. You should be able to come up with novel strategies, but then you should have to have the mechanics to actually implement it. A lot of this multitasking requires high APM, but high APM is not the goal of the game. It is only a means to the end of multitasking every small detail of your army so that you get the most out of every single thing.
kickinhead
Profile Joined December 2008
Switzerland2069 Posts
May 13 2010 22:23 GMT
#210
On May 14 2010 07:15 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 07:14 kickinhead wrote:
On May 14 2010 07:07 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 07:02 Two_DoWn wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:46 Spawkuring wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:40 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:38 Spawkuring wrote:
There's no real reason why some units have to be super easy and others don't.

Yes there is! "Easy to learn, hard to master" Its their fricking motto


And before you say every noob can micro phoenix's perfectly, no they cannot.


The idea behind "easy to learn, hard to master" is that it's easy for a newbie to use, but there's an extreme amount of depth for a person willing to dig deeply into it.


Making phoenix attack on movement contradicts this because it's "Easy to learn, easy to master". Yes, there will always be a gap between noob and pro, but even you can't deny that the gap is much smaller than if Blizzard had implemented the BW moving shot.



Can you show me a true copper level who has mastered phoenix micro perfectly?

umm, you click move and the phoenix does everything for you? How is that even possible not to master. The only thing that changes as players get better is the number of move commands, not damage or anything else.

I'm sorry, but your noob friendly idea is complete shit. The units should be useful and good without micro, but situationally better with micro that is engaging, takes practice, and requires multi tasking. SC2 doesnt need training wheel micro to make new players feel better about themselves. It needs units that work so that a low level player can succeed without micro, then begin to add more and more micro in as they improve. No way in hell blizz should deliberately make some units easier to micro just because they can. It isnt micro if it doesnt call your attention away from something else. What you want is automation, and automation is not good for a game meant to be played at a high level.

If you really want noob starcraft 2 so much, why not just make it so that the novice maps all have automated moving shots to make new players feel all warm and fuzzy inside as they play. Worrying about noobs has no place in making decisions that effect competitive and serious gamers. Its like making a shooting game that aims and shoots for you, all you have to do is move and select guns.



Wow your like saying the exact same things that we heard at the begining of the MBS wars. But thats fine stick to your guns. lol weve seen your kind before :p



Anyway since none of you want to post any evidence how about i post some for you. Look at this example of phoenix micro which is obviously "easy to master"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00nA_BRln38&feature=related


This Vid is a bad example, cuz all Toss had to do is to fly away from the Mutas - there is no need to fly around them n' stuff, because mutas are the Units that will engage you, not the other way round. You can just sit there and w8 in the middle of the Map and if the Mutas try to attack anything from you, catch them on the way over and just fly away from them and kill them in the process.

It's like saying: look how good zergling-micro is by wildly clicking and running in circles around another Unit - it's just silly. ^^'


Im waiting for your counter evidence showing a low level player who has mastered this.


But it's mastering sth that isn't useful in the game.

You don't have to fly around the Mutas like crazy, you just have to keep your distance! Besides, it's not only about Muta VS Phoenix-Micro, it's about Micro against all Units.

Though I get you opinion about Phoenix-Micro doesn't have to be like Muta-Micro, mainly because Mutas are also able to attack ground...

But what would you recommend doing with the Vikings then?
https://soundcloud.com/thesamplethief
Rokk
Profile Joined March 2010
United States425 Posts
May 13 2010 22:25 GMT
#211
On May 14 2010 07:14 kickinhead wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 07:07 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 07:02 Two_DoWn wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:51 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:46 Spawkuring wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:40 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 06:38 Spawkuring wrote:
There's no real reason why some units have to be super easy and others don't.

Yes there is! "Easy to learn, hard to master" Its their fricking motto


And before you say every noob can micro phoenix's perfectly, no they cannot.


The idea behind "easy to learn, hard to master" is that it's easy for a newbie to use, but there's an extreme amount of depth for a person willing to dig deeply into it.


Making phoenix attack on movement contradicts this because it's "Easy to learn, easy to master". Yes, there will always be a gap between noob and pro, but even you can't deny that the gap is much smaller than if Blizzard had implemented the BW moving shot.



Can you show me a true copper level who has mastered phoenix micro perfectly?

umm, you click move and the phoenix does everything for you? How is that even possible not to master. The only thing that changes as players get better is the number of move commands, not damage or anything else.

I'm sorry, but your noob friendly idea is complete shit. The units should be useful and good without micro, but situationally better with micro that is engaging, takes practice, and requires multi tasking. SC2 doesnt need training wheel micro to make new players feel better about themselves. It needs units that work so that a low level player can succeed without micro, then begin to add more and more micro in as they improve. No way in hell blizz should deliberately make some units easier to micro just because they can. It isnt micro if it doesnt call your attention away from something else. What you want is automation, and automation is not good for a game meant to be played at a high level.

If you really want noob starcraft 2 so much, why not just make it so that the novice maps all have automated moving shots to make new players feel all warm and fuzzy inside as they play. Worrying about noobs has no place in making decisions that effect competitive and serious gamers. Its like making a shooting game that aims and shoots for you, all you have to do is move and select guns.



Wow your like saying the exact same things that we heard at the begining of the MBS wars. But thats fine stick to your guns. lol weve seen your kind before :p



Anyway since none of you want to post any evidence how about i post some for you. Look at this example of phoenix micro which is obviously "easy to master"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00nA_BRln38&feature=related


This Vid is a bad example, cuz all Toss had to do is to fly away from the Mutas - there is no need to fly around them n' stuff, because mutas are the Units that will engage you, not the other way round. You can just sit there and w8 in the middle of the Map and if the Mutas try to attack anything from you, catch them on the way over and just fly away from them and kill them in the process.

It's like saying: look how good zergling-micro is by wildly clicking and running in circles around another Unit - it's just silly. ^^'


Why do mutalisks have to engage the phoenixes? A lot of time the mutalisks will be attacking a vulnerable position where the phoenixes will have to come defend. If the phoenixes just fly away, the mutalisks can go back to attacking whatever is vulnerable. The micro comes from mutalisks staying near a vulnerable place so that phoenixes cannot just fly around the map. Therefore, to keep from getting hit, they will have to dance in the 1-range window (3-4] where phoenixes can do damage but receive none. In response, the mutalisks will try to outmaneuver the phoenixes so that they enter their range of attack. Units cannot be analyzed in a vacuum.
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-13 22:26:24
May 13 2010 22:26 GMT
#212
On May 14 2010 07:23 kickinhead wrote:
But it's mastering sth that isn't useful in the game.


Of course its useful. By keeping your phoenix's the correct distance they can kill mutalisks. How is that not useful?
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
kickinhead
Profile Joined December 2008
Switzerland2069 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-13 22:28:07
May 13 2010 22:27 GMT
#213
On May 14 2010 07:26 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 07:23 kickinhead wrote:
But it's mastering sth that isn't useful in the game.


Of course its useful. By keeping your phoenix's the correct distance they can kill mutalisks. How is that not useful?


Yes, but it's not like you have to fly around them the way the person in the VoD did. But I guess there is still some Micro with the Phoenix now, so I think your right on this one.
https://soundcloud.com/thesamplethief
Archerofaiur
Profile Joined August 2008
United States4101 Posts
May 13 2010 22:29 GMT
#214
On May 14 2010 07:27 kickinhead wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 07:26 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 07:23 kickinhead wrote:
But it's mastering sth that isn't useful in the game.


Of course its useful. By keeping your phoenix's the correct distance they can kill mutalisks. How is that not useful?


Yes, but it's not like you have to fly around them the way the person in the VoD did. But I guess there is still some Micro with the Phoenix now, so I think your right on this one.



Thanks

Personally I really like the different types of micro that could be put into Starcraft 2. Not every unit should have muta micro just like not every unit should have maurader micro.
http://sclegacy.com/news/28-scl/250-starcraftlegacy-macro-theorycrafting-contest-winners
kickinhead
Profile Joined December 2008
Switzerland2069 Posts
May 13 2010 22:32 GMT
#215
On May 14 2010 07:29 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 07:27 kickinhead wrote:
On May 14 2010 07:26 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 07:23 kickinhead wrote:
But it's mastering sth that isn't useful in the game.


Of course its useful. By keeping your phoenix's the correct distance they can kill mutalisks. How is that not useful?


Yes, but it's not like you have to fly around them the way the person in the VoD did. But I guess there is still some Micro with the Phoenix now, so I think your right on this one.



Thanks

Personally I really like the different types of micro that could be put into Starcraft 2. Not every unit should have muta micro just like not every unit should have maurader micro.


This leaves the question open what to do with Units like Viking or Banshee.

Or has anyone ever thought about how the Carrier-Micro works in SC2? Maybe if you tweak sth there, they can actually be useful when microed correctly. Plz Sluggaslamoo - work your awesome magic on the carrier!
https://soundcloud.com/thesamplethief
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
May 13 2010 22:38 GMT
#216
On May 13 2010 23:52 FrozenArbiter wrote:
The hellion I dunno about, but the tank one I reaallllllllly hope Blizz implements.

This.

When I saw the muta one I was like "meh."

Then I saw the Hellion one and was like "wow, this is pretty cool."

Then I saw the tank and was like "OMG WANT NOW!"
Moderator
Angra
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States2652 Posts
May 13 2010 23:02 GMT
#217
Oh my god I wish this was the real game. Good work.

I'm so tired of people being like "THIS ISNT BW THIS IS SC2 ITS A DIFFERENT GAME" who cares.. if SC2 was like this it would be so much better of a game than it is now. Of course there'd be some things that needed tweaking I'm sure, as there are probably some units that would be way too powerful with no cooldown, but still. If SC2 were more like this and less like it is now in terms of attack cooldowns.. holy crap I'd love it so much more.
LaLuSh
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden2358 Posts
May 13 2010 23:04 GMT
#218
On May 14 2010 07:29 Archerofaiur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 07:27 kickinhead wrote:
On May 14 2010 07:26 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 07:23 kickinhead wrote:
But it's mastering sth that isn't useful in the game.


Of course its useful. By keeping your phoenix's the correct distance they can kill mutalisks. How is that not useful?


Yes, but it's not like you have to fly around them the way the person in the VoD did. But I guess there is still some Micro with the Phoenix now, so I think your right on this one.



Thanks

Personally I really like the different types of micro that could be put into Starcraft 2. Not every unit should have muta micro just like not every unit should have maurader micro.


Brings us to another issue. Current phoenix micro really would need LAN latency to work good. And with LAN latency i mean real LAN, a few milliseconds worth of delay.

100+ ms is enough to make it hard to maintain the proper distance. Battle.net being random, connections being unstable and prone to packet losses just adds to the problem.

Another Blizzard compromise. In the name of esports? I think not.
Kim_Hyun_Han
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
706 Posts
May 13 2010 23:14 GMT
#219
On May 14 2010 05:24 Duelist wrote:
Microing is hardly something respected anywhere. You could put a monkey or any simple robot or AI micro units 10x faster than any teenage boy ever could dream of. It's a totally useless and uninteresting skill. When i hear people say some players on SC1 were able to beat the very best because of micro tricks, and talk about that as if it was a good thing, makes me shiver. I'm glad though, because it seems SC2 isn't going on the same direction as SC1, but more strategy based. Maybe we'll see good players actually being more rewarded for being smart, fast thinkers and strategists, than robot clickers.

Blizzard seems to know this, and for that i'm glad they don't listen to these worried boys complaining about not being able to use their 1000 apms and having to think a bit more than their used to.


this is a totally pro-troll on star2 forums
i wonder whats your team on ShinHan Bank Trolleague

show yourself, we all know you are a korean protrollgamer
Zeke50100
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States2220 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-13 23:19:57
May 13 2010 23:19 GMT
#220
On May 14 2010 07:27 kickinhead wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2010 07:26 Archerofaiur wrote:
On May 14 2010 07:23 kickinhead wrote:
But it's mastering sth that isn't useful in the game.


Of course its useful. By keeping your phoenix's the correct distance they can kill mutalisks. How is that not useful?


Yes, but it's not like you have to fly around them the way the person in the VoD did. But I guess there is still some Micro with the Phoenix now, so I think your right on this one.


Consider that Phoenixes have a much faster movement speed, and only 1 more range. Then, show me a video of you perfectly microing Phoenixes to not get hit.

It's more difficult than you think ^_^
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 20 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 50m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech83
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 2095
Bisu 97
Dewaltoss 62
JulyZerg 53
ToSsGirL 41
HiyA 39
Nal_rA 36
Sharp 24
ajuk12(nOOB) 20
sorry 17
[ Show more ]
SilentControl 6
Dota 2
XcaliburYe113
NeuroSwarm102
boxi9886
League of Legends
JimRising 483
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K555
shoxiejesuss456
olofmeister59
Other Games
summit1g7609
C9.Mang0299
XaKoH 156
Trikslyr16
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick633
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 49
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 27
• Light_VIP 17
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt670
• Jankos589
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
1h 50m
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
Map Test Tournament
2h 50m
The PondCast
4h 50m
RSL Revival
1d 1h
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
1d 18h
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
1d 23h
RSL Revival
2 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Online Event
3 days
[ Show More ]
Wardi Open
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
LiuLi Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.