• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 13:02
CET 19:02
KST 03:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3
Community News
Starcraft, SC2, HoTS, WC3, returning to Blizzcon!18$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship5[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage3Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly2Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win9
StarCraft 2
General
Starcraft, SC2, HoTS, WC3, returning to Blizzcon! RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win 5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8) TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) $3,500 WardiTV Korean Royale S4
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review [BSL21] RO32 Group Stage Practice Partners (Official) [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions
Tourneys
[BSL21] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION
Strategy
Current Meta How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Why we need SC3
Hildegard
Career Paths and Skills for …
TrAiDoS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1634 users

PvP HotS: Broke the Matchup

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
BestFriends
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada133 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-08 20:48:08
February 08 2013 20:42 GMT
#1
Summarized below is a detailed description of the Protoss vs Protoss metagame along with the optimal way to abuse it. The build and theory may not seem apparently obvious, especially in the volatility of a new game and the crazy meta that ensues, but with significant changes to the voidray, coupled with detection from the stargate, this is the case.

In order to make a point I will be making certain generalizations, and am fully aware that this game is not a game of rock/paper/scissors game, but a game where scissors can defeat rock through good fundamentals. For consistency I will also be making the assumption of equivalent skill/level of play when addressing build order.

PvP: Wings of Liberty Theory
+ Show Spoiler +
PvP as we kno it from wings of liberty (WoL), exclusively centred around the use of colossus with a slight emphasis on Archon/Immortal with Zealots as buffer. As such the match-up looked as, follows:

Phoenix openings > Robo openings> Twilight openings > phoenix openings, where > indicates a slight advantage moving into the midgame.

Simply put these advantages were built on the number of options, or lack thereof, that one opening has vs another which ultimately leads to a stronger/faster endgame composition that all three openings would eventually funnel into, Colossus.


PvP: Heart of the Swarm Theory
+ Show Spoiler +
The biggest change moving from WoL to HotS, is the redesign of the Voidray. As such the end game hierarchy of compositions now looks like:
(Loosely speaking) VoidRay>> Colossus>> Gateway, where >> indicates a significant advantage when in direct engagement.

The VoidRay is now king, with everything else under it. However, unlike its predecessor the colossus, the counter to VoidRay’s aren't more VoidRays, but mass phoenix or mass stalker with storm, with the latter not trading very well given a correct split and an equivalent army value from the Void Ray player.

The main difference between the VoidRay and Colossus composition from WoL, is that the counter to Colossus was more Colossus, a ground unit and therefore easily manipulated through positional play and a variation of unit interaction. In contrast, the counter to VoidRay is the phoenix, a unit that can only be countered through more phoenix. (I understand stalkers can kill phoenix but it is irrelevant as I will show later.)


The Build
+ Show Spoiler +

The build supply will vary with probe stacking etc. Try to build it as smoothly as possible with probes being the priority on 1 base.

Note I have decided to omit the mothershipcore from the build until 2 base. Although the mothershipcore has versatility and a place in gateway openings, it does not serve an actual purpose within stargate openings and actually leave you vulnerable to certain openings such as 3 gate pressure or 4 gate dt.

9 Pylon

Chrono probes 3 times in a row

13 Gateway, scout with probe.

15 gas

16 Pylon

18ish Cybernetics core (place it when you can afford it)

19 Gas

20ish zealot

21/22/23 Pylon#3 before Cybercore finishes

@Cybercore 100% complete: start and Chrono warptech

@100 gas: queue up Sentry and chronoboost gateway.

@150 gas: build Stargate

@ next 100 gas 2nd sentry

*Constant probe production until 20 on minerals and 3 on each gas*

*Add gates 2 and 3 as you can afford them without cutting probes after stargate*

*When sg is done chrono out 4 phoenix in a row*

*If no aggression is done scout with a halu phoenix/if there is aggression scout with real phoenix for dts and tech (if dts make oracle and 3 phoenix and out-produce him in army and take an expo with a robo)*

*When expanding the key is to watch his gas timings, gas deposit in units and tech choices. If you do not see any tech stay on phoenix gateway with msc. If you see tech go into immortal 1 forge gateway composition with 8-10 phoenix. Go into colo production as soon as you know you're not being 2 base pushed. The exception is if you scout a colossus bay/2 stargate transition, in which case go up to 2 stargate voidray/phoenix with a splash of immortals*

*Good practice is to leave 2 zealots on hold position at your ramp in case you miss a dt shrine*

This build allows for the ability to attain a significant number of phoenixes relatively quickly along with the safety-net of being able to allocate chrono differently depending on what you scout.

The above build is optimal if playing vs mirror Stargate openings, dt openings,robo openings and non aggressive twilight openings (not 3 gate pressure before teching twilight)

Variations of this opening due to scouting

Against 3 Gate Pressure/dBling Style

Currently it’s popular for your opponent to go 3 gate pressure/3 stalker pressure with mothership core into some sort of tech. Bling likes to go 3 gate 3 stalker rush with MSC into about 6-9 stalker pressure depending on what he scouts.

If you scout this or feel unsafe, you can modify the build above by making the second sentry before stargate and 2x chrono your cyber core, even adding the gates before stargate. Just forcefield the units out followed by your first warp-ins and you will be fine. It’s the same concept of holding 3 gate pressure in WoL with the exception you have to stand further back from the edge due to msc. Don't worry about the risk of losing the sentries to the msc, because with 2 chrono on the cybercore, warpgate will be finishing up, and he cannot risk over extending too far in with a slow unit like the msc(if he does snipe it with your first warp-in). The biggest thing when facing pressure is to

[image loading]

Against 3 Gate Contain Expo

Three gate contain into expo is probably the best option your opponent can do vs this build. Against the majority of 3 gate tech variations you will have more than enough army value to just pick up his units and fight your way out into your natural with 3 gate phoenix.
However there will be times where it is necessary to hold your ramp leading to a contain expo by him.
In this spot the best play is to counter his main with phoenix. It usually forces a nexus cannon and a warp-in of 3 stalkers. At this point he has the choice of coming back home with his contain or sitting in front of your ramp. If he chooses the latter, simply sit your 5-6 phoenix at his natural and deny the benefits of his expansion as long as possible. Due to a significant portion of his army being at your natural, he can't effectively deal with your phoenixes without you moving around his army and into the main sniping probes.
Your play vs a contain should be to get out colossus to break the contain and take an expo. Do not worry about the time difference between expanding, as your tech is superiorly progressed, and the amount of resources gained by your opponent by the expo lead does not offset the tech lead you have.

Against Blink Openings
Just open the standard way. Blink research time has been increased such that it will frequently be the follow up of 3 gate or 3 stalker rush openings, regardless the response is the same. Go up to 4 phoenix and have constant unit production out of 3 gates. It will be an easy hold.

Against Phoenix Mirror/Greedy Openings

If you can identify early on that your opponent is playing a non aggressive style you can be more liberal in your risk taking. There are some builds that are 1 gate 1 stargate expo if they feel a potential phoenix mirror. I am not going to post a recommendation as it is very game by game dependant. In general try reach saturation faster and save more chrono for phoenix production.


Why this Build is King
+ Show Spoiler +
Due to the VoidRay being the most potent unit in a final army composition, all that matters is the potential to create them, instead of actually producing them. The most optimal way to make this happen is to mass the counter to VoidRays(phoenix), thus monopolizing the ability to produce them. In other words if you control the rights to make Voidrays you alone have the ability to produce colossus, thus forcing your opponent into an inferior tech choice.

In WoL Blink players could still take solace in the fact that they had more invested resources in an endgame tech path, coupled with minimal damage from phoenix due to blink openings, thus leading to a powerful mid/late game and a strong transition into colossus. However in HotS it is important to note that due to the progression of Protoss tech, it is not how much damage the phoenixes can do but merely the fact that one player has them. The implication is that MSC and blink provide good defensive capabilities but the resulting influx of resources cannot be allocated in an effective manner.

To exemplify this point let’s say player A opens SG and Player B opens non SG. If B goes Colossus, A can go mass VR, If B goes mass gateway, A can go colossus with phoenix, leading to the problems B had with colossus from wings of liberty. If both A and B go stargate it turns into a very fragile game where neither player has an incentive to move away from Phoenix production, and as such will turn into a mass phoenix vs phoenix with lots of ground units, where one single engagement determines that game.


Conclusion
+ Show Spoiler +
Let me start by saying that although it is very favoured for the player opening phoenix, games will still be won with other openings and other tech choices, since Starcraft is not always about advantages. For those of you who are wondering why I have not mentioned the oracle, it is because it is always better to allocate the gas to phoenix. The times when oracles come in handy are when you need detection or want to do a counter swing vs a very aggressive 1 base protoss.


Replays
http://www.2shared.com/file/Yp0RWwTR/vs_blink_expand.html

I will add more replays later when I get the chance.
It's not about winning but the prevention of defeat.
KadaverBB
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany25657 Posts
February 08 2013 20:56 GMT
#2
Moving to HotS Forum.
AdministratorLaws change depending on who's making them, but justice is justice
AGIANTSMURF
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States1232 Posts
February 08 2013 21:03 GMT
#3
I think you are thinking too hard in regards to one player reacting to the other. The game is much more dynamic than "A opens SG and Player B opens non SG. If B goes Colossus, A can go mass VR, If B goes mass gateway, A can go colossus with phoenix, leading to the problems B had with colossus from wings of liberty"

there was already an issue in wings of liberty where if one player opened robo and the other player didnt open robo, then the robo player has a tech advantage going into the late game. However it was up to the non-robo player to make use of his early-mid game tech to make something happen and gain the upper hand by out playing his opp. which would allow him to either win the game out right or gain an advantage large enough that it allows him to tech switch into robo and catchup/out produce his opp. who had already dedicated himself to that tech.

Just like in wings of liberty, different maps will favor different tech paths (on cloud kingdom a player who opens robo into colossus or an expand was at a disadvantage to someone who goes for a blink observer build. but on daybreak, the robo expand had an advantage over blink obs once the robo player had sufficient units to tackle blink head on.)

i could go into detail regarding certain situations but i wont. the TLDR is basically that while yes void rays are powerful, they are not the best unit in pvp. Mass void rays can be countered, and as for your statement regarding the stargate player has an automatic advantage, I feel this is only true if both players sit on their hands and do nothing. PvP has become a little more dynamic than, Ok neither of us are going all-in so lets just sit and max on colossus with mothership. We should be seeing alot more mid game engagements
Thats "Grand-Master" SMURF to you.....
rEalGuapo
Profile Joined January 2011
Germany832 Posts
February 08 2013 21:04 GMT
#4
I collected many a freewin from this kind of Stargate play using 3Gate MsC pressure with fast Twilight.
This "King BO" imo is not capable of holding the early pressure without dooming you to die a little later.
SnowfaLL
Profile Joined December 2008
Canada730 Posts
February 08 2013 21:05 GMT
#5
So you are basically saying "Now in HotS, instead of countering one unit with that exact unit and the larger number wins (like WoL) to counter one unit, you have to use DIFFERENT units and multiple different combinations can actually work against it"..

uhh.. Doesnt that mean HotS FIXED PvP??
Favorites: Moon, Grubby, Naniwa, TAiLS, viOLeT, DongRaeGu
SuperYo1000
Profile Joined July 2008
United States880 Posts
February 08 2013 21:12 GMT
#6
On February 09 2013 06:04 rEalGuapo wrote:
I collected many a freewin from this kind of Stargate play using 3Gate MsC pressure with fast Twilight.
This "King BO" imo is not capable of holding the early pressure without dooming you to die a little later.



ya....I pretty much got mangled by 3 gate msc pressure with fast twilight when using some similar to the "King BO"

I dont think its even close to developed yet to establish a decent analysis of the matchup
HeavenResign
Profile Joined April 2011
United States702 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-08 21:19:48
February 08 2013 21:19 GMT
#7
I agree that HotS PvP is radically different because of the stargate. I've been doing a 3 stalker opening, and when the opponent goes stargate their builds are absurdly greedy, they are building their SG before building a sentry, and I simply walk into their base killing their zealot/stalker, forcing them to pull probes while I expand behind it. In WoL, the game would virtually be over. But repeatedly the Protoss comes back because unless I too go stargate behind it their army always seems to beat mine, even if I go immediately into blink stalkers. I don't think this is bad but it just shows the matchup is so far from being figured out and it's way too early to post things as dramatic as the title of this thread.
ailouros
Profile Joined August 2008
United States193 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-08 21:54:00
February 08 2013 21:51 GMT
#8
I've been using a 2 gate expand that I haven't had anyone break yet. I really need to work on developing a followup though.


A 4 gate would kill it though I'm pretty sure.
FlyingBeer
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States262 Posts
February 08 2013 22:17 GMT
#9
What league are you in? This is certainly not a win-all build order.

"However there will be times where it is necessary to hold your ramp leading to a contain expo by him. ... Your play vs a contain should be to get out colossus to break the contain and take an expo. Do not worry about the time difference between expanding, as your tech is superiorly progressed, and the amount of resources gained by your opponent by the expo lead does not offset the tech lead you have."

Um... yes it does. If he's able to get a 3gate pressure contain, expand to his natural, and hold it until you have colossus, then you have to all-in. Expanding in that situation is just stupid. You need to go kill him. With a Stargate opening, you need to be very aggressive early. If you wait for a bunch of phoenix, either you'll lose to DTs or he'll expand well before you, photon overcharge one base and put 4 Stalkers at the other and you'll fall behind on probes.
BestFriends
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada133 Posts
February 08 2013 22:26 GMT
#10
On February 09 2013 06:03 AGIANTSMURF wrote:

i could go into detail regarding certain situations but i wont. the TLDR is basically that while yes void rays are powerful, they are not the best unit in pvp. Mass void rays can be countered, and as for your statement regarding the stargate player has an automatic advantage, I feel this is only true if both players sit on their hands and do nothing

I never said mass voidrays can’t be countered. What I said was having the ability to go voidray means the other person can’t go robo, and with you already going phoenix, he is forced to play a gateway heavy game. It should be obvious the stargate player has a major tech advantage. I agree on certain maps, that phoenix is less potent then other openings
On February 09 2013 06:05 Kaden wrote:
So you are basically saying "Now in HotS, instead of countering one unit with that exact unit and the larger number wins (like WoL) to counter one unit, you have to use DIFFERENT units and multiple different combinations can actually work against it"..

uhh.. Doesnt that mean HotS FIXED PvP??
.

No. try actually reading what I posted. What I said was the counter is phoenix vs phoenix which is a lot worse then colo vs colo was, with everyother “different” unit interaction being at a disadvantage.

On February 09 2013 06:19 HeavenResign wrote:
I agree that HotS PvP is radically different because of the stargate. I've been doing a 3 stalker opening, and when the opponent goes stargate their builds are absurdly greedy, they are building their SG before building a sentry, and I simply walk into their base killing their zealot/stalker, forcing them to pull probes while I expand behind it. In WoL, the game would virtually be over. But repeatedly the Protoss comes back because unless I too go stargate behind it their army always seems to beat mine, even if I go immediately into blink stalkers. I don't think this is bad but it just shows the matchup is so far from being figured out and it's way too early to post things as dramatic as the title of this thread.


And @ superyo / guapo.
If you had actually read what I posted you would realize you can’t walk up my ramp…
Just because you play greedy openings on ladder doesn’t mean all stargate openings are the same.
It's not about winning but the prevention of defeat.
Freeborn
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany421 Posts
February 08 2013 22:46 GMT
#11
good post.

From the pvp I played I definetely agree that in most cases the phoenix player has the advantage.

Voidray gate composition beats gateway and phoenix beats voidray. To beat colo you have to go 2SG though I think or go voidray colo gateway.

Anyways seems like a good BO and with 2 sentries the only danger to you are blink+msc and DT's.
Freeborn
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany421 Posts
February 08 2013 22:47 GMT
#12
I don't think this is worse than WoL though, WoL pvp was really SO BAD.

I prefer the phoenix to the colossus
moskonia
Profile Joined January 2011
Israel1448 Posts
February 09 2013 00:23 GMT
#13
On February 09 2013 07:26 aYtDuSteR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 09 2013 06:05 Kaden wrote:
So you are basically saying "Now in HotS, instead of countering one unit with that exact unit and the larger number wins (like WoL) to counter one unit, you have to use DIFFERENT units and multiple different combinations can actually work against it"..

uhh.. Doesnt that mean HotS FIXED PvP??
.

No. try actually reading what I posted. What I said was the counter is phoenix vs phoenix which is a lot worse then colo vs colo was, with everyother “different” unit interaction being at a disadvantage.

That is very wrong, as you forget that a feedback transition is able to counter the masses of phoenix. I agree that the phoenix is the very strong, but the fact that it has a direct counter (HT and archons) means it can't be the best thing to do.

Basically you say stalkers with storm is irrelevant versus void rays, I disagree here since even with good split you will still be able to hit a decent amount of void rays (you can't oversplit them or it won't be effective), and also you can use attack and blink back, to force the cooldown. Void rays which are not charged will lose to stalkers with some storm support. And even if you do lose the battle versus the void rays, you will be able to reinforce much faster due to the warpgate mechanic. Overall I think that gateway > air >> robo >> gateway.

Lastly there is one composition which is near impossible if not truly impossible to beat, and that is the mass carriers. This is because per supply the carrier is the most efficient (the void ray which is the counter in WoL has 4 supply now, which makes it cost efficient, but not supply efficient), and that the carriers are so big they don't care one bit for storms. The only counter to the carrier is the tempest, which dies to almost anything else. This is OK since the carrier takes 2 minutes to build, so if you allowed someone to get maxed on carriers you deserve to lose.

As you see HotS does not break PvP but fixes it, there is not one path which is the best and everything has a counter. While the phoenix is a great option for the early game, robo blink openings are still good and immortal expand is possible with smart use of the msc. I think that it will take a very long time till this matchup gets figured out, especially since it got near figured out in the end of WoL (with positioning, usage of immortals and drops, I think it got really interesting and even the colossus wars have their spark since its not true anymore that the one with more colossi wins, its the one with the better composition and concave).
TheDougler
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada8306 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-09 01:20:45
February 09 2013 01:19 GMT
#14
You actually can gain a lot of advantage from microing phoenix vs phoenix though. It's weird too because this is not the case in muta vs muta. But in Phoenix vs phoenix there's generally only up to around 5 or 7 phoenix firing at the same time, which is microable. Furthermore, you only ever have around that 5-7 firing because the battle happens while moving. You're never gonna have phoneix sitting in one place firing at other phoenix sitting in one place because there is no disadvantage to moving. Where you move the phoenixes and how you move them is very important. It's WAY more fun than colossi vs colossi.

In other news, this thread writes about phoenix vs phoenix but a quick ctrl + f of "range", "upgrade", "anion" and "pulse" all turn up ZERO results. (well, except now that I've mentioned them).

That upgrade is KEY in stargate vs stargate in HoTS. It's the ZvZ zergling speed of stargate vs stargate. If you get that upgrade significantly before your opponent in a phoenix vs phoenix situation you will gain a TREMENDOUS advantage and likely win the game or make a decent comeback in it. Plus, then you can transition into carriers, which as the above poster writes, will often win games.

Just some food for thought.
I root for Euro Zergs, NA Protoss* and Korean Terrans. (Any North American who has beat a Korean Pro as Protoss counts as NA Toss)
jcroisdale
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States1543 Posts
February 09 2013 01:55 GMT
#15
Im convinced that stargate is the only way to open, and the composition you build is dependent on scouting where all openings are inferior to SG besides SG itself. I thinks its honestly worse then Wol was with 4gate only.
"I think bringing a toddler to a movie theater is a terrible idea. They are too young to understand what is happening it would be like giving your toddler acid. Bad idea." - Sinensis
PaperPrinter
Profile Joined December 2012
33 Posts
February 09 2013 02:15 GMT
#16
Just by looking at the match historys of the top 10 protoss players on the HotS ladder you can see that the most popular opening, as well as the one that leads to the win, is stargate by a large margin.

With oracle having detection right out of the stargate it has 60 second of detection, so dt openings are quite god awful and will die to a 3 gate + VR all in/contain.

blink all ins are awful as well since the mothership core photon overcharge will buy enough time to get out a few void rays and stalkers of your own, so you will be able to push that back no problem and you're already ahead in the void ray count.

Robo openings are obviously just bad vs SG openings so....

So I'm guessing until theres a void change that all pro games will just be phoenix vs. phoenix for a very long time. Imo, the Voids should require an upgrade to make charge an activation ability, the duration/cooldown should also be changed so that it requires more skill to use as well as allows for opponents to bait charges.
Supah
Profile Joined August 2010
708 Posts
February 09 2013 02:27 GMT
#17
It straight up loses to a greedier SG build though, and those are infuriating; additionally, MsC pokes are pretty difficult to hold and 1 Gate Blink is super tough to hold considering you have no MsC for a very long time [IIRC, you won't have enough until Phoenix 2/3 are in production, maybe even later].
BestFriends
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada133 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-09 02:53:15
February 09 2013 02:47 GMT
#18
On February 09 2013 09:23 moskonia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 09 2013 07:26 aYtDuSteR wrote:
On February 09 2013 06:05 Kaden wrote:
So you are basically saying "Now in HotS, instead of countering one unit with that exact unit and the larger number wins (like WoL) to counter one unit, you have to use DIFFERENT units and multiple different combinations can actually work against it"..

uhh.. Doesnt that mean HotS FIXED PvP??
.

No. try actually reading what I posted. What I said was the counter is phoenix vs phoenix which is a lot worse then colo vs colo was, with everyother “different” unit interaction being at a disadvantage.

That is very wrong, as you forget that a feedback transition is able to counter the masses of phoenix. I agree that the phoenix is the very strong, but the fact that it has a direct counter (HT and archons) means it can't be the best thing to do.

Basically you say stalkers with storm is irrelevant versus void rays, I disagree here since even with good split you will still be able to hit a decent amount of void rays (you can't oversplit them or it won't be effective), and also you can use attack and blink back, to force the cooldown. Void rays which are not charged will lose to stalkers with some storm support. And even if you do lose the battle versus the void rays, you will be able to reinforce much faster due to the warpgate mechanic. Overall I think that gateway > air >> robo >> gateway.

Lastly there is one composition which is near impossible if not truly impossible to beat, and that is the mass carriers. This is because per supply the carrier is the most efficient (the void ray which is the counter in WoL has 4 supply now, which makes it cost efficient, but not supply efficient), and that the carriers are so big they don't care one bit for storms. The only counter to the carrier is the tempest, which dies to almost anything else. This is OK since the carrier takes 2 minutes to build, so if you allowed someone to get maxed on carriers you deserve to lose.

As you see HotS does not break PvP but fixes it, there is not one path which is the best and everything has a counter. While the phoenix is a great option for the early game, robo blink openings are still good and immortal expand is possible with smart use of the msc. I think that it will take a very long time till this matchup gets figured out, especially since it got near figured out in the end of WoL (with positioning, usage of immortals and drops, I think it got really interesting and even the colossus wars have their spark since its not true anymore that the one with more colossi wins, its the one with the better composition and concave).


you have absolutely no idea what I'm trying to say. Against gateway comp you go colossus and it plays out exactly like wol.

To they guy who said greedy blink opening will be hard to stop. You have more army value opening phoenix then he does going blink.

Greedier stargate builds require changing the build slightly as mentioned in the op. Hence why you scout. You can make this build as greedy as you want.

I did not go into depth on phoenix vs phoenix because I thought the natural tech progression was implied.The point is that stargate vs stargate is a lot more volatile then wol was. If you're down phoenix you have no map presence and run the risk of losing the game due to 1 missmicro on the field.


It's not about winning but the prevention of defeat.
BronzeKnee
Profile Joined March 2011
United States5217 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-09 04:01:48
February 09 2013 03:56 GMT
#19
On February 09 2013 10:55 jcroisdale wrote:
Im convinced that stargate is the only way to open, and the composition you build is dependent on scouting where all openings are inferior to SG besides SG itself. I thinks its honestly worse then Wol was with 4gate only.


Bingo. I hate HOTS PvP more than anything. Flying units don't have to deal with terrain and have limited micro potential compared to ground units. They are just A-move.

Anyway, I fully agree with the OP in theory. However, Colossus/VoidRay/Phoenix could be countered by Tempest/Stalker/Archon/HT I suppose (assuming the Tempest still does extra damage vs Colossus, which I am not sure, it is considered a massive air unit to Corrupters, is the Colossus a massive air unit to Tempests?), and most of those are Gateway units. In practice I haven't played enough PvP macro games to know if that would work.

AGIANTSMURF
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States1232 Posts
February 09 2013 04:46 GMT
#20
On February 09 2013 07:26 aYtDuSteR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 09 2013 06:03 AGIANTSMURF wrote:

i could go into detail regarding certain situations but i wont. the TLDR is basically that while yes void rays are powerful, they are not the best unit in pvp. Mass void rays can be countered, and as for your statement regarding the stargate player has an automatic advantage, I feel this is only true if both players sit on their hands and do nothing

I never said mass voidrays can’t be countered. What I said was having the ability to go voidray means the other person can’t go robo, and with you already going phoenix, he is forced to play a gateway heavy game. It should be obvious the stargate player has a major tech advantage. I agree on certain maps, that phoenix is less potent then other openings



But unless you're opponent is committing to mass air you can still go robo. I usually will go heavy blink stalker with 2-3 colossus if they go for an air-ground comp. my point is you have to keep scouting your opponent and tailor your composition accordingly.
Thats "Grand-Master" SMURF to you.....
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
LAN Event
18:00
Day 3: Ursa 2v2, FFA
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 236
UpATreeSC 90
MindelVK 40
Codebar 21
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 767
Jaedong 648
Shuttle 466
Soma 362
firebathero 253
sSak 211
Rush 152
BRAT_OK 63
Backho 58
Snow 55
[ Show more ]
Hyun 46
Movie 16
scan(afreeca) 12
Shine 7
Dota 2
qojqva2978
Dendi1145
Counter-Strike
fl0m789
pashabiceps475
Other Games
Mlord583
B2W.Neo485
Beastyqt444
ceh9428
Lowko281
ArmadaUGS174
KnowMe165
Mew2King51
QueenE49
Trikslyr48
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL220
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Reevou 10
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1641
League of Legends
• TFBlade685
Other Games
• WagamamaTV349
• Shiphtur244
• imaqtpie118
Upcoming Events
OSC
3h 58m
Replay Cast
4h 58m
OSC
17h 58m
LAN Event
20h 58m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 8h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 15h
LAN Event
1d 20h
IPSL
1d 23h
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
BSL 21
2 days
Gosudark vs Kyrie
Gypsy vs Sterling
UltrA vs Radley
Dandy vs Ptak
Replay Cast
2 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
LAN Event
2 days
IPSL
2 days
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
BSL 21
3 days
spx vs rasowy
HBO vs KameZerg
Cross vs Razz
dxtr13 vs ZZZero
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025

Upcoming

BSL Season 21
SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.