EPTSome notes regarding SC2 networking - Page 5
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
chongu
Malaysia2585 Posts
| ||
|
Shauni
4077 Posts
| ||
|
Qiin
Australia102 Posts
On March 25 2010 17:48 Shauni wrote: Regarding the fix. I have 5 folders in the registry but every 'IPAddress' has the value of 0.0.0.0. Two of the folders however, have DhcpIpAddress set as my internal IP. How do I know which folder to add the key dword in? Usually the folder with the MOST stuff is the right one. | ||
|
SoleSteeler
Canada5427 Posts
On March 25 2010 18:05 Qiin wrote: Usually the folder with the MOST stuff is the right one. http://www.wowinterface.com/downloads/info13581-LeatrixLatencyFix.html Just run that script. Very simple, easy to use, easy to remove etc. | ||
|
DeCoup
Australia1933 Posts
On March 25 2010 15:14 Psyonic_Reaver wrote: I'm on windows 7 64-bit and I see a DWORD (32-bit) and a QWORD (64-bit) R1CH says to use DWORD but I'm assuming he's on a 32 bit windows program. Should I use QWORD since I'm on a 64-bit? I'm on windows 7 64 bit and I chose the DWORD (32-bit) option and it worked fine. | ||
|
FortuneSyn
1826 Posts
| ||
|
FortuneSyn
1826 Posts
On March 25 2010 19:04 SoleSteeler wrote: http://www.wowinterface.com/downloads/info13581-LeatrixLatencyFix.html Just run that script. Very simple, easy to use, easy to remove etc. For a computer/registry nooby such as myself, is this safe? | ||
|
OOl
United States65 Posts
| ||
|
Senx
Sweden5901 Posts
Bookmarked this thread in case i run into high latency in the future. | ||
|
SoleSteeler
Canada5427 Posts
On March 25 2010 22:39 FortuneSyn wrote: For a computer/registry nooby such as myself, is this safe? Yes, it's from one of the biggest and most trusted WoW interfaces sites on the internet. All it does is add the stuff to your registry for you. Almost 400,000 people have downloaded it. And it comes with a remover and checker to make sure it's working. Very easy, I just did it myself. Big difference. | ||
|
Qiin
Australia102 Posts
| ||
|
kawoq
Guatemala357 Posts
PD: love your actitude about knowing the fact that you can be wrong... | ||
|
Adeny
Norway1233 Posts
| ||
|
leandroqm
Netherlands874 Posts
I think blizzard made a mistake when opting for TCP, but they'll surely prove me wrong anytime soon! ^^ Their servers might need a lot more CPU power to deal with the overhead generated from soooo many (established) connections. Let's hope for the best!  | ||
|
Random()
Kyrgyz Republic1462 Posts
Incidentally, I don't quite understand why Blizzard insists on having a fixed worst-case latency value (I remember they mentioned that setting this to 250ms was an overkill). In SC1, this value could be set in-game (low latency, high latency, very high latency). Why cannot it be automatically adjusted during the game to suit both players' connections? | ||
|
StayFrosty
Canada743 Posts
| ||
Excalibur_Z
United States12235 Posts
On March 25 2010 19:10 DeCoup wrote: I'm on windows 7 64 bit and I chose the DWORD (32-bit) option and it worked fine. From what I understand, on Win7, TcpAckFrequency is set to 1 by default. For those using Vista, I believe you need to have at least SP1 (or the deployed hotfix) before it will take effect. | ||
|
The_Voidless
United States184 Posts
| ||
|
MamiyaOtaru
United States1687 Posts
No LAN mode here, even if you are on the same physical LAN. I don't see that going over so well. Also I wouldn't count on seeing ICCUP for SC2 any time soon, though if Bnet is good enough who cares. Except one could say that by routing all packets through itself it isn't good enough. We'll see. I certainly haven't noticed any terrible lag issues while playing beta, but I am not very high level. | ||
|
YunhOLee
Canada2470 Posts
| ||
| ||
