EPTOn October 07 2013 00:21 TwiStEr wrote:
Again a Korean for WCS EU campion. This format sucks so ****ing much.
Im outta here!
Again a Korean for WCS EU campion. This format sucks so ****ing much.
Im outta here!
HF doing whatever!
[WCS EU] Finals Day 2 Premier Season 3 2013 - Page 52
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Doublemint
Austria8744 Posts
HF doing whatever! | ||
|
IcemanAsi
Israel681 Posts
more overseer | ||
|
Dingodile
4139 Posts
The you probably didnt watch the moment. There was one wm which hit 30 zerg supply suddenly ( I saw the supply numbers after the hit). More banelings than zerglings. | ||
Jer99
Canada8159 Posts
When zerg doesn't split against widow mines, its widow mines OP and not the zergs fault for not splitting? That's what i am seeing. The winrates right now are in favor of zerg, so why would terran get a nerf? | ||
|
BlackCompany
Germany8388 Posts
| ||
|
miniskirt
France487 Posts
On October 07 2013 00:21 TwiStEr wrote: Again a Korean for WCS EU campion. This format sucks so ****ing much. Im outta here! the format is great, the point repartition suck | ||
|
sudete
Singapore3054 Posts
On October 07 2013 00:23 lolfail9001 wrote: Do not forget, that MMA offraces zerg too :D I imagine he gets Ventral Sacs all the time  | ||
|
argonautdice
Canada2719 Posts
| ||
|
Larkin
United Kingdom7161 Posts
Not blindly a move onto a minefield? Unless you kill the whole army attacking into the Terran's base is just pointless, you know they're gonna have mines everywhere. He should have used the chance to spread creep, harass with mutas, and start hive. | ||
|
Grettin
42394 Posts
| ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8744 Posts
On October 07 2013 00:23 Jer99 wrote: So when terran doesn't split their marines against banelings, it's not banelings OP but the terrans fault for not splitting? When zerg doesn't split against widow mines, its widow mines OP and not the zergs fault for not splitting? That's what i am seeing. The winrates right now are in favor of zerg, so why would terran get a nerf? DK hates terran, isn't it obvious? | ||
|
Lonyo
United Kingdom3884 Posts
On October 07 2013 00:23 Jer99 wrote: So when terran doesn't split their marines against banelings, it's not banelings OP but the terrans fault for not splitting? When zerg doesn't split against widow mines, its widow mines OP and not the zergs fault for not splitting? That's what i am seeing. The winrates right now are in favor of zerg, so why would terran get a nerf? Zerg and terran are entirely different in terms of unit control. For one thing, zerg units are mostly melee or very short range, meaning it's a hell of a lot harder to effectively work with the units when splitting, and they are also faster, meaning you have less control time, and banelings have a shorter range than WM, again adding to difficulty. Plus WM are burrowed so you can't see them. Plus no medivacs to quickly pick up units etc etc. It's just a different scenario entirely. Another thing is it's BORING to see spam of MMWM. Who cares about balance when it's just boring as hell. | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
| ||
|
DusTerr
2520 Posts
On October 07 2013 00:20 SkullZ9 wrote: I completely agree with this, I don't know why people compare micro against banelings and WM That's just because you can see the banelings (ZvZ). If WMs were not burrowed you'd probably find it VERY easy to micro against them. The other big thing people are overlooking is the offensive capability of banelings vs WM. WM have to be positioned before (occasionally during) a fight. Banelings can attack. | ||
|
lolfail9001
Russian Federation40190 Posts
It included actually using static defense. | ||
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
On October 07 2013 00:24 argonautdice wrote: I bet practicing against Scarlett's mutabanelings does MMA's TvZ wonder. I'm willing to bet Scarlett and MMA rarely practice together. She's been on break, they're cross server, time zone differences, etc. | ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
| ||
|
goody153
44267 Posts
On October 07 2013 00:22 lolfail9001 wrote: Lol, MMA, who plays like Innovation, that actually splits, against zerg, that happens to dominate EU GM ladder. Complaints about WMs ensue. i think mma is better than vortix to be honest .. but that doesnt mean vortix suck .. i see no european zerg doing that good against crazy constant pressure with limited bases who couldnt expand .. the disgusting part that people complains is that .. mma was basically building nothing other than widow mines and marines .. and mass amount of them .. 5 mines at a time is just too much .. | ||
|
Buff345
United States323 Posts
| ||
|
Keeemy
Finland7855 Posts
On October 07 2013 00:23 Dingodile wrote: The you probably didnt watch the moment. There was one wm which hit 30 zerg supply suddenly ( I saw the supply numbers after the hit). More banelings than zerglings. But he didn't "macro like a monster". Or kill all the split attacks. I don't even think his micro against mines was that good. He sent some lings/banes but after that just a-moved. Didn't really snipe the mines with his mutas or anything. | ||
| ||
