EPTBut here's my video: https://www.rekt.gg/show_video/5285 Terrible micro but awesome maphack
The www.REKT.gg Diamond and Below Invitational - Page 3
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Linko_66
Ukraine28 Posts
But here's my video: https://www.rekt.gg/show_video/5285 Terrible micro but awesome maphack | ||
|
AzureSushi
Italy11 Posts
| ||
|
Linko_66
Ukraine28 Posts
On January 06 2017 06:05 AzureSushi wrote: That's why you post only the important part, not the whole game xD. I saw most of the clips on the site were 20-30 seconds. I'm not talking about the actual file upload time (which btw apparently has a size limit that isn't mentioned anywhere) but the time it takes to buffer the video, prepare it for editing which is not even available atm, and then to appear on the site after adding title and other stuff. Also that's not the whole game. I've cut all the parts with no action in them. | ||
|
DinoMight
United States3725 Posts
On January 06 2017 06:56 Linko_66 wrote: I'm not talking about the actual file upload time (which btw apparently has a size limit that isn't mentioned anywhere) but the time it takes to buffer the video, prepare it for editing which is not even available atm, and then to appear on the site after adding title and other stuff. Also that's not the whole game. I've cut all the parts with no action in them. Hey, Thanks for mentioning this stuff. We're gathering a lot of feedback while we work on the platform and wanted to leave it a bit open ended to see how people use it. Speed- simply a money thing. We'll start paying for faster servers soon so this won't be an issue. Editing- we're still working on this, but where you see "edit" there will be a video editor. You'll be able to trim your video, add text, music, emojis, etc. Clip length - we didn't mention anything specifically to see what users' expectations were. however, the site is mainly supposed to be short clips and we'll be implementing a length limit as soon as our video editor is done (so that people have the tool they need to trim it). We didn't want to force short clips from the beginning in case people didn't have access to an editor. Ultimately rekt is supposed to be about editing, sharing, and interacting over short impactful clips. So there's still a little work to do. Thanks for your feedback mate and thanks for participating! | ||
|
Turambar13
8 Posts
Hope it takes off. -Bert | ||
|
DinoMight
United States3725 Posts
On January 06 2017 09:56 Turambar13 wrote: I checked out the site. Just a tip, you need an "about" page, explain why rekt.gg is awesome etc. Hope it takes off. -Bert Thanks buddy! Ignorant and I just played the same guys 4 times in a row on ladder. They kept trying to proxy us every game. This happened: https://www.rekt.gg/show_video/5286 This is the kind of stuff we're looking for! Short/funny/rekt clips. ALSO - Tournament update. We're getting close to 32 signups. We COULD switch it up to 32 players and single elim just to be more inclusive. What do you think? In the end we want to get the most possible viewership and encourage the SC2 scene. So whatever you guys like. | ||
|
Linko_66
Ukraine28 Posts
| ||
|
Turambar13
8 Posts
| ||
|
Linko_66
Ukraine28 Posts
On January 06 2017 23:22 Turambar13 wrote: Single elimination makes the experience not so fun. You should do a group stage so 8 groups of 4 but have each match be BO 1 to save time, this way if you lose you at least have one more game. I think bo1 is kind of a coin flip. At least make the decider matches (for the 1st and 2nd place) bo3. | ||
|
Ignorant prodigy
United States385 Posts
IMO if this one is successful I could see it growing in scope, but for the first go at it I think BO1 is the right decision. Unless there’s some volunteers… Right now Dino is acting as organizer/sponsor/admin and stream host Trying to coordinate 32+ people in a group stage on top of that.. yeaaa…… | ||
|
DinoMight
United States3725 Posts
| ||
|
Turambar13
8 Posts
In the round of 8 do another group stage (double elimination) and have Bo 1 matches for everything but the final elimination match make it a Bo 3. Then you have a 4 player single elimination bracket that can be Bo 3. | ||
|
DinoMight
United States3725 Posts
So a ton of Bo1s is like the longest possible scenario. I'd rather have a lot of Bo3s. | ||
|
Linko_66
Ukraine28 Posts
| ||
|
NukeOfficial
23 Posts
| ||
|
DinoMight
United States3725 Posts
On January 07 2017 07:04 NukeOfficial wrote: So. If we have more than one clip should we post them all here or will it be "auto detected"? You're all set man! | ||
|
DinoMight
United States3725 Posts
| ||
|
SlickJack
22 Posts
| ||
|
xJustxJordanx
39 Posts
| ||
|
xJustxJordanx
39 Posts
On January 06 2017 09:56 Turambar13 wrote: ALSO - Tournament update. We're getting close to 32 signups. We COULD switch it up to 32 players and single elim just to be more inclusive. What do you think? In the end we want to get the most possible viewership and encourage the SC2 scene. So whatever you guys like. 32 player single elim Bo3 would be best I think. Bo5 semis, Bo7 Finals. Every game woudn't be casted, but you'd be able to do it in a day, which is desireable. Also, the prize pool you offered could easily be an open tourney and attract pretty much any pro player. So, not going to complain about the chanc to win some decent cash. Just saying you could've made it an open to attract a higher caliber of players. Also, those players would've attracted more viewers to the stream (if that's what you're after). Just my thoughts! Also, are you guys looking for staff? Organizers, casters, etc? | ||
| ||
