• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 01:03
CET 07:03
KST 15:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-1818Weekly Cups (Dec 22-28): Classic & MaxPax win, Percival surprises2Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !11Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4
StarCraft 2
General
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Weekly Cups (Dec 22-28): Classic & MaxPax win, Percival surprises Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Starcraft 2 Zerg Coach ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !
Tourneys
OSC Season 13 World Championship WardiTV Mondays $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play
Brood War
General
I would like to say something about StarCraft A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ (UMS) SWITCHEROO *New* /Destination Edit/ What monitor do you use for playing Remastered?
Tourneys
[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET SLON Grand Finals – Season 2
Strategy
Current Meta [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Mechabellum
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread How Panthegel 5 gm Helps Repair the Eye Surface Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced
Blogs
National Diversity: A Challe…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1183 users

Purify Is Going Backwards - Page 5

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next All
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
September 21 2012 20:11 GMT
#81
On September 22 2012 04:31 Blacklizard wrote:
The MSC could be responsible for big metagame shifts. Maybe super greedy expands won't be able to be so greedy, and that may be fine. If that happens, it could make up for Protoss's poor early game scouting, which is reliant on a ton of inferrances.

Personally I really love the Mothership Core. It gives Protoss everything it needed early game. Right now, the MSC definitely helps in defense. It also gives options for poking/recall. It gives the ability to see and/or hit incoming 10 minute bio drops at one more location. And it gives options for harassment. I think of it as a really slow flying reaper... pretty decent at killing a handful of marines, lings, or workers but without support it goes down fast.

Sure, it is worrying that 4 gates would be stronger against Terran. But honestly, 4 gates were pretty God awful against Terran in the past. 2 repaired bunkers were just about enough? Maybe now it will require 4 bunkers because 2 will go down. Still very defendable if Terran doesn't play super greedy.

A late 4 gate against Zerg seems pretty weak to me. I'd be more worried about the 2 base 8 gate timing + MSC. Except that swarmhosts counter practically any number of gateway units, so it doesn't appear to be a problem there either.

Really, I think the mothership core is doing fine. The lastest buff hasn't been tested a ton, but it's probably close to being fine. I think the good far outweighs the bad. More options early game make for more interesting games. Offensively and defensively.


It occurrs to me that what the MSC purify really helps are 2-base 7-gates since these already line up at the time that a MSC would get across the map. And 7-gate all-ins are already quite strong against both Terran and Zerg. Throw in a 50/50 unit that deals ~40 DPS and can't be hit by roaches or lings, and you've got a pretty scary all-in.
InVerno
Profile Joined May 2011
258 Posts
September 23 2012 14:53 GMT
#82
I really dont like the idea of the purify cannon, feels weird to me to balace out. Seems like the noob-supply-block button for terrans. The MSC can be used effectively in agression, even in PvP its pretty hard to expand if the opponent push with that, and actually its pretty easy to bring to the opponent base, because can defend his ass by itself. In PvZ can only save the first expansion, but nothing about the third expansion, wich is very hard to take in some maps (hey 2 base allin PvZ metagame, nice to meet you) the actual style of the mappool is heavily oriented by this protoss flaw, but when the unit number increase the purify will do nothing interesting, so later the games goes on, less usefull will be to protect expansion with correct positional play. Also, the cannon is always needed for burrow so u cant skip forge at all. In TvP, nothing very cool to defend about early siege push.

I will like a lot much a cloacking field consuming the MSC energy with the AoE of a nexus. Will not add anything at the aggression, if the opponent has detection. Will be usefull for expand at every minute of the game, and will add so much interest in the position of the MSC. Its a 0.5vel unit, the position is soo important.. but when i use it, i simply let it fly around with any creative or projected move..
HumpingHydra
Profile Joined November 2008
Canada97 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-23 15:33:53
September 23 2012 15:33 GMT
#83
All these ideas playing with the purifier ability in pylon power seem like the best solution. If pylon power doesn't go up cliffs, (you can't warp in on HGround with pylon on LGround can you?) then the pylon power solution works well. However if they elect to allow pylon power the full range up high-ground I suggest that the mothership core should have to "attach" to a pylon, similar to the way it used to attach to a nexus in order to use purifier. Then I would suggest a energy per second usage for purifier. This would make offensive play, if done successfully, very hard to execute (and hopefully worthy of the win, but it would be rare). On defence, establishing a pylon at your natural, close to your nexus would be all that is required to hold that particular region with your MoCore.

I also suggest that in order to make it more useful for offence and less useful for defence, make the MoCore move faster when told to move to a nexus, and slower base movement speed. There could be a small blue beam from the top of the nexus to the MoCore that helps it move faster, but also allows an opposing player to scout the fact that a mothership core is moving faster toward a nexus. As in, I've got a limited time to do damage with these blink stalkers as the MoCore is coming.

Could result in weird proxy nexus MoCore rushes (could be hilarious or ridiculous). This ability could have a minimum activation pull range. IE MoCore must move within natural-to-main distance before blue beam activates and helps MoCore movement speed.
For the Swarm!
Tao367
Profile Joined June 2012
United Kingdom324 Posts
September 23 2012 16:50 GMT
#84
High burst but a slow attack speed is bad for defence. Conversely, high burst but a slow attack speed is good for offence. If it is going to be a tool for protoss designed to help with earlyish defence, it needs to be a fast, low damage weapon for it to be efficient and worth using. At the moment, I saw a game on day9's daily that it's better used to energize sentries to use force fields to stop them coming in than using the energy to kill the enemy units.
DBS
Profile Joined July 2012
515 Posts
September 23 2012 17:09 GMT
#85
Ok so why not just scrap purify and make it a permanent cannon. Obviously they would need to make it worse but it could just be a permanent cannon. Then it still has the capability to energize sentries to increase the time you can buy w/ FFs. Also in the current state isn't possible to ff behind the units and then kill them w/ MC purify. Protoss would just wait until there opponent really commits and then can trap half their army and slaught with mothership core
"a pitchfork is for hay. a trident is for killing bitches." -djwheat
playa
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States1284 Posts
September 23 2012 20:26 GMT
#86
I like it. I would imagine most don't, though, as they still choose to all-in in p vs p every game because they have no understanding of why this was implemented and/or never tried anything but that in WoL. I like that you can roam around with it, but it would be nice if you could still teleport it to w/e nexus you choose. They could make it even slower, if that's possible, if need be. If you go to defend your third with it, there's a good chance you're going to end up defending nothing with it. It should have more utility past the early game. I could use a mothership for recall.

rembrant
Profile Joined July 2012
62 Posts
September 23 2012 20:52 GMT
#87
They could just make the msc be able to transform into a cannon, like say you turn it to a cannon as long as u want but it can't move or use spells till you transform it back, give transform a big cooldown or cost energy.
GoldenH
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
1115 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-23 21:52:46
September 23 2012 21:49 GMT
#88
On September 22 2012 05:11 kcdc wrote:
It occurrs to me that what the MSC purify really helps are 2-base 7-gates since these already line up at the time that a MSC would get across the map. And 7-gate all-ins are already quite strong against both Terran and Zerg. Throw in a 50/50 unit that deals ~40 DPS and can't be hit by roaches or lings, and you've got a pretty scary all-in.


What I'm really looking forward to is trying it with my old stargate expand build, where I built a VR really fast and expand behind it. But it died with the VR nerfs, as they no longer could handle queens and zergs were more used to building queens to deal with banshee harass.

But i have been watching videos at how much the msc owns queens and I bet that the MSC (and maybe a phoenix or two) could totally keep the queens busy long enough for the VR to focus down a hatch.

Frankly I don't think MSC is needed. Let phoenix transform into cannon in power radius, that'll give protoss the stargate harass opener it needs. (or bring back overcharge but let it hit the ground ^^ so phoenix disable after a bit, but you can rotate your phoenix so if he's putting on pressure, you don't have energy to harass, or vice versa)
"(Dudes are) not going to say "Buy this game — I cried at the end". (...) I suppose the secret is to find a game that makes you shoot eight million fuckin' dudes and then cry about how awesome it is to shoot eight million fuckin' dudes." - Tim Rogers
nmetasch
Profile Joined April 2012
United States600 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-23 21:58:10
September 23 2012 21:57 GMT
#89
What if, to promote defensiveness with the MSCore, they gave it a buff whenever it's sitting in a pylons energy radius. It could be something like attack speed, just not range, so that way it couldn't be offensively abused.

Or perhaps only allow purify to be used within the power of a pylon.
wcr.4fun
Profile Joined April 2012
Belgium686 Posts
September 23 2012 21:57 GMT
#90
On September 21 2012 13:13 avilo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2012 13:07 kcdc wrote:
On September 21 2012 12:50 avilo wrote:
The thing is with longer duration it makes greedy protoss FEs way too good. Which is probably why they're changing it to have a shorter duration.


The goal is for it to make expanding more stable in PvP, and to do that, you have to buff Protoss frontal defense enough to make TvP rushes irrelevant. On the flip side, Terran rushes are almost irrelevant in WoL, and the mothership core is slow, so Terran drop and harass openings will still be strong.


They don't want something that lets you just expo for free in any match-up. Terran rushes being almost irrelevant would be exactly one of the points -_-


I don't see how zerg doesn't get a free expo in every match up. This point goes for other races in certain match ups as well. So it's just another poor excuse by blizzard imo...
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
September 23 2012 22:44 GMT
#91
On September 24 2012 06:57 wcr.4fun wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2012 13:13 avilo wrote:
On September 21 2012 13:07 kcdc wrote:
On September 21 2012 12:50 avilo wrote:
The thing is with longer duration it makes greedy protoss FEs way too good. Which is probably why they're changing it to have a shorter duration.


The goal is for it to make expanding more stable in PvP, and to do that, you have to buff Protoss frontal defense enough to make TvP rushes irrelevant. On the flip side, Terran rushes are almost irrelevant in WoL, and the mothership core is slow, so Terran drop and harass openings will still be strong.


They don't want something that lets you just expo for free in any match-up. Terran rushes being almost irrelevant would be exactly one of the points -_-


I don't see how zerg doesn't get a free expo in every match up. This point goes for other races in certain match ups as well. So it's just another poor excuse by blizzard imo...


Yeah, they've expressly stated that they believe the MsC is too easy to retreat from and wait out. They buffed the range to address this problem, and they presumably buffed the DPS for the same reason. The balance changes on purify were to buff the MsC's defense, not to nerf it. They'll eventually get purify where they want it defensively, and Avilo will be sad that TvP rushes will suck even harder than they do in WoL. But Protoss players will rejoice that PvP won't suck quite as badly.
Crawdad
Profile Joined September 2012
614 Posts
September 23 2012 22:45 GMT
#92
On September 24 2012 07:44 kcdc wrote:
Yeah, they've expressly stated that they believe the MsC is too easy to retreat from and wait out. They buffed the range to address this problem, and they presumably buffed the DPS for the same reason. The balance changes on purify were to buff the MsC's defense, not to nerf it. They'll eventually get purify where they want it defensively, and Avilo will be sad that TvP rushes will suck even harder than they do in WoL. But Protoss players will rejoice that PvP won't suck quite as badly.


Are you talking about the current meta or the end goal? Because right now, Purify SUUUCKS at defense, and is good at offense. If you want to defend, you're better off Energizing a Sentry.
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
September 23 2012 22:54 GMT
#93
The end goal is to have it good at defense and bad at offense. Assuming they're competent, they'll eventually get it there. Actually, I've even told them how to do it, so they don't even need to be competent--they just need to be literate.
wcr.4fun
Profile Joined April 2012
Belgium686 Posts
September 23 2012 22:57 GMT
#94
On September 24 2012 07:54 kcdc wrote:
The end goal is to have it good at defense and bad at offense. Assuming they're competent, they'll eventually get it there. Actually, I've even told them how to do it, so they don't even need to be competent--they just need to be literate.


I wonder how they'd react if this was on the battle net forums; literally this made me laugh pretty hard haha.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
September 23 2012 23:57 GMT
#95
I don't see how it is so strong for offense. If you just float your core to the enemy and he doesn't bother to scout for it or check it, then yeah, it can be quite strong. The question is if you deserve to win using this strategy. It's like demanding cannon rushes are impossible to win with, even when they're unscouted. It's difficult to really test the potency of purify when people don't have builds yet that account for it.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
Blacklizard
Profile Joined May 2007
United States1194 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-24 00:14:36
September 24 2012 00:09 GMT
#96
On September 22 2012 05:11 kcdc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 22 2012 04:31 Blacklizard wrote:
The MSC could be responsible for big metagame shifts. Maybe super greedy expands won't be able to be so greedy, and that may be fine. If that happens, it could make up for Protoss's poor early game scouting, which is reliant on a ton of inferrances.

Personally I really love the Mothership Core. It gives Protoss everything it needed early game. Right now, the MSC definitely helps in defense. It also gives options for poking/recall. It gives the ability to see and/or hit incoming 10 minute bio drops at one more location. And it gives options for harassment. I think of it as a really slow flying reaper... pretty decent at killing a handful of marines, lings, or workers but without support it goes down fast.

Sure, it is worrying that 4 gates would be stronger against Terran. But honestly, 4 gates were pretty God awful against Terran in the past. 2 repaired bunkers were just about enough? Maybe now it will require 4 bunkers because 2 will go down. Still very defendable if Terran doesn't play super greedy.

A late 4 gate against Zerg seems pretty weak to me. I'd be more worried about the 2 base 8 gate timing + MSC. Except that swarmhosts counter practically any number of gateway units, so it doesn't appear to be a problem there either.

Really, I think the mothership core is doing fine. The lastest buff hasn't been tested a ton, but it's probably close to being fine. I think the good far outweighs the bad. More options early game make for more interesting games. Offensively and defensively.


It occurrs to me that what the MSC purify really helps are 2-base 7-gates since these already line up at the time that a MSC would get across the map. And 7-gate all-ins are already quite strong against both Terran and Zerg. Throw in a 50/50 unit that deals ~40 DPS and can't be hit by roaches or lings, and you've got a pretty scary all-in.


Vs Z, at first I thought the same thing but now swarmhosts stop all that stuff cold I am pretty sure. Vs T, yeah it's a worry of mine, too. But, those kind of all-ins work best against fast 3rd CC... so maybe that will go out of style. But if T sees it coming, I'm am pretty confident they can defend it. Widow mines with auto-cast turned off in the path of the mothership core would also be a guaranteed kill on the mothership core I would think (and now you can build two or three from a naked factory, no problem, they are nearly guaranteed to pay for theirself). The MSC unit is so slow it absolutely has to fly in a straight line or close to it. On close air maps... yeah probably a problem if the Terran gets even a little greedy. But personally I always think balance against greedy play works out fine as long as you can stop 1 or 2 base all-ins if you are prepared.

EDIT: Vs T, flying in a straight line matters because you can place widow mines where you want them or scout at the right moment with scan or buildings or a reaper where the mothership should be (will need to know per map). And with widow mines being so good at prevent Protoss moving out without observer, the 7 gate super fast all-ins can't work if Terrans start making a few widow mines regarless of their long term tech choices just to force observers.
Zato-1
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Chile4253 Posts
September 24 2012 00:16 GMT
#97
On September 21 2012 09:06 kcdc wrote:
Dayvie, Purify isn't working. It's good for attacking and bad at defense, which is the exact opposite of what it should be. I know you're gonna fix it. I've read your blogs, listened to your interviews, we've even played on ladder a few times in WoL. I know you've got this. But the last two balance changes have me a little nervous since they're going precisely backwards.

Your goal is for purify to be strong for defense, but not too strong for offense. When the beta began, you found that purify was weak for for defense because the attacker could just duck out of range and wait for purify to expire. Meanwhile, it was actually pretty decent for offense because bases don't run away.

So you started by buffing the range from 7 to 10, hoping that purify would be better for defense since it would get more shots off while the attacker pulled back. But this is supposed to be a PvP fix, and an extra shot or two on a retreating stalker isn't that big of a deal. Meanwhile, buffing the range made the core WAY better at attacking. At 10 range, it can pick off spines, queens and bunkers while mitigating return fire.

And now you've buffed its burst damage while reducing the defensive availability of the effect (shorter duration, higher energy cost). I'm guessing that this too was to make purify kill more units before they retreat. But defensively, that extra retreat damage comes at the cost of making purify less available and allowing the attacker to return sooner. And it naturally makes the core even stronger for attacks where you can plan for that huge DPS to be there right when you need it.

In Starcraft, the attacker chooses WHEN the battle happens. That means the attacker wants to be powerful in a short burst, while the defender wants to be equally ready at all times to prevent the attacker from forcing the fight at a moment of weakness. At 100 energy for purify, the mothership core has exactly zero defensive utility for the first 89 seconds after it spawns. That's a gigantic window where the defender would absolutely be better off if they hadn't built the core. And after that 25 second purify cast, there's another 153 second window where the core is again completely and utterly useless.

Does 89 seconds of weakness, 25 seconds of face-smashing awesomeness, and 153 seconds of weakness sound like a good defense? No, it sounds awful--the attacker just fights during one of the huge windows of weakness.

But it's AWESOME for an attack where you get to force the fight to happen during those 25 seconds.

What you need to do to make purify good for defense is make it so that it's always available to the defender. In order to discourage offensive use, you need to make it not too powerful in short bursts which an attacker will always manipulate to line up with the engagement. Simply put, reduce or remove the energy requirement, and nerf the attack itself.

And while you're at it, if you really don't want the mothership core to be used offensively, take the range back down to 7 and make purify only enabled when the mothership core is positioned within a power field. That way, its attack can be plenty powerful for defense, but super weak for offense since the attacker would have to slow push pylons into the enemy's base in order to make a mothership core rush deal any lasting damage.

Please fix this. Don't keep buffing its ability to pick off a retreating unit at 10 range--that just makes it insanely strong for an attack. Defense needs to be reliable and available. Offense needs to be powerful in short bursts. This critical concept needs to be reflected in purify's design.

PS: I'd appreciate it if someone with beta access could re-post this in the HOTS beta forums so that it has a snowball's chance in hell to actually be seen.

Well said, you hit all the right notes. I have nothing to add, other than I hope that Blizzard's balance team also understands this and changes the current functionality of Purify.
Go here http://vina.biobiochile.cl/ and input the Konami Code (up up down down left right left right B A)
Deleted User 135096
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
3624 Posts
September 24 2012 00:18 GMT
#98
wait what? you don't have a beta key? this man needs one asap.
Administrator
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
September 24 2012 00:42 GMT
#99
Black lizard, you're right that the new units might make 2 base all ins weaker. Still, if Z takes a quick third, they narrowly defend a 7 gate all in with hatch tech units in WoL. It's hard to imagine swarm hosts coming out in time and in large enough numbers to defend the timing at 8:30. Maybe Z will open lower income with faster tech to defend P's 2 base timings, but if the MsC is strong enough offensively to force Z into tech openings, that strikes me as a problem on its own. Why not just make it less useful for those attacks?
emc
Profile Joined September 2010
United States3088 Posts
September 24 2012 01:22 GMT
#100
make purify only activate on nexus and has like 12 - 15 range, not a lot of DPS but costs maybe 75 energy. It could be like a pseudo tempest early on, it chips any attacking opponents to death but isn't cause for concern although it can tip the battle in toss favor as defenders only, not attackers.

either that or the mothership core could have some kind of existence field, where it only appears on the map inside pylon energy fields. so if toss can't get a pylon in or near your base, then it can't actually attack. Mothership is invisible and cannot issue commands other than move, unless it's in a friendly pylon power field in which case it can use it's abilities. sound fair?
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 6h 57m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 259
Ketroc 54
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 484
Snow 170
Shuttle 140
ZergMaN 99
EffOrt 54
Noble 27
Bale 20
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm131
League of Legends
JimRising 776
C9.Mang0555
Counter-Strike
summit1g8602
m0e_tv462
minikerr31
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor117
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV116
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 33
• Adnapsc2 11
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 120
• HerbMon 17
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo995
• Stunt354
Other Games
• Scarra1929
Upcoming Events
OSC
6h 57m
Korean StarCraft League
20h 57m
OSC
1d 5h
IPSL
1d 7h
Dewalt vs Bonyth
OSC
1d 11h
OSC
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Patches Events
3 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

C-Race Season 1
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
Escore Tournament S1: W2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
Escore Tournament S1: W3
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Thunderfire SC2 All-star 2025
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
Underdog Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.