|
On May 24 2016 05:48 Shellshock wrote:
How have the PvP maps been so far? missed the first 4
Dasan was pretty cool with contrasting expansion patterns from both players, and lots of interesting harassment centred around the gold.
I missed the game on Frozen Zone.
The game on Galactic Process was Stalker+Disruptor wars, but the map lent itself to very interesting positional play.
The game on New Gettysburg was basically a normal PvP except with players getting their air units caught on the air blockers.
edit: The game on Shiva, Harstem went for phoenixes, but got them sniped by puCK's blink stalkers. The ramps are buggy on that map.
|
On Frozen Zone it was Disruptor wars as well.
|
Dasan was fairly good in PvP, worked much better than in the last match.
Didn't like Frozen Zone too much, map felt gigantic and the minimap was hard to read...
Liked Galactic Process, an improved Cloud Kingdom imho.
Missed Shiva, so no idea.
|
The fact that we're seeing so many blink stalker/disruptor is more reflective of the playstyle of the players than the maps though.
edit: The fact that the orange decals go over the unbuildable rocks somehow bothers me a lot.
|
On May 24 2016 05:56 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
The fact that we're seeing so many blink stalker/disruptor is more reflective of the playstyle of the players than the maps though.
edit: The fact that the orange decals go over the unbuildable rocks somehow bothers me a lot.
Yeah its still more interesting than Immortal Archon Zealot imo.
|
United States97274 Posts
The map layout on this one reminds me of that underwater map for some reason
|
On May 24 2016 06:09 Shellshock wrote:
The map layout on this one reminds me of that underwater map for some reason
Underwater map? I can't think of anything.
|
United States97274 Posts
On May 24 2016 06:14 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2016 06:09 Shellshock wrote:
The map layout on this one reminds me of that underwater map for some reason Underwater map? I can't think of anything.
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/File:AbyssalCity.jpg
it's like if you added 1 more base on each side edge and took out 1 on the top and bottom. I mean it's not super close but it made me think of Abyssal City
|
On May 24 2016 06:15 Shellshock wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2016 06:14 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On May 24 2016 06:09 Shellshock wrote:
The map layout on this one reminds me of that underwater map for some reason Underwater map? I can't think of anything. http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/File:AbyssalCity.jpgit's like if you added 1 more base on each side edge and took out 1 on the top and bottom. I mean it's not super close but it made me think of Abyssal City
Oh. I somehow never realized it was supposed to be an underwater map. It does look kinda superficially similar, but I feel it plays very different. For example games on Abyssal City usually revolved around losing that bottom left/top right third, while the third and fourth bases on this map only have one entrance.
On May 24 2016 06:05 Aunvilgodess wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2016 05:56 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
The fact that we're seeing so many blink stalker/disruptor is more reflective of the playstyle of the players than the maps though.
edit: The fact that the orange decals go over the unbuildable rocks somehow bothers me a lot. Yeah its still more interesting than Immortal Archon Zealot imo.
I guess, but for a map test tournament having such stylistic players can be seen as a disadvantage.
|
Aotearoa39261 Posts
Aiur Plateau is really weird in an awesome way.
|
On May 24 2016 06:42 Plexa wrote:
Aiur Plateau is really weird in an awesome way.
Yeah it's a beautiful map with so many quirky designs thrown together in a way that somehow fits. It's also the most confusing map since Raid Assault, and would probably be more vetoed than KCK if it ended up on ladder.
|
how long has this been going on?
|
Aotearoa39261 Posts
This game is like a game of pong.
|
This is the most stressful stalemate situation I've seen...
|
United States97274 Posts
|
|
|
I think Aiur Plateau's definitely got my vote...
|
Russian Federation421 Posts
The last map was amazing. I just wish I didn't have to watch disruptor wars for 7 games before that.
|
... well not everyone's beastyqt and studies the map ahead of time, but still Harstem plz.
|
United States8476 Posts
On May 24 2016 06:21 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2016 06:15 Shellshock wrote:On May 24 2016 06:14 ZigguratOfUr wrote:On May 24 2016 06:09 Shellshock wrote:
The map layout on this one reminds me of that underwater map for some reason Underwater map? I can't think of anything. http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/File:AbyssalCity.jpgit's like if you added 1 more base on each side edge and took out 1 on the top and bottom. I mean it's not super close but it made me think of Abyssal City Oh. I somehow never realized it was supposed to be an underwater map. It does look kinda superficially similar, but I feel it plays very different. For example games on Abyssal City usually revolved around losing that bottom left/top right third, while the third and fourth bases on this map only have one entrance. Show nested quote +On May 24 2016 06:05 Aunvilgodess wrote:On May 24 2016 05:56 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
The fact that we're seeing so many blink stalker/disruptor is more reflective of the playstyle of the players than the maps though.
edit: The fact that the orange decals go over the unbuildable rocks somehow bothers me a lot. Yeah its still more interesting than Immortal Archon Zealot imo. I guess, but for a map test tournament having such stylistic players can be seen as a disadvantage.
It's not a player-based stylistic thing, it's a foreigner vs korean thing. All foreigners prefer Stalker/Disruptor while all koreans prefer Zealot/Immortal/Archon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
