EPTOn December 01 2013 04:03 75 wrote:
how were the innovation vs patience games?
how were the innovation vs patience games?
You can go back 20 pages and see what they caused.
[DreamHack] Winter Day 3 2013 - Page 110
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Heartland
Sweden24603 Posts
You can go back 20 pages and see what they caused. | ||
|
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
| ||
|
Tobblish
Sweden6404 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:03 75 wrote: how were the innovation vs patience games? Fake Blink Stalkers, overreaction and 2gate vs CC first | ||
|
felisconcolori
United States6168 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:02 opisska wrote: Probably the right reaction to this is to abandond the build on the first sight of the Thor (while continuing to fake pressure) and then laugh about the two medivacs the terran misses for each Thor. Mech doesn't need medivacs as much, and if you've got Thors... Of course, then you have OTHER problems. | ||
|
Boundz(DarKo)
5311 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:04 Schelim wrote: that x-ray vision ad is so stupid Quiet you non-believer. | ||
Jer99
Canada8159 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:03 75 wrote: how were the innovation vs patience games? mobius strip | ||
|
felisconcolori
United States6168 Posts
He just sees right through the marketing. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45937 Posts
 Nice. | ||
|
samurai80
Japan4225 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:02 opisska wrote: Probably the right reaction to this is to abandond the build on the first sight of the Thor (while continuing to fake pressure) and then laugh about the two medivacs the terran misses for each Thor. Sounds legit  | ||
|
75
Germany4057 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:03 Rinny wrote: Consider the following, there are two starcraft players X and Y, X is slightly better at starcraft and he wins 60% of the games he plays against Y leaving Y to win only 40% . It is entirely possible for Y to play a set number of games with X and win more than him, but if X and Y were to play a million games of starcraft the probability that Y would win more games than X is VERY close to 0 like .000000001% . However if they were to play a 3 games (as in a bo3) the probability that Y would win more games is like 32 percent. Most of the time playing cheesy doesn't result in a win rate of >50% in starcraft II (the exception being in the early days when tournaments were dominated by 1 base scv pulls) because as the game gets figured out and some of those strategies are patched out they lose their effectiveness. But even without a >50% winrate it's totally possible to beat superior opponents. TL;DR Lower amounts of games in a series mean it is more likely for inferior opponents to advance. bbbbbut everything is cheese what protoss does? | ||
|
Zebb
United States834 Posts
On December 01 2013 03:56 Popkiller wrote: MMA beat him 2-1 in the winners bracket. SPEAKING of which... where's my damn extended series??? I'm waiting for Life to 4-3 Taeja in the final so Taeja gets second place in a double elim tournament for going 5-4 against one player | ||
|
Tobblish
Sweden6404 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:05 felisconcolori wrote: He just sees right through the marketing. Don't give them any more ideas for stupid commercials please..  | ||
|
rinnnedor321
53 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:02 opisska wrote: Probably the right reaction to this is to abandond the build on the first sight of the Thor (while continuing to fake pressure) and then laugh about the two medivacs the terran misses for each Thor. thors combat stats are not that bad at all. their DPS is worth the cost. spending 600/400 to be immune to blink, and being behind 4 medivacs, while having tons of DPS instead, isnt that bad considering you are allowed to do a standard bio build and essentially not have to worry about blink ever again paying a 600/400 insurance policy to do bio while not worrying about bios stupidest counter (blink) the plan is just do normal bio but then somehow get the thors in there when blink would normally screw around with you. sacrifice the first 4 medivacs to be immune to blink. then get more medivacs after that. its a trade off sure but you wouldnt need to worry about blink | ||
|
goody153
44277 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:02 Schelim wrote: lol i can't tell if that guy is being serious or not. anyways, if you wanna use a techlab factory against blink all-ins, make fucking siege tanks. yeah if blizz actually decided to make siege tanks fucking worth it vs toss .. and if ever that happens then protoss players will now feel what terran players felt because of msc .. | ||
|
Incomplet
United Kingdom1419 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:00 ottosec wrote: Goddamn twitch. Anybody got the link to that Swedish site that usually streams DH? download livestreamer here https://github.com/chrippa/livestreamer/releases/tag/v1.7.0 download vlc http://vlc-player.softm8.com/?gclid=CPuumPiZjbsCFSjpwgodpFQATQ open command prompt type this: livestreamer http://www.twitch.tv/dreamhacksc2 best (must right click then paste, cant use control V) enjoy lag free HD | ||
|
Popkiller
3415 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:05 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Top 3: P, Z, T Nice. and each of the three represent the best their race has to offer. | ||
|
samurai80
Japan4225 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:03 Rinny wrote: Consider the following, there are two starcraft players X and Y, X is slightly better at starcraft and he wins 60% of the games he plays against Y leaving Y to win only 40% . It is entirely possible for Y to play a set number of games with X and win more than him, but if X and Y were to play a million games of starcraft the probability that Y would win more games than X is VERY close to 0 like .000000001% . However if they were to play a 3 games (as in a bo3) the probability that Y would win more games is like 32 percent. Most of the time playing cheesy doesn't result in a win rate of >50% in starcraft II (the exception being in the early days when tournaments were dominated by 1 base scv pulls) because as the game gets figured out and some of those strategies are patched out they lose their effectiveness. But even without a >50% winrate it's totally possible to beat superior opponents. TL;DR Lower amounts of games in a series mean it is more likely for inferior opponents to advance. Which benefits inferior players that is protoss. Is that what you mean ? | ||
|
75
Germany4057 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:03 Heartland wrote: You can go back 20 pages and see what they caused. On December 01 2013 04:04 Tobblish wrote: Fake Blink Stalkers, overreaction and 2gate vs CC first thanks | ||
|
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:05 felisconcolori wrote: He just sees right through the marketing. lmao. i don't even care so much for the scientific facts (or lack thereof), it's just such a stupid script it's almost impressive, even for an ad. i can haz x-ray visionz!!! *guys turn to girl with incredibly creepy looks on their faces* "ewwwww, you guys are groooss" way to insult your target group by making them look stupid as fuck, both genders. | ||
|
Tobblish
Sweden6404 Posts
On December 01 2013 04:06 Incomplet wrote: download livestreamer here https://github.com/chrippa/livestreamer/releases/tag/v1.7.0 download vlc http://vlc-player.softm8.com/?gclid=CPuumPiZjbsCFSjpwgodpFQATQ open command prompt type this: livestreamer http://www.twitch.tv/dreamhacksc2 high (must right click then paste, cant use control V) enjoy lag free HD High quality setting is shit, if you lag on Best/Source you should instead increase the filecaching to 10-20sec. | ||
| ||
