• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:19
CEST 10:19
KST 17:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-69SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-64PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August)14Neeb returns to progaming; rejoins ONSYDE18
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) StarCraft 2 at SC4ALL II Invite #4/8 - Percival Protoss AoE skill expression 5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start) StarCraft 2 at SC4ALL II Invite #3/8 - Clem
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) Tasteless Time Warp: SC Evo Showmatch (May 25) SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-6
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 537 Hostile Territory Mutation # 536 Railroad Switch Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance
Brood War
General
ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool Recent recommended BW games Making an Online Broodwar Manager Game ASL22 General Discussion [Personal Project Share] Terran Defense v0.60
Tourneys
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament - Season 3 SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-6
Strategy
Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Diablo 2 thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live!
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
Iain M Banks Says He Has Cancer And Months To Live US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The Clem Fan Club INnoVation Fan Club The Scarlett Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
NBA General Discussion Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
What is a Gamer?
TrAiDoS
Hello guys!
LIN1s
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7715 users

Purify Is Going Backwards

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
September 21 2012 00:06 GMT
#1
Dayvie, Purify isn't working. It's good for attacking and bad at defense, which is the exact opposite of what it should be. I know you're gonna fix it. I've read your blogs, listened to your interviews, we've even played on ladder a few times in WoL. I know you've got this. But the last two balance changes have me a little nervous since they're going precisely backwards.

Your goal is for purify to be strong for defense, but not too strong for offense. When the beta began, you found that purify was weak for for defense because the attacker could just duck out of range and wait for purify to expire. Meanwhile, it was actually pretty decent for offense because bases don't run away.

So you started by buffing the range from 7 to 10, hoping that purify would be better for defense since it would get more shots off while the attacker pulled back. But this is supposed to be a PvP fix, and an extra shot or two on a retreating stalker isn't that big of a deal. Meanwhile, buffing the range made the core WAY better at attacking. At 10 range, it can pick off spines, queens and bunkers while mitigating return fire.

And now you've buffed its burst damage while reducing the defensive availability of the effect (shorter duration, higher energy cost). I'm guessing that this too was to make purify kill more units before they retreat. But defensively, that extra retreat damage comes at the cost of making purify less available and allowing the attacker to return sooner. And it naturally makes the core even stronger for attacks where you can plan for that huge DPS to be there right when you need it.

In Starcraft, the attacker chooses WHEN the battle happens. That means the attacker wants to be powerful in a short burst, while the defender wants to be equally ready at all times to prevent the attacker from forcing the fight at a moment of weakness. At 100 energy for purify, the mothership core has exactly zero defensive utility for the first 89 seconds after it spawns. That's a gigantic window where the defender would absolutely be better off if they hadn't built the core. And after that 25 second purify cast, there's another 153 second window where the core is again completely and utterly useless.

Does 89 seconds of weakness, 25 seconds of face-smashing awesomeness, and 153 seconds of weakness sound like a good defense? No, it sounds awful--the attacker just fights during one of the huge windows of weakness.

But it's AWESOME for an attack where you get to force the fight to happen during those 25 seconds.

What you need to do to make purify good for defense is make it so that it's always available to the defender. In order to discourage offensive use, you need to make it not too powerful in short bursts which an attacker will always manipulate to line up with the engagement. Simply put, reduce or remove the energy requirement, and nerf the attack itself.

And while you're at it, if you really don't want the mothership core to be used offensively, take the range back down to 7 and make purify only enabled when the mothership core is positioned within a power field. That way, its attack can be plenty powerful for defense, but super weak for offense since the attacker would have to slow push pylons into the enemy's base in order to make a mothership core rush deal any lasting damage.

Please fix this. Don't keep buffing its ability to pick off a retreating unit at 10 range--that just makes it insanely strong for an attack. Defense needs to be reliable and available. Offense needs to be powerful in short bursts. This critical concept needs to be reflected in purify's design.

PS: I'd appreciate it if someone with beta access could re-post this in the HOTS beta forums so that it has a snowball's chance in hell to actually be seen.
aLt)nirvana
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
Singapore846 Posts
September 21 2012 00:29 GMT
#2
I agree with this, i think purify is heading in the wrong direction.

This is what i posted in the private HoTS beta forums before the latest two patches about my ideas on the mothership core.

I feel the mothership core can be tweaked into something more integral to our race and end up becoming kinda like what the queen is to zerg. It should be the first thing every protoss player wants to make when gets his cyber up.

1. Hotkey priority selection

The mofo core spell is kinda a one off thing. You use either purify once or energize once and then you're done with it for the next 5 minutes. Often times when selecting units in your base during a defense, the mofo core is usually parked at the entrance and gets caught in the selection and ends up delaying forcefields or makes the user have to TAB through his other spell casters to get to it.

Also, say I wanna do an attack but want to have the mofo core in my hotkey selection so i can recall my army should things go bad. I don't want it in another hotkey, nor do I want to have to press TAB first before i cast FFs every single time when selecting my main army group.

Basically I feel it should be moved to the last in terms of priority in spell casting units because of the relative infrequent usage of the spells.

2. Movement speed within base

The mofo core is incredibly slow. That is good. When its being "offensive". However, when used as a defense, good players know never to engage, they either wait out the purify charge or they "kite" by walking 1 square out of its range each time and avoid it completely. If its supposed to be a defensive unit at times, it needs to be able to defend more competently! Perhaps if its within a pylon radius it is "powered" by pylons and moves at a slightly faster speed, maybe that of the tempest? The concept would be similar to queens moving faster on creep and being able to provide that added defenders advantage. I don't see why we can't have this for protoss as well.

It would also introduce a few more dynamics in the game like the importance of pylon placement or chaining pylons in a row. This way it becomes unit people pay more attention to that could move "quicker" between your three bases for defending rather that it just staying in one position during the whole assault with people not bothering to move it cause it will never get there in time. Its "off-pylon" speed is good and should remain the same as it is now.

3. Mothership morphing speed


This is a tricky one. I do not like that you cannot chorno the build time and as a result the loss of it is much more severe compared to WoL. If you mofo ship dies, gl for the next 5 mins. And at the same time starting with full energy makes it almost OP so perhaps a better balance between the energy and morphing time could be reached.

Maybe during the transition into the mofo ship, a tripod extends itself out of its !@# and plants itself to the ground, effectively making it a building during the transition. There is also proper animation so it looks more realistic with it slowly increasing in size during the morph, and will give opponents an idea when the mofo ship is about to pop out based on the animation. Right now its like whoa where did that come from! Surprise! It was in my pocket all along! And this also means since its a building during that period it gets added armor and that way it can be chronoed too, making logical sense.
sc2sea.com - The SEA / ANZ community
wcr.4fun
Profile Joined April 2012
Belgium686 Posts
September 21 2012 00:30 GMT
#3
Don't bother reasoning with logic. We've got a battle hellion who's biological now.
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-21 00:55:46
September 21 2012 00:55 GMT
#4
nirvana, if you have access to the private forums, can you make sure the design team knows that short powerful bursts are good for offense but bad for defense? This seems so obvious, but they're going in the exact opposite direction. It's mind-boggling that they'd buff damage and attack range while reducing its defensive availability.
aLt)nirvana
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
Singapore846 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-21 01:09:07
September 21 2012 01:08 GMT
#5
hi kcdc, I have done so.

Do note that Blizzard really does listen attentively in that forum, at least in the patch before this one. The carrier being brought back was them listening to incontrol + various pros and the oracle phase shield was actually a specific suggestion from grubby. It was really awesome to see Blizzard make the changes after listening to them and evaluating their suggestions.

(Just want to give the development team big props for that)
sc2sea.com - The SEA / ANZ community
SarcasmMonster
Profile Joined October 2011
3136 Posts
September 21 2012 01:12 GMT
#6
On September 21 2012 10:08 aLt)nirvana wrote:
hi kcdc, I have done so.

Do note that Blizzard really does listen attentively in that forum, at least in the patch before this one. The carrier being brought back was them listening to incontrol + various pros and the oracle phase shield was actually a specific suggestion from grubby. It was really awesome to see Blizzard make the changes after listening to them and evaluating their suggestions.

(Just want to give the development team big props for that)


Is no one telling them to buff Siege Tanks
MMA: The true King of Wings
rpgalon
Profile Joined April 2011
Brazil1069 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-21 01:17:14
September 21 2012 01:16 GMT
#7
I don't know if I agree 100% with this, I mean, it all depends on the type of attack you are under, sometimes a stronger defense that lasts less time is better than a really long but weak one.

I still need to see more MC attacks to know if it is really viable or if it just that the opponents still are not prepared for it and so it may look better than it really is.

I do agree that MC should be changed until attacking with it becomes nonviable/really bad.
badog
DMKraft
Profile Joined December 2010
476 Posts
September 21 2012 01:18 GMT
#8
I'd like to see what happens if it can only cast purify when within a pylons range.
rpgalon
Profile Joined April 2011
Brazil1069 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-21 01:27:42
September 21 2012 01:26 GMT
#9
they should just go back with it being immobile, make the movement speed 0, and give to it an ability that has a cooldown or requires low energy, that allows the MC to teleport to any protoss building (maybe exclude pylons since it could be used for cheese).
badog
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7032 Posts
September 21 2012 01:32 GMT
#10
God forbid you can ever do a rush strategy against protoss. The mothership core is a unit that you almost get for free. Protoss has some issues with defending in pvp, but what is with people that think the expansion is supposed to stop all aggressive play?
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
DeCoup
Profile Joined September 2006
Australia1933 Posts
September 21 2012 01:35 GMT
#11
Meh. If it can hold early pressure and also be sued offensively I don't mind that.
"Poor guy. I really did not deserve that win. So this is what it's like to play Protoss..." - IdrA
Infernal_dream
Profile Joined September 2011
United States2359 Posts
September 21 2012 01:36 GMT
#12
On September 21 2012 10:32 Grumbels wrote:
God forbid you can ever do a rush strategy against protoss. The mothership core is a unit that you almost get for free. Protoss has some issues with defending in pvp, but what is with people that think the expansion is supposed to stop all aggressive play?


Didn't realize 150/150 and worker build time was free. Didn't realize that my momma core ALWAYS had 100 energy to be defensive with. Oh wait, it doesn't. Quit being an idiot. This thing is trash and will not change pvp. I'll attack, be delayed 25 seconds just like if you dropped ff's with sentries. Except now there's no ff's. And it doesn't even attack at all once it's done. So i'll rape your base afterwards. Blizzard is doing terrible things with hots and it's going to trash very quickly.
HowardRoark
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
1146 Posts
September 21 2012 01:43 GMT
#13
Wait, I thought the purify could only be placed on Nexuses? So then how can it ever be used offensive unless you build a nexus in your enemy's base? Or, if you can place it anywhere, why not just change it to only be able to put in on Nexuses? Problem fixed?
"It is really good to get the double observatory if you want to get the speed and sight range for the observer simultaneously. It's a little bit of an advanced tactic, and by advanced, I mean really fucking bad."
SuperYo1000
Profile Joined July 2008
United States880 Posts
September 21 2012 01:47 GMT
#14
On September 21 2012 10:36 Infernal_dream wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2012 10:32 Grumbels wrote:
God forbid you can ever do a rush strategy against protoss. The mothership core is a unit that you almost get for free. Protoss has some issues with defending in pvp, but what is with people that think the expansion is supposed to stop all aggressive play?


Didn't realize 150/150 and worker build time was free. Didn't realize that my momma core ALWAYS had 100 energy to be defensive with. Oh wait, it doesn't. Quit being an idiot. This thing is trash and will not change pvp. I'll attack, be delayed 25 seconds just like if you dropped ff's with sentries. Except now there's no ff's. And it doesn't even attack at all once it's done. So i'll rape your base afterwards. Blizzard is doing terrible things with hots and it's going to trash very quickly.




not that Im argueing for or against you but isnt it 100/100?
Iranon
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States983 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-21 01:49:33
September 21 2012 01:47 GMT
#15
On September 21 2012 10:35 DeCoup wrote:
Meh. If it can hold early pressure and also be sued offensively I don't mind that.


It's not about whether the current stat numbers are where they should be, it's about Blizzard understanding the implications of the stats. They said they wanted it to be a defensive unit, and then they changed some stat values to make it worse on defense and better on offense. Whether or not you want it to be good on offense, that means someone's not doing their job correctly and beta testers should tell them about it.

Edit: to the above few posters. It's 100/100, 30 second build time (a bit less than 2 probes), and is a flying unit with 0.47 move speed, it is no longer attached to the nexus.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7032 Posts
September 21 2012 01:49 GMT
#16
On September 21 2012 10:36 Infernal_dream wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 21 2012 10:32 Grumbels wrote:
God forbid you can ever do a rush strategy against protoss. The mothership core is a unit that you almost get for free. Protoss has some issues with defending in pvp, but what is with people that think the expansion is supposed to stop all aggressive play?


Didn't realize 150/150 and worker build time was free. Didn't realize that my momma core ALWAYS had 100 energy to be defensive with. Oh wait, it doesn't. Quit being an idiot. This thing is trash and will not change pvp. I'll attack, be delayed 25 seconds just like if you dropped ff's with sentries. Except now there's no ff's. And it doesn't even attack at all once it's done. So i'll rape your base afterwards. Blizzard is doing terrible things with hots and it's going to trash very quickly.

It's sad. I don't even know why I bother with online forums sometimes, what with all the stupidity. (it must be boredom)

The mothership core costs 50/50 and has a quite low build time. You will have purify by the time most rush strategies hit, outside of really early ones. Protoss has forcefields, that will have your opponent have to commit to any aggressive moves. So even if purify only lasts 20 seconds, it's enough to stop most attacks. And even if you attack and then successfully run away to draw out purify, you will still get some kills with it and either way it's an improvement to your base defense.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
September 21 2012 01:50 GMT
#17
On September 21 2012 10:32 Grumbels wrote:
God forbid you can ever do a rush strategy against protoss. The mothership core is a unit that you almost get for free. Protoss has some issues with defending in pvp, but what is with people that think the expansion is supposed to stop all aggressive play?


I said nerf its stats. It's right there in the post. I don't want it to be super-strong defensively--just strong enough to give the defender an edge in early PvP WG attacks. What matters is that it's reliably available defensively and not that great for attacks.
DeathPengu
Profile Joined January 2011
Taiwan137 Posts
September 21 2012 01:58 GMT
#18
Great post, definitely correct. Blizzard, fix this plz.
Buchan
Profile Joined July 2011
Canada184 Posts
September 21 2012 02:11 GMT
#19
I just don't think Purify is ever going to work as intended. Because if you buff it too much it will shut down all aggressive strategies early game. It will always just be a buying time spell, people will just bait out purify and then wait or find other means of entry into the enemy base. It will always just be a time buying spell which does help Protoss early game but it's just not a fun to use or watch game mechanic.

Which is why I think they should just scrap purify and start coming up with a new defensive ability. Give the mothership core the ability to create destructible rocks in a specific area. That way it could block off ramps and chokes giving Protoss more time to build an army behind. Then change the name of the Mothership Core to Dustin Browder and bam, fixed.
SuperYo1000
Profile Joined July 2008
United States880 Posts
September 21 2012 02:13 GMT
#20
On September 21 2012 11:11 Buchan wrote:
I just don't think Purify is ever going to work as intended. Because if you buff it too much it will shut down all aggressive strategies early game. It will always just be a buying time spell, people will just bait out purify and then wait or find other means of entry into the enemy base. It will always just be a time buying spell which does help Protoss early game but it's just not a fun to use or watch game mechanic.

Which is why I think they should just scrap purify and start coming up with a new defensive ability. Give the mothership core the ability to create destructible rocks in a specific area. That way it could block off ramps and chokes giving Protoss more time to build an army behind. Then change the name of the Mothership Core to Dustin Browder and bam, fixed.



.....thats called force field we already have that :D
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 42m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft610
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 312
Mind 104
Leta 98
Dewaltoss 71
sSak 70
BeSt 62
sorry 26
Dota 2
XcaliburYe135
League of Legends
JimRising 474
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King87
Other Games
m0e_tv307
Livibee62
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick661
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH289
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2220
League of Legends
• Jankos1031
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
42m
herO vs SHIN
Clem vs Solar
Serral vs Rogue
Ladder Legends
9h 42m
Ladder Legends
11h 42m
RSL Revival
1d
OSC
1d 4h
OSC
1d 15h
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
The Patches Monday
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
PiG Sty Festival
3 days
[ Show More ]
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S3: W6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
Acropolis #5
RSL Revival: Season 6
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W7
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
Escore Tournament S3: W8
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSA
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
Thunderpick World Champ.
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.