|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2359 Posts
On January 17 2011 14:58 noob styles wrote:
Im not sure is anyone else will feel the same way about this but. Im finding the new APM graph heading a little hard to understand easily/quickly. I think its the addition of APM after macro/micro
So atm it looks like:
NAME (RACE), actions: XXXX, APM: XXX, Micro APM: XXX, Macro APM: XXX
I think it might be a little better to just have:
NAME (RACE), actions: XXXX, APM: XXX, Micro: XXX, Macro: XXX
Otherwise this is a fantastic program keep up the good work!
Thanks for the note, I will change that to a new format.
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2359 Posts
On January 17 2011 15:02 Musketeer wrote:
It's absolutely awesome that you added the camera view. However, the whole thing (no matter which replay I watch) is just the same pinkish color. Am I doing something wrong?
No, you're not doing anything wrong.
Players have different in-game colors. If I would take those colors and mix them on the Camera areas, you would see it result in colors from which you could not tell who (which color) looked at that area for how long... The mixed colors would not be informative especially if you're analyzing a 3v3 or 4v4 game...
So instead I use 1 color to show the areas weighted by the total time of all players looked at there.
But if you want to see only the Camera areas of a specific player (player 1 for example), it is very simple: just disable the other player(s). The camera areas (and everything on all charts) are always calculated from the enabled players. So simply enable player 1 only to see his/her camera areas, enable player 2 only to see his/her camera areas etc.
|
On May 11 2010 09:56 Dakota_Fanning wrote:
-1.2 Patch support
Replays with version 1.2 are not supported. Also changed some icons according to Patch 1.2
Should that be "are now supported" instead of "are not supported"?
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2359 Posts
On January 17 2011 21:19 Nolari wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2010 09:56 Dakota_Fanning wrote:
-1.2 Patch support
Replays with version 1.2 are not supported. Also changed some icons according to Patch 1.2 Should that be "are now supported" instead of "are not supported"?
Yes, you're right, good catch. Corrected it. Thanks for the note.
|
since the last update the counter in auto-named replays isn't working anymore, every replay it saves is 002
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/AXrqp.png)
any ideas?
my renaming template is /f\/Y\/F3 /P1(/r1) vs /P2(/r2) /m./e
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2359 Posts
On January 18 2011 05:43 god deezy yo wrote:since the last update the counter in auto-named replays isn't working anymore, every replay it saves is 002 any ideas? my renaming template is /f\/Y\/F3 /P1(/r1) vs /P2(/r2) /m./e
There is a bug with the /Fx counter: it substitutes the number of replays that are in the auto-replay folder. If you use a sub-folder in your naming template, unfortunately the replay will not land in the auto-replay folder but instead in one of its sub-folders (and that's where the replay number should be determined).
This is a bug I plan to fix in the future.
|
Thank you guys very much for the help 
this program is so baller
|
Thanks for update to work with the 1.2 patch^^
|
Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this address in a way that will never complete.
when i try to dl:O
|
On January 18 2011 06:48 Dakota_Fanning wrote:Show nested quote +On January 18 2011 05:43 god deezy yo wrote:since the last update the counter in auto-named replays isn't working anymore, every replay it saves is 002 any ideas? my renaming template is /f\/Y\/F3 /P1(/r1) vs /P2(/r2) /m./e There is a bug with the /Fx counter: it substitutes the number of replays that are in the auto-replay folder. If you use a sub-folder in your naming template, unfortunately the replay will not land in the auto-replay folder but instead in one of its sub-folders (and that's where the replay number should be determined). This is a bug I plan to fix in the future.
good to know, can't wait
thanks for all your efforts dude!
|
Latest patch turned sc2gears from "yeal you should probably get this" to "required if you play starcraft"
Thanks for the hardwork, making sure all my friends dl a copy ;D
|
Wow. I've been waiting for the 1.2 update and you surprise me with a huge additions of unbelievable features
|
|
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2359 Posts
On January 18 2011 08:53 Sfydjklm wrote:
Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this address in a way that will never complete.
when i try to dl:O
Sc2gears is hosted on a cloud download system. The server you are redirected might have temporary error. Try again now, I'm sure it will work.
|
I'm having trouble getting the program to work on my mac
When I try to run the command in the terminal, I get this error:
+ Show Spoiler +Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: Bad version number in .class file
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:676)
at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:124)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:260)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(URLClassLoader.java:56)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:317)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:280)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:375)
any possible solutions?
|
On January 20 2011 04:25 alphafuzard wrote:I'm having trouble getting the program to work on my mac When I try to run the command in the terminal, I get this error: + Show Spoiler +Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: Bad version number in .class file
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:676)
at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:124)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:260)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(URLClassLoader.java:56)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:317)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:280)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:375)
any possible solutions?
The issue you are experiencing probably is related to a corrupt Java Software installation. Please download and install the latest version here.
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2359 Posts
On January 20 2011 04:25 alphafuzard wrote:I'm having trouble getting the program to work on my mac When I try to run the command in the terminal, I get this error: + Show Spoiler +Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: Bad version number in .class file
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:676)
at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:124)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:260)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(URLClassLoader.java:56)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:317)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:280)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:252)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:375)
any possible solutions?
You probably have Java 5.0 or older. Sc2gears requires Java 6.0.
Type "java -version" in a console/terminal to find out the version of your Java.
|
There seems to be some bug in the latest version. The APM value is much lower than it should be when you open a replay in the anylyzer. In the lists from replay searches the APM count looks to be working. Is this only for me?
|
Dakota_Fanning
Hungary2359 Posts
On January 20 2011 19:30 Horsy wrote:
There seems to be some bug in the latest version. The APM value is much lower than it should be when you open a replay in the anylyzer. In the lists from replay searches the APM count looks to be working. Is this only for me?
I did not experience this.
2 things that might explain it:
-The header now contains APM, Micro APM and Macro APM values. The last one is Macro APM which is obviously lower than the APM.
-You might have "Use listed actions as chart input data" option enabled (below the action list) and your action list is filtered.
|
On January 20 2011 20:59 Dakota_Fanning wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2011 19:30 Horsy wrote:
There seems to be some bug in the latest version. The APM value is much lower than it should be when you open a replay in the anylyzer. In the lists from replay searches the APM count looks to be working. Is this only for me? I did not experience this. 2 things that might explain it: -The header now contains APM, Micro APM and Macro APM values. The last one is Macro APM which is obviously lower than the APM. -You might have "Use listed actions as chart input data" option enabled (below the action list) and your action list is filtered.
Oh sorry, it was the macro apm thing. Thank you for that information
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
