EPTThe 2014 Weightlifting Progress Thread - Page 39
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
Thor.Rush
Sweden702 Posts
| ||
|
Abraxas514
Canada475 Posts
On March 26 2013 05:13 Crushinator wrote: Protein power does not dissolve in water. At no point does the powder become a liquid. Whey is fast absorbing, because almost all the other proteins absorb slower. This. And I'd like to add, the reason why whey is absorbed quicker is because the stuff you use is ground up really fine. This gives more surface area for your body to metabolize in your stomach/small intestine. But there's more. After a workout, your metabolism takes a little while to restart. If you're getting hungry during a workout, you're doing something wrong. Drinking a protein shake is an easier way for your body to begin digesting instead of a solid piece of cheese, even though both have the same proteins. | ||
|
Deadeight
United Kingdom1629 Posts
On March 26 2013 05:05 AoN.DimSum wrote: thoughts on deloading haha He looks identical to almost every US person involved in powerlifting. One of these days I'm going to have to shave my head and grow a beard, and put on a bunch more fat. | ||
|
phyre112
United States3090 Posts
On March 26 2013 05:13 Crushinator wrote: Protein power does not dissolve in water. At no point does the powder become a liquid. Whey is fast absorbing, because almost all the other proteins absorb slower. My point wasn't that "protein powder is a liquid" it was to point out that the reason things get digested faster is because of the number of steps needed to digest them - liquids have fewer steps than solids, and whey has fewer steps than casein. Powder gets digested faster than larger meals too, but slower than liquid because it has a higher surface:area ratio, so a greater proportion of enzymes can be active upon it at a given time. That's how biology works. And my second point was that "fast" is a relative term, and what you were calling "fast" still takes over 3 hours to digest a single scoop from a protein shake, not counting what you mix it with. | ||
|
FFGenerations
7088 Posts
skipped, done some cd and had 2 cigarettes fri skipped also  saturday run 22 mins sunday run 25 mins monday squat 90kg 6-5-5 a bit poor bench 80kg 7-6-6 deadlift 130kg 5-3, 120kg 5, pretty poor | ||
|
infinity21
Canada6683 Posts
| ||
|
Vitruvian
United States168 Posts
On March 26 2013 07:22 FFGenerations wrote: and had 2 cigarettes GODDAMMIT STAHP | ||
|
infinity21
Canada6683 Posts
Front squat 1x7x212 4x7x207 Accidentally did 212 for my first set D: | ||
|
Adel
Belgium86 Posts
On March 25 2013 13:37 decafchicken wrote: Olympic lifting is an exceedingly safe sport. super super safe. It's very hard to hurt yourself because worse comes to worse and feel like anything hurts you just drop the bar and get out of the way. Any sort of proper heavy lifting is going to put stress on your spine, which is not a bad thing. Your spine is built to support weight so as long as you keep proper form there's no worries. It will also make your spine stronger which will help you in MMA and life in general. Yeah, I don't know if it came across correctly, but I wasn't trying to say that you could be crushed under the BB. If your back doesn't stay straight enough, you have an extreme amount of stress put on intervertebral discs in your lower back, and you run the risk of a serious injury. Not much of a problem if you do it properly, because it doesn't happen. My point is : it's very hard to do it properly. I tried a BB military press, but I have too much trouble keeping my back straight while doing it, so olympic lifting is out of question for now. I'm becoming able to do a couple exercices I couldn't do because of joint flexibility problems. Maybe olympic lifting'll be be one of them someday. On March 25 2013 14:23 Deadeight wrote: You can always move out of the way during an Olympic lift, despite how dodgey they look. Helps that they're generally trained in very low reps as well so you don't get exhausted during a set. Like with deadlift, I once was grinding out a rep and it slipped out of my left hand, ended up with me falling over backwards with the 200kg bar down on top of me (shins still vertical), luckily all I got was two bruised quads (and pride). Super safe though. I don't know anyone who has gotten injured from lifting, can't say the same for "safe" stuff like football (soccer) though, I've never understood how they get so many injuries, more than rugby. Yeah you got off lucky  The most common injury when you're playing football (so, soccer yeah) is with the menisc. There are various injuries based on that (shattered menisc, sometimes it just leaves the knee and wanders around your shin, ...), most of them requiring surgery. Also since there are many cases of muscle/tendon/ligament hyperextension, they can be torn pretty easily too. | ||
|
Intact
Sweden634 Posts
Right now I do: Deadlift: 365 lbs x3 Bench: 176 x5 Squats:286 x3 Dips + 55 x8 Thanks! | ||
|
decafchicken
United States20166 Posts
FS- 70 100 120 130 140 150 then 10 singles of 160 every minute. CJ- 70 100 120 130 133 137 140 143x 143 147(no jerk) Snatch - 70 90x(rofl) 90 100 110 120 125x Where in america are you going to? If you're going to play WR and bulk a bit you're going to want to focus on a lot of skill specific things like agility, route running, and hand skills. On March 26 2013 04:30 sJarl wrote: This post is for Decaf: I may have set my CJ goals too low. Goal was 90kg. Did 85kg today on my first workout... Not complaining though. Told you :-D @cambium nice! | ||
|
feanor1
United States1899 Posts
On March 26 2013 10:42 Intact wrote: Anyone have experience of bulking up for football? Right now I play quarterback for a team in Sweden, but I'm going to a school in america this fall to study and play football. I figured I'm not nearly good enough to play QB in a US team so I figured I was gonna switch to my old position of Wr/Safety. I'm 6'3 and 198 pounds, I feel like I need to go up a couple pounds, maybe 205 something would be enough and not loose speed. Tips on stuff that will help you bulk up but maintain speed would be appreciated. Right now I do: Deadlift: 365 lbs x3 Bench: 176 x5 Squats:286 x3 Dips + 55 x8 Thanks! You are plenty big to play WO in high school. I agree with Decaf, your biggest issue will be skills and agility/speed. Also standards for high school football are very very varied across the US. | ||
|
Donkeys
Mexico308 Posts
Session 1 (pounds. 130-3pm) c&j 135, 155, 175, 185, 195, 205, 210x(miss jerk) sn pulls triples 155, 160, 165, 170, 170 squat 225x2, 245x2, 265x2, 275x1 Session 2 (kilos. 8pm) squat 100x3, 110x3, 120x2, 125, 130, 135, 140(miss), 140, 145(miss), 115x3, 120x3, 125x3 power jerks 60kgx3x3 Time to eat and crash lol. | ||
|
Cambium
United States16368 Posts
On March 26 2013 02:35 infinity21 wrote: Damn, I'll catch up to you... PR with belt is 280 atm just a baby plate away | ||
|
Abraxas514
Canada475 Posts
On March 26 2013 07:12 phyre112 wrote: My point wasn't that "protein powder is a liquid" it was to point out that the reason things get digested faster is because of the number of steps needed to digest them - liquids have fewer steps than solids, and whey has fewer steps than casein. Powder gets digested faster than larger meals too, but slower than liquid because it has a higher surface:area ratio, so a greater proportion of enzymes can be active upon it at a given time. That's how biology works. And my second point was that "fast" is a relative term, and what you were calling "fast" still takes over 3 hours to digest a single scoop from a protein shake, not counting what you mix it with. Number of steps? This doesn't change. And I think you meant surface area:volume ratio. Also, it takes considerably longer than 3 hours to fully metabolize anything that's not a sugar or water. But, honestly, who cares. We drink whey for DAT PRO-TEIN. | ||
|
Deadeight
United Kingdom1629 Posts
It may be semantics as well, but casein doesn't "absorb" more slowly, because casein doesn't get absorbed. Amino acids get absorbed. Casein takes a long time to digest because of acid coagulation, so surface area etc. | ||
|
NeedsmoreCELLTECH
Netherlands1242 Posts
On March 26 2013 07:22 FFGenerations wrote: wednesday skipped, done some cd and had 2 cigarettes fri skipped also Just wanted you to know that if you really insist on fucking up your life, not only can I not stop you but I also don't give a shit. This is YOU not sticking to promises and YOU taking the blame. I don't get why you insist on being mediocre. | ||
|
sJarl
Iceland1699 Posts
 + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/sesWn3v.jpg) + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Y6EO7fZ.jpg) bw 93,5kg @ 185cm. | ||
|
decafchicken
United States20166 Posts
| ||
|
Intact
Sweden634 Posts
On March 26 2013 11:44 feanor1 wrote: You are plenty big to play WO in high school. I agree with Decaf, your biggest issue will be skills and agility/speed. Also standards for high school football are very very varied across the US. I'm going to a Junior college in California, don't know how it compares to high school level but I guess similar or slightly better. Workout question: I've never really done deadlifts before, so the 365x3 was just trying out how far I could go yesterday, but today my lower back and abs are killing me ( not injury pain, post workout soreness). Is it supposed to hit back/abs more than legs? | ||
| ||
