|
On May 12 2013 01:37 sharkeyanti wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2013 14:35 Sub40APM wrote:
Blues need to trade Tarasenko for a bonefined 1st line forward. Their scoring by committee doesnt seem to work against a decent goalie -- quick this year is not the quick of last year and the Kings were eminently beatable.
Maybe call up Van and see if theyll give you the Sedins for Tarasenko and a couple of picks. Your goons can protect them while they cycle and they will provide an extra dimension so you wont have to rely on freaking Alex Steen. Doesn't Tarasenko have first-line potential? And he sure costs a hell of a lot less than an established top line forward.
he may have the potential, but the Blues need results now, not in another 3 years when he grows up. And they have plenty of cap space. You can keep stocking up young talent all you want but then youll have plenty of chokes like the oe they just did vs. La.
|
On May 11 2013 12:55 monx wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2013 12:32 Masamune wrote:
so the leafs have won more playoff games this season than the slabs and canubs combined! lawl yea lets not talk about the previous seasons lol....but yea grats.
+ Show Spoiler +
|
On May 11 2013 14:35 Sub40APM wrote:
Blues need to trade Tarasenko for a bonefined 1st line forward. Their scoring by committee doesnt seem to work against a decent goalie -- quick this year is not the quick of last year and the Kings were eminently beatable.
Maybe call up Van and see if theyll give you the Sedins for Tarasenko and a couple of picks. Your goons can protect them while they cycle and they will provide an extra dimension so you wont have to rely on freaking Alex Steen.
Simply not going to happen. Trading Tarasenko might be one of the worst moves the franchise has ever done, which is saying something. You don't trade from a weakness to address a weakness. They need a #1 center pretty clearly, but they can package some of their wingers and/or Shattenkirk to fill that hole, not their most dynamic offensive player.
|
Canada17708 Posts
Maple Leaf Square will be abso-fucking-lutely nutz tomorrow night.
Can't Wait!
|
On May 12 2013 02:23 Sub40APM wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2013 01:37 sharkeyanti wrote:On May 11 2013 14:35 Sub40APM wrote:
Blues need to trade Tarasenko for a bonefined 1st line forward. Their scoring by committee doesnt seem to work against a decent goalie -- quick this year is not the quick of last year and the Kings were eminently beatable.
Maybe call up Van and see if theyll give you the Sedins for Tarasenko and a couple of picks. Your goons can protect them while they cycle and they will provide an extra dimension so you wont have to rely on freaking Alex Steen. Doesn't Tarasenko have first-line potential? And he sure costs a hell of a lot less than an established top line forward. he may have the potential, but the Blues need results now, not in another 3 years when he grows up. And they have plenty of cap space. You can keep stocking up young talent all you want but then youll have plenty of chokes like the oe they just did vs. La.
Pretty tough to call losing to last year's champs who happen to play a smart and physical game a "choke." In watching 3 of those games, I think it was clear that they did need something of an elite talent to help them at forward. Granted, LA doesn't play a superstar game themselves. Those were all hard-fought games.
|
Canada17708 Posts
St. Louis is a good team.
|
On May 12 2013 03:40 Thallis wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2013 14:35 Sub40APM wrote:
Blues need to trade Tarasenko for a bonefined 1st line forward. Their scoring by committee doesnt seem to work against a decent goalie -- quick this year is not the quick of last year and the Kings were eminently beatable.
Maybe call up Van and see if theyll give you the Sedins for Tarasenko and a couple of picks. Your goons can protect them while they cycle and they will provide an extra dimension so you wont have to rely on freaking Alex Steen. Simply not going to happen. Trading Tarasenko might be one of the worst moves the franchise has ever done, which is saying something. You don't trade from a weakness to address a weakness. They need a #1 center pretty clearly, but they can package some of their wingers and/or Shattenkirk to fill that hole, not their most dynamic offensive player.
...Why would they trade Shattenkirk?
|
You can't beat Quick on solid effort alone sadly. Either Elliott needed to steal a game or they needed a sniper to step up. St. Louis is really solid all-around, but they just don't have anyone that can score. I really liked the Blues too :c
|
On May 12 2013 04:49 sharkeyanti wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2013 02:23 Sub40APM wrote:On May 12 2013 01:37 sharkeyanti wrote:On May 11 2013 14:35 Sub40APM wrote:
Blues need to trade Tarasenko for a bonefined 1st line forward. Their scoring by committee doesnt seem to work against a decent goalie -- quick this year is not the quick of last year and the Kings were eminently beatable.
Maybe call up Van and see if theyll give you the Sedins for Tarasenko and a couple of picks. Your goons can protect them while they cycle and they will provide an extra dimension so you wont have to rely on freaking Alex Steen. Doesn't Tarasenko have first-line potential? And he sure costs a hell of a lot less than an established top line forward. he may have the potential, but the Blues need results now, not in another 3 years when he grows up. And they have plenty of cap space. You can keep stocking up young talent all you want but then youll have plenty of chokes like the oe they just did vs. La. Pretty tough to call losing to last year's champs who happen to play a smart and physical game a "choke." In watching 3 of those games, I think it was clear that they did need something of an elite talent to help them at forward. Granted, LA doesn't play a superstar game themselves. Those were all hard-fought games.
Taking a 2-0 win into LA and choking 4 games in a row is a choke. Especially when pancake scores the game and series winner.
|
On May 12 2013 03:40 Thallis wrote:Show nested quote +On May 11 2013 14:35 Sub40APM wrote:
Blues need to trade Tarasenko for a bonefined 1st line forward. Their scoring by committee doesnt seem to work against a decent goalie -- quick this year is not the quick of last year and the Kings were eminently beatable.
Maybe call up Van and see if theyll give you the Sedins for Tarasenko and a couple of picks. Your goons can protect them while they cycle and they will provide an extra dimension so you wont have to rely on freaking Alex Steen. Simply not going to happen. Trading Tarasenko might be one of the worst moves the franchise has ever done, which is saying something. You don't trade from a weakness to address a weakness. They need a #1 center pretty clearly, but they can package some of their wingers and/or Shattenkirk to fill that hole, not their most dynamic offensive player.
this is the exact same attitude that has the Oilers getting the first round pack year after year. No one is going to give you a legitimate #1 center for the 2nd line wingers and a 2d pairing d man. If the Blues want to go further than the first round they need to make a bold move. Otherwise, in another 3 years when his rookie contract is out he will be gone.
|
|
|
How the hell are the Isles out-shooting the Pens by a 2-1 margin with just 10 minutes remaining in the game?
|
On May 12 2013 10:21 xDaunt wrote:
How the hell are the Isles out-shooting the Pens by a 2-1 margin with just 10 minutes remaining in the game?
better yet, how is the game tied with that statistic?
|
Canada17708 Posts
well, let's examine Vokoun's career playoff save percentage first before we worry about actually watching the game.
let's do the same with Glenn Resch and Billy Smith and Felix Potvin and Patrick Roy and Ken Wregget and Alan Bester and Curtis Joseph and Corey Schwab... 
"the best hockey game ever played" featured a 3:1 ratio in shots. and a 4:1 ratio in offensive zone time.
|
Well, that makes next round that much harder for the Sens, was really hoping for the Islanders to at least take it to 7 games.
|
|
|
On May 12 2013 11:06 Critter wrote:
Well, that makes next round that much harder for the Sens, was really hoping for the Islanders to at least take it to 7 games.
It's going to be hard regardless.
|
BROOKS
ORPIK
PAUL
MARTIN
Those are the kinds of goal you need in the playoffs if you expect to advance. Especially when you're playing bad for long stretches of games.
Vokoun made some absolutely ridiculous saves again late.
LET'S GO PENS
|
Even if they lost Isle's did phenomenal this season imo. Was amazing to be at the last home game, and game 4 this series. was amazing to see so many people at the Coliseum in the playoffs. Good fight they gave to the Pens too. Next year i hope is even better, cheers to the Islanders on a damn good year.
|
On May 12 2013 11:42 Skinnyboy wrote:
Even if they lost Isle's did phenomenal this season imo. Was amazing to be at the last home game, and game 4 this series. was amazing to see so many people at the Coliseum in the playoffs. Good fight they gave to the Pens too. Next year i hope is even better, cheers to the Islanders on a damn good year.
isles got strength and speed and heart
just need a better goalie and they'll be a top-5 team in the east
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
