NFL 2014 Season - Page 164
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23930 Posts
love those rookie contracts. I'm not sad to see percy go, but we could use some help in the reciever department. | ||
|
Craze
United States561 Posts
edit: I think it's a good thing in our read-option offense to have choices for Wilson to make. Too often it looked as if either Wilson or Bevell were forcing things to go toward Percy. | ||
|
tonight
United States11130 Posts
On October 19 2014 01:11 Craze wrote: I think Baldwin and Lockett are underrated, and now that Percy is gone we'll get to see them get more targets. edit: I think it's a good thing in our read-option offense to have choices for Wilson to make. Too often it looked as if either Wilson or Bevell were forcing things to go toward Percy. Harvin didn't really get that many targets. Started off fast getting him involved then as the season progressed it was less and less. | ||
|
Craze
United States561 Posts
On October 19 2014 13:05 tonight wrote: Harvin didn't really get that many targets. Started off fast getting him involved then as the season progressed it was less and less. He had quite a few designed runs out of the backfield too, considering Lynch only got the ball 10 times against the Cowboys. You're right though, he didn't get many targets. But we didn't get many offensive plays either. I trust Schneider and co. to do the right thing or fix it quickly, like they did here. If it's true he got into it with Russel Wilson then you know he was a major problem, Wilson is the poster-child for a nice guy. | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
On October 19 2014 01:09 GreenHorizons wrote: Less than a million for a superbowl winning qb. Gotta love those rookie contracts. I'm not sad to see percy go, but we could use some help in the reciever department. I'd like to see more incentive based contracts as well.. | ||
|
GTR
51593 Posts
lol okay | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35172 Posts
On October 19 2014 20:42 GTR wrote: http://espn.go.com/dallas/nfl/story/_/id/11727006/joseph-randle-dallas-cowboys-partners-meundies-shoplifting-arrest lol okay Classic Dallas. | ||
|
Kevin_Sorbo
Canada3217 Posts
On October 19 2014 13:16 Craze wrote: He had quite a few designed runs out of the backfield too, considering Lynch only got the ball 10 times against the Cowboys. You're right though, he didn't get many targets. But we didn't get many offensive plays either. I trust Schneider and co. to do the right thing or fix it quickly, like they did here. If it's true he got into it with Russel Wilson then you know he was a major problem, Wilson is the poster-child for a nice guy. oh really??? http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24734287/russell-wilson-truthfully-i-used-to-beat-people-up-a-lot | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
![]() | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
Ravens > Falcons: it is impressive how quickly the Ravens have retooled on defense. They will be contending in the AFC. Redskins > Titans: Today's championship of mediocrity. Seahawks > Rams: I kinda want to pick the Rams here. The Seahawks got tooled last week. They are vulnerable. This is a very different animal than last year's team. If the Rams could mount anything resembling a pass rush, I'd take them. Browns > Jaguars: Hoyer the Destroyer leading the Browns to a top 5 offense!!! Without Josh Gordon!! Buffalo > Vikings: I don't think that I have picked a Bills game correctly yet. I see Bridgewater having a miserable day on offense today. Bears > Dolphins: I feel like this is a game that the Dolphins should win if they weren't chronic underachievers. Long past time to fire that coach. Lions > Saints: Why did the Lions D get so good all of a sudden? That D is carrying their underperforming offense. Packers > Panthers: I think Packers fans are relaxed now. The Panthers D looks like it is done after a hot start. Chargers > Chiefs: Have you Keenan Allen owners given up on him yet? Cardinals > Raiders: Carr looks pretty good. Cowboys > Giants: Romo is sure banking those soulcrushing interceptions. They are coming, but not yet. Broncos > Niners: The Niners are going to be playing without half of their starters on defense, including their 3 pro bowl linebackers. This could get ugly. They have no right winning this game. Kaepernick will have to play out of his mind to give them a chance. Steelers > Texans: I don't like either of these teams. | ||
|
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
Chargers > Chiefs: Have you Keenan Allen owners given up on him yet? No, but I benched him this week. >_> He'll rebound sooner or later! | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
On October 20 2014 00:40 xDaunt wrote: Picks for this week: Ravens > Falcons: it is impressive how quickly the Ravens have retooled on defense. They will be contending in the AFC. Redskins > Titans: Today's championship of mediocrity. Seahawks > Rams: I kinda want to pick the Rams here. The Seahawks got tooled last week. They are vulnerable. This is a very different animal than last year's team. If the Rams could mount anything resembling a pass rush, I'd take them. Browns > Jaguars: Hoyer the Destroyer leading the Browns to a top 5 offense!!! Without Josh Gordon!! Buffalo > Vikings: I don't think that I have picked a Bills game correctly yet. I see Bridgewater having a miserable day on offense today. Bears > Dolphins: I feel like this is a game that the Dolphins should win if they weren't chronic underachievers. Long past time to fire that coach. Lions > Saints: Why did the Lions D get so good all of a sudden? That D is carrying their underperforming offense. Packers > Panthers: I think Packers fans are relaxed now. The Panthers D looks like it is done after a hot start. Chargers > Chiefs: Have you Keenan Allen owners given up on him yet? Cardinals > Raiders: Carr looks pretty good. Cowboys > Giants: Romo is sure banking those soulcrushing interceptions. They are coming, but not yet. Broncos > Niners: The Niners are going to be playing without half of their starters on defense, including their 3 pro bowl linebackers. This could get ugly. They have no right winning this game. Kaepernick will have to play out of his mind to give them a chance. Steelers > Texans: I don't like either of these teams. probably just something I ate but I'm taking Texans > Steelers. | ||
|
tonight
United States11130 Posts
| ||
|
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
|
Ghostcom
Denmark4783 Posts
On October 20 2014 00:40 xDaunt wrote: Picks for this week: Ravens > Falcons: it is impressive how quickly the Ravens have retooled on defense. They will be contending in the AFC. Redskins > Titans: Today's championship of mediocrity. Seahawks > Rams: I kinda want to pick the Rams here. The Seahawks got tooled last week. They are vulnerable. This is a very different animal than last year's team. If the Rams could mount anything resembling a pass rush, I'd take them. Browns > Jaguars: Hoyer the Destroyer leading the Browns to a top 5 offense!!! Without Josh Gordon!! Buffalo > Vikings: I don't think that I have picked a Bills game correctly yet. I see Bridgewater having a miserable day on offense today. Bears > Dolphins: I feel like this is a game that the Dolphins should win if they weren't chronic underachievers. Long past time to fire that coach. Lions > Saints: Why did the Lions D get so good all of a sudden? That D is carrying their underperforming offense. Packers > Panthers: I think Packers fans are relaxed now. The Panthers D looks like it is done after a hot start. Chargers > Chiefs: Have you Keenan Allen owners given up on him yet? Cardinals > Raiders: Carr looks pretty good. Cowboys > Giants: Romo is sure banking those soulcrushing interceptions. They are coming, but not yet. Broncos > Niners: The Niners are going to be playing without half of their starters on defense, including their 3 pro bowl linebackers. This could get ugly. They have no right winning this game. Kaepernick will have to play out of his mind to give them a chance. Steelers > Texans: I don't like either of these teams. Am I blind or did you forget the Colts vs Bengals? Or are we simply pretending the game isn't happening? I'm personally going with a Colts win provided they can even half-way decently stuff the run. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On October 20 2014 01:33 Ghostcom wrote: Am I blind or did you forget the Colts vs Bengals? Or are we simply pretending the game isn't happening? I'm personally going with a Colts win provided they can even half-way decently stuff the run. Yep, looks like I did forget that game. Colts > Bengals: The Bengals are so supremely disappointing. Also, this is the kind of game that the Colts love to get up for. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
On October 20 2014 00:55 Souma wrote: Saints are coming off a Bye. Wouldn't be surprised if they got their shit together. Yeah, I'm not comfortable with my pick there but not comfortable enough to change it... | ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
On October 20 2014 01:41 xDaunt wrote: Okay, fantasy question: Andre Holmes or Crabtree? Holmes. Live on the edge. On October 20 2014 01:44 y0su wrote: Yeah, I'm not comfortable with my pick there but not comfortable enough to change it... I think the Saints defense isn't going to be able to stop Bush and Bell and Detroit's going to feed them. I like the Lions today. | ||
| ||
