[Code S] Ro16 Group D Season 2 2015 - Page 30
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Fuell
Netherlands3111 Posts
| ||
dazed25
3566 Posts
On May 29 2015 20:47 kaykoose wrote: Parting makes protoss look OP. He should finally win a GSL this season Life was the biggest obstacle for that and he's out. I feel like herO and Rain might have a slight chance but he's still massively favored (other than the loss to herO). Maybe Dream if his TvP is really as good as his stats suggest. I personally don't think so but we'll see. Myungsik beat him RO32... Oh god myungsik as GSL champion would be hilarious. | ||
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On May 29 2015 20:47 newtii wrote: Zergs really should more effort and not just build roaches and a-move. Tbh, their game plan is really lacking. I don't know if you believe what you are writing but it comes across as you trying to "bait" anger out of zerg players. I think the thread as a whole would prefer if you didn't do that. I see by your post count that you are new to the TL community so maybe you are just unfamiliar with the rules and environment of this website. | ||
Neemi
Netherlands656 Posts
On May 29 2015 20:43 KelsierSC wrote: it's not, parting played really well and rogue made a few mistakes that proved fatal. Agreed, PartinG played amazing and I loved watching him do what he did, because I'm sure not many Protoss players could pull it off as well as he did. I just wish that the Zerg could do more to actively combat the Protoss. I know it's pretty balanced around the fact that it's really hard to pull off what PartinG did so this is not intended as a comment on balance, but watching helplessly while your much bigger army slowly dies is the worst feeling there is. | ||
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
On May 29 2015 20:48 DJHelium wrote: Well I disagree, I think he would've gotten crushed in an engagement with that many forcefields. The reason he could kill sentries/immortals is because Parting was out of forcefields. If he's not he can just start to back off as soon as Rogue starts to burrow and keep putting up forcefield walls. And still wouldn't kill as many Roaches as he did in the end because his army was a lot larger. Parting had like 100-110 supply while Rogue was almost maxed when that attack happened, IIRC the moment Rogue literally engaged on Parting and killed his Sentries and Immortals, Parting was at ~150 supply, that's like 40 additional supply of Stalkers. | ||
DJHelium
Sweden13480 Posts
On May 29 2015 20:50 c0ldfusion wrote: I don't get the balance whine in this thread. Rogue is just not as good as PartinG. As far as I'm concerned Life is the only relevant zerg and even he is trending downward. So you're saying there's soon no relevant zerg and you don't get the balance whine? I agree Parting is the stronger player here. | ||
in_flvxx
Australia226 Posts
| ||
Baadbeat
France203 Posts
On May 29 2015 20:50 temporary1 wrote: Dont whine about forcefields, whine about zerg's lack of micro potential. In current meta first non a-move thing zerg has is pretty much hive tech, while almost every unit protoss has has some kind of active or spell-esque ability. Players have gotten so much better after WoL that nowadays players can just thrive out of talent and being better in the game. LotV units address this for all races, so direction they are taking seems good. Best players should win. Well in some way burrow + FFbait + Army positionning is some kind of micro but I believe Rogue's army placement in these two games was below PartinG's | ||
FakePseudo
Belgium716 Posts
On May 29 2015 20:50 c0ldfusion wrote: I don't get the balance whine in this thread. Rogue is just not as good as PartinG. As far as I'm concerned Life is the only relevant zerg and even he is trending downward. Or maybe nearly every zerg has collided with a wall called Protoss in individual leagues | ||
Video2000
Denmark517 Posts
| ||
RaFox17
Finland4581 Posts
On May 29 2015 20:50 c0ldfusion wrote: I don't get the balance whine in this thread. Rogue is just not as good as PartinG. As far as I'm concerned Life is the only relevant zerg and even he is trending downward. There is only one relevant zerg. Could that be a sign of something? Maybe? Eh? When Maru and Taeja were only relevant terrans there were problems. Maybe zerg´s just need to adapt. | ||
Magnifico
1958 Posts
On May 29 2015 20:50 dazed25 wrote: Life was the biggest obstacle for that and he's out. I feel like herO and Rain might have a slight chance but he's still massively favored (other than the loss to herO). Maybe Dream if his TvP is really as good as his stats suggest. I personally don't think so but we'll see. Myungsik beat him RO32... Oh god myungsik as GSL champion would be hilarious. Parting doesn't lose to terran. PvP anything can happen really. | ||
Gwavajuice
France1810 Posts
On May 29 2015 20:48 [PkF] Wire wrote: I've seen Z attempt everything against that, infestors, fast ultras, spire, ling roach pressure, hydra ling, 2 base burrow. Everything. I fail to see something that works consistently. it's because it's not about units, it's about macro, micro and execution. Rogue had everything in game 2, simply think about what happends if he pops his roaches out under the sentries instead of splitting them in every bases. But he said "oh yeah I'm gonna outmultitask him" But in the end, not only parting is perfectly fine defending his 3 bases, but he manages to deny the 4th with the voidray and put a darkshrine up. Rather than balance or game design, the only thing that series shows is taht (at the moment) Parting >> Rogue. | ||
DJHelium
Sweden13480 Posts
On May 29 2015 20:51 Ramiz1989 wrote: And still wouldn't kill as many Roaches as he did in the end because his army was a lot larger. Parting had like 100-110 supply while Rogue was almost maxed when that attack happened, IIRC the moment Rogue literally engaged on Parting and killed his Sentries and Immortals, Parting was at ~150 supply, that's like 40 additional supply of Stalkers. I would have to rewatch to make sure, but imo there was no point where Rogue would've been better off engaging there. I could be wrong though ![]() Gtg now, sad to miss the Gumiho games ![]() | ||
newtii
58 Posts
On May 29 2015 20:51 KelsierSC wrote: I don't know if you believe what you are writing but it comes across as you trying to "bait" anger out of zerg players. I think the thread as a whole would prefer if you didn't do that. I see by your post count that you are new to the TL community so maybe you are just unfamiliar with the rules and environment of this website. OK, sorry, I just feel that Parting does not get the recognition that he deservers. | ||
Wintex
Norway16836 Posts
| ||
GumBa
United Kingdom31935 Posts
On May 29 2015 20:54 newtii wrote: OK, sorry, I just feel that Parting does not get the recognition that he deservers. Parting has more hype behind him than 90% of all pros | ||
ZackAttack
United States884 Posts
| ||
[PkF] Wire
France24192 Posts
On May 29 2015 20:55 ZackAttack wrote: People balance whining should be ashamed. Rouge had that game won twice and threw it away. My hatred for PartinG must blind me. But I feel ZvP is too rough atm. | ||
Wintex
Norway16836 Posts
| ||
| ||