EPT[SPL] Samsung vs. KT Round 1 2014 - Page 32
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Pangpootata
1838 Posts
| ||
Ragnarork
France9034 Posts
| ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
| ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
Yeah, I'm OK with that. | ||
|
Squat
Sweden7978 Posts
| ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
| ||
|
Ravomat
Germany422 Posts
On January 07 2014 22:17 DarkLordOlli wrote: I think it's alright for the lack of a better term. If you don't do the sort of damage you're setting out for by committing to the attack, you'll be pushed behind by the consequences. Like say a blink/archon/charge 3 base timing would delay robotics/stargate tech for very long which will give you trouble dealing with an ultralisk army, taking a 4th base and dealing with tech switches. So you'd really have to get some damage in. It may or may not have been Zest's plan this game, he did hit a (too late) timing but had 3/2 started behind it and got 2 robotics facilities up so he was at least set up to transition. That is exactly my point. If your attack fails, then you're behind obviously. You can't be ready for everything. Though an all-in implies that if your attack fails, you lost. Zest didn't cut economy like a madman to get his push rolling, so he could transition while pushing, and he didn't lose his entire army when it was engaged on. | ||
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
| ||
|
THELEHGOTERRAN
United States1837 Posts
| ||
|
Pangpootata
1838 Posts
| ||
|
Kasaraki
Denmark7115 Posts
| ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
| ||
|
Ragnarork
France9034 Posts
| ||
|
Volband
Hungary6034 Posts
| ||
|
YyapSsap
New Zealand1511 Posts
| ||
|
Fjodorov
5007 Posts
| ||
|
shadymmj
1906 Posts
| ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
| ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
| ||
|
Qwerty85
Croatia5536 Posts
| ||
| ||
