• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
TeamLiquid Liquipedia LiquidDota LiquidLegends
EDT 16:35
CEST 22:35
KST 05:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Shopify TSL 718WTL 2021 Summer - Week 3 Recap and Week 4 Preview11Code S RO16 Preview: Trap, Armani, sOs, Zest5Code S RO16 Preview: Rogue, Zoun, INnoVation, Dark11[ASL11] Ro24 Preview Pt 3:Contenders and Streamers10
Community News
FlaSh going to army in 3 weeks45ESL Open Week #66: Stats, Clem, Solar win6Code S RO16: Rogue and INno advance to the RO89ByuN to begin wrist treatment12New Worlds Map Contest: ALL SUBMISSIONS56
StarCraft 2
General
Shopify TSL 7 WTL 2021 Summer - Week 3 Recap and Week 4 Preview [GSL] Music List Code S RO16: Rogue and INno advance to the RO8 Code S RO16 Preview: Trap, Armani, sOs, Zest
Tourneys
[WTL 2021] Summer - Week 4 Genesis Legends Inv #6 Apr 16/18th 7PM CET [GSL 2021] Code S - Group D The Siege Perilous - $5,000 in top-end hardware! Team GP Cup
Strategy
How to Defeat Protoss - Part 1: Powering Simple Questions Simple Answers Practice Partner Thread Season 1 - 2018 How to Break the F2 Hotkey Addiction
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Routavaara [M] (2) Tropical Sacrifice [M] (4)Nautilus [UMS] Micro Match
External Content
The StarCraft Observer Podcast Episode #5 The Pylon Show Mutation # 260 Fright night Mutation # 259 Breath Of Destruction
Brood War
General
Ladder statistics race distribution (2021?) FlaSh going to army in 3 weeks [ShowMatch] Foreign All-Star vs Korean Gamer BW General Discussion Unimpressed Flash Meme
Tourneys
Reps.Ru Victory Day present New Worlds Map Contest: ALL SUBMISSIONS BSL12 - Russia Puts in Money BSL 2v2 Showmatch - MadiNho/KenZy vs Scan/BishOp
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fog of War Noises Sorry's TvP lategame Ghost strategies? pvz FE, goons opening
Other Games
Heroes of the Storm
HotS: WP and Funny Moments [HotS] CCL Season 2: ONYX [HotS] The Road to Paris QQ/Rage Thread. Simple Questions, Simple Answers
General Games
Path of Exile Cyberpunk 2077 Genshin Impact - Coop RPG Diablo 2 thread Final Fantasy XIV
TL Mafia
[M][N] Mafia Mafia: Mafia Edition Active List of Mafia Games 2.0 TL Mafia Community Thread Active List of Mafia Games [M][T] Poker Mafia
Hearthstone
Is Hearthstone Gambling?
LoL General
LoL Tournaments
LoL Strategy
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Coronavirus and You NASA and the Private Sector Trading/Investing Thread Men go body sculpting
Fan Clubs
The Scarlett Fan Club The One And Only Incredible Acer.Bly Fan Club! The TY Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [TV] HBO Game of Thrones Hip Hop / Rap Music Discussion Movie Discussion!
Sports
2020 - 2021 Football Thread NBA General Discussion 2020 NFL and College Football Corona Season Formula1 2019 TL Golf Thread
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers Help! i need a low profile keyboard!!!
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts The Automated Ban List Ask TL Staff Anything
Blogs
The StarCraft O…
TheStarCraftObserver
Magic the Gathering Cu…
TheRealNanMan
Whale Watching at Hervey Bay i…
Tak3r
To Be a Vtuber
Zambrah
Help me win a vacation by watc…
Chosi
Golf Battle Report (Persona…
FlaShFTW
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 956 users

Some notes regarding SC2 networking

Forum Index > SC2 General
167 CommentsPost a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
R1CH
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Netherlands10032 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-19 17:33:09
March 24 2010 20:00 GMT
#1
Since I see a lot of misinformation flying around, here's some brief information about SC2 and how its networking works.

UPDATE: Note that when I refer to latency in this post, I'm meaning network latency over the wire. Starcraft 2 includes a built-in command buffer that also adds input latency to smooth out and jittering or higher ping players - no amount of tweaking will reduce or alter that.

UPDATE 2: After some more research it appears SC2 is routed peer to peer rather than server based. Very disappointing . Irrelevant portions of this thread have been struck through.

UPDATE 3: Most of this thread is no longer relevant as this was written during the beta. The actual release uses UDP for game data so it has no issues with TCP latency.

Architecture
Stacraft 2 games run using a server, similar to HoN - not peer to peer as the original BW does. This means that Blizzard is the one hosting the games, not you (note: custom games were not tested). The protocol is TCP, not UDP. I'm unsure why Blizzard decided to go with TCP/IP, since latency is generally worse over TCP especially with regard to lost packets. Perhaps they didn't want to deal with fragmentation or NAT issues?

"Drop hacks" / Lag
Since other players also connect to Blizzard's server, not you, there is no way to be "drop hacked" in SC2. Drop hacking involves terminating the connection to the other player via some means - trivial in BW since both players are connected to each other - desynchronize the connection and you get a drop. However in SC2, since you are only connected to Blizzard's server, not the other player, the most you can do is disconnect yourself from the server, causing you to drop. Since the server knows who disconnected, it can award the win to the remaining player.

Note that this does not preclude any bugs in SC2 that might allow someone to purposefully cause a drop condition by sending malformed packets that crash the server (thus dropping everyone), but given the server architecture, drop hacking should not be an issue in SC2 provided the servers are reliable and well-coded.

You may notice there is still the "Waiting for players" screen. Rather than allow the server to continue if one player is lagging, it pauses the game for everyone. This was done out of fairness I imagine, since if someone is lagging it would not be fair for them to have to engage the other players army. Technically there is no reason why the game can't keep going similar to how HoN handles latency where only the player lagging experiences any lag. In theory this should allow a large number of spectators to be in a game without impacting the latency for the players - if a spectator lags, who cares?


Port Forwarding
Since Starcraft 2 does not use peer to peer connections, you do not need to open any ports to play nor will doing so "improve" your connection. You connect to Blizzard's server, much like you connect to teamliquid.net every time you click a link - you do not need to open ports for outgoing connections.

Map Hacking
Please keep in mind this is not a thread to discuss map hacking in, just some technical commentary. As some people have argued, since SC2 uses a server, it should be possible for the server to eliminate map hacking by only sending unit data for what a player can currently see. Theoretically, this could work - however as many have pointed out, SC2 is a lot more complex than other games such as HoN that do this - in HoN, there is a very small amount of units you have to consider, with only a few of those (heroes) having any particular state. With SC2, there can be hundreds of units, each in many states. If someone moves into your fog of war with hundreds of units that your game doesn't know about, that will result in a large amount of data required to be sent to your client. TCP doesn't burst particularly well, and if one of those packets in the burst is lost, you have a significant delay. There is also spells such as Scan that reveal part of the map immediately on clicking, which the server has no way to predict you using.

While it is technically possible to reduce map hacking with some clever coding and possibly imperceptible latency compromises, this was not done. The technical requirements for such impose a great deal on the latency of the game, and for an RTS latency is extremely important. Which brings me on to...


Improving Latency
As I've mentioned, SC2 uses TCP. TCP is designed for data transfer with latency as a secondary consideration to bandwidth, so isn't really ideal for real-time games. Almost every FPS game in existence uses UDP for this reason. TCP requires reliable delivery - if a packet is lost, it has to be retransmitted, stalling the rest of the data while this happens. There is a small tweak you can make to improve TCP responsiveness for gaming.

Change TcpAckFrequency to 1:

How
Run registry editor (Start, Run, regedit) and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Interfaces. You will see a list of random looking keys, find the one that has the "IPAddress" value that matches your current IP. Right click on the right side and go New -> DWORD. Call it TcpAckFrequency with a value of 1.

Why this works
Usually TCP delays sending acknowledgments of received data until either more data has been received OR a timeout period elapses. This timeout period may be because the sending side is waiting for the ack before sending more data. By setting TcpAckFrequency to 1, you send an acknowledgment immediately rather than waiting, preventing miniature "stalls" in the data stream. Note that this WILL reduce your bandwidth, as you will be sending more ack packets, thus using more network resources.


Things that MIGHT help
If you use ADSL, your connection may use interleaving which is a method of error resistance that adds latency to your connection. Look in your ADSL modem settings for an option to turn it off. Note that this may increase the chances of line noise affecting your connection, so it might be required to be on. You may need to contact your ISP as it may be something controlled on their side, but don't expect them to be too accommodating.

Wired vs wireless: A properly configured wireless network should have minimal latency, however if you are in a crowded area with obstructions and other 2.4 GHz noise, the latency caused by retransmissions might add up and cause issues. Try pinging your router - your latency should be 1-2ms at most. If not, try a wired connection while gaming.

If you have a low quality wireless card (common in cheap desktop / laptops), you may experience random periods of lag while it switches frequencies for background scanning (used for roaming between access points). You can turn off background scans with a tool such as WlanOptimizer (Vista / 7 only).

Tweaking your RWIN (Windows XP only) may help - see any number of guides online regarding this.

Things that will NOT help
There is a huge amount of useless information on the Internet that offers supposedly improved performance. The following will NOT improve your network quality at all: Opening your ports. Changing "TCPNoDelay" registry setting. Changing "NetworkThrottlingIndex" registry setting. Changing "TcpDelAckTicks" registry setting. Disabling "QoS Packet Scheduler". In fact, very few registry tweaks will help - there's usually a good reason defaults are the defaults.
Facebook Twitter Reddit
AdministratorTwitter: @R1CH_TL
TL+ Member
Wr3k
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada2533 Posts
March 24 2010 20:09 GMT
#2
Thanks Rich.
Lysithea
Profile Joined February 2008
Sweden200 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-26 00:14:34
March 24 2010 20:12 GMT
#3
On March 25 2010 05:00 R1CH wrote:
Improving Latency
Change TcpAckFrequency to 1:
<div style="margin-left: 32px">
How
Run registry editor (Start, Run, regedit) and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Interfaces. You will see a list of random looking keys, find the one that has the "IPAddress" value that matches your current IP. Right click on the right side and go New -> DWORD. Call it TcpAckFrequency with a value of 1.


Those of us that played wow noticed this a few years ago as well, I went from ~200ms ingame to around 50ms. I do it manually in regedit but for those that are less used to tinker around in the regedit here's a simple program that fixes this for you regardless of win os: http://www.wowinterface.com/downloads/info13581-LeatrixLatencyFix.html

(it has nothing to do with wow, just happens to be hosted on a wow related site)
"Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee." - Muhammad Ali
Wr3k
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada2533 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-24 20:17:29
March 24 2010 20:14 GMT
#4
So what exactly does the TCPAckFrequency setting do? Does it have something to do with window size?

Edit: Nvm, you explained it.
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States11883 Posts
March 24 2010 20:17 GMT
#5
Great analysis R1CH. Although SC2 uses the "routed peer-to-peer" system, apparently similar to the one that Blizzard touted for War3, it doesn't appear that TcpAckFrequency would have any effect unless every player participating in the game had set it to the same value. Essentially, you're always playing at the speed of the slowest player, because any desyncs or delays call the Waiting for Players screen, right? The more people that know about the regkey, the better, though.

I suppose it's probably too late to expect Blizzard to restructure their netcode around UDP and simply adopt the measures for software port forwarding that War3 included.
Moderator
theqat
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States2213 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-24 20:21:56
March 24 2010 20:19 GMT
#6
Wow, thanks R1CH

Edit: TcpAckFrequency should be a hexadecimal value?
R1CH
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Netherlands10032 Posts
March 24 2010 20:19 GMT
#7
On March 25 2010 05:17 Excalibur_Z wrote:
SC2 uses the "routed peer-to-peer" system.

How do you know this? It would seem pretty flawed if this were the case, and make a lot of my points invalid .
AdministratorTwitter: @R1CH_TL
TL+ Member
onmach
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States1241 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-24 20:22:34
March 24 2010 20:21 GMT
#8
I'm surprised sc2 uses tcp. That's pretty strange, but I guess the blizzard guys know what they are doing.
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States11883 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-24 20:29:09
March 24 2010 20:26 GMT
#9
On March 25 2010 05:19 R1CH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 25 2010 05:17 Excalibur_Z wrote:
SC2 uses the "routed peer-to-peer" system.

How do you know this? It would seem pretty flawed if this were the case, and make a lot of my points invalid .


Isn't that basically what you described though? Player A sends data to the server which is then sent to Players B and C, Player B sends data to the server which is then sent to Players A and C, and so forth. That is the War3 routed peer-to-peer system that Blizzard championed. I use that in quotes for SC2 because on the surface it appears quite similar, but of course it may not be.

EDIT: Although I suppose from that vague description I described what could be either routed peer-to-peer or client/server =/ Regardless, my initial question stands: wouldn't this only have an impact if every player enabled it?
Moderator
Manaldski
Profile Joined January 2004
229 Posts
March 24 2010 20:28 GMT
#10
Nice write-up. I tested the custom games and they are also routed through the server. I may also add one thing on how you can improve your latency: By getting a good add-in NIC. Best ones are the Intels: Intel PRO/1000 MT or GT(old versions) or the newer Intel PRO/1000 CT, they are very good and cheap NICs, under $30. Here are same reviews comparing it with integrated NICs:

http://forum.ncix.com/forums/topic.php?id=1304406
http://www.donutey.com/intelpro.php

Note that the Integrated NICs are evolving and difference is getting narrower but its still good to get one especially if you want to game and torrent at the same time.
R1CH
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Netherlands10032 Posts
March 24 2010 20:41 GMT
#11
On March 25 2010 05:26 Excalibur_Z wrote:
EDIT: Although I suppose from that vague description I described what could be either routed peer-to-peer or client/server =/ Regardless, my initial question stands: wouldn't this only have an impact if every player enabled it?

If it was indeed a routed P2P rather than client/server, it would indeed minimize the benefit, but it wouldn't be completely worthless since assuming both sides are data starved the same amount of time, you reduce it 50% by "fixing" it on your end.
AdministratorTwitter: @R1CH_TL
TL+ Member
RiGun
Profile Joined February 2010
Argentina155 Posts
March 24 2010 20:43 GMT
#12
On March 25 2010 05:28 Manaldski wrote:
Nice write-up. I tested the custom games and they are also routed through the server. I may also add one thing on how you can improve your latency: By getting a good add-in NIC. Best ones are the Intels: Intel PRO/1000 MT or GT(old versions) or the newer Intel PRO/1000 CT, they are very good and cheap NICs, under $30. Here are same reviews comparing it with integrated NICs:

http://forum.ncix.com/forums/topic.php?id=1304406
http://www.donutey.com/intelpro.php

Note that the Integrated NICs are evolving and difference is getting narrower but its still good to get one especially if you want to game and torrent at the same time.


That's an interesting review, I've always thought that any NIC was enough for gaming, but there are some interesting results in that review.
R1CH
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Netherlands10032 Posts
March 24 2010 20:49 GMT
#13
On March 25 2010 05:28 Manaldski wrote:
I may also add one thing on how you can improve your latency: By getting a good add-in NIC. Best ones are the Intels: Intel PRO/1000 MT or GT(old versions) or the newer Intel PRO/1000 CT, they are very good and cheap NICs, under $30. Here are same reviews comparing it with integrated NICs:

Gonna have to disagree there, at the data rates most games use there is very little benefit to offloading. Even in the article you linked the only benefit was when maxing the connection with a torrent, and torrents are wildly erratic in speeds to begin with so I don't consider that a valid test. In any case it isn't a realistic scenario where you'd be gaming with large downloads going on in the background.

The only issue where a NIC really comes into play regarding latency is when running a server, where the amount of outgoing data begins to affect latency based on the link speed - eg 100mbps vs 1gbps. At 100mbps, you have 13107bytes/ms throughput vs 131070bytes/ms. Depending on the number of games, players, etc all hosted on the same server, this can begin to add up.
AdministratorTwitter: @R1CH_TL
TL+ Member
AnodyneSea
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Jamaica757 Posts
March 24 2010 20:50 GMT
#14
awesome post, i think you nailed it. BW used to have servers though back in the day, i remember all those server splits and stuff and i could always join anybody's games. It was probably more cost effective after a certain number of years to get rid of them and make it the way it is now.
Lost within the hope of freedom, not for control but in the light of our cause
Osmoses
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
Sweden3785 Posts
March 24 2010 20:52 GMT
#15
Awsum, I wish I knew jack shit about networking =)
Excuse me hun, but what is your name? Vivian? I woke up next to you naked and, uh, did we, um?
7
Profile Joined February 2010
Canada1218 Posts
March 24 2010 20:53 GMT
#16
Really informative. Thanks for taking the time to explain all this!
I love the sense of camaraderie when an entire line of cars teams up to prevent a dick from cutting in at the front. Stay strong, brothers!
mgj
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
191 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-24 21:07:58
March 24 2010 20:55 GMT
#17
Awesome post R1CH, thanks!

Improving Latency
+ Show Spoiler +
As I've mentioned, SC2 uses TCP. TCP is designed for data transfer with latency as a secondary consideration to bandwidth, so isn't really ideal for real-time games. Almost every FPS game in existence uses UDP for this reason. TCP requires reliable delivery - if a packet is lost, it has to be retransmitted, stalling the rest of the data while this happens. There is a small tweak you can make to improve TCP responsiveness for gaming.

Change TcpAckFrequency to 1:

How
Run registry editor (Start, Run, regedit) and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Interfaces. You will see a list of random looking keys, find the one that has the "IPAddress" value that matches your current IP. Right click on the right side and go New -> DWORD. Call it TcpAckFrequency with a value of 1.

Why this works
Usually TCP delays sending acknowledgments of received data until either more data has been received OR a timeout period elapses. This timeout period may be because the sending side is waiting for the ack before sending more data. By setting TcpAckFrequency to 1, you send an acknowledgment immediately rather than waiting, preventing miniature "stalls" in the data stream. Note that this WILL reduce your bandwidth, as you will be sending more ack packets, thus using more network resources.

I just want to attach a link for the curious: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagle's_algorithm


I've always thought that any NIC was enough for gaming, but there are some interesting results in that review.

Yeah i've seen some pretty amazing results from gaming NIC's before. But honestly? I dont believe it for a second. Your ISP's peering and infrastructure is so much more important than the last router->PC connection.
But hey, stranger things have happend. Someone sponsor me a gaming NIC so i can check for myself =P

Things that MIGHT help
If you use ADSL, your connection may use interleaving which is a method of error resistance that adds latency to your connection.

I dont know about other countries, but where i live this option is not available directly for the end-user. However, a lot of ISP's will enable/disable fast interleave if you specificly request it.

Edit: Should read posts better. You pretty much already covered what i said about interleaving.
Malambis
Profile Joined August 2007
United States20 Posts
March 24 2010 20:55 GMT
#18
Good post R1CH, I had changed TcpAckFrequency on my previous install but had forgotten about it after reinstalling recently.
Polar_Nada
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States1547 Posts
March 24 2010 20:57 GMT
#19
wowowow thanks for the info!!
[ReD]NaDa and fnaticMSI.SEn fighting~! ::POlar @ UC Irvine::
Whiplash
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
United States2801 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-24 20:57:52
March 24 2010 20:57 GMT
#20
Thanks R1CH, I just did this and I am testing to see if I did it right. My IP address wasn't listed (just the one from my home router, not the one at college) so I used the old one. It was the only IPAddress file that had a number as well.
Former professional broadcaster. Back in college to get a degree, then back to e-Sports!
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Best of the Best Tour
19:00
Round-Robin $ Matches!
TerrOr vs trutaCz
Bonyth vs kogeT
ox.tQ213
LiquipediaDiscussion
CreightonOlsen Tournament
16:00
The Siege Perilous - Quali #4
souL vs BlyLIVE!
Cure vs TBD
CreightonOlsen1314
IndyStarCraft 587
3DClanTV 210
aXEnki
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 1374
IndyStarCraft 587
UpATree 175
ZombieGrub112
SKillous 92
Nathanias 69
Mackintac 32
PiLiPiLi 29
GunGFuBanDa 1
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 955
Shuttle 477
ggaemo 307
Snow 84
sSak 69
NaDa 39
PianO 36
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby1920
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
FalleN 3624
bouly8
Super Smash Bros
PPMD356
Other Games
Day[9].tv1410
fl0m787
Lowko631
MaximusBlack570
ToD484
Mew2King373
RotterdaM285
Happy216
crisheroes201
ProTech179
KnowMe162
Trikslyr124
JuggernautJason46
EmSc Tv 10
Organizations
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
ESL CS:GO2290
Other Games
BasetradeTV260
StarCraft 2
ESL.tv206
OGamingTV SC2 154
Other Games
EmSc Tv 10
StarCraft 2
EmSc2Tv 10
Blizzard YouTube
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• zuka 68
• EnkiAlexander 28
• angryscii 15
• D4rkn0ob1k 11
• Alpha X_
• Genesis Gaming
• AlphaB_SC2
• Migwel
• Matiz_pl
• Laughngamez YouTube
• LaughNgamez Trovo
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
• Gussbus
• gravity620
• intothetv
• AweesomeSauce
SC2: Legacy of the Void
• KarlJayG
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 13
• sscaitournament3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
Upcoming Events
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
2h 55m
Foul Play NA Showmatch
3h 25m
OSC
3h 25m
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
5h 25m
Grand Platypus Open
11h 25m
CreightonOlsen Tournament
19h 25m
BSL 2v2 Tournament
19h 25m
BW Jeez Weekly
20h 25m
Alpha X Junior Champion…
20h 25m
Theleo-ua Showmatch Ser…
22h 25m
eOnzErG vs Casper
[ Show More ]
Best of the Best Tour
1d
Cross vs OyAji
DragOn vs TerrOr
Cross vs trutaCz
OSC
1d 2h
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
1d 5h
Alpha Pro Series
1d 5h
Future vs ArT
TriGGeR vs Erik
EPT Open Cups
1d 6h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 13h
BeAsT Cup
1d 15h
Alpha X Event
1d 15h
Starkiller vs Mamba
Asuna vs TBD
CreightonOlsen Tournament
1d 19h
WardiTV Spring Champion…
1d 19h
BSL: Ladder Tournament
1d 19h
Genesis Legends Cup
1d 20h
Online Event
2 days
SpeCial vs Astrea
GSL Code S
2 days
Bunny vs Dream
Rogue vs Zest
IntoTheAlphaX Pro Circuit
2 days
ByuN vs Zest
DongRaeGu vs Zoun
EPT Open Cups
2 days
EPT Open Cups
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
OlimoLeague
3 days
WardiTV Spring Champion…
3 days
ByuN vs Solar
ByuN vs Trap
ByuN vs Zest
Zoun vs Cure
Zoun vs DongRaeGu
Trap vs Zest
Solar vs Zest
Solar vs Trap
KCM Race Survival
4 days
Team GP event
4 days
KeeN vs Percival
CreightonOlsen Tournament
4 days
GSL Code S
5 days
Hurricane vs Maru
INnoVation vs Trap
KCM Ladies Race Survival
5 days
IntoTheAlphaX Pro Circuit
5 days
Bunny vs Armani
Solar vs Creator
WardiTV Spring Champion…
5 days
BSL: Ladder Tournament
5 days
OSC
5 days
Online Event
6 days
CreightonOlsen Tournament
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL11 GosuLeague
2021 GSL S1: Code A
Nexus Forces Tour. Q2
ESL Pro League Season 13

Ongoing

Foreign All-Star vs Korean Gamer
ASL Season 11
Bombastic StarLeague 12
Russian Hasu League 2021
Best of the Best Tour
KCM Race Survival 2021 Season 1
Deathfate Pro League 1
Ultimate Battle: Soma vs JyJ
WTL 2021 Summer
2021 GSL S1: Code S
WardiTV Spring Championship 2021
Masters Clash Champ. 2021
Nexus Forces Tour.
NGS Storm Division S2
JMcGPlays ARAM Tournament
Spring Sweet Spring #1
BLAST Premier Spring Showd.
ESEA S36 - NA Premier
ESEA S36 - EU Premier
ESEA S36 - AU Premier

Upcoming

BSL12 GosuLeague
theleo_ua showmatch 3
BW Jeez Weekly 109
BW Jeez Weekly 108
CasterMuse Narak StarLeague Season 4
theleo_ua showmatch 2
BW Jeez Weekly 107
DH Masters Summer: Finals
TSL 7
NeXT 2021 S1–SC2 Masters
2021 AfreecaTV GSL Super Tournament 2
DHM Summer: China
DHM Summer: NA
DHM Summer: Oceania
DHM Summer: Asia
DHM Summer: LatAm
DHM Summer: Europe
Community Clash League S2
CCL Season 2 Icebreaker
ESL One Cologne 2021
BLAST Premier Spring Finals
IEM Summer 2021
cs_summit 8
Flashpoint Season 3
DH Masters Spring 2021
CBCS Elite League S1
Perfect World League S1
Funspark ULTI 2020
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2021 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.