On June 01 2011 10:22 ArgosDelta wrote: Do you really not understand basic argumentation? This is community college status.
the first quote was using the logic that saying rape is bad. Ive explained this several times. I was arguing from the viewpoint of my opponent. This is argumentation 101. It's not hard to comprehend. You use your opponents argument and apply it to show it doesn't make any sense.
the second quote is what i'm actually trying to state. My personal opinion. The point that makes perfect sense.
Think of it like this. You walk into class and your teacher says "A+B=C but B+B also = C. A=1 B=2 C=3" Now obviously you say "Wait teacher,that would mean B+B would be 2+2=3." Would it be logical to assume you're arguing that's true? No, you're obviously pointing out to the teacher that the problem is wrong by using the logic of the problem to follow it through.
You may want to consider taking some courses at your local college.
Okay, so you're saying that StarCraft is not like genocide. Any arguments in which you implied that StarCraft is like genocide was taken from your hypothetical opponent's perspective. Is that correct?
If that's the case, then I'd like you to explain this post:
You can't just say "Starcraft is NOTHING like genocide" without providing a valid argument for that. My argument is that it is like genocide, war, and terrorism for several reasons. 1. All 3 races have systematically murdered each other throughout the game's history in both the campaign and the multiplayer. 2. 100% of the game is focused on murdering agents of other cultures largely based on their race(species if you wish to call it by that.) 3. The protagonist of Wings of Liberty is a leader of a terrorist organization.
Nowhere do you indicate that this argument was "taken from the opponent's point of view." In fact, every time you've argued that StarCraft is a "genocide simulator," you NEVER once indicated that it was taken from some imaginary opponent's point of view. It's only AFTER I repeatedly questioned your claims that you "revealed" that your nonsensical comparisons of StarCraft and genocide were taken from some hypothetical, imaginary opponent's perspective.
By the way, the argumentative technique you're employing is known as a "strawman's argument." You might want to check out your local community college to understand why this is a logical fallacy.
I'm sorry that I assumed you could follow basic argumentative techniques.
Your reply is also laced with appeals to ridicule but i'll ignore that for now.
The opponent is neither hypothetical or imaginary, that argument has been used many times in this thread.
"saying rape implies the act of rape" It has been stated in this thread.
It is not a strawman, I'm addressing the argument in this thread that rape implies the actual act of rape, nowhere have i changed that logic in my posts.
saying that the contextual use of rape is equivalent to the contextual action of murder is neither unequivalent or superficial. It is using the same premise that the reference or simulation of a horrific act is inappropriate regardless of context.
It's clearly not a strawman.
You expect me to follow your arguments when you take on the perspective of other people without ever indicating that you are doing so? Really, I suggest you read over your posts in this thread. You sound like a schizophrenic.
Here's a tip for future arguments: if you're going to shift perspectives, then you better indicate BEFOREHAND that you're doing so, instead of retrospectively. I'm willing to bet that 99% of the people who read this thread assumed that you were supporting the idea that StarCraft simulated genocide.
By the way, you are engaging in a strawman argument. Nobody in this thread (other than you) claimed that StarCraft simulates genocide. You're criticizing an extrapolation that you arrived at by yourself, which is the definition of attacking a strawman.
Ah, yes, here come the ad hominems...
You don't seem to be able to grasp what I was saying. Nor do you seem able to grasp what a strawman is. I did not arrive at the extrapolation by myself. The argument was presented many many times in this thread that saying rape is equivalent to referencing the act of rape. I never arrived at this by myself. It is impossible for what I said to be a strawman because of the above. Let me state it again. The argument that saying rape is equivalent to the act of rape has been used many times in this thread. I did not make up a strawman to attack. I used the premise of "referencing a horrific act is inappropriate regardless of context", the premise behind the argument "saying rape is equivalent to referencing the act of rape". I then applied the premise to another horrific act, genocide, to prove that the premise isn't true by virtue of the fact that we don't consider it inappropriate to commit genocide in the context of the game.
On June 01 2011 11:21 Brad wrote: I can't believe I just listened to Destiny trying to defend himself using the word n*****. I feel like I'm living in the twilight zone these days.
In other news, Weapon of Choice will NOT air this weekend (June 5th, 2011) due to MLG Columbus. Please be sure to tune into http://www.mlgpro.com during the WoC timeframe!
On May 31 2011 17:05 Eurekastreet wrote: I think your reasoning is interesting but I don't get the premise : why do you 100% agree that fuck and shit have no substitutes ? Since when is "fuck him" or "fuck her" (etc) such a noble image ?
I didn't hear anyone arguing that "fuck" and "shit" are words that are hard to substitute.
Substitutes to some of the mentioned [i]phrases[/] are harder to substitute, in the same way that "I can't believe it's not butter" hardly is a substitute for butter.
Here [spoiler]
[/spoiler]is Billy Connolly being very relevant.
My point was not that they're hard or not to substitute, but instead I was asking why we should tolerate those words, and not others ? They may not be as offensive as the others mentioned, but who decides what's suitable and what's not is what I'm concerned about, and why...?
This argument can be extended to any event though, it's effectively the slippery slope argument and I don't think it's really applicable here. We as a collective decide and it's not like it's something ridiculously vague or hard to figure, as inControl did point out, there are some pretty clear-cut "lightning rod words". There are some points I consider somewhat valid in regards to this topic, but this isn't one of them, it's not that hard to draw the line...
As for Rabiator, your point of view is just utterly bizarre to me, yes you can't shield your kids from everything, but the only real solution to that would be making everything G-rated so that there's nothing your kid can go look at behind your back that you may not want them looking at. Just because you can't make sure your child isn't watching age-inappropriate content doesn't make it societies job to remove all age restrictive content so that everything is appropriate for them.
You've stated in other posts that, "Kids will seek out X-rated content even more", well what is your solution other than empowering the parents to police their children? Removing all age-restrictive content so that no one can access it?
Yeah but this is going in circles. You say "we as a collective decide" and "it's not that hard to draw the line": who is that "we" who draw the line (I haven't been invited to that club) ? and where do you draw the line ? Tell me who is "we", what are your criterias for suitable words to use on an internet stream, a complete list of words-not-to-be-used, and the reasons why you'd keep some words and exclude some others, then we probably could start a discussion ; I'd still would have an issue with the censorship thing but that'd be another chapter.
i know som1 who's been raped, and i took the time to ask her about this, you know what she replied? she informed me that she finds no hurt in the "casual use of the word"- in this case destiny on his stream, but she finds it hurting and reminding when people blow it up, and talks about the actual case of rape (for instance incontroll on weapon of choice) i find it a bit ironic that som1 would argue "do not use the word rape, it reminds people of when they were raped", and then would continue to talk about rape extensively
I have watched Destiny's stream since beta, and I don't want him to change his persona for his stream in any way. Give me the full package please, and let the softhearted people watch one one the 95% of the mild content streams instead.
Just watched Weapon of Choice with Destiny, much respect for Incontrol, Destinys argument was total shit. He argued with censoring because how else can he say "shut the fuck up".... There is several words that you can use for the N word. ] You say it to be offensive because of its past use, you don't use it for any other reason other to hit nerve with people.
Destiny is a product of the internet, his vocabulary shows that, and as everyone knows, the internet is a terrible place. He sometime over his life on the internet has developed a pretty stupid defense to his obviously offensive personality. Also I like the end, he has all these strong opinions on stuff then ends the show with I don't get out much.
PLEASE STOP THIS FUCKING RETARDED ARGUMENT, please people, get over yourself, everyone has said what they think nobody agrees so get over the fucking argument jezus... i'm getting fed up with it.. think mods should start banning everyone that starts about this argument.. pff
On June 13 2011 01:59 Chaoz wrote: When did the times change? It's a bit too early in the west coast now. I need my sleep, bah.
Don't think it's officially changed. But unfortunatly i don't think Chill has invented the time machine yet. So they properly had to move it abit because of TLAttack...
So, during the GSL segment you managed again to not talk about GSL at all and to plug a unrelated site. Just make another segment about this site but don't put GSL in your summary next time >< That was slightly annoying, as this becoming to be an habit. If you want to watch only recommended games, search "[GSL] Super" in the TL tourney section, each and every single game has a poll, with sometimes more than 200 votes, it should be enough to know what to watch and what to not watch. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=[GSL] Super&t=t&f=36&u=&gb=date&d=create
I sound like a hater again, (because each time I post here is to complain xD) but each time I wait for the GSL segment and each time you talk about something unrelated during the GSL segment.
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Ja8QD.jpg)
