• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:59
CEST 12:59
KST 19:59
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed17Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Soulkey Muta Micro Map? [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 663 users

Incentives to move out on the Map - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
The6357
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States1268 Posts
May 05 2010 16:50 GMT
#41
enemy expands = move out
2010 worldcup!! corea fighting!!!
kickinhead
Profile Joined December 2008
Switzerland2069 Posts
May 05 2010 16:53 GMT
#42
@The6357: Again, I don't mean "move out to attack" or "move out to expand" but "move out to position yourself somewhere on the map". I really think ppl should read the posts before they spam it with their 4-word-sentences...

On May 05 2010 23:28 cloudJR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 04 2010 16:11 PH wrote:
There's plenty of incentive to move out of your base and onto the map. Having map control is very important.


If not the most important lol


Do you even think before you post?

Why do you think moving out on the Map with several Units serves any purpose in SC2 other than to attack the opponent?

Why would you move out with your attack-force or a part of it and therefore have less defense in your base other than to simply attack the enemy base?

Again, I'm not talking about getting up an additional Expansion, which is the same turtelling style we see atm, just with one more base...

I can't think of one reason why you should move out on the Map and position your army somewhere, but I can think of a whole lot why you shouldnt:

1) High mobility of every race makes counterattacks very dangerous.
2) Small maps with backdoors favour cheese and timing-attacks, which could come at any time of the game, especially if the enemy sees that your whole army is outside of your base.
3) Xel-Naga-Tower can be occupied by 1 Unit, each more Unit is basically a waste.
4) The lousy highground-advantage you get in SC2 is to easy negated to take the risk of leaving your base.
5) Warp-in's, Nydus-worms, cliff-jumping Units, extremely fast Speedlings etc. will just rip your less defended base apart.
6) If you move out with only a part of your Units and the opponent is attacking you, your Army will be split and because it's nearly impossible to retreat without suffering heavy Damage (Marauders, Force-Fields, Speedling-Surround, Fungal Growth etc.) it's GG most of the times.
7) Containing the opponent is much harder because of the overall high mobility of Units, Mapstructure, lack of positional boni etc.

This may not be true for every MU and for every race, but it's the overall theme of the game atm.

But really - give me 1 reason to move out on the Map just to what you call "control" the Map. It's not really "controlling" the Map IMHO, if the enemy could wipe out your forces on the Map with one clean attack and then kill your base, is it? Mapcontrol can only be achieved when moving out on the Map is rewarded with a certain bonus to your army-strength, otherwise you'd better call it "risking your Units on the Map", because it does make absolutely no sense to let your base be less defended... -.-°

Don't just use buzzwords you don't know what they actually mean.
https://soundcloud.com/thesamplethief
MorroW
Profile Joined August 2008
Sweden3522 Posts
May 05 2010 16:58 GMT
#43
personally i make units in my natural then i attack and win or lose
thats simply how the game works for me atm... not so fun xd
Progamerpls no copy pasterino
kickinhead
Profile Joined December 2008
Switzerland2069 Posts
May 05 2010 17:04 GMT
#44
On May 06 2010 01:58 MorroW wrote:
personally i make units in my natural then i attack and win or lose
thats simply how the game works for me atm... not so fun xd


Why should you do anything else if the game does not reward you for it?

Exactly what I'm thinking about SC2 atm.

I was loling so hard when Rotterdam played in Zotac-cup (I believe it was Zotac) and both players turtelled in base until one player attacked and won and wrote something like: "SC2 is so boring, you just turtle and attack..."

It's exactly what SC2 is atm.

I'm even exaggerating: it's truly the worst RTS I've ever played in this aspect. xD
https://soundcloud.com/thesamplethief
Snaiil
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Sweden312 Posts
May 05 2010 17:25 GMT
#45
I really don't agree with OP, moving out is really important unless your build favors staying defensive. For example, whenever I play against Zerg I move my army around the map with an observer, sniping creep tumors and checking for expansions. You really don't want that creep to expand too much. It's also easy to contain the enemy if you are active on the map, letting you expand.

Having the Xel'Naga watch towers is also key since you can spot incoming drops and when the enemy moves out. Like you say, most people turtle until they feel confident enough to move out, since I will have the Xel'Naga watch towers, I will see him attacking and know how to react to it, giving me a big advantage.

Having your army out on the map doesn't mean you aren't defending, you are defending, scouting and containing at the same time. With good map control, your opponent won't be able to drop your base, use nydus worms or reapers to harass your base since you will see it and hopefully react properly to it.

But sure, you can just skip all that and sit in your base macroing while your enemy gathers all the information he needs about you and knows when he can expand, what units he will need and how he can put pressure on you, keeping you contained.
NonY
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
8748 Posts
May 05 2010 17:29 GMT
#46
On May 06 2010 02:04 kickinhead wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2010 01:58 MorroW wrote:
personally i make units in my natural then i attack and win or lose
thats simply how the game works for me atm... not so fun xd


Why should you do anything else if the game does not reward you for it?

It's not the game's fault at the moment -- it's the players'. As people get good enough to competently harass while watching over their main army and their base, harass will pay off more. The units and abilities are there. People just aren't trying or they're trying and failing.
"Fucking up is part of it. If you can't fail, you have to always win. And I don't think you can always win." Elliott Smith ---------- Yet no sudden rage darkened his face, and his eyes were calm as they studied her. Then he smiled. 'Witness.'
kickinhead
Profile Joined December 2008
Switzerland2069 Posts
May 05 2010 17:40 GMT
#47
On May 06 2010 02:29 Liquid`NonY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2010 02:04 kickinhead wrote:
On May 06 2010 01:58 MorroW wrote:
personally i make units in my natural then i attack and win or lose
thats simply how the game works for me atm... not so fun xd


Why should you do anything else if the game does not reward you for it?

It's not the game's fault at the moment -- it's the players'. As people get good enough to competently harass while watching over their main army and their base, harass will pay off more. The units and abilities are there. People just aren't trying or they're trying and failing.


Harrassing is one thing, but I would count that to "moving out to attack", with moving out on the Map, I really just mean position yourself around the Map, so that there is "action" going on on other places than the 2 mains or expansions.

But It's easily understandable that getting out on the Map to intercept scouting probes, scout for expo's and stuff is useful IF you have the skill of knowing exactly when you have to retreat and without Maphack, I guess this would be too risky even if you are a very skilled player, at least in the near future.
https://soundcloud.com/thesamplethief
hoovehand
Profile Joined April 2010
United Kingdom542 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-05 17:57:26
May 05 2010 17:56 GMT
#48
interesting point, although i believe the map makers are entirely at fault.

big 8 player maps are always the best, because you can stealth expand, therefore a player needs to scout around and move out to keep an eye on the opponent's economy...

the blizzard maps are novice maps. you can only expand about 2 times before all minerals are gone and this is also largely at fault for there being no late game in competitive play.
kickinhead
Profile Joined December 2008
Switzerland2069 Posts
May 05 2010 18:07 GMT
#49
On May 06 2010 02:56 hoovehand wrote:
interesting point, although i believe the map makers are entirely at fault.


Not really - Mapmakers can only work with what Blizzard gave them to work with, at least that's my understanding of Mapmaking.

I don't know whether Mapmakers will have the possibility to make any changes to this matter other by changing the Map-architecture, but will that be enough without highground-advantage, extremely high mobility of all the races and reatreating meaning loss atm in SC2?

I highly doubt it...
https://soundcloud.com/thesamplethief
SichuanPanda
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada1542 Posts
May 05 2010 18:44 GMT
#50
Every single day about 20 threads like this pop up. Quite frankly I'm tired of seeing them - accept SC2 for the game it is or don't play, don't whine about it not being 'BW clone' or a game with a feature set that YOU want. Blizzard went with a certain style and they are sticking with it, and if that is unappealing to people I think they should just accept it and stop making threads about what they think needs changed. Its all personal opinion and hearsay.
i-bonjwa
PanzerDragoon
Profile Joined March 2010
United States822 Posts
May 05 2010 18:54 GMT
#51
I think you can forget about mines ever coming back. The type of play they promoted was very unpopular with the average BW player, and even many TLers find Terran mine/tank wars to be boring. Blizzard wanted to make the game with more mobility, but I think the byproduct of that has been a game where its very dangerous to move out of your base if you aren't directly attacking.

The only thing I think thats truly needed is a return to the BW high ground mechanic. It makes sense, it gives an actual advantage to a high ground position. Right now cliffs are very strong for drops, but ramp high ground is basically the same as flat ground. One flying unit completely eliminates high ground advantage, which is silly.
kickinhead
Profile Joined December 2008
Switzerland2069 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-05 18:58:28
May 05 2010 18:58 GMT
#52
On May 06 2010 03:44 SichuanPanda wrote:
Every single day about 20 threads like this pop up. Quite frankly I'm tired of seeing them - accept SC2 for the game it is or don't play, don't whine about it not being 'BW clone' or a game with a feature set that YOU want. Blizzard went with a certain style and they are sticking with it, and if that is unappealing to people I think they should just accept it and stop making threads about what they think needs changed. Its all personal opinion and hearsay.



Oh okay, I may have been mislead by the assumption a Beta-test's whole purpose is actually improving the game.

trolls like you really shouldn't be allowed to post anything... -.-°
https://soundcloud.com/thesamplethief
Mios
Profile Joined April 2010
United States686 Posts
May 05 2010 19:29 GMT
#53
On May 06 2010 03:54 PanzerDragoon wrote:One flying unit completely eliminates high ground advantage, which is silly.


Well strategically this would mean if you killed that one flying unit you would have a massive advantage, which I've seen. Terran reveals the observer with scanner and kills it which gives the player an invincible army until he gets vision again. This micro mechanic is fine imo, and its getting more interesting once people get used to it. High ground usually gives a positioning advantage also.

I don't think high ground advantage is the problem. If it was changed to the way it was in BW, giving defender's MORE of an advantage, it would provide even less incentive for players to stop turtling. I suppose there could be other spots on the map with high ground and good visibility, but I don't think miss chance is any more fun than lack of vision and changing it wouldnt be enough to get players to move out any more than they do already.

There needs to be spots on the map that are crucial to lock down and control, forcing early and constant conflict. Health/Energy/Shield fountain/tower? High yield vespene geysers? Gold expo in the middle on high ground? 10% damage/damage reduction Xel'Naga tower near a base/expo? Mercenary camp in the middle with interesting, useful units? I don't know what they should add, but they should definitely add something thats worth fighting the opponent for.
no LAN and intercontinental bnet = T_T
Craton
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States17250 Posts
May 05 2010 19:44 GMT
#54
On May 04 2010 17:02 hacpee wrote:
you can get a big portion of your army chopped up retreating.


I would say this is the single biggest reason for this in sc2 compared to sc1. In SC1 you'd lose a few units due to bad AI, but that was about it. Now, you really can't retreat without losing huge chunks (and thereby losing the game, anyway); it really penalizes moving your army around. I miss the troop moment you used to see in SC1 with armies constantly moving from one area to another.

There is just way too much shit in SC2 that renders you powerless, which really detracts from enjoyment. Imagine how frustrating it would be to play SC1 if e.g. maelstrom or ensnare were on units that you already used, so that every game you dealt with slowed or immobilized units. That's where we are in SC2.
twitch.tv/cratonz
KumquatExpress
Profile Joined October 2009
United States344 Posts
May 05 2010 19:51 GMT
#55
On May 05 2010 18:00 LaSt)ChAnCe wrote:
as far as expoing goes, it can be delayed a lot longer in most cases due to having two gas at each spawn... expanding isn't immediately necessary if you can get twice is much gas

You still get 5000 gas @ 8 gas per return even if you have both geysers; they're split up into 4/cargo each now, with 2500 total. And they dont work at all after being depleted. Expoing is delayed a lot longer because it's more dangerous to expo with the threat of terrible terrible damage.
Speedythinggoesin, speedythingcomesout.
RodKarew
Profile Joined May 2010
United States53 Posts
May 05 2010 20:02 GMT
#56
I agree with you the map pool is very limited, but the fact of the matter is blizzard is just going to be lazy on purpose. The reason why is they pretty much are giving the players the tools, aka the map editor to make better maps. The down side of this is they are going to charge a premium price for these player created new maps that are created in the community, which blows pretty hard.
Do what you can, with what you have, where you are. Theodore Roosevelt
kickinhead
Profile Joined December 2008
Switzerland2069 Posts
May 06 2010 07:59 GMT
#57
On May 06 2010 05:02 RodKarew wrote:
I agree with you the map pool is very limited, but the fact of the matter is blizzard is just going to be lazy on purpose. The reason why is they pretty much are giving the players the tools, aka the map editor to make better maps. The down side of this is they are going to charge a premium price for these player created new maps that are created in the community, which blows pretty hard.


I don't really know what the Map-Editor is capable of, but will it be possible to implement any of my changes suggested in the first post other than the one about "Map-Architecture" and "More Xel-Naga Towers..."?
https://soundcloud.com/thesamplethief
kickinhead
Profile Joined December 2008
Switzerland2069 Posts
May 09 2010 20:00 GMT
#58
Another Idea:

Why not make IMBA-skills that kill movement around the Map like concussive shells, Force-Fields and Fungal Growth worse?
Those skills are too good anyways and at least concussive shells and Force-Field dominate movement around the Map way too soon and much too strong.

I wouldn't mind if they removed concussive shells and force-fields completely, especially concussive shells and I say that even though I play Terran myself! ^^'
https://soundcloud.com/thesamplethief
LunarC
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States1186 Posts
May 09 2010 21:59 GMT
#59
I think the problem lies in a combination of unit design and the lack of a high-ground advantage.

Certain units are designed to be just as effective while on the move as they are when they are holding ground. I mean, virtually every match-up is played similarly and that's due to how every army composition is so identical in terms of how they move. Also, the fact that these "certain units" have so much attacking power and health doesn't help at all. I think this is to help newer players out and make the game much simpler, but that's a pretty huge hit to the competitive scene.

What needs to occur is a complete revamp of how units work, but I don't see that happening in the near future. Funny how it's still in beta and I still get this feeling -.-
REEBUH!!!
SexyBimbo
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany89 Posts
May 09 2010 23:35 GMT
#60
Hmm just curious, couldn't i calm myself down with the solace of a TL-made Promod?

I mean in the worst case scenario Blizzard will totally screw up and top players will discover SC2 to be plain crappy within the next 3 months or so. We can then still wait for a serious promod with a useful high-ground-mechanic and some nice unitchanges and the return of something along the lines of a lurker and mines and actual micro, can we? Can we??

Pls say we can >.< (btw i know splitting the community sucks, but if vanilla sc2 sucks even harder then i know waht i will prefer)

SB
Why do ppl do this; does my name look anything like Kiwikaki?? - Kawaiirice
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Sea Duckling Open #136
CranKy Ducklings68
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 398
Nina 231
StarCraft: Brood War
actioN 2186
Barracks 985
Larva 909
Mini 900
Soma 471
firebathero 378
Pusan 356
TY 300
Hyun 195
Dewaltoss 192
[ Show more ]
Last 168
Hyuk 92
Backho 92
ToSsGirL 52
Sharp 50
Free 44
Stork 43
Bonyth 36
zelot 21
Sea 0
Dota 2
Gorgc7303
singsing2278
XcaliburYe307
Super Smash Bros
Westballz38
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor218
Other Games
B2W.Neo393
DeMusliM301
Fuzer 234
Lowko101
SortOf86
Trikslyr25
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2661
StarCraft: Brood War
Afreeca ASL 704
UltimateBattle 115
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH233
• sitaska28
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2113
League of Legends
• Jankos1248
• Stunt732
Upcoming Events
Epic.LAN
1h 2m
CSO Contender
6h 2m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
23h 2m
Online Event
1d 5h
Esports World Cup
2 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.