EPTBlizzard says: SC2 Singleplayer was too long - Page 9
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS |
|
Rinny
United States616 Posts
| ||
|
jorge_the_awesome
United States463 Posts
On October 30 2011 02:20 Rinny wrote: I just wanted to watch the story so I made marine medic every mission and a moved. on very easy. took like 5 mins a mission, I did the exact same thing on brutal. I'd like Blizzard to add some sort of plot to the game. This one was basically "Whoa! Save your girlfriend and help a bunch of random inconsequential losers!". I didn't really like the scene where Valerian talks about saving Kerrigan. To me, it was a scene that was designed to generate hype but inhibit higher thought. And then Raynor gets all angsty and makes himself out as a hero working against all odds. When he actually had OP medics (just kidding, but it felt like the story arc was designed to make the player think "Wow, I didn't expect that! I wonder what will happen next" when there weren't very many plot twists). | ||
|
DashFlow
United Kingdom176 Posts
I'd rather have a game with more content and time taken to develop it than a game which comes out earlier than expected. | ||
|
Monokeros
United States2493 Posts
| ||
|
blackbrrd
Norway477 Posts
| ||
|
Thebbeuttiffulland
Brazil288 Posts
| ||
|
Lunchador
United States776 Posts
On October 30 2011 06:42 Thebbeuttiffulland wrote: for casual players who can spend 1-2 hours per day on the game its really too long Okay... seriously, no it isn't! Don't tell me you don't read 300+ page novels because they're too long and you only have 1-2 hours a day to read. The beauty of single-player games is they're made to be played at your own pace. This ain't no MMORPG where you have to dedicate to a tight schedule to advance your character and see more of the plot. If it took you a whole month to finish where others would spend under a week, that's fine and dandy! The important question should be: was it enjoyable? Were you eager to keep coming back for more the next day? Or are we truly in an era where the public's attention span is limited to CoD-type short as balls games? | ||
|
nerak
Brazil256 Posts
 | ||
|
KobraKay
Portugal4381 Posts
On October 26 2011 08:19 ClysmiC wrote: I thought the whole point of splitting the game into 3 parts was the long and epic storyline they had planned... Exactly...we get to wait like 5 years or something to see the end of the game because people wanted something epic. Now we're going to get that same amount of time but get a shorter campaign like it was in SC and BW (where we got 3 races in one zip).... Its probably the first time Im mad at blizzard but if we wait for so long and then get a shorter thing....well I have to live with it but I'll be mad  and sad...and rage a little bit too. | ||
|
Nothingtosay
United States875 Posts
| ||
|
DarkEnergy
Netherlands542 Posts
| ||
|
RumTalk
Jamaica135 Posts
| ||
|
gtftakuo
United States3 Posts
| ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
On October 30 2011 06:54 Lunchador wrote: Okay... seriously, no it isn't! Don't tell me you don't read 300+ page novels because they're too long and you only have 1-2 hours a day to read. The beauty of single-player games is they're made to be played at your own pace. This ain't no MMORPG where you have to dedicate to a tight schedule to advance your character and see more of the plot. If it took you a whole month to finish where others would spend under a week, that's fine and dandy! The important question should be: was it enjoyable? Were you eager to keep coming back for more the next day? Or are we truly in an era where the public's attention span is limited to CoD-type short as balls games? Agree, that argument is so stupid. Just because you don't have time to finish it in 3 days doesn't make it too long, you should be glad that you're one of the people lucky enough to have the awesomeness ahead of them for so much longer. | ||
|
Mithriel
Netherlands2969 Posts
On October 30 2011 06:42 Thebbeuttiffulland wrote: for casual players who can spend 1-2 hours per day on the game its really too long rofl what?!?!? Are you serious? First of all 1-2 hours a day i wouldn't call casual, but lets not get into definitions now. Lets say for good order completing complete single player is 10hours playtime (getting some achievements too). Why is having to spend 5-10days (1-2hours a day) to much? Its a 60 euro game, why does it have to be so casual someone can finish it in 2hours? I dont see whats wrong with people casually playing a game they enjoy and spending weeks finishing it. | ||
|
stork4ever
United States1036 Posts
| ||
|
Dreck
Germany8 Posts
But I hope Brutal will be a challenge. | ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
On October 31 2011 03:36 Dreck wrote: The problem are the casuals (as always)... Blizzard said most of the players didn't played through the Singeplayer and only 0.2% have done it on Brutal. The HotS Campaign will be much more casual, bet your ass on it. But I hope Brutal will be a challenge. I highly doubt only 0.2% have done it on Brutal. It's not THAT hard. I have friends who have beaten it with no huge problems in as low leagues as Gold, without even playing Terran. Pretty sure that would cover a little more than 1/500 players -.- Edit: More specifically, I mean that if you want to play on Brutal, most players can finish it. It's a matter of will, not skill. | ||
|
farnham
1378 Posts
| ||
|
Sandtrout
243 Posts
There are just so many reasons why somebody doesn't finish the campaign that aren't "it's too long", for example: some people are simply not interested in the campaign, others are disappointed by the story, yet others bought the game as their first rts and they just aren't really interested in that genre. I'd bet that only a small percentage of people that didn't finish the campaign did so because it took them too long. | ||
| ||
