• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:17
CEST 07:17
KST 14:17
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash9[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy17ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool51Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen Gypsy to Korea BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ How Can I Add Timer & APM Count? [ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group E [ASL21] Ro24 Group F Azhi's Colosseum - Foreign KCM
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9779 users

[Q] Burrowing given just from a Lair be broken?

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Normal
Ceric
Profile Joined May 2010
United States36 Posts
May 11 2010 17:42 GMT
#1
At current time you have to get a lair and research burrowing. Now if you want to effectively "cloak" your roaches you also have to research movement. I put this as an equivalent to DT's or Banshees/Ghosts. DT's you just need to tech to them. Banshee's/Ghost you need to research cloak.

I just think that Burrowing is a very iconic ability for Zerg and its a shame that the cost to benefit of it not being very attractive. I do enjoy harassing terrans with tunneling roaches but thats a special case.

So what does everyone think. Would it be game breaking if the Lair upgrade just gave Burrowing for "Free"?
This Lingo will be the Death of me
heishe
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany2284 Posts
May 11 2010 17:47 GMT
#2
they should just make it equal to the overlord speed upgrade. 50/50 and lower research time.
If you value your soul, never look into the eye of a horse. Your soul will forever be lost in the void of the horse.
KinosJourney2
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Sweden1811 Posts
May 11 2010 17:47 GMT
#3
Burrow being free would be imbalanced, i like burrow but paying 200/200 for it at lair tech is just outrageous IMO
ocho wrote: EDIT: NEVERMIND, THIS THING HAS APM TECHNOLOGY OMG
Amber[LighT]
Profile Blog Joined June 2005
United States5078 Posts
May 11 2010 17:49 GMT
#4
On May 12 2010 02:47 heishe wrote:
they should just make it equal to the overlord speed upgrade. 50/50 and lower research time.


you mean like when the beta first came out?
"We have unfinished business, I and he."
Ideas
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States8167 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 17:50:43
May 11 2010 17:50 GMT
#5
I really wish that Zerg had a real "cloaked danger" in the way lurkers/spidermines were or DTs/Banshees are. burrowed roaches/banelings just dont really cut it at all. I'm not saying bring lurkers back, but I really wish zerg would have a unit that forces the other races to want to get detection.
Free Palestine
MorroW
Profile Joined August 2008
Sweden3522 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 17:53:09
May 11 2010 17:51 GMT
#6
they should make overlord upgrade twice as expensive because everyone auto-gets it on lair. in rts games u want to make choices and sacrifices. stuff like warp gate, overlord speed or concussive shells r just practically free. in fact make all of it more expensive xd. i like strategic choices, not obvious choices
On May 12 2010 02:50 Ideas wrote:
I really wish that Zerg had a real "cloaked danger" in the way lurkers/spidermines were or DTs/Banshees are. burrowed roaches/banelings just dont really cut it at all. I'm not saying bring lurkers back, but I really wish zerg would have a unit that forces the other races to want to get detection.

i really agree. would be awesome if some z unit could attack underground (or maybe u wanted cloaked zerg units :p) anyhow im also not saying bring back lurker but the idea itself of zerg units attacking from underground makes me say, thats zerg in raw form!
Progamerpls no copy pasterino
Koffiegast
Profile Joined February 2010
Netherlands346 Posts
May 11 2010 17:51 GMT
#7
Funny part is that even when it is burrowed, shadows are shown on the ground. Also, it isnt as if pretty much any toss/terran doesn't have something for detection.. as most of them get a turret/cannon out anyways, if not for their other capabilities for detection (scan, observ)
Wut
Koffiegast
Profile Joined February 2010
Netherlands346 Posts
May 11 2010 17:54 GMT
#8
On May 12 2010 02:51 MorroW wrote:
they should make overlord upgrade twice as expensive because everyone auto-gets it on lair. in rts games u want to make choices and sacrifices. stuff like warp gate, overlord speed or concussive shells r just practically free. in fact make all of it more expensive xd. i like strategic choices, not obvious choices


Yet they increased the damage of marines if I recall recollectly and keep overlords hp at the same 200 as BW.. what other options would Zerg have for scouting? Also, it isnt as if overseer has more hp than a normal overlord...
Wut
Ceric
Profile Joined May 2010
United States36 Posts
May 11 2010 17:57 GMT
#9
I see Warpgates as a sort of double edge sword in there own right. When I rush with a terran I can just put my barracks on a hot key and the rally point on the attacking units. Hotkey, pump units while watching the current ones. Warpgate I need to get to a pylon first and then drop them. If I can get a proxy pylon then its a non-issue. Though as mentioned I'm not Platinum in the least bit. Anyway back to the issue at hand.

A stealth unit be sort of cool. Sort of like if the changling could mimic the enemies unit attack at say half damage or something. Maybe just lowering the price to 100/100 would be a enough to make it a more viable tech choice.
This Lingo will be the Death of me
Phunkapotamus
Profile Joined April 2010
United States496 Posts
May 11 2010 18:01 GMT
#10
Burrowing at 50/50 with a short upgrade time was too powerful at the beginning of beta.

However, at the same time, time burrowed units were more powerful and burrowed movement speeds were faster.

I don't feel it's necessary to nerf both sides of the equation to balance it. I'd like to see burrow back to its former cost and upgrade time. Then again, I play Zerg, so go figure.
"Do a barrel roll"
OPSavioR
Profile Joined March 2010
Sweden1465 Posts
May 11 2010 18:02 GMT
#11
On May 12 2010 02:47 KinosJourney2 wrote:
Burrow being free would be imbalanced, i like burrow but paying 200/200 for it at lair tech is just outrageous IMO

its 100/100
i dunno lol
Ceric
Profile Joined May 2010
United States36 Posts
May 11 2010 18:04 GMT
#12
I didn't have the numbers handy.

All the burrow moving units are now slower. Especially compared to all the cloaked units. Do any Platinum level players use Burrow?
This Lingo will be the Death of me
Ryuu314
Profile Joined October 2009
United States12679 Posts
May 11 2010 18:04 GMT
#13
On May 12 2010 02:42 Ceric wrote:
At current time you have to get a lair and research burrowing. Now if you want to effectively "cloak" your roaches you also have to research movement. I put this as an equivalent to DT's or Banshees/Ghosts. DT's you just need to tech to them. Banshee's/Ghost you need to research cloak.

I just think that Burrowing is a very iconic ability for Zerg and its a shame that the cost to benefit of it not being very attractive. I do enjoy harassing terrans with tunneling roaches but thats a special case.

So what does everyone think. Would it be game breaking if the Lair upgrade just gave Burrowing for "Free"?

Making it free or cheaper would maybe not be game breaking, but it'd be pretty dumb. Think of it this way. Terran and Protoss can't achieve cloaking until tier 3 or higher. Burrow is available by tier 2. Of course it's going to be more expensive.
TecNoPhi
Profile Joined May 2010
United States25 Posts
May 11 2010 18:04 GMT
#14
I think it would be rather unbalancing. Just upgrading to Lair itself opening a style of play (burrowing), I think it will basically force opposing players to get detectors at that point or be at a disadvantage. And considering the timing I've seen possible on hatch upgrading to lair, it's could be rather early in the game.
Fun
ccou
Profile Joined December 2008
United States681 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 18:09:22
May 11 2010 18:06 GMT
#15
On May 12 2010 02:51 MorroW wrote:
they should make overlord upgrade twice as expensive because everyone auto-gets it on lair. in rts games u want to make choices and sacrifices. stuff like warp gate, overlord speed or concussive shells r just practically free. in fact make all of it more expensive xd. i like strategic choices, not obvious choices
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2010 02:50 Ideas wrote:
I really wish that Zerg had a real "cloaked danger" in the way lurkers/spidermines were or DTs/Banshees are. burrowed roaches/banelings just dont really cut it at all. I'm not saying bring lurkers back, but I really wish zerg would have a unit that forces the other races to want to get detection.

i really agree. would be awesome if some z unit could attack underground (or maybe u wanted cloaked zerg units :p) anyhow im also not saying bring back lurker but the idea itself of zerg units attacking from underground makes me say, thats zerg in raw form!


I agree. I just auto get all 3 abilities: warp gate, pneumatized carapace, and concussive shells without any consideration. They're sooo cheap. Actually, with warp gate, I'd probably still auto get it unless it's like 200/200.
Wake up Mr. B!
Ideas
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States8167 Posts
May 11 2010 18:13 GMT
#16
speaking of overlord speed, why the fuck is it so damn cheap in sc2? I just can't figure it out. It's not like corsairs or cloaked wraiths get out way earlier (in fact, they're not even in the game!).
Free Palestine
AdahnSC
Profile Joined March 2010
United States376 Posts
May 11 2010 18:16 GMT
#17
dark shrine is 100/250
cloak is 200/200
burrow is 100/100
burrow + roach burrow movement is 250/250

really its not that big of a difference.
Ceric
Profile Joined May 2010
United States36 Posts
May 11 2010 18:19 GMT
#18
On May 12 2010 03:16 VX14 wrote:
dark shrine is 100/250
cloak is 200/200
burrow is 100/100
burrow + roach burrow movement is 250/250

really its not that big of a difference.


Ignoring the teching to get there.

Wouldn't the differences amount to an extra Zealot for Toss and an extra Marine for Terran?
This Lingo will be the Death of me
Chrion
Profile Joined March 2010
United States31 Posts
May 11 2010 18:40 GMT
#19
On May 12 2010 02:51 Koffiegast wrote:
Funny part is that even when it is burrowed, shadows are shown on the ground. Also, it isnt as if pretty much any toss/terran doesn't have something for detection.. as most of them get a turret/cannon out anyways, if not for their other capabilities for detection (scan, observ)
Get sight on the terran command center and as soon as he drops a mule, have a field day.
micro, macro, micro, macro, ahhhhhhhh!!!!
Vexx
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States462 Posts
May 11 2010 19:29 GMT
#20
On May 12 2010 03:16 VX14 wrote:
dark shrine is 100/250
cloak is 200/200
burrow is 100/100
burrow + roach burrow movement is 250/250

really its not that big of a difference.


Great analysis. Did you consider the part where cloaked units attack while cloaked or that they move at normal speed while cloaked? Not that big of a difference I guess huh?

I have been trying to use burrow more and more recently and have been very pleased with the results. Yes, it's a painful 100/100, but it's invaluable when you're getting harassed by air as zerg cause you can just burrow your drones and save your queen while reinforcements arrive. Burrowed banelings can be very devastating sometimes. I have had very very mixed results with burrowed roaches. It's a gimmicky one-trick pony that is really hit or miss. And even when it hits, it better do serious damage cause they aren't getting out alive.

The problem with burrowed roaches is the cost of the units, the research and the amount of units you need to be effective. As opposed to throwing in 2 DTs or 2 cloaked banshees or 2 void rays.

The lurker conflicts too much with the baneling is what the issue is for introducing the lurker. Everything the baneling does, the lurker can do better without dieing. Yes the baneling is new... but it's not really better. Though, it is satisfying to explode a marching terran army.

I think burrow research should be faster and just a bit cheaper, maybe 75/75. I do like that few people research it though. Makes me feel unique!



I am not nice.
Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
May 11 2010 19:37 GMT
#21
They should keep the research time, but bump the cost down. 100/100 for something that may or may not be useful is kinda asking a lot.

Burrow roaches are good more so for positioning than sneak attacks. With only 3 range being able to pop up on top of your target is a big benefit. Doubly so if it results in the enemy being unable to flee. You can also use it to attack while your opponent's forces are spread out while moving giving you the chance to pick off some free troops.
Logo
Wi)nD
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada719 Posts
May 11 2010 19:37 GMT
#22
they had it the teir 1 tec, but moved it up to teir 2 b/c it was being used a large amount (back when raoches has fast movement speed when burrow) but since they changed all that, i would like to see them move burrow down to teir1 , u still need the movement undergorund for teir2 so it prob wont make any difference
cr4ckshot
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States291 Posts
May 11 2010 19:37 GMT
#23
I always research burrow-move when I'm facing forcefields. It totally shuts down their sentry-heavy build.
Ceric
Profile Joined May 2010
United States36 Posts
May 11 2010 19:44 GMT
#24
On May 12 2010 04:37 cr4ckshot wrote:
I always research burrow-move when I'm facing forcefields. It totally shuts down their sentry-heavy build.



Forcefields don't block them like Supply depots and like do?
This Lingo will be the Death of me
Chriamon
Profile Joined April 2010
United States886 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 19:56:29
May 11 2010 19:55 GMT
#25
Its really kind of a shame that, by the time burrow comes out, zerg's enemy will have detection (for the most part). There isn't really a time where burrowed units can really be abused, because burrow comes so late.

On May 12 2010 04:44 Ceric wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2010 04:37 cr4ckshot wrote:
I always research burrow-move when I'm facing forcefields. It totally shuts down their sentry-heavy build.



Forcefields don't block them like Supply depots and like do?

Correct, burrowed roaches can move under force fields.
http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/274906/1/Blaze/
KinosJourney2
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Sweden1811 Posts
May 11 2010 19:58 GMT
#26
On May 12 2010 03:02 OPSavioR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2010 02:47 KinosJourney2 wrote:
Burrow being free would be imbalanced, i like burrow but paying 200/200 for it at lair tech is just outrageous IMO

its 100/100


O shi-

Oh well, i guess 100/100 is fine then. But if it had a lower build time it would be used more.
ocho wrote: EDIT: NEVERMIND, THIS THING HAS APM TECHNOLOGY OMG
poor newb
Profile Joined April 2004
United States1879 Posts
May 11 2010 20:01 GMT
#27
roach movement underground should be free, burrow stay the same
How do you mine minerals?
Bluerain
Profile Joined April 2010
United States348 Posts
May 11 2010 20:07 GMT
#28
make burrowed movement a tier 3 up for banelings and im sure more ppl will get detectors lol
Tone_
Profile Joined May 2009
United Kingdom554 Posts
May 11 2010 20:08 GMT
#29
Why is it being the same as banshee research / DTs timing / cost a bad thing!?

Argument is 100% pointless, wrong and unfounded.

A reason to buff zerg and how this would help zerg and not make things imbalanced would be useful. Do this why I go make a (nonsensically titled) thread about how DT's should be easier to get k?
Hasta La Victoria Siempre | 톤
PanzerDragoon
Profile Joined March 2010
United States822 Posts
May 11 2010 20:13 GMT
#30
its more expensive than cloak because it applies to all your ground units. Terran spends 200/200 on banshee cloak and it applies to ONE unit.
AmstAff
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Germany949 Posts
May 11 2010 20:13 GMT
#31
but roach HP regeneration benefit from burrow.
after 2 years i reached it = marine icon
Destro
Profile Joined September 2009
Netherlands1206 Posts
May 11 2010 20:23 GMT
#32
yea i gotta agree, burrow plays such a huge role that its completely worth that amount of resources. roach regen, baneling ambush, drone save, etc etc
bring back weapon of choice for hots!
hoovehand
Profile Joined April 2010
United Kingdom542 Posts
May 11 2010 21:11 GMT
#33
On May 12 2010 04:29 Vexx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2010 03:16 VX14 wrote:
dark shrine is 100/250
cloak is 200/200
burrow is 100/100
burrow + roach burrow movement is 250/250

really its not that big of a difference.


Great analysis. Did you consider the part where cloaked units attack while cloaked or that they move at normal speed while cloaked? Not that big of a difference I guess huh?

I have been trying to use burrow more and more recently and have been very pleased with the results. Yes, it's a painful 100/100, but it's invaluable when you're getting harassed by air as zerg cause you can just burrow your drones and save your queen while reinforcements arrive. Burrowed banelings can be very devastating sometimes. I have had very very mixed results with burrowed roaches. It's a gimmicky one-trick pony that is really hit or miss. And even when it hits, it better do serious damage cause they aren't getting out alive.

The problem with burrowed roaches is the cost of the units, the research and the amount of units you need to be effective. As opposed to throwing in 2 DTs or 2 cloaked banshees or 2 void rays.

The lurker conflicts too much with the baneling is what the issue is for introducing the lurker. Everything the baneling does, the lurker can do better without dieing. Yes the baneling is new... but it's not really better. Though, it is satisfying to explode a marching terran army.

I think burrow research should be faster and just a bit cheaper, maybe 75/75. I do like that few people research it though. Makes me feel unique!





i agree with this.

burrow roaches is a gimmick but burrow most definately ain't. burrow owned in broodwar, back when everyone had detection coming out of their ears.

i think the problem is that if you skip burrow then you really don't get a chance to get it until much later.
avilo
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States4100 Posts
May 11 2010 21:19 GMT
#34
just think about this: for the cost of 1 cheap upgrade your opponent just turned his entire army into dark templar. yah, it's a bit too powerful
Sup
MrRey
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
183 Posts
May 11 2010 21:26 GMT
#35
The changes to the Burrow upgrade were there mostly because it made the roaches imba, with their regen and stuff.

After that they kept nerfing the roaches, reducing their movement underground, greatly reducing their health regen.
So I guess they should put back Burrow like it was. Maybe not the price but the research time.
heishe
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany2284 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 21:33:40
May 11 2010 21:27 GMT
#36
I think it's completely retarded design to let 2 upgrades depend on each other. The roach burrowed movement upgrade has to be removed.

edit: I just think its stupid that in theory it's possible to have burrowed movement without actually having burrow. That just seems totally awkward (yeah I know nobody will do a thing like that, still it seems totally stupid). So they should remove the upgrade or merge it with the speed upgrade.

I mean it would make total sense. With the upgrade the roach DNA gets altered in a way that makes their legs and "arms" stronger, which enables them to both run faster and move underground.
If you value your soul, never look into the eye of a horse. Your soul will forever be lost in the void of the horse.
Kare
Profile Joined March 2009
Norway786 Posts
May 11 2010 21:29 GMT
#37
I cant belive how much I miss the lurker.. :/
In life you can obtain all sorts of material wealth, but the real treasure is the epic feelings you get while doing something you love.
TimmyMac
Profile Joined December 2008
Canada499 Posts
May 11 2010 21:36 GMT
#38
On May 12 2010 06:19 avilo wrote:
just think about this: for the cost of 1 cheap upgrade your opponent just turned his entire army into dark templar. yah, it's a bit too powerful

What the fuck? Are you conveniently ignoring that no zerg units can attack while burrowed?
heishe
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany2284 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 21:38:27
May 11 2010 21:38 GMT
#39
and also that zerg units generally dont one-shot workers

edit: and also that they can't move at all except for 2.
If you value your soul, never look into the eye of a horse. Your soul will forever be lost in the void of the horse.
Clow
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
Brazil880 Posts
May 11 2010 21:44 GMT
#40
Zerg needs a new unit that is melee and only attacks when burrowed! That'd be so kewl!
Or just give us lurkers.
(–_–) CJ Entusman #33
Zeke50100
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States2220 Posts
May 11 2010 21:49 GMT
#41
On May 12 2010 06:36 TimmyMac wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2010 06:19 avilo wrote:
just think about this: for the cost of 1 cheap upgrade your opponent just turned his entire army into dark templar. yah, it's a bit too powerful

What the fuck? Are you conveniently ignoring that no zerg units can attack while burrowed?


What happens when the opponent backs up his forces to defend? Oh, right, use burrow. It's easier to notice, for sure, but is much cheaper (both in that Roaches are dirt cheap, and it doesn't require teching up to T3 for the sole purpose of being able to do it)

They have differences, but that doesn't mean they aren't comparable.
Persev
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States127 Posts
May 11 2010 21:54 GMT
#42
I rarely see or use burrow in my plat games. In 2v2 detection is more abundant. In 1v1 burrow has become very rare. The reason is the burrow is at lair tech and units move really slowly while burrowed. As a zerg player its good to be sneaky,but often times concentrating your forces quickly supercedes the reason why you get burrow. Research time for burrow comes much later in sc2 tier 2 now. The time window to get into position and burrow and surprise...I just haven't been able to do it efficiently without looking like road kill. Ideally this ability would be awesome with banelings to stop initial marine/marauder but as it stands now the timing window for getting this ability and to getting into position to stop a huge macro balls of enemy units is very very small. I'll keep trying but this ability seems to have been over compensated a bit much. Lastly, by end game detection is really abundant in 1v1 so its usually less useful to get by then. In summary the location where burrow has been placed seems to be to late to be useful in thecompetitive games I've been in. I would really like to see burrow used more (or again).
Be nice!
bITt.mAN
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Switzerland3693 Posts
May 11 2010 21:56 GMT
#43
Its sad how burrow is underused.

What's more sad is Blizzard is making creative, interesting, risky (and just plain fun) strategies using burrow in the early stages of the game less and less viable.

Moving burrow tech so far into the game prevents you from doing a burrowed speed-ling backsatab. It prevents you getting vision on important places before they have detection/ map control/presence. Burrow is also nice and useful to save your drones getting ripped to shreds if your opponent dosen't have detection immediately on hand.

Burrow is an unalienable right of the Tier 1 Zerg, do not discriminate, vote against making it hard to use.
BW4LYF . . . . . . PM me, I LOVE PMs. . . . . . Long live "NaDa's Body" . . . . . . Fantasy | Bisu/Best | Jaedong . . . . .
Evilruler
Profile Joined May 2010
Brazil116 Posts
May 11 2010 22:10 GMT
#44
Burrow is expensive but it's worth it.
On May 12 2010 05:23 Destro wrote:
burrow plays such a huge role that its completely worth that amount of resources. roach regen, baneling ambush, drone save, etc etc

What may make it feel wrong is: it's in tier 2; it's too expensive (100/100); it takes too long to research.
Solutions and repercutions:
-Put it back in tier 1 - would enable faster burrow play, but roach would still need a upgrade to move underground, wich doesn't make sense (they can't have it from the beginning if roach is T1). It's a neat solution, but the idea of having 2 different upgrades that depend on each other is awkward.
On May 12 2010 06:27 heishe wrote:
I just think its stupid that in theory it's possible to have burrowed movement without actually having burrow. That just seems totally awkward (yeah I know nobody will do a thing like that, still it seems totally stupid). So they should remove the upgrade or merge it with the speed upgrade.

-Nuke the tunneling claws - Seems a good choice. Wouldn't create imbalance because the time wouldn't change for roaches to be able to burrow (stays T2), and makes things more simple. Drawback is: any burrow play would take time to start, but it'll be easier to get if you don't get it asap you'll be able to get it later since it'll be 1 upgrade instead of 2 (cheaper, easier).
-Make it faster - reduce the time to upgrade burrow and it can be used fast (duh), the point is, being able to create a window of time in wich you can use a "burrow rush" to some advantage, involving strategy. The issue here is: it really need's to be faster to be usefull?
-Put it on sale - redue min/gas cost. Wouldn't change nothing alone, 25/25 less is what? A baneling? Even 50/50 doesn't make much difference, the issue is: WHEN your gonna be able to get it (being expensive balances if it is available fast).
Papillon
Profile Joined February 2010
Germany131 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 22:20:21
May 11 2010 22:15 GMT
#45
burrow at tier 1 wouldnt fit the game.
in sc1 early burrow harrassment was done by zerglings but even when you were out with your units and saw them entering your base you had a chance to defend with your workers plus new built units because of the ai not prioritizing workers.
now in sc2 this is not the case and there are more effective tier 1 units for zerg like banelings and roaches.
and you really cant afford "blind scans" to detect eventually burrowed units at your base.
making burrow somehow more effective overall is another thing but being tier 1 wouldnt be fun at all

still i think burrow in sc2 is quite underused
MoNoNauT
Profile Joined April 2010
United States74 Posts
May 11 2010 22:21 GMT
#46
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=121485

my post from a few weeks ago, relevant to this discussion.
"The best counter to anything in Starcraft is to go fuckin' kill him." - Day[9]
Evilruler
Profile Joined May 2010
Brazil116 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-11 22:40:12
May 11 2010 22:38 GMT
#47
On May 12 2010 07:15 Papillon wrote:
burrow at tier 1 wouldnt fit the game.
in sc1 early burrow harrassment was done by zerglings but even when you were out with your units and saw them entering your base you had a chance to defend with your workers plus new built units because of the ai not prioritizing workers.
now in sc2 this is not the case and there are more effective tier 1 units for zerg like banelings and roaches.
and you really cant afford "blind scans" to detect eventually burrowed units at your base.
making burrow somehow more effective overall is another thing but being tier 1 wouldnt be fun at all

still i think burrow in sc2 is quite underused


Banelings are T1, lol, I wasn't aware of that. =P I wish had a beta key...
But I agree with you, Pap, it's hard to think of burrow back to T1 in SC2. Instead, to making it workable faster (ppl has been complaining about the minimal/nonexistent time window to use it) the only option seems to be make the upgrade faster to research.
Xeken
Profile Joined May 2010
United States77 Posts
May 11 2010 22:39 GMT
#48
I was under the impression that burrow was nerfed earlier in beta due to roach regen being too good. Now that roach regen is more balanced, a lowered cost/time may not be asking for too much.
-orb-
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States5770 Posts
May 11 2010 22:50 GMT
#49
On May 12 2010 02:47 heishe wrote:
they should just make it equal to the overlord speed upgrade. 50/50 and lower research time.


Yeah lets make all zerg upgrades cost 50/50 and take no time while we're at it.

50/50 upgrades that take no time are stupid, plain and simple. When you make a beneficial upgrade cost that less and take that small of an amount of time to get you're essentially taking the choice away from the player and making it stupid NOT to get. It's the same thing with concussive shells and imo it's a failure from blizzard when you put upgrades like that in the game. Upgrades are supposed to be a choice. Maybe I'm remembering incorrectly but I don't remember a single upgrade in brood war being that cheap OR that quick.

Meanwhile extremely important protoss upgrades like charge cost 200/200 and take years to complete...
'life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery'
how sad that sc2 has no shield battery :(
-orb-
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States5770 Posts
May 11 2010 22:52 GMT
#50
On May 12 2010 07:39 Xeken wrote:
I was under the impression that burrow was nerfed earlier in beta due to roach regen being too good. Now that roach regen is more balanced, a lowered cost/time may not be asking for too much.


For the record, roach regen isn't balanced.

I played a PvZ the other day in which we both had 200/200 armies. My upgrades were 3/3, his were 0/0. He burrows all his roaches and my entire army is attacking including me storming the roaches and not a single one dies.
'life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery'
how sad that sc2 has no shield battery :(
sLiniss
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States849 Posts
May 11 2010 23:00 GMT
#51
I agree to the posts that say Zerg should have some sort of "burrow danger" where a unit would have the mechanics of a Lurker. Of course, this can be done without bringing the Lurker back.

Burrow is extremely underused. I've been playing Z at high gold rankings and it seems like the only reason to get it is if I'm doing some gimmicky thing with banelings.
Chronopolis
Profile Joined April 2009
Canada1484 Posts
May 11 2010 23:01 GMT
#52
100/100 is extremely reasonable for an ability that is as versatile as burrow. You can create ambushes, hide drones, heal roaches, harrassment tricks etc. If burrow would come bundled with lair, aside from balance issues, it would remove any player choice in the matter.
It would be nice if a player had to pay for something like creep generation, but could skip it in favour of a more aggresive play and more units.
btlyger
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States470 Posts
May 11 2010 23:01 GMT
#53
I really think they over nerfed burrow.

I've researched it probably 4 times since the change, and even though I would love to use it with roaches like I've been seeing a few of these pro-matches do, I just don't see it being very cost/time effective.
"Minerals being mined. Minerals being mined. Minerals being mined." Learn how to post: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting
Xeken
Profile Joined May 2010
United States77 Posts
May 11 2010 23:13 GMT
#54
On May 12 2010 07:52 -orb- wrote:
For the record, roach regen isn't balanced.

I played a PvZ the other day in which we both had 200/200 armies. My upgrades were 3/3, his were 0/0. He burrows all his roaches and my entire army is attacking including me storming the roaches and not a single one dies.


That's great and all, but we are talking about early game burrow possibilities, not burrow with organic carapace.
afiddy
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
Canada108 Posts
May 11 2010 23:39 GMT
#55
What are you guys even talking about? Burrow is completely fine as it is now. Although I do have to agree that 2 upgrades being dependant on eachother is a little dumb. There are times where I research tunneling claws and then find out that I didn't even research burrow yet, just because when I go to upgrade tunneling claws I just assume my roaches can tunnel underground once its done. But then its just like, "oh right, they need to learn how to burrow first ~lol~." I think both speed and tunneling should be a combined upgrade with a higher price. Maybe something like 175/175. Also, haven't you guys watched the TL invitational? Both Slush and Artosis used burrow/tunneling claws for roaches really well for surrounding and flanking.

I find people are seeing certain aspects of the game as being too "black and white." Just because something works in the opponents favor and is harder for you, doesn't mean it's imba.
Alpha and Omega.
Skee
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada702 Posts
May 11 2010 23:41 GMT
#56
Burrowed roaches can move under forcefields... enough said.
Talic_Zealot
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
688 Posts
May 12 2010 00:25 GMT
#57
Stop making such comparisons. Burrowed roaches/ DTs, EMP/ Storm, ... the races/abilities/units work in completely different ways. They have not been cost-balanced in the way you compare them deliberately.
There are three types of people in the universe: those who can count, and those who cant.
Jonoman92
Profile Blog Joined September 2006
United States9107 Posts
May 12 2010 00:41 GMT
#58
On May 12 2010 02:50 Ideas wrote:
I really wish that Zerg had a real "cloaked danger" in the way lurkers/spidermines were or DTs/Banshees are. burrowed roaches/banelings just dont really cut it at all. I'm not saying bring lurkers back, but I really wish zerg would have a unit that forces the other races to want to get detection.


I can only speak for TvZ since i'm a T player but if you have no detection and a z player goes mass roach it doesn't matter if you go pure marauder. When those things pop up under your army you are done.

So it does force me to get a turret out by my front natural choke and encourages me to get a raven so i don't get owned by burrowed banelings (though not many z's are abusing this.... yet.)
mucker
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1120 Posts
May 12 2010 00:48 GMT
#59
Burrow is very powerful when used properly. If you force your opponent to build one extra detector or do one extra scan it has pretty much paid for itself. A burrowed ling preventing an expo can do this. It can give you tons of extra scouting info without risking ovis, makes all sorts of flanks and ambushes possible, can save your drones and queens, can be better than retreating when waiting for reinforcements... any of these uses can pay for burrow many times over. Then there are banelings, roaches and infestors, which we are really just learning how to use...

Burrow any earlier than it comes now would be too fast. And it may even be too cheap at its current cost. 100/100 to be able to hide any ground unit... Also I've noticed in replays that a lot of people research burrow at their lair after the ovi speed upgrade. It can actually be researched at any hatch once you have a lair.
It's supposed to be automatic but actually you have to press this button.
errol1001
Profile Joined April 2008
454 Posts
May 12 2010 01:13 GMT
#60
On May 12 2010 07:52 -orb- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2010 07:39 Xeken wrote:
I was under the impression that burrow was nerfed earlier in beta due to roach regen being too good. Now that roach regen is more balanced, a lowered cost/time may not be asking for too much.


For the record, roach regen isn't balanced.

I played a PvZ the other day in which we both had 200/200 armies. My upgrades were 3/3, his were 0/0. He burrows all his roaches and my entire army is attacking including me storming the roaches and not a single one dies.


Isn't the problem there the fact that you were using storm instead of colossi?
Bael
Profile Joined March 2010
Australia49 Posts
May 12 2010 01:32 GMT
#61
I think the only thing lacking from the Zerg cloaked/burrowed arsenal is a unit that can attack and pose a real threat while invisible. Toss have DTs (and Mothership cloak field), Terran have Banshees (and Ghosts), all of which can move and attack while invisible; while Zerg have Banelings, which are immobile and require sheer luck or foresight more than anything (enemy moves whole army over banelings without detection). Because of the lack of range on a baneling's attack, if you try to burrow offensively (i.e when the enemy can see you) it's a simply matter to avoid walking over that area until they get detection. Burrowed banelings might be useful for positioning the enemy's army, but they've unlikely to do any damage of their own. Zerg need a ranged unit that can straight-up attack the enemy for the same cost of using a DT or Banshee. *cough* Lurker *cough*.

While the Roach/Infestor movement-while-burrowed gimmicks are useful in some isolated situations, the true power of cloaked units is being able to deal heavy damage to the opponent while they scramble to get detection into play, either in economic harassment or picking off units. If you leave a DT or Banshee in your base without responding quickly, terrible, terrible damage can be wreaked on your worker line. With Roaches, once they've unburrrowed, you reveal your hand, and they are effectively countered pre-detection by having an army nearby to attack them when they've unburrowed. So what does Zerg need? A useful attacking/harassment unit that can strike while burrowed.

Did someone say Lurker?
Zeke50100
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States2220 Posts
May 12 2010 01:38 GMT
#62
It doesn't matter that they have an army waiting for Burrowed Roaches, because that means you're keeping their army contained.
hoovehand
Profile Joined April 2010
United Kingdom542 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-12 07:50:41
May 12 2010 07:49 GMT
#63
50/50 upgrades are dumb, especially as the insanely useful concussive shells and overlord speed received the buff... much less useful ones still cost a fortune - for example reaper speed 150/150 120 sec :D

every terran gets concussive shells and every zerg gets overlord speed.

might as well remove the upgrade and just make it passive in the current situation.
Artrey
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany270 Posts
May 12 2010 08:32 GMT
#64
On May 12 2010 07:50 -orb- wrote:
50/50 upgrades that take no time are stupid, plain and simple. When you make a beneficial upgrade cost that less and take that small of an amount of time to get you're essentially taking the choice away from the player and making it stupid NOT to get. It's the same thing with concussive shells and imo it's a failure from blizzard when you put upgrades like that in the game. Upgrades are supposed to be a choice.


On May 12 2010 16:49 hoovehand wrote:
50/50 upgrades are dumb, especially as the insanely useful concussive shells and overlord speed received the buff... much less useful ones still cost a fortune - for example reaper speed 150/150 120 sec :D

every terran gets concussive shells and every zerg gets overlord speed.

might as well remove the upgrade and just make it passive in the current situation.


You are really missing something there. Upgrades are not only meant to be a choice, they are also meant to provide lategame viability to early game units, which would be too powerful otherwise. Concussive Shells as a cheap upgrade exists to make the early game easier/possible for toss. Overlord Speed exists to give Zerg a better lame game scouting and Overlord viability but denying full early game mapcontrol which would counter all proxy-builds.

It is just not only about giving choices, but about balancing the pace of the game. And that is why 50/50 upgrades have their place.

As for burrow, I also think it should be back to Tier 1 and have a bit reduced research time (maybe 30% down). It's so rare to actually see people use it anymore, even with infestors or roaches... Not at all for flanking because once you get it, your opponents usually have a raven or an obs.
mnck
Profile Joined April 2010
Denmark1518 Posts
May 12 2010 09:31 GMT
#65
The fact that burrow applies to all Zerg units makes it invaluable. But using it just to get a DT-like surprise effect, then is not worth it.

Burrow adds so much strength to units like Infestors, Banelings, scouting Zerglings and rescuing drones, that it is almost always worth it getting burrow. The choice is when to get it, not whether you want to get it or not.

It is a lot like Warp gate tech for Protoss. It's such a great tech you always want to get it, but the choice is when. Same goes for burrow, when can I spare 100 gas on this upgrade?
@Munck
Kaza
Profile Joined April 2010
United States31 Posts
May 12 2010 09:58 GMT
#66
Are there any good replays of burrow being utilized? I'm in platinum and I hardly ever see a real good use for it. In theory its a good way to set up ambushes and all that, but how often do you have time to do all that and not have the enemy notice?
Orzabal
Profile Joined December 2009
France287 Posts
May 12 2010 10:43 GMT
#67
On May 12 2010 02:47 heishe wrote:
they should just make it equal to the overlord speed upgrade. 50/50 and lower research time.


agree
ZenDeX
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Philippines2916 Posts
May 12 2010 11:00 GMT
#68
On May 12 2010 18:58 Kaza wrote:
Are there any good replays of burrow being utilized? I'm in platinum and I hardly ever see a real good use for it. In theory its a good way to set up ambushes and all that, but how often do you have time to do all that and not have the enemy notice?

There was this Roach tactic wherein Zerg would rush Tunneling Claws so that he would place his Roach army directly underneath the Marauders and then unburrow.
Phlatline
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
Croatia176 Posts
May 12 2010 11:17 GMT
#69
omg if burrowed roach is imba, what to say when u have to deal with banshee or dt?
Not really broken, since they can't attack burrowed. Make a turret or don't spend every little bit of your energy on mule Oo
As Toss you can just make "A" observer and be fine...
IrrasO
Profile Joined October 2008
United States408 Posts
May 12 2010 11:19 GMT
#70
what alot of the zerg users in here neglect is that banshees/ghosts require energy for cloaking. they're also not dirt cheap to mass produce like the roaches are. with roaches at 75/25 with a build time of 27, compared to the banshee and ghost (150/100/60sec and 150/150/40sec respectively) you just won't be able to mass produce these as much as you would roaches to abuse the cloaking. i can't really say anything about dts however, i hate those.
morimacil
Profile Joined March 2010
France921 Posts
May 12 2010 11:43 GMT
#71
Id rather have the cost increased a bit, and the research time decreased greatly.

I think it would be much more interesting to see stuff like early burrowed roach harassment, burrowing banelings in the mineral lines of possible expos for your opponent, stopping early pushes with burrowed banelings, setting up flanks or backstab attacks early on, and so on.
All that kind of stuff would be really cool to do early on, would add a bit more change to the gameplay too. But in return, you would be actually paying for it, investing in that tech.

As is currently, against protoss, you cant get burrow before he makes an observer, against terran, you obv cant get it before he gets an orbital, but its also not realistic to get for example burrowed banelings at his choke before he pushes out.

Lots of cool stuff can be done with burrow, but when by te time its done, your opponent is already nearly at T3, or already there, then its not all that useful
Velr
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Switzerland10870 Posts
May 12 2010 11:52 GMT
#72
Once upon a time fast burrow + roach claws were fun to use.

Then they increased the research time for burrow because roach regen was broken....


Problem with burrow is:
By the time youi have it, toss has observers (its fine atm against Terran) and burrowing anything that cant move very fast or move while burrowed is just to risky.
burrow Hydras off creep is like playing in the lottery.
Prem_
Profile Joined April 2010
United States85 Posts
May 12 2010 12:02 GMT
#73
Nahhh dont give it for free... thats just dumb because basically all of the zerg units will be able to use it.
The only good job is a blow job.
CryGirl1921
Profile Joined February 2010
Poland78 Posts
May 12 2010 12:25 GMT
#74
100/100 for burrow is kinda ok, but lower research time !!
BluBla
guitarizt
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States1492 Posts
May 12 2010 12:26 GMT
#75
On May 12 2010 20:52 Velr wrote:
Once upon a time fast burrow + roach claws were fun to use.

Then they increased the research time for burrow because roach regen was broken....


Problem with burrow is:
By the time youi have it, toss has observers (its fine atm against Terran) and burrowing anything that cant move very fast or move while burrowed is just to risky.
burrow Hydras off creep is like playing in the lottery.


Yeah they kept nerfing the regen and then the burrow move speed but burrow should be 50/50 again.
“There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self.” - Hemingway
dessilator
Profile Joined May 2010
United States8 Posts
May 12 2010 12:45 GMT
#76
Toss has to also build another building before he can use DTs
Actua
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada101 Posts
May 12 2010 13:04 GMT
#77
Burrow is amazingly effective in Sc2, and it's probably due to the lesser presence of detection.

vs terran : I've blown up countless amounts of 1 base pushes. Seriously, burrow 9 + blings in a well spread manner into a choke or spot you know the player will go through and watch as any amount of marines/marauders/tanks will explode in a second. It litterally gives you the game.

vs toss: clearly not as useful ( if not useless) unless he went for another tech tree than robo

Vs zerg: God, I once planted like 15+ blings on blistering sands and blew up like 15 or so roaches with a couple hydras. Cant always be that lucky, but they really fuck up hydra tech if used correctly.

Btw, 10-15 zerg plat player
Reason
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
United Kingdom2770 Posts
May 12 2010 13:14 GMT
#78
On May 12 2010 02:51 MorroW wrote:
they should make overlord upgrade twice as expensive because everyone auto-gets it on lair. in rts games u want to make choices and sacrifices. stuff like warp gate, overlord speed or concussive shells r just practically free. in fact make all of it more expensive xd. i like strategic choices, not obvious choices
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2010 02:50 Ideas wrote:
I really wish that Zerg had a real "cloaked danger" in the way lurkers/spidermines were or DTs/Banshees are. burrowed roaches/banelings just dont really cut it at all. I'm not saying bring lurkers back, but I really wish zerg would have a unit that forces the other races to want to get detection.

i really agree. would be awesome if some z unit could attack underground (or maybe u wanted cloaked zerg units :p) anyhow im also not saying bring back lurker but the idea itself of zerg units attacking from underground makes me say, thats zerg in raw form!

There should be a trapdoor spider!
Speak properly, and in as few words as you can, but always plainly; for the end of speech is not ostentation, but to be understood.
AnodyneSea
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Jamaica757 Posts
May 12 2010 13:15 GMT
#79
On May 12 2010 03:04 Ceric wrote:
I didn't have the numbers handy.

All the burrow moving units are now slower. Especially compared to all the cloaked units. Do any Platinum level players use Burrow?


You need to watch some SLush ZvT he uses burrowed roaches very well, i started using it and its very very effective
Lost within the hope of freedom, not for control but in the light of our cause
AmstAff
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Germany949 Posts
May 12 2010 13:21 GMT
#80
On May 12 2010 07:50 -orb- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2010 02:47 heishe wrote:
they should just make it equal to the overlord speed upgrade. 50/50 and lower research time.


Yeah lets make all zerg upgrades cost 50/50 and take no time while we're at it.

50/50 upgrades that take no time are stupid, plain and simple. When you make a beneficial upgrade cost that less and take that small of an amount of time to get you're essentially taking the choice away from the player and making it stupid NOT to get. It's the same thing with concussive shells and imo it's a failure from blizzard when you put upgrades like that in the game. Upgrades are supposed to be a choice. Maybe I'm remembering incorrectly but I don't remember a single upgrade in brood war being that cheap OR that quick.

Meanwhile extremely important protoss upgrades like charge cost 200/200 and take years to complete...


# THIS!

i dont understand why they make upgrades 50/50 and 20 seconds or something. its just stupid. just make them an ability of the unit without tech or make them expensive enough so that you dont tech them automatically.
as P i tech charge really late cause its not that important for my playstyle and its expensive or blink only if i see mutas or banshees but things like concussive shells i grade directly cause they are super cheap have small research time and have a HUGE effect.
after 2 years i reached it = marine icon
T0fuuu
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Australia2275 Posts
May 12 2010 14:42 GMT
#81
Why does everyone seemingly want to make zerg and their roaches be even more multipurpose? They already move ridiculously fast, do decent damage, have good health, can regenerate health as well, are ranged and can move while burrowed. And now you want them to force the other player to get detection? they already have such good map control thanks to creep vision, speedlings and overlords, giving units burrow cheaply/quickly would just mean that t/p would never be ablee to moveout on the map.

getting burrow wouldnt even be an option at 50/50 ud just do it and force the other player to get detection. its stupid.
ZenDeX
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Philippines2916 Posts
May 12 2010 14:47 GMT
#82
On May 12 2010 23:42 T0fuuu wrote:
ud just do it and force the other player to get detection. its stupid.

Seems like for you, the simpler the game the less stupid it is.
T0fuuu
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Australia2275 Posts
May 12 2010 16:33 GMT
#83
On May 12 2010 23:47 lolaloc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2010 23:42 T0fuuu wrote:
ud just do it and force the other player to get detection. its stupid.

Seems like for you, the simpler the game the less stupid it is.


Do you not get concussive shells? burrow should be a choice to be made, not just another cheap upgrade. Cloak is a choice that is not cheap, DT is a choice with its own branch off. Burrow should remain as it is. How is making having tech choices that require alot of investment and thought simplifying the game?
AmstAff
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Germany949 Posts
May 12 2010 16:43 GMT
#84
On May 12 2010 23:47 lolaloc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2010 23:42 T0fuuu wrote:
ud just do it and force the other player to get detection. its stupid.

Seems like for you, the simpler the game the less stupid it is.


i dont understand this...
after 2 years i reached it = marine icon
ZenDeX
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Philippines2916 Posts
May 12 2010 16:45 GMT
#85
On May 13 2010 01:33 T0fuuu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2010 23:47 lolaloc wrote:
On May 12 2010 23:42 T0fuuu wrote:
ud just do it and force the other player to get detection. its stupid.

Seems like for you, the simpler the game the less stupid it is.


Do you not get concussive shells? burrow should be a choice to be made, not just another cheap upgrade. Cloak is a choice that is not cheap, DT is a choice with its own branch off. Burrow should remain as it is. How is making having tech choices that require alot of investment and thought simplifying the game?

I don't see your point.

In the way I see it, when an opponent is forced to adapt because of certain circumstances, the game becomes more complex in nature. If a player can't force his opponent to change his plan, we would get repetitive games.
gillon
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Sweden1578 Posts
May 12 2010 16:51 GMT
#86
On May 12 2010 02:54 Koffiegast wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2010 02:51 MorroW wrote:
they should make overlord upgrade twice as expensive because everyone auto-gets it on lair. in rts games u want to make choices and sacrifices. stuff like warp gate, overlord speed or concussive shells r just practically free. in fact make all of it more expensive xd. i like strategic choices, not obvious choices


Yet they increased the damage of marines if I recall recollectly and keep overlords hp at the same 200 as BW.. what other options would Zerg have for scouting? Also, it isnt as if overseer has more hp than a normal overlord...


They also removed marine range and made them build slower. How is this related to anything?
www.teamproperty.net | "You should hate losing, but you should never fear defeat." - 이윤열
Keype
Profile Joined March 2010
Sweden455 Posts
May 12 2010 17:09 GMT
#87
Please don't forget Dark shrine is tier 3 , it's not a short tech way. Lair u can get after spawningpool roach warren too.. and ghost academy after rax, ghosts and dts are way more expensive then roaches and it got their reasons
Tornado Terran Fighting!
0mgVitaminE
Profile Joined February 2009
United States1278 Posts
May 12 2010 17:21 GMT
#88
On May 12 2010 02:51 MorroW wrote:
they should make overlord upgrade twice as expensive because everyone auto-gets it on lair. in rts games u want to make choices and sacrifices. stuff like warp gate, overlord speed or concussive shells r just practically free. in fact make all of it more expensive xd. i like strategic choices, not obvious choices
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2010 02:50 Ideas wrote:
I really wish that Zerg had a real "cloaked danger" in the way lurkers/spidermines were or DTs/Banshees are. burrowed roaches/banelings just dont really cut it at all. I'm not saying bring lurkers back, but I really wish zerg would have a unit that forces the other races to want to get detection.

i really agree. would be awesome if some z unit could attack underground (or maybe u wanted cloaked zerg units :p) anyhow im also not saying bring back lurker but the idea itself of zerg units attacking from underground makes me say, thats zerg in raw form!

True, but it's basically the upgrade time that you're paying for. Concussive shells could have started on the marauder, but since everyone realized how dominant that was early, they put a research time and small cost on it. imo Blizzard wants these upgrades almost every game, almost forcing a uniqueness out of certain units/buildings.
Hi there. I'm in a cave, how bout you?
junemermaid
Profile Joined September 2006
United States981 Posts
May 12 2010 17:28 GMT
#89
On May 12 2010 09:41 Jonoman92 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 12 2010 02:50 Ideas wrote:
I really wish that Zerg had a real "cloaked danger" in the way lurkers/spidermines were or DTs/Banshees are. burrowed roaches/banelings just dont really cut it at all. I'm not saying bring lurkers back, but I really wish zerg would have a unit that forces the other races to want to get detection.


I can only speak for TvZ since i'm a T player but if you have no detection and a z player goes mass roach it doesn't matter if you go pure marauder. When those things pop up under your army you are done.

So it does force me to get a turret out by my front natural choke and encourages me to get a raven so i don't get owned by burrowed banelings (though not many z's are abusing this.... yet.)


Yes.... one of my friends has been experimenting with a baneling / roach contain that comes pretty quickly. The zerg doesn't need overwhelming numbers, but just needs to show his hand. When the terran scans the zergs base and sees a baneling nest / roach warren with a lair upgrade that should automatically send red flags out that he CANNOT move out without medivac or ravens (burrowed banelings, burrowed while moving roaches, etc). This gives zerg a HUGE window to take map control, expand, diversify his bonds, etc...

It seems to me that brute force builds (like the ghost / marauder push) are becoming less effective as people realize how to take control of the positional and territorial game.
the UMP says YER OUT
ilnp
Profile Joined December 2002
Iceland1330 Posts
May 12 2010 17:37 GMT
#90
On May 12 2010 02:51 MorroW wrote:
they should make overlord upgrade twice as expensive because everyone auto-gets it on lair. in rts games u want to make choices and sacrifices. stuff like warp gate, overlord speed or concussive shells r just practically free. in fact make all of it more expensive xd. i like strategic choices, not obvious choices



in my opinion, functional upgrades should be either costly and quick, or cheap and long. cheap and fast is basically the worst -- basically the only part of this is getting to the tech to make it. concussive shells is the dumbest, because they're the same tech as getting the marauder. At least with the overlord, it's a perk of getting a lair, which comes after the overlord.

Expensive and long is also an option, but means that it's going to be a rarity in the game. Expensive and quick means you have to save for it to do it -- but once you save, you'll get it back relatively quickly. Look at stim for example -- oh I gotta save 150/150.. ok, got it, now I can't attack for 150s
8===D~~
Masq
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada1792 Posts
May 12 2010 17:41 GMT
#91
I can say that from personal experience (terran) burrowed roach and baneling is a nightmare.

Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 43m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft563
UpATreeSC 32
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 10950
Shuttle 486
BeSt 476
ggaemo 98
JulyZerg 57
sSak 33
GoRush 22
Icarus 9
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm145
League of Legends
JimRising 727
Other Games
summit1g12293
RuFF_SC2112
amsayoshi47
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1049
BasetradeTV96
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 72
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 30
• Light_VIP 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki15
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt436
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
1h 43m
Cure vs Rogue
Maru vs TBD
MaxPax vs TBD
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
8h 43m
BSL
13h 43m
Afreeca Starleague
1d 4h
Wardi Open
1d 4h
Replay Cast
1d 18h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
BSL
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W1
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.